SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “standard of care”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2,990 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Standard-of-Care Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell (CART) and Bispecific T-Cell Engager (TCE) Therapies in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM).

We aimed to evaluate the real-world (RW) efficacy and safety of standard-of-care CART versus TCE therapies in relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM), to assess utilization, outcomes, and tolerability of these therapies in a RW oncology in the US. Data were derived from the US-based, electronic health record-derived deidentified Flatiron Health Research Database, 2021-2024. A total of 419 patients (CART n = 220; TCE n = 199) with a confirmed diagnosis of myeloma who received CART or TCE as a standard-of-care treatment after at least 2 prior lines of therapy were included. Patients in the CART cohort were younger, had better ECOG PS, and a higher receipt of a prior autologous stem cell transplant versus bispecific TCE cohort. In CART versus TCE cohort, the overall response rates (ORR) were 83.3% versus 66.3%, median duration of response 7.9 months versus 4.3 months, progression free survival (PFS) 13.6 months versus 10.5 months, and overall survival (OS) of 29.8 months versus 21.9 months, respectively. A higher percentage of hematologic toxicity, infections, and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) were noted in the CART versus TCE cohort. This study provides insights on the RW effectiveness of CART versus TCE in the treatment of RRMM; highlights the differences in patient selection, clinical responses, treatment duration, and toxicity profiles.

CART↗

PubMed2026

Comparative Evaluation of Virtual Reality versus Standard Nursing Care in Managing Pain and Fear during Lumbar Puncture Procedures: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Meningitis is a serious infectious disease that can cause significant morbidity and long-term neurological problems. Although a lumbar puncture is a necessary diagnostic procedure, it is often accompanied by discomfort, anxiety, and fear, which can severely impact the patient's experience. Although there is few data on its application prior to lumbar puncture in adult patients with meningitis, immersive virtual reality (VR) has become a promising non-pharmacological technique for lowering procedural distress. Thus, among individuals undergoing lumbar punctures, this randomized controlled research assessed how well pre-procedural VR reduced pain, anxiety, and fear while enhancing patient satisfaction. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) in reducing pain and fear among adults undergoing lumbar puncture (LP) compared with standard care protocol. METHODS: A randomised clinical trial was conducted from May to October 2025, using a single-blind, true experimental design. A total of 85 patients were randomly assigned to either the VR intervention group ( n = 41) or the control group receiving standard care ( n = 44). Pain levels were assessed using a visual analogue scale. Fear was assessed using the Multidimensional Fear-of-Injection Scale. Data were analysed using SPSS version 26. RESULTS: According to the study, the findings revealed a significant reduction in pain levels among the study group following the VR intervention, with mean pain scores dropping from 7.54 ± 1.925 to 2.49 ± 0.675. In contrast, the control group showed increased pain intensity, with mean scores rising from 6.84 ± 1.842 to 8.36 ± 1.348. The VR group showed a significant reduction in fear scores across all domains, whereas no significant changes were observed in the control group. Direct fear decreased from 20.12 ± 1.71 to 9.44 ± 2.00, indirect fear from 17.24 ± 1.46 to 8.66 ± 2.24, physiological response improved from 0.34 ± 0.66 to 3.00 ± 1.00 and avoidance behaviour decreased from 16.71 ± 1.49 to 7.80 ± 1.85. CONCLUSIONS: The research shows that the use of VR prior to LP significantly reduces level of pain and fear compared to standard care. These results support VR as a non-pharmacological intervention for fear and pain to improve patient experience during invasive procedures. In contrast, the control group experienced no improvement.Trial Registration: The IRCT code for the trial was IRCT ID 20250803066743N1.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Randomized Trial of Intensive Nurse-Led Follow‑Up Versus Standard Care in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND:  Nurses play a key role in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management. This randomized controlled trial evaluated intensive nurse-led program in patients with IBD starting advanced therapy. METHODS:  Patients were randomized (1:1) to intensive nurse follow‑up (Arm A) or standard care (Arm B). Both arms received baseline nurse education; Arm A additionally had scheduled nurse calls and visits. Primary outcome was reduction in IBD‑Disk score in W12. Secondary outcomes were W52 reduction, robust response (> 20-point improvement), and IBD-Disk remission (score < 40). RESULTS: Overall, 98 patients were randomized (Arm A: n = 50; Arm B: n = 48) with similar baseline characteristics. Mean baseline IBD‑Disk scores were 49.2 ± 20.7 in Arm A and 42.0 ± 19.8 in Arm B (p = 0.07). At W12, both groups improved, with greater IBD-Disk reductions in Arm A (16.1 ± 22.9 vs. 10.1 ± 20.1, p = 0.09). At W52, improvement was greater in Arm A (18.4 ± 20.7 vs 9.4 ± 17.8; p = 0.08). More patients achieved robust response in Arm A (49% vs 21%, p = 0.013) at W12. By W52, IBD-Disk remission was achieved by 22/25 (88%) patients in Arm A vs 18/28 (64%) in Arm B (p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS:  In this pilot randomized trial, intensive nurse-led follow-up did not significantly improve IBD-Disk at week 12, yet favorable trends of functional outcomes were observed. Intensive nurse‑led follow‑up program may improve quality of life in patients with IBD. These findings support the integration of specialist IBD nurses to improve patient‑centered outcomes.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A Standardized Nursing-Led Protocol Integrated Pain, Sleep, Medication Adherence, and Symptom Management in Postherpetic Neuralgia.

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a persistent neuropathic pain condition after herpes zoster that frequently coexists with sleep disturbance, medication-related problems, and fluctuating symptoms. This study evaluated whether a standardized nursing-led protocol could improve multidimensional short-term outcomes beyond usual care. In this prospective, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, 128 adults with PHN were allocated 1:1 to usual care or usual care plus an eight-week protocol integrating structured pain assessment, sleep monitoring, medication-adherence support, and rule-based digital symptom monitoring. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score from baseline to Week 8. Secondary outcomes included Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), MMAS-8 medication adherence, symptom burden, pain-related nocturnal awakenings, breakthrough pain, rescue analgesic use, adverse events, rule-based alerts, and nursing satisfaction. Week-8 data were available for 116 participants (57 usual care; 59 protocol). Mean NRS scores decreased from 7.19 ± 1.08 to 4.82 ± 1.53 in the usual-care group and from 7.28 ± 1.05 to 3.24 ± 1.28 in the protocol group. An NRS reduction of at least 2 points occurred in 49.1% and 76.3% of participants, respectively. The protocol group also showed larger improvements in PSQI, MMAS-8, symptom burden, and nocturnal awakenings, with fewer breakthrough-pain episodes and less rescue-analgesic use. These findings support further evaluation of the standardized nursing-led protocol in preregistered multicenter trials with intention-to-treat analyses and longer follow-up.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effectiveness of Topical Huzhang Sanhuang with Standard Nursing for Chemotherapy-Induced Phlebitis: Randomized Controlled Study.

Chemotherapy-induced phlebitis (CIP) is a common complication of peripheral intravenous chemotherapy that can cause pain, local inflammation, treatment interruption, and diminished quality of life. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of the topical Huzhang Sanhuang (HZSH) formula, combined with standard nursing care, in managing CIP. Ninety-four hospitalized patients with CIP (grade I or higher) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either topical HZSH formula plus standard nursing care (experimental group, n = 47) or 50% magnesium sulfate wet dressing plus standard nursing care (control group, n = 47) for 14 days. Prespecified outcomes included phlebitis grade, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), symptom resolution time, and safety indicators. By Day 14, patients in the experimental group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in phlebitis severity than those in the control group (risk ratio for grade ≥ II, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.87; P = 0.012). The experimental group also showed significantly larger reductions in VAS pain scores, hs-CRP levels, and IL-6 concentrations (all P < 0.01). Kaplan-Meier analysis further demonstrated faster resolution of multiple local symptoms in the experimental group. Treatment adherence was high in both groups, and no serious adverse events or major safety concerns were observed. These findings indicate that the topical HZSH formula, combined with standard nursing care, is a safe and effective integrative nursing intervention that accelerates clinical recovery, alleviates local symptoms, and reduces the inflammatory burden in patients with chemotherapy-induced phlebitis.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy of an Adhesive Hydrocolloid Bandage on Wound Healing: Findings of a 28-Day, Single-Centre, Randomised, Controlled Study.

This single-centre, randomised, controlled study assessed the wound healing efficacy of adhesive bandages in eligible healthy adults (N = 36) aged 25-55 with Fitzpatrick skin types II and III using a model of laser-induced wounds. Here, we report data for wounds that were randomised to treatment with either a hydrocolloid bandage for multi-day use (BAND-AID Adhesive Bandage Hydroseal), standard of care (SoC) (BAND-AID Adhesive Bandage Tru-Stay Sheer) or an uncovered control. Primary endpoints included the time to complete healing and a composite wound healing score. Hydrocolloid bandage-treated wounds healed twice as fast as the uncovered control or SoC-treated wounds. Median time (days) to complete healing was significantly faster for the hydrocolloid bandage-treated wounds (6.9) versus SoC (11.9) and uncovered control (11.8). Hydrocolloid bandage-treated wounds had significantly better composite wound healing scores versus SoC and versus uncovered control over 2 weeks. At Day 28, cosmesis was better with hydrocolloid bandage treatment (0.3) versus SoC (0.6) and uncovered control (2.1) (change from baseline in a composite scar score; higher score = worse outcome). Multi-day wound occlusion with a hydrocolloid bandage promoted faster healing and improved cosmesis compared with daily SoC dressings or uncovered control.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effect of urinary catheter securement band on meatal pressure injury in male intensive care patients: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness of a urinary catheter securement band in preventing meatal pressure injury (meatal-PI) in male ICU patients, and to identify associated risk factors and the timing of injury development. METHODS: A total of 248 adult male ICU patients were randomly allocated to an intervention group (n = 124) or a control group (n = 124) between December 2024 and April 2025. The intervention group received a catheter securement band in addition to standard care, while the control group received standard care alone. Meatal-PI was evaluated daily using a structured monitoring form and a validated staging system. RESULTS: The incidence of meatal-PI was significantly lower in the intervention group (6.5%) compared with the control group (16.1%) (p = 0.016). Multivariate analysis identified catheter securement, use of silicone catheters, higher Braden Scale scores, and shorter ICU length of stay as independent protective factors, while advanced age was associated with increased risk. Additional factors significantly associated with meatal-PI included comorbidities, higher device burden, latex catheter use, dry skin, lower Glasgow Coma Scale and Braden scores, sedation, and perineal oedema (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a catheter securement band significantly reduces the incidence of meatal-PI in male ICU patients. Incorporating catheter securement devices into routine nursing care, prioritising silicone catheter use, and performing regular meatal assessments may enhance patient safety by reducing the risk of device-related pressure injuries. Further research comparing different catheter securement methods across diverse patient populations is warranted. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: The use of catheter securement bands may reduce the incidence of meatal-PI in male ICU patients. Incorporating standardized catheter stabilization strategies into routine intensive care nursing practice may enhance patient safety and support pressure injury prevention efforts.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

How Following Medical Artificial Intelligence Advice Can Mitigate Malpractice Liability: Cross-National Insights from a Randomized Trial.

Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly influences clinical decision-making, yet its recommendations may diverge from standard care. Although malpractice concerns are thought to discourage physicians from following AI advice, experimental evidence from the United States suggests the opposite: lay jurors are more likely to hold physicians liable when they reject AI recommendations. Whether this pattern extends to systems in which court-appointed experts, not lay jurors, determine liability remains unknown. Methods: To examine how physicians and laypeople in expert-based and lay-juror legal systems evaluate physicians' acceptance or rejection of AI recommendations, particularly when those recommendations deviate from standard care, we designed a randomized vignette study: a 2 × 2 factorial design varying the AI recommendation (standard vs. nonstandard care) and a fictional physician's decision (accept vs. reject). The study was conducted online in 2023 among nationally representative samples of U.S. and German adults and from 2023 to 2024 among German physicians. In total, 387 German physicians, 2291 U.S. adults, and 2283 German adults participated; those not completing the survey or failing attention checks were excluded per preregistered criteria. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 vignettes, varying the AI recommendation (standard vs. nonstandard care) and physician's decision (accept vs. reject). The reasonableness of the fictional physician's decision was measured, rated by participants on a Likert scale. Results: Analysis, following preregistered exclusion criteria, included 248 German physicians, 1202 U.S. adults, and 1358 German adults. Physicians accepting standard-care AI recommendations were rated more reasonable than those rejecting them (U.S. laypeople: t = 5.36; 95% CI, 0.45-0.97; P < 0.001; German physicians: t = 2.47; 95% CI, 0.14-1.30; P = 0.02; German laypeople: t = 4.14; 95% CI, 0.27-0.76; P < 0.001). Ratings of physicians accepting versus rejecting AI nonstandard-care recommendations were statistically equivalent. Equivalence was tested at an α-value of 0.05 using a two 1-sided tests procedure, reported with 90% CIs per standard convention (U.S. laypeople: t = -4.90; 90% CI, -0.1 to 0.36; P < 0.001; German physicians: t = -1.76; 90% CI, -0.12 to 0.67; P = 0.04; German laypeople: t = 5.35; 90% CI, -0.35 to 0.06; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Across the United States and Germany, samples representative of lay jurors and court-appointed experts viewed accepting standard-care AI advice as more reasonable, whereas accepting or rejecting nonstandard-care AI advice was judged similarly. Contrary to predictions, malpractice liability regimes do not necessarily pose a barrier to AI use in precision medicine.

Artificial Intelligence↗

PubMed2025

Improving Community-Based Care for Adolescents with ADHD: a Randomized Controlled Trial of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Fidelity Supports.

Cognitive-behavioral treatments (CBTs) for adolescents with ADHD demonstrate promise of long-term effects on outcome. However, their implementation in routine care community clinics faces barriers that impact quantity, efficiency, and quality of delivery, as well as client outcomes. This study is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the impact of an AI-assisted service delivery model on therapist implementation of Supporting Teens' Autonomy Daily (STAND), a CBT blended with Motivational Interviewing (MI) for adolescents with ADHD. Adolescents with ADHD (N = 51), who were clients at three community mental health agencies, received treatment from 23 therapists. There was randomization of adolescents and therapists to AI-assisted or standard implementation supports. In addition to standard supports (i.e., training, standard facilitation resources, technical assistance, case supervision), AI-assisted support package included digitized facilitation resources housed in a clinical dashboard (Care4), feedback on content fidelity, and AI-generated feedback on MI implementation quality. The AI-assisted group was associated with more efficient treatment delivery and lower number of appointments attended by the adolescent. There was also a significant decrement in MI quality over time in the AI-assisted group compared to the standard support group. Feedback in focus groups indicated that therapists perceived a task-oriented mindset to be associated with receipt of the AI-assisted support package, leading therapists to prioritize efficiency over relational aspects of therapy. Following the results of this trial, a future, larger RCT should examine the impact of the AI-assisted implementation model on mental health outcomes and cost savings to organizations, third party payers, and clients. Trial registration number: NCT05135065; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Registered September 2021.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comparison of Adult Tracheostomy Outcomes Before and After Implementation of a Dedicated Tracheostomy Team.

OBJECTIVE: (A) Determine patient and institutional factors associated with increased length of stay (LOS) and complications of tracheostomy, (B) Develop data-driven quality improvement in tracheostomy care. DESIGN: Mixed methods protocol used cross-sectional survey assessing institutional trends in tracheostomy-specific care. Retrospective chart review compared tracheostomy patient outcomes prior to and during implementation of a multidisciplinary tracheostomy care team and standardized guidelines. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing tracheostomy from January 2019 to December 2021 at a tertiary hospital. METHODS: Patient factors, procedure type and indication, tracheostomy tube size, management timeline, insurance, and disease severity using Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score were analyzed for associations with LOS and adverse events. Multivariate analyses controlled for APACHE II score and payer source. LOS and complications were compared between patients before and during implementation of multidisciplinary tracheostomy care team and standardized guidelines. RESULTS: Three-hundred and eighteen patients met criteria with a 21.7% complication rate, average LOS of 24 days (SD = 28.523), and median LOS post-tracheostomy of 14 days (IQR 7, 29). Departments without standardized protocols had greater LOS (F[1,316] = 28.706, P < .001]) and complication odds (OR = 2.92, P = .015, 95% CI[1.231, 6.930]). Larger tracheostomy tube size was linked to increased LOS (β = .253, t(314) = 4.741, P < .001, 95% CI[4.137, 10.081]). Delays from ventilation discontinuation to cuffless tube exchange and decannulation correlated with increased LOS (β = .406, t(184) = 6.321, P < .001, 95% CI[.928, 1.771]); (β = .554, t(129) = 7.625, P < .001, 95% CI[1.008, 1.715]). When focusing on a single department, comparing 2019 patients to 2021 patients (pre- and post-guideline and care team), overall, LOS decreased from 33.08 to 30.83 days (P = .586). When excluding patients discharged on a ventilator, the 2019 group had average LOS of 37.938 days versus 33.41 days in 2021 (P = .344). CONCLUSIONS: Standardized tracheostomy care guidelines and multidisciplinary care teams are critical to improving institutional outcomes. Data-driven approaches to quality improvement ensure efficient and targeted methods to improving patient care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Long-term motor outcomes after parent-administered early physiotherapy in children born very preterm.

OBJECTIVE: This observational follow-up study investigated whether early parent-administered physiotherapy during the neonatal period was associated with motor outcomes in childhood, and compared these outcomes between two preterm groups and a term-born control group. STUDY DESIGN: This is a follow-up of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial that initially included 153 infants born very preterm (≤32 weeks' gestation), randomised to either early parent-administered physiotherapy or standard care, between 34 and 37 weeks' gestation. At 7-10 years, motor outcomes were assessed in 92 children (intervention, n = 43; standard care, n = 49) and in 83 term-born controls. The primary outcome was the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (MABC-2). Group differences were analysed using linear mixed models adjusted for age, sex, and parental education. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for scores ≤5th and ≤ 15th percentiles to estimate the likelihood of having or being at risk for movement difficulties. RESULTS: Mean MABC-2 total score was 9.0 (SD3.0) in the intervention group, 9.6 (SD3.0) in the standard care group, and 10.8 (SD2.9) in the control group. Adjusted mean difference between the intervention and the standard care groups did not differ but both the intervention and standard care groups had lower scores than the control group (-1.2; 95% CI: -2.3 to -0.2 and -0.6; 95% CI: -1.6 to 0.3, respectively). Adjusted ORs for scoring ≤5th or ≤15th percentile did not differ in either preterm group compared with the control group. CONCLUSION: At 7-10 years, motor outcomes did not differ between children born very preterm who received three-week parent-administered physiotherapy and those who received standard care during the neonatal period. However, both preterm groups had lower motor scores than term-born peers.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Anabolic androgen therapy in critically ill adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Critical illness is characterized by a catabolic, proinflammatory state. Anabolic agents, such as testosterone, have therefore been proposed as therapeutic targets. Our objectives were to assess the effects of testosterone in critically ill populations on patient-important outcomes and identify design limitations to inform future studies. We searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) through Medline, Embase, and EBM Reviews databases from inception through February 24, 2026, including English language articles enrolling adults (≥18 years) admitted to ICU where anabolic androgen therapies (AAT) were compared with placebo or standard of care. Studies had to report at least one of: mortality, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, or duration of mechanical ventilation. We extracted data independently using a standardized data extraction tool, and feedback was received from all co-authors to ensure agreement. For each outcome, we performed meta-analyses using a random-effects model with inverse variance weighting in RevMan. We used the GRADE approach to assess certainty in pooled estimates of effect. Of 1325 screened articles, we found 4 that fit our inclusion criteria. Together, we judged risk of bias as 'some concerns' in 3 trials and 'high' in the final trial, and ultimately found that the effects of anabolic-androgen therapy on patient-important outcomes uncertain. With the uncertainty of current evidence for the effects of anabolic-androgen therapy in critically ill adults, there is insufficient support for its routine use. Future randomized evidence is needed to determine whether anabolic-androgen therapy improves clinically-important outcomes and better define its safety profile in critically ill adults.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Optimizing smoking cessation pharmacotherapy and counseling for adult primary care patients: a factorial randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Even with the most effective smoking cessation pharmacotherapies (i.e., varenicline or combination nicotine replacement [C-NRT]), the majority of people ultimately return to smoking. This research explored how to optimize the use of varenicline and C-NRT to promote smoking cessation. METHODS: Primary care patients participated in a 2x2x2x2 factorial experiment that evaluated 4 factors: 1) Medication Type (Varenicline vs. C-NRT [patch + mini-lozenge]), 2) Preparation (pre-quit) Medication (4 Weeks vs. Standard); 3) Medication Duration (Extended [24 weeks] vs. Standard [12 weeks]); and 4) Counseling Type (Cessation Counseling [4 sessions] vs. Referral Support [2 sessions focused on use of referral resources]). This study was discontinued prior to reaching the proposed sample size (N = 608) due to pandemic-related budgetary constraints. RESULTS: Participants (N = 496) were 55% women and 45.6% Black individuals. There were no statistically significant main effects of the 4 factors on abstinence at 12, 26 or 52 weeks. There was a 3-way interaction between Medication Type, Preparation Medication, and Counseling Type (p = 0.04) predicting the primary outcome of biochemically confirmed abstinence at 52 weeks; cessation counseling vs. referral support improved varenicline quit rates when 4 weeks versus 1 week of pre-quit medication was offered. For C-NRT, counseling type did not significantly improve quit rates regardless of the use of preparation medication. CONCLUSIONS: There was no robust evidence that enhanced pre-quit or extended duration of varenicline or C-NRT increased abstinence rates. More intensive counseling may support cessation for different pharmacotherapy regimens. Given the lack of consistent findings, this research should be viewed as exploratory to guide future research.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to integrate precision skin cancer risk feedback in federally qualified health centers.

BACKGROUND: Skin cancers are the most common type of cancer in the United States, occur in all segments of the population, and are preventable. Our previous research with primary care patients' demonstrated interest in and efficacy of a precision prevention intervention providing feedback on MC1R risk level (higher versus average) in combination with prevention education materials relative to a standard educational intervention. Our current study is a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial deployed at six federally-qualified health centers. This paper presents the study protocol. METHODS: A community advisory panel will guide development of study materials and measures. Staff training at each clinic will be completed in-person. Patients will be approached and screened in-person. Those completing genetic testing and the baseline survey will be randomized to the precision versus standard intervention for each risk level with a target sample size of 286 for each combination. Primary outcomes of effectiveness, assessed at 6 and 12 months, include a tanning score (5 items assessing intentional and unintentional tanning), number of sunburns, conduct of a skin self-examination, and electronic health record documentation of clinician-patient communication about skin cancer prevention. Effectiveness comparisons will focus on the precision relative to the standard intervention among higher risk participants. Implementation data will be collected to identify barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: Effectiveness and implementation outcomes will be evaluated following study completion. CONCLUSIONS: Results will guide subsequent scale-up of the precision intervention, including modifications of the intervention as well as methods for implementation. CLINICAL TRIALS IDENTIFIER: NCT07222995.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Design, rationale, and baseline patient characteristics for the Sickle Cell Disease and CardiovAscular Risk-Red cell Exchange (SCD-CARRE) trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite wide utilization of automated red blood cell exchange (RBCX) transfusion in adult patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), no consensus or quality efficacy data exist on its use. The Sickle Cell Disease and CardiovAscular Risk- Red cell Exchange (SCD-CARRE) trial tests the hypothesis that an automated chronic RBCX transfusion strategy reduces acute health care encounters and death while improving quality of life and end-organ function (cardiac, pulmonary and renal) in participants with SCD that are at high risk of death. METHODS: Adult patients with SCD with elevated tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity (TRV) and/or chronic kidney disease were considered to be at high risk of death and were randomly assigned to RBCX plus standard of care vs standard of care alone. Participants assigned to RBCX received 12 months of exchange transfusions to maintain target pretransfusion hemoglobin S% < 30%, post-transfusion hemoglobin S% < 20%, and post-transfusion hemoglobin concentration ≥10 g/dL. All study participants were managed according to NHLBI/ASH/ATS Expert Panel guidelines. The primary endpoint was the number of SCD acute health care encounters or death over 13 months. Secondary endpoints included measures of cardiovascular and renal function, exercise capacity, patient reported outcomes (all collected at baseline, and months 4, 8, and 12), and transfusion-related adverse events (collected monthly). RESULTS: Between 2020 and 2025, the SCD-CARRE trial randomized 173 participants at 23 sites across 3 countries. Enrolled participants had mean (SD) age of 45.8 (11.8) years and 54% were female. At baseline, participants had average TRV of 2.8 (0.5) m/s such that 45.9% had a TRV between 2.5 to 2.9 m/sec and 28.1% had a TRV ≥ 3.0 m/sec. The median (Q1, Q3) eGFR in this cohort was 60 (36, 110) mL/min/1.73 m2. The median (Q1, Q3) 6-minute walk test distance was 375 meters (309, 439), the median daily steps were 3,728 (2,187, 5,821), and participants experienced a median (Q1, Q3) of 2 (1, 5) pain episodes in the year prior to randomization. The trial results are pending. CONCLUSIONS: The SCD-CARRE trial successfully enrolled a cohort of n = 173 adults with SCD. This study highlights a rationale to evaluate the effect of automated chronic RBCX transfusion strategy plus standard of care as compared to standard of care alone in SCD patients at high risk of death with a focus on patient centered outcomes, preservation of cardiovascular function, end-organ complications and death. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT04084080, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04084080.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation in Invasively Ventilated Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) is increasingly used in invasively ventilated adults in the intensive care unit (ICU), yet its therapeutic efficacy and safety remain uncertain due to inconsistent evidence. AIM: To synthesize evidence on the clinical efficacy and safety of MI-E in this population and to examine methodological and clinical heterogeneity underlying reported outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies (including RCTs and randomized crossover trials), conducted following PRISMA guidelines, with risk of bias assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials involving 310 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) significantly increased sputum clearance (SMD = 0.63, 95% CI, 0.32-0.93; p < 0.00011; I2 = 38%) without affecting oxygenation (MD = 0.28, 95% CI, -0.53 to 1.09; p = 0.50; I2 = 9%). Data on respiratory mechanics, ventilation duration and ICU stay could not be pooled. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: MI-E significantly improves sputum clearance in invasively ventilated critically ill adults, with no severe adverse events reported in the included studies. Its effects on other outcomes remain inconclusive due to limited data and heterogeneity. Standardized protocols and larger trials are needed. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Clinicians may consider MI-E as an adjunct for respiratory secretion management. Application should be guided by structured patient assessment and individualized parameter adjustment. Future research should standardize interventions and target well-defined patient subgroups to inform clear practice guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, with registration number CRD42023403299.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

External ventricular drain safety campaign and opportunities for global neuroanesthesiology quality and safety.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes the conceptualization and implementation of the External Ventricular Drain (EVD) Safety Campaign, a global patient safety initiative by the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care. It summarizes recent literature on EVD insertion and maintenance, highlights opportunities to advance quality and safety in neuroanesthesiology, and outlines priorities and a framework for future work. RECENT FINDINGS: The Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care launched a global initiative to improve EVD management. EVD insertion and maintenance remain key areas of ongoing research and quality improvement, particularly in reducing complications. SUMMARY: The EVD Safety Campaign provides a structured framework to improve care delivery and patient outcomes worldwide. Continued focus on standardization, education, and complication reduction, especially infection prevention, will be essential to advancing the field.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Transdermal 17β-Estradiol for the Treatment of COVID-19: Protocol of an Early Terminated Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Early epidemiological studies suggested that pre- and postmenopausal women receiving estrogen therapy were less likely to develop severe disease or die from COVID-19 infection. Potential mechanisms include estrogen-mediated immunomodulation and 17β-estradiol-induced downregulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme type 2 (ACE2), the cellular receptor for SARS-CoV-2. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of transdermal 17β-estradiol as an adjunctive treatment for COVID-19 in men and postmenopausal women. METHODS: We designed and conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing 17β-estradiol transdermal gel plus standard care with standard care alone in adults with confirmed COVID-19. Initial ethics and funding approvals were obtained in March 2021. Owing to changes in the epidemiology of COVID-19 in Qatar and revisions to national quarantine policies, protocol amendments were required before recruitment commenced in February 2022. The treatment duration was reduced from 10 to 7 days due to changes in national quarantine guidelines. Recruitment and follow-up were conducted between February 2022 and June 2022. RESULTS: Recruitment was substantially lower than anticipated because widespread COVID-19 vaccination, declining disease severity, and revised national quarantine policies markedly reduced the number of eligible hospitalized patients. Consequently, the planned sample size was not achieved, and the study was terminated in June 2022. A total of 29 men with mild COVID-19 were enrolled, with 44.8% (n=13) randomized to standard care and 55.2% (n=16) to transdermal 17β-estradiol plus standard care. The intervention was well tolerated, with no adverse safety signals or thromboembolic events reported. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study was underpowered to assess efficacy because recruitment targets were not achieved, it showed that transdermal 17β-estradiol was well tolerated, with no major safety concerns among enrolled participants. The experience also provided important operational lessons for conducting clinical trials during rapidly evolving pandemics. Adequately powered studies are required to determine whether transdermal estrogen has therapeutic potential against COVID-19, other ACE2-mediated coronavirus infections, or potentially other severe viral illnesses.

Humans↗