PubMed2026
High-quality genome assemblies are essential for robust research across biological and medical fields. Assembly errors can have far-reaching consequences for downstream analyses, including gene annotation and the inference of synteny. In contrast to the rapid growth of genomic data volume, there is a notable lag in the integration of chromosome-level assemblies with cytogenetic data. We conducted the first direct genome-to-genome comparison, integrating comparative chromosome painting, the alignment of chromosome-specific probes to available genome assemblies, and synteny-based comparison of independent chromosome-level assemblies of the loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta, 2n = 56) and the red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans, 2n = 50). Using two independent sets of flow-sorted chromosome-specific probes in cross-species hybridizations, together with the sequencing and mapping of chromosome-derived DNA libraries, we assigned assembled scaffolds to all physical chromosomes of both species. In C. caretta, chromosomal assignments and genome-wide synteny were fully consistent with the published assembly, except for the reduced sizes of two microchromosome scaffolds, which we attribute to under-representation of repetitive DNA. In contrast, in T. s. elegans, cytogenetic validation of the assemblies revealed a false rearrangement compared to a missed one. Our results show that even highly contiguous vertebrate genome assemblies can misrepresent chromosome structure. When cytogenetic analyses reveal such inaccuracies, updated reference genomes should be generated for widely studied species to enable accurate inference of karyotype evolution and downstream comparative genomic analyses.