Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 12345152

Sterilization. Determining a good candidate.

Abstract

After 4 years, 10% of the 1800 low-income women in a 5-year study felt some regrets after the procedure. Although each individual is different, if a woman has 1 or more of the following characteristics, she may not be a good candidate for sterilization: under age 30; has few or no children; not involved in a stable relationship; made the decision to be sterilized alone and with minimal reflection; recently experienced a personal life crisis; feels sterilization will solve a sexual problem; expectations about sterilization are unrealistic; pressured by others to be sterilized. Although women who have had the procedure sometimes experience regret, other women regret not having been sterilized. Approximately 40% of the women who decided for sterilization but had their intentions blocked expressed regret at the short-term follow-up, and one-third reported regret at the second interview 4 years later. Also, women who chose not to be sterilized and then experienced a subsequent pregnancy were 7 times more likely to express regret than women who went through with the procedure. To counsel a woman who wants no more children but does not want sterilization, ask her how she would feel if she became pregnant again, and try to determine how badly she does not want to be pregnant, says Libby Antarsh, PhD, director of US programs for the Association of Voluntary Surgical Contraception in New York City. Also, make sure she has accurate information about other methods of birth control, she says.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

1993. Sterilization. Determining a good candidate.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12345152/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Strategies to reduce HIV risk behavior in HIV primary care clinics: brief provider messages and specialist intervention.

Reducing HIV transmission is a critical goal worldwide, prompting new strategies to slow the spread of the virus. This paper describes the theoretical underpinnings of the Comprehensive Harm Reduction Protocol (CHRP) and the process of its implementation in one large urban HIV clinic and two smaller rural primary care clinics. Patients enrolled in CHRP complete the Risk Diagnostic Questionnaire (RDQ), self-reporting HIV transmission risk behavior at most clinic visits. Clinicians review RDQs to trigger dialogue using motivational interviewing and the stages of health behavior change to reduce high-risk behaviors (drug use, alcohol use, or high-risk sexual behavior). In the ongoing evaluation study, CHRP patients receive two provider-only visits before being randomized to continue with provider brief prevention messages only or to receive additional intensive counseling with a risk-reduction specialist following the provider visit. If outcome data support one or both interventions, CHRP could be a useful model for widespread adoption. Observations from the implementation of this protocol are presented in order to facilitate the adoption of this protocol in interested clinics. Later, results of the evaluation of the implementation of the protocol may have value in developing prevention policy in HIV treatment clinics.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗