SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “INLAYS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

[Study of the interaction between impression materials, dye materials, gold inlay casting technics and the geometrical design of inlay cavities. I. Identification of the inlay waxes--Class I and Class II inlay waxes. Physical properties. (Flow due to temperature variation)].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Dentistry↗

PubMed1999

A 3-year study of inlays milled from machinable ceramic blocks representing 2 different inlay systems.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of ceramic inlays made from machinable ceramic blocks. METHOD AND MATERIALS: The 2 inlay systems involved computer-aided design and computer-aided machining (Cerec Cos 2.1) or copy-milling technique (Celay). The study comprised 15 Celay inlays and 15 Cerec inlays placed in 17 patients. The inlays were evaluated clinically at baseline (1 week) as well as 1 and 3 years later (modified California Dental Association quality evaluation system). RESULTS: One Celay inlay fractured after 1 year of service, and 2 Cerec inlays were replaced, 1 after 6 months and 1 after 1 year, because of pulpal pain and persisting hypersensitivity. One Celay inlay lost retention after 2 years. At the 3-year evaluation, chipping and hairline cracks were seen in 2 Celay inlays. Progressive disintegration of the marginal luting cement was seen for both Celay and Cerec inlays. The remaining 25 inlays performed satisfactorily throughout the 3-year period. CONCLUSION: Because of their relatively high failure rate, these inlays should be reserved for esthetic indications.

Cementation↗

PubMed1993

The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study.

Four inlay systems--gold, Cerec, Mirage, and Empress inlays--were evaluated for their adaptation to stone die and clinically to the tooth by means of a replica technique. Twenty inlays of each system were placed on premolars and molars in the lower jaw. A microscope was used to measure the adaptation at the approximal margin, at the inner axial wall, and at the occlusal cavosurface area. An overall better fit was observed for the gold inlays than for the ceramic inlays. When the different measuring locations were compared, a better fit was found for the occlusal area. The greatest discrepancies were recorded for the Cerec inlays, whereas the Mirage and Empress inlays were comparable.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Marginal seal comparisons between resin-bonded Class II porcelain inlays, posterior composite restorations, and direct composite resin inlays.

The microleakage of indirect porcelain and direct composite resin-bonded inlays was compared with that of posterior composite resin restorations using Class II preparations of extracted molar teeth. The resin-bonded inlay restorations provided a better marginal seal at the cervical restoration/dentin interface than did the composite resin restoration. The efficacy of this marginal seal varied with the particular treatments and materials used. Resin-bonded porcelain inlays had a higher incidence of cervical excess from the composite resin luting agent than did the posterior composite resin restorations.

Composite Resins↗

PubMed1990