PubMed · 14132843
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
H J ELLNER, G C MILLER. 1964. PROSTATIC ABSCESS SIMULATING CARCINOMA.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14132843/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinicopathological significance of microscopic abscess formation (MAF) at the invasive front of advanced low rectal cancer. METHODS: The clinicopathological features of 226 consecutive patients with low rectal cancer, who underwent curative resection between May 1997 and December 2002, were analysed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven (25.2 per cent) of the 226 tumours had MAF and 169 (74.8 per cent) did not. Patients with tumours showing MAF were more likely to have extended surgery than those without MAF: 47 versus 31.4 per cent respectively underwent non-sphincter-preserving surgery (P=0.029) and 82 versus 60.9 per cent underwent lateral lymph node dissection (P=0.003). The incidence of lymph node metastases was lower in patients with MAF (30 versus 53.3 per cent; P=0.002). Univariable analysis of disease-free survival revealed that depth of invasion (P<0.001), lymph node status (P<0.001), histological type (P=0.035), lymphatic invasion (P<0.001), venous invasion (P<0.001), perineural invasion (P<0.001), focal dedifferentiation (P<0.001) and MAF (P<0.001) were significant prognostic factors. Multivariable analysis showed that lymph node status (P<0.001), perineural invasion (P=0.002), venous invasion (P=0.033) and MAF (P=0.012) remained independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: MAF may reflect indolent tumour behaviour and a more favourable outcome in patients with advanced low rectal cancer.
The patient, a 43-year-old Japanese man suffering from duodenal ulcer and reflux esophagitis, was admitted to our hospital because of submucosal tumor in the antrum and obstructive stenosis of duodenum. Several imaging tests could not rule out the possibility of malignant disease. Therefore, the patient was surgically treated. Pathohistological examination of resected tissue demonstrated Heinrich type I heterotopic pancreas in the gastric lesion and submucosal abscess in the duodenal lesion with stenosis. In this case, it was considered that the heterotopic pancreas caused chronic inflammation to form the gastric tumor, and submucosal abscess leading to the severe duodenal stenosis.
BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to compare the therapeutic effectiveness of percutaneous drainage with antibiotics versus antibiotics alone in the treatment of appendicitis complicated by periappendiceal abscess. METHODS: In a prospective study, 50 patients with acute appendicitis complicated by periappendiceal abscess > or = 3 cm in size were randomly assigned to two groups. The first group received treatment with ultrasound guided-percutaneous drainage and i.v. antibiotics (ampicillin, cefuroxime, and metronidazole), and the other group received antibiotics only. Patient's baseline characteristics, duration of hospital stay, and treatment outcome and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Appendectomy was avoided in 16/25 patients in the drainage group and 2/25 patients in the non-drainage group during follow-up with RR of 0.39 (95% CI = 0.22-0.62; p < 0.05). One patient in the drainage group and 8 patients in the non-drainage group underwent surgery in the first month after the beginning of treatment. Eight patients in the drainage group and 15 in the non-drainage group underwent interval appendectomy. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding patient demographics, abscess size, and pretreatment clinical symptoms. Hospital stay up to the subsidence of clinical and sonographic signs was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) in the drainage group, with a mean difference of 6.4 days (95% CI = 5.0-7.9; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous drainage with antibiotics is a safe and effective way of treating acute perforated appendicitis. The recurrence rate for these patients is relatively low, and very often interval appendectomy is not required. For patients with periappendiceal abscess > or = 3 cm in diameter, antibiotic therapy alone is insufficient and the recurrence rate is high.