Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42709403

A chromosome-level, haplotype-resolved genome assembly for the barn owl, Tyto alba.

Abstract

Recent advances in long-read sequencing have enabled near telomere-to-telomere (T2T) assemblies across diverse taxa. However, avian genomes remain challenging due to numerous microchromosomes, small, typically < 20Mb, DNA molecules that are gene-, GC-, and repeat-rich. As a consequence, microchromosomes are often missing from genome assemblies. Here, we present a chromosome-level, haplotype-resolved genome assembly for the Western barn owl (Tyto alba). Using a trio-binning strategy with Illumina parental reads combined with PacBio HiFi and Oxford Nanopore Technologies data, we generated two phased contig sets. These were scaffolded into 40 linkage groups using a linkage map. Comparative analyses identified unplaced HiFi scaffolds corresponding to microchromosomes, which we integrated into six additional microchromosomes using long reads information. The two assemblies present 46 chromosomes, matching the karyotype of the species. They exhibit strong synteny between parental haplotypes, except for a &#x223c;38 Mb complex region on chromosome 7 containing nested inversions. This high-quality reference provides a haplotype-resolved and chromosome-level genome for Strigiformes, enabling fine-scale studies of structural variation and avian genome evolution.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hugo Corval, Anne-Lyse Ducrest, Marianne Bachmann Salvy, Allison Burns, Alexandros Topaloudis, C&#xe9;line Simon, Elisa Cora, Daniel Cavaleri, Bettina Almasi, Alexandre Roulin, Christian Iseli, Nicolas Guex, Tristan Cumer, J&#xe9;r&#xf4;me Goudet. 2026-09-08. A chromosome-level, haplotype-resolved genome assembly for the barn owl, Tyto alba.. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience%2Fgiag092

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Structural complexity and mechanistic diversity of MECOM rearrangements in myeloid neoplasms.

Rearrangements involving MECOM at chromosome 3q26.2 are recurrent in myeloid neoplasms, classically represented by inv(3)(q21q26.2) and t(3;3)(q21;q26.2), which reposition the GATA2-distal haematopoietic enhancer and drive aberrant EVI1 overexpression. However, the full structural and mechanistic diversity of MECOM rearrangements (MECOM-r) is yet to be explored. We retrospectively analysed 97 cases with cytogenetically defined MECOM-r and identified 12 with complex rearrangements using GTG-banded karyotyping and tri-colour interphase/metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridisation analyses. These 12 cases demonstrated remarkable structural heterogeneity. The abnormalities encompassed translocations, inversions, insertions, duplications, and deletions, which often coexisted within the same specimen as multiple rearranged subclones. Insertional events emerged as a distinct mechanism of MECOM activation. These encompassed insertions of MYNN and/or MECOM into chromosomes 1 and 6, insertion of chromosome 8 segment into MECOM, and inverted insertions between homologous chromosome 3 segments. Recurrent breakpoints at 3q21 across multiple cases, together with localised copy number imbalances frequently involving the MYNN and GOLIM4 loci at 3q26.2, underscore the architectural fragility of these two regions. Co-occurring abnormalities such as -5/del(5q), -7/del(7q), and TP53 loss were common, reflecting a permissive genomic background for chromosomal reassembly. Our findings expand the mechanistic landscape of MECOM-r beyond canonical inv(3)/t(3;3), establishing 3q21 and 3q26.2 as structural 'hotspots' and genomic instability hubs. Distinct from fusion-driven oncogenes such as KMT2A, MECOM activation results from enhancer hijacking and regional structural remodelling, leading to EVI1 overexpression and clonal evolution in myeloid malignancies.

Humans

LINE-1 repeats are a defining feature of the Xce.

During early development, female mammals inactivate one X chromosome to balance their X-linked gene dosage with males. While allelic choice is random in inbred mouse populations, choice can be significantly skewed in interstrain hybrids. The genetic basis of skewing has long been attributed to the mysterious "X chromosome controlling element(s)" (Xce) with different strengths among species, subspecies, and strains. When two X-chromosomes with different Xce strengths are inherited by offspring, the X chromosome with the stronger Xce will have a higher probability of remaining active. Here, we provide evidence that L1Tf repeats-a subfamily of long interspersed nuclear elements 1-plays a role in determining Xce strength. L1Tf elements form a condensed core within the inactive X (Xi) territory. Mouse strains with varying Xce strengths differ in the L1Tf copy number on the X chromosome, with the strength of the Xce allele being inversely related to L1Tf copy number. L1Tf expression mediates the Xce effect. However, in contrast to a prior report, L1Tf RNA does not coat the Xi. Rather, L1Tf promotes condensation of the Xi core. Intriguingly, L1Tfs recruit and sequester YY1 from active genes, accelerating XCI in cis. Thus, L1Tf copy number, expression, and binding of YY1 are key defining features of the Xce. We propose a model in which the Xce influences the choice of Xist alleles by promoting YY1 binding to the nucleation site for the initiation of Xist spreading.

Animals

Communication crossroads: Exploring generational dynamics in nursing from the bedside to the boardroom.

Nurses have up to four times more patient contact than physicians, positioning them as central drivers of communication in health care. Effective communication directly influences patient outcomes, teamwork, staff engagement, and the overall care experience. Today's nurses operate within a highly diverse environment that includes four generations in the workforce and up to eight generations of patients, each with distinct values, expectations, and communication preferences. This article examines how generational differences shape communication across three key relational domains: peer-to-peer, nurse-to-patient, and nurse-to-leader interactions, and offers insights to strengthen collaboration, engagement, and quality of care.

Humans