PubMed · 11905120
Five commandments for APA.
Abstract
The author delineates 5 rules of scientific review and publishing and argues that these norms need to be upheld even when to do so proves politically difficult. The 5 rules are: (a) Scientific articles should be judged only by their logic and the strength of their evidence; (b) the results of a competent peer review should be accepted; (c) disagreements with scientific articles should be aired in peer reviewed commentaries; (d) efforts to judge scientific articles on the basis of political concerns should be resisted; and (e) the explicit rules and normative expectations of peer review should not be arbitrarily altered.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Nora S Newcombe. 2002. Five commandments for APA.. https://doi.org/10.1037/%2F0003-066x.57.3.202
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.