PubMed · 14290090
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R A MCEWEN. 1965. EFFICIENT RESTORATIVE PROCEDURES.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14290090/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
In the literature on fatigue testing of acrylic bone cements, data sets of various sizes have been used in different test series for the same cement formulation. There are two important consequences of this situation. First, it means that some test series last much longer than others, with all the implications for the cost of testing. Second, it makes drawing conclusions about the fatigue performance of a cement, based on the results of different literature series, a problematic issue. Clearly then, a recommendation as to what should be the minimum number of test specimens to use that would allow for confidence in the results of the statistical treatment of the test results (Gmin) would be desirable. In the present work, a method that could be used to culminate in such a recommendation is described. This method involves (i) obtaining experimental fatigue test results and (ii) analyzing those results using the Weibull probability distribution function and other statistical methods. This methodology is illustrated using fatigue life results obtained from uniaxial tension-compression fatigue tests on specimens fabricated from the polymerizing dough of one commercially available acrylic bone cement. For a tolerable error of 5%, we estimated Gmin to be either 7 (if the fatigue life results are treated using the two-parameter Weibull distribution function) or 11 (if the fatigue life results are treated using the three-parameter Weibull distribution function). To be on the conservative side, we therefore recommend that Gmin be 11. Three key limitations of the methodology presented here are discussed.
This study determined the effect of using five resin composites and two irradiation distances to test the performance of dental curing lights. Three types of curing lights with similar spectral distributions, but each delivering a different power density, were used for irradiation times ranging from 3 to 60 s. Power densities were measured at 2 and 9 mm from the tip of the light guide. Five composites 1.6 mm thick and of the same shade were irradiated at 2 and 9 mm from the light guide with energy densities of 1.2-38.0 J/cm(2). The Knoop hardness at the top and bottom of the composite specimens was measured 15 min after irradiation and again after immersion in water at 37 degrees C for 24 h. There was a linear relationship between the hardness and the logarithm of the energy density received by the composite (r2 > 0.81). The analysis of variance showed that the composite, the side tested, the distance from the light guide, and the curing light/irradiation time combination all had a significant effect on the hardness (p < 0.01). Plots of the hardness at the bottom 15 min after irradiation by each light were generated for all the composites. These plots illustrated that the effects of the different curing light/irradiation time combinations on hardness were not the same for each composite. The effects of each curing light/time combination on hardness were also different at 2 and 9 mm from the light guide. In conclusion, when comparing the effects of different light sources on resin polymerization, several different composites should be irradiated at clinically relevant distances from the light guide. Using high-powered curing lights for 3 or 5 s did not deliver sufficient energy to cure the 1.6-mm thick specimens of composites used in this study.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: No study has evaluated the efficacy of auxiliary tooth preparation elements for crowns with originally reduced resistance form. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effects of different auxiliary preparation features on the resistance form of crowns with reduced axial wall and total occlusal convergence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An Ivorine tooth was prepared on a milling machine with 20-degree total occlusal convergence (TOC), 2.5 mm of occlusocervical dimension, and a shoulder finish line. This design lacked geometric resistance form. The crown preparation was subsequently modified to include mesiodistal grooves, mesiodistal boxes, buccolingual grooves, occlusal inclined planes, an occlusal isthmus, and reduced TOC in the axial wall from 20 to 8 degrees TOC in the cervical 1.5 mm of the axial wall. The grooves and boxes were placed into the tooth with the same 20-degree TOC as the initial axial walls. Ten standardized metal dies were used for each preparation design. Standardized complete metal crowns were fabricated for all specimens. The metal crowns were cemented on metal dies with resin-modified glass ionomer cement. A strain gauge was placed at the mid-lingual cervical area of each crown preparation margin. The resistance of each specimen was evaluated when force was applied at a 45-degree angulation to the long axis of the die in a lingual to buccal direction. The peak loads during crown dislodgment, as well as the tensile stress at the mid-lingual cervical area, were measured using a universal testing machine (Kgs) for each specimen. The control group consisted of 10 dies, with the original crown preparation having no geometric resistance form and no auxiliary preparation features. Strain gauges provided the force (Kgs) that resulted in electric currency disrupt at the crown/die interface, thus providing data regarding the force required for slight crown micromovement (2 microm). Data between control and experimental groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test (alpha=.05). RESULTS: Proximal grooves, proximal boxes, buccolingual grooves, occlusal inclined planes, and occlusal isthmuses were not effective at increasing a crown's resistance to dislodgement when the tooth preparation lacked resistance. The only crown modification that offered enhanced resistance form when compared with the control group was the reduced TOC in the cervical half of the axial wall. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this in vitro study the crown preparation modification that significantly enhanced the resistance form of a compromised tooth preparation was reducing the TOC at the cervical aspect of the axial wall. Placing auxiliary retentive features such as grooves and boxes into a compromised tooth preparation (2.5 mm occlusocervical dimension and 20-degree TOC) was not effective when these retentive features possessed the same 20-degree TOC as the prepared axial walls.