Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “immunotherapy resistance”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Decoding tumor immune microenvironment heterogeneity by single-cell and spatial multi-omics: From immunotherapy resistance to translational biomarkers.

Immune checkpoint blockade has transformed cancer therapy, yet primary and acquired resistance remain major clinical challenges. Increasing evidence indicates that immunotherapy resistance cannot be fully explained by tumor-intrinsic alterations or conventional biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, or microsatellite instability. Instead, therapeutic response is shaped by the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) as a heterogeneous, spatially organized, and dynamically evolving ecosystem. Single-cell omics has revealed diverse immune and stromal cell states, including progenitor and terminally exhausted T cells, suppressive myeloid programs, B-cell/TLS-associated immune-reactive states, and CAF-mediated exclusion phenotypes. Spatial transcriptomics, spatial proteomics, and imaging-based approaches further demonstrate that these cell states assemble into distinct immune niches, including immune-inflamed, T-cell-excluded, myeloid-suppressive, metabolic/hypoxic, and TLS-associated niches. These spatial ecosystems determine whether antitumor immune cells can access malignant cells, receive antigen-presenting support, or become restrained by stromal, vascular, metabolic, and myeloid barriers. In this review, we summarize how single-cell and spatial multi-omics redefine TIME heterogeneity in immunotherapy resistance, highlight ligand-receptor communication networks linking cell states to spatial immune dysfunction, and discuss emerging translational biomarkers for patient stratification. We further propose that future immunotherapy biomarkers should evolve from static single-marker assays toward longitudinal, spatially resolved, and interpretable multi-omics models that guide precision combination immunotherapy.

Humans↗

Integration of single-cell transcriptomics and genomic mutation analysis identifies an immunotherapy-resistant tumor subcluster and validates ARNTL2 as a malignant driver in lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy resistance in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains a critical clinical challenge, and the mechanisms underlying resistance-associated intratumoral heterogeneity are poorly characterized. METHODS: We performed single-cell RNA sequencing of LUAD patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy (responders vs. non-responders), integrating inferCNV, GSVA, and differential expression analyses. Cluster-specific genes were validated across seven independent cohorts (TCGA-LUAD, GSE13213, GSE26939, GSE29016, GSE30219, GSE31210, GSE42127). A multi-algorithm machine learning framework was used to construct a prognostic model, and the immune microenvironment was characterized using TCIA scoring, seven infiltration algorithms, and ESTIMATE. ARNTL2 function was assessed by CCK-8 and Transwell assays in A549 and H1299 cells. RESULTS: Non-responders showed significant enrichment of epithelial cells, depletion of cytotoxic T/NK cells, and elevated copy number variation burden versus responders (p < 0.0001). A resistance-enriched malignant subcluster (Cluster 2) exhibited hyperproliferative and metabolic reprogramming signatures with upregulated KRT17, S100A2, and CST6, which showed tumor-specific overexpression, adverse prognostic value, and genomic amplification across cohorts. CoxBoost combined with survivalSVM achieved optimal predictive performance (C-index = 0.686), yielding robust risk stratification (HR: 2.54-10.51, all p < 0.05). Low-risk patients showed greater immune infiltration and higher TCIA immunophenoscores. ARNTL2 was an independent prognostic factor (HR: 2.07-4.64) strongly correlated with risk score (r = 0.69), and its knockdown suppressed proliferation and invasion in both LUAD cell lines (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study identifies a resistance-associated malignant subcluster in LUAD, constructs a validated CoxBoost + survivalSVM prognostic model with robust immune stratification, and establishes ARNTL2 as a core oncogenic driver and therapeutic target.

ARNTL2↗

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in the treatment of patients with immunotherapy-resistant advanced renal cell carcinoma: final results of a single-institution Phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no standard treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who do not experience a response to first-line immunotherapy. In the current Phase II study, the authors explored the antitumor activity of a combination of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in this setting. METHODS: Forty-two patients with RCC who had progressive disease following immunotherapy received gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 intravenously on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days) and L-OHP (90 mg/m2 intravenously on Day 1 every 21 days) for a minimum of 2 cycles before responses were evaluated. Responses to treatment and toxicity were recorded according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, respectively. RESULTS: No complete responses were recorded; however, 6 patients experienced a partial response (14.28%; 95% confidence interval, 5.43-28.5%), 11 patients (26.19%) had temporary stable disease as a best response, and the remaining 25 patients (59.52%) experienced progression despite receiving treatment. The median time to disease progression was 2.5 months (mean, 3.86 months; range, 1.5-11.0 months), whereas the median overall survival was 9.5 months (mean, 10.46 months; range, 4.0-22.5 months). With regard to toxicity, treatment generally was well tolerated, with only one episode of Grade 4 toxicity and expected episodes of Grade 3 toxicity, including myelosuppression and neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: The current results suggest that the combination of gemcitabine and L-OHP possesses a certain level of activity and an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with immunotherapy-resistant advanced RCC.

Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell↗

Cancer Immune Responsiveness and MHC Class I Antigen Presentation: Mechanisms of Immune Escape and Immunotherapy Resistance in Gastrointestinal Cancers.

The Antigen Processing and Presentation Machinery (APM) is essential for immune surveillance by enabling the presentation of antigenic peptides to T lymphocytes and facilitating the elimination of infected or transformed cells. In cancer, the integrity of this process influences cancer immune responsiveness (CIR), defined as a tumour's capacity to be recognised by the immune system and respond to immunotherapy. Tumours with intact antigen presentation pathways are more likely to generate effective antitumour responses, whereas APM defects promote immune escape and therapeutic resistance. Cancer cells frequently evade immune detection through altered antigen processing or reduced expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules, limiting tumour antigen presentation to cytotoxic T lymphocytes. These alterations are increasingly recognised as determinants of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors and potential predictive biomarkers. APM defects may be reversible or irreversible. Interferon-mediated signalling can restore MHC class I expression and T-cell cytotoxicity in some tumours, whereas permanent genomic alterations affecting human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I genes, &#x3b2;2-microglobulin (&#x3b2;2-m), or interferon-&#x3b3; (IFN-&#x3b3;) pathway components can severely impair antigen presentation. Emerging evidence highlights four mechanistic levels of APM perturbation: peptide generation, peptide loading, MHC class I integrity, and epigenetic regulation. Each contributes to distinct patterns of immune evasion. This review examines how MHC class I alterations influence CIR and contribute to immune evasion and immunotherapy resistance in gastrointestinal malignancies, while discussing therapeutic strategies to restore or bypass APM deficiencies.

Humans↗

ZNF180 modulates tumor intrinsic immunotherapy resistance in melanoma through driving plasticity.

BACKGROUND: Based on our previous study, we have identified ZNF180, a zinc finger protein, as a pro-tumorigenic regulator in primary melanoma and a marker for poor prognosis. Herein, we report that ZNF180-regulated pathway, hence ZNF180-regulome, underlies resistance towards immune checkpoint inhibitions (ICIs). METHODS: To investigate regulatory roles of ZNF180 to confer these immune suppressive phenotypes, we performed ZNF180 knock-down in melanoma cells in vitro with different genetic backgrounds, namely A375 (BRAF-mutant) and SKMEL147 (NRAS-mutant) cells, and performed RNA- and ATAC-sequencing. We performed integrative analysis of RNA- and ATAC-sequencing data with publicly available sequencing data from ICI-treated cohorts to construct comprehensive model of ZNF180-regulome and its impacts on immune microenvironment. Further, we performed ZNF180 silencing in immune competent Yumm1.7 murine model to confirm the changes in immune microenvironments. RESULTS: ZNF180-regulome was predictive of ICI responses in independent bulk sequencing cohorts, and ZNF180+ tumors persisted after the therapy with immune-suppressive features such as MHC-I loss and CD155 expressions, the primary ligand to TIGIT inhibitory receptor. Further, ZNF180 silencing revealed its regulations on AP-1 transcription factors to drive melanoma reprogramming towards de-differentiated MITFlowAXLhigh cells, an established melanoma subtypes associated with recurrence and ICI resistance. In tandem, we observed that ZNF180+ tumor neighborhood significantly excluded with CD4 T-cells in metastatic tumor, and its silencing in immune competent murine model increased CD4 helper T-cell infiltrations with significant tumor regression in vivo. CONCLUSION: Collectively, these results indicate ZNF180 is a tumor intrinsic regulator of melanoma plasticity to drive de-differentiated phenotypes with immune-suppressive features including loss of immunogenicity, T-cell inhibitory signals through TIGIT/CD155 checkpoint and exclusion of CD4 helper T-cells. As ZNF180-regulome manifests in non-metastatic melanoma in contrast to the current focus of standard-of-care ICI on the metastatic disease, these results establish ZNF180-regulome as a biomarker and novel therapeutic avenue for early-stage, non-metastatic melanoma to intervene ICI resistance.

Immune checkpoint inhibition↗

Contact immunotherapy of resistant warts.

Contact immunotherapy has been proved effective in the treatment of resistant warts. This report chronicles our experience with a new contact immunotherapy agent, diphenylcyclopropenone. We have achieved a cure rate of 62% in 45 patients with resistant warts of all types who came to our general dermatology clinic. Cure rates may be lower in patients who have experienced multiple treatment failures. The majority of cures were obtained within 3 to 4 months. Although it appears somewhat less effective than published reports of dinitrochlorobenzene contact immunotherapy, diphenylcyclopropenone contact immunotherapy is an effective treatment for resistant warts and avoids any potential problems from mutagenicity.

Administration, Topical↗

Glucose regulated proteins in cancer progression, drug resistance and immunotherapy.

It has been established that as molecular chaperones, the glucose-regulated proteins (GRPs) play an important role in maintaining cellular homeostasis. This conventional concept of GRPs as protein folding chaperones is updated by discoveries that GRPs promote tumor proliferation, metastasis, drug resistance, immunotherapy, which have major clinical implications in the prognosis and treatment of cancer. Further, the localization of GRPs on the cell surface of certain cell types suggests that they serve new functions as cell surface receptors for signaling. These and other new developments on the role of GRP78, GRP94 and GRP170 in cancer progression and therapy are discussed in this review.

Cell Proliferation↗

A murine plasmacytoma MOPC 104E resistant to cyclophosphamide is resistant to immunotherapy.

A murine plasmacytoma MOPC 104E (MOPC) is highly sensitive to chemotherapeutic agents such as cyclophosphamide and mitomycin C as well as to immunotherapy (OK-432-combined adoptive immunotherapy using interleukin-2-cultured killer cells). In the present study, we prepared cyclophosphamide-resistant MOPC cells (MOPC-CPA/R) by serial in vivo passage of tumor cells following cyclophosphamide treatment. The in vivo sensitivity of MOPC-CPA/R to mitomycin C or to immunotherapy (OK-432-combined adoptive immunotherapy) was significantly decreased compared to the parent MOPC. In vitro experiments showed that MOPC-CPA/R were more resistant (five-fold) to lysis by cultured immune spleen cells than MOPC. Inhibition of the lytic activity of cultured immune spleen cells against MOPC was significantly increased (P less than 0.05) by the addition of unlabeled MOPC compared to unlabeled MOPC-CPA/R. These results suggest that MOPC-CPA/R express weaker antigenicity than MOPC. However, the transfer of immune spleen cells cultured with tumor extract derived from MOPC-CPA/R significantly prolonged the survival of MOPC-CPA/R-inoculated mice. Thus, by repeated cyclophosphamide treatment, tumor cells with low-antigenicity were selected. These tumor cells had lower sensitivity to another chemotherapeutic agent and immunotherapy. Such an immunological response may play an important role in cancer therapy.

Animals↗

Camptothecin analogs (irinotecan or topotecan) plus high-dose cyclophosphamide as preparative regimens for antibody-based immunotherapy in resistant neuroblastoma.

PURPOSE: We used high-dose cyclophosphamide plus topotecan/vincristine (CTV) or irinotecan (C/I) in patients with resistant neuroblastoma. The aim was to use a regimen with little risk to major organs to (a) achieve or consolidate remission in heavily treated patients and to (b) induce an immunological state conducive to passive immunotherapy with the murine 3F8 antibody. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: CTV and C/I included cyclophosphamide 140 mg/kg ( approximately 4200 mg/m(2)). With CTV, topotecan 2 mg/m(2) was infused i.v. (30 min) on days 1-4 (total, 8 mg/m(2)), and vincristine 0.067 mg/kg was injected on day 1. With C/I, irinotecan, 50 mg/m(2) was infused i.v. (1 h) on days 1-5 (total, 250 mg/m(2)). Mesna and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor were used. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients received 38 courses of CTV, and 26 patients received 38 courses of C/I. All patients had previously received topotecan, a hemopoietic stem-cell transplant, and/or high-dose cyclophosphamide. CTV and C/I caused myelosuppression of comparably prolonged duration as follows: absolute neutrophil counts <500/ micro l lasted 5-12 days in patients who had not previously received transplant and 7-21 days in patients who were post-transplant. Other significant toxicities included typhlitis (two CTV-treated patients, one C/I-treated patient) and hemorrhagic cystitis (one C/I-treated patient). Major responses were seen in 4 (15%) of 26 CTV and 4 (17%) of 24 C/I-treated patients with assessable disease. Bone marrow disease resolved in 5 (28%) of 18 CTV-treated patients and in 4 (27%) of 15 C/I-treated patients. 3F8 after CTV or C/I was not blocked by neutralizing antibodies, consistent with the desired immunosuppressive effect of high-dose cyclophosphamide. CONCLUSIONS: CTV and C/I require transfusional and antibiotic support but otherwise entail tolerable morbidity. They have modest antineuroblastoma activity in heavily treated patients and are good preparative regimens for passive immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies.

Adolescent↗

Comprehensive proteomic and pathological profiling identifies PRAS40 as a novel biomarker and mediator of primary immune checkpoint blockade resistance in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized the treatment landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet primary resistance remains a significant clinical challenge. Recent evidence implicates PRAS40 (AKT1S1) in regulating cellular survival and immune responses, but its role in immunotherapy resistance is not fully understood. METHODS: Transcriptomic data from TCGA and GTEx cohorts were analyzed to assess PRAS40 expression. Prognostic value was evaluated using Cox regression. Immune microenvironment features were characterized with CIBERSORT and TIMER. Predictive efficacy for ICB response was examined using TIDE and IPS. Plasma PRAS40 levels in 66 NSCLC patients receiving ICB were quantified by proximity extension assay (PEA), and multiplex immunohistochemistry assessed associations among PRAS40, PD-L1, and CD8+ T cells in tumor tissues. RESULTS: High PRAS40 expression was associated with poor prognosis, reduced CD8+ T cell infiltration, and downregulation of immune checkpoint genes. Elevated circulating PRAS40 predicted primary ICB resistance and shorter progression-free survival, independent of PD-L1 or CD8+ T cell status. CONCLUSION: PRAS40 is strongly associated with primary ICB resistance in NSCLC and may serve as a novel predictive biomarker. These findings support its potential to guide personalized immunotherapy in lung cancer.

Humans↗

Engineered resistance to camptothecin and antifolates by retroviral coexpression of tyrosyl DNA phosphodiesterase-I and thymidylate synthase.

PURPOSE: Gene transfer of cDNA sequences that confer drug resistance can be used (1) to protect hematopoietic cells against the toxic effects of chemotherapy, (2) for in vivo enrichment of genetically engineered cells and (3) to protect cytotoxic T lymphocytes in drug-resistant immunotherapy approaches for the treatment of cancer. We have previously developed strategies to confer resistance to agents targeting thymidylate synthase (TS) and have now expanded our drug resistance strategies to include retroviral expression of tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase (TDP-I), an enzyme recently implicated in the repair of topoisomerase-I (Top-I)/DNA lesions induced by camptothecin (CPT). The combination of TS and Top-I inhibition has been shown to be an effective treatment for several types of cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retroviral vectors were generated that individually encoded TS and TDP-I or that coexpressed both enzymes. Murine fibroblast and Chinese hamster lung transfectants were generated with the vectors and resistance to TS- and Top-I-directed inhibitors was tested. Murine bone marrow progenitor cells were also transduced using recombinant retroviruses encoding TS and TDP-I and the degree of drug resistance conferred to gene-modified cells was tested. RESULTS: Enforced expression of TDP-I increased TDP-I activity in gene-modified cells and conferred up to threefold resistance to CPT. The degree of resistance was dependent on the duration of drug treatment. Simultaneous expression of the TS gene encoding E. coli TS optimized for expression in mammalian cells (optecTS) and TDP-I conferred extremely high-level resistance to concurrent treatment with the TS-inhibitor BW1843U89 and CPT. Furthermore, by direct analysis of DNA fragmentation using the comet assay, substantial protection was conferred (fourfold) against DNA fragmentation associated with combination drug treatments by dual enzyme expression compared to non-modified cells. Hematopoietic progenitor assays of murine bone marrow cells transduced with retroviral vectors encoding TS and TDP-I showed that bone marrow cells could be protected from the cytotoxic effects of TS and Top-I inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: Enforced expression of optecTS and TDP-I conferred antifolate and CPT resistance to genetically modified cells. Additionally, this work further illustrated a role for TDP-I in the repair of dead-end Top-I complexes and implied that TDP-I expression analysis may aid in predicting the therapeutic effectiveness of the CPT class of compounds.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗

Sensitization of human bladder cancer cells to Fas-mediated cytotoxicity by cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II).

PURPOSE: The resistance of bladder cancer to anticancer chemotherapeutic drugs is a major problem. Several immunotherapeutic approaches have been developed to treat drug-resistant tumor cells. The Fas antigen (Fas)-Fas ligand pathway is involved in cytotoxic T lymphocyte and natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Like the Fas ligand, anti-Fas monoclonal antibody (mAb) induces apoptosis in tumor cells expressing Fas. Several anticancer drugs also mediate apoptosis and may share with Fas common intracellular pathways leading to cell killing. We reasoned that treatment of drug-resistant cancer cells with a combination of anti-Fas mAb and drugs might overcome their resistance. This study has investigated whether anticancer drugs synergize with anti-Fas mAb in cytotoxicity against bladder cancer cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cytotoxicity was determined by a 1-day microculture tetrazolium dye assay. Synergy was assessed by isobolographic analysis. RESULTS: Treatment of the T24 human bladder cancer cell line with anti-Fas mAb in combination with 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin C or methotrexate did not overcome resistance to these agents. However, treatment of T24 tumor cells with a combination of anti-Fas mAb and cisdiamminedichloroplatinum (II) (CDDP) resulted in a synergistic cytotoxic effect. In addition, the CDDP-resistant T24 line (T24/CDDP) was sensitive to treatment with a combination of anti-Fas mAb and CDDP. Synergy by combination of anti-Fas mAb and CDDP was also achieved in three other bladder cancer lines and four freshly derived human bladder cancer cells. The combination of anti-Fas mAb and carboplatin also resulted in a synergistic cytotoxic effect on T24 cells; however, the combination of anti-Fas mAb and trans-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) resulted in an additive cytotoxic effect. Treatment with CDDP enhanced the expression of Fas on T24 cells. The synergy achieved in cytotoxicity with anti-Fas mAb and CDDP was also achieved in apoptosis. Incubation of T24 cells with anti-Fas mAb increased the intracellular accumulation of CDDP. Treatment of freshly isolated bladder cancer cells with CDDP enhanced their susceptibility to lysis by autologous lymphocytes. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that combination treatment of bladder cancer cells with anti-Fas mAb and CDDP overcomes their resistance. Synergy was achieved with established CDDP-resistant bladder cancer cells and freshly isolated bladder cancer cells. In addition, the sensitization required low concentrations of CDDP, thus supporting the potential in vivo application of combination of CDDP and immunotherapy in the treatment of CDDP- and/or immunotherapy-resistant bladder cancer.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗

Enhancement of Fas-mediated apoptosis in renal cell carcinoma cells by adriamycin.

Anti-Fas monoclonal antibody (mAb) kills Fas-expressing cells by apoptosis. Several anticancer agents also mediate apoptosis and may share common intracellular pathways leading to apoptosis with Fas. Thus, we reasoned that combination treatment of drug-resistant cells with anti-Fas mAb and drugs might overcome their resistance. We investigated whether anticancer agents enhance Fas-mediated apoptosis and cytotoxicity against renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cells. Treatment of ACHN RCC cells with anti-Fas mAb in combination with 5-fluorouracil, vinblastine, IFN-alpha, or IFN-gamma did not overcome resistance to these agents. However, combination treatment with anti-Fas mAb and Adriamycin (ADR) resulted in a synergistic cytotoxic effect. Furthermore, synergy was also obtained even when the exposure time was shortened from 24 h to 8 or 2 h. Synergy was also achieved in four other RCC cell lines and five freshly derived human RCC cells. Treatment with anti-Fas mAb in combination with epirubicin or pirarubicin also resulted in a synergistic cytotoxic effect on ACHN cells. Similar results were achieved with a combination of humanized anti-Fas mAb and ADR. Incubation of ACHN cells with ADR augmented the expression of Fas and p53, but not Bcl-2, Bax, or caspase-3. However, the activity of caspase-3 itself was apparently enhanced after treatment with ADR alone or combined treatment with anti-Fas mAb. The synergy obtained in cytotoxicity with anti-Fas mAb and ADR was also achieved in apoptosis. Exposure of ACHN cells and freshly derived RCC cells to ADR enhanced their susceptibility to lysis by peripheral blood lymphocytes and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. This study demonstrates that combination treatment of RCC cells with anti-Fas mAb and ADR might overcome their resistance. The sensitization required a low concentration of ADR and a short exposure time, thus supporting the potential in vivo application of a combination of ADR and anti-Fas mAb or immunotherapy in the treatment of ADR- and/or immunotherapy-resistant RCC.

Acridine Orange↗

Effects of syngeneic cellular vaccinations alone or in combination with GM-CSF on the weakly immunogenic F98 glioma model.

Cancer vaccines are one approach for the treatment of brain tumors. Most experimental studies are performed on so-called "immunogenic" brain tumor models such as the rat 9L glioma which does not reflect characteristics of human glioblastoma. In the present study, we tested syngeneic cellular vaccinations alone or in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on the weakly immunogenic F98 glioma model. Previous studies have shown the efficacy of this treatment on the 9L glioma model. Fisher rats received an intracerebral implantation of F98 cells. Three days later, two subcutaneous vaccinations with irradiated F98 cells were realized in presence or absence of GM-CSF. This scheme of vaccination induced a systemic cellular and humoral immune response capable of in vitro cytolytic activity against F98 cells. However, no significant differences in survival times were noted between vaccinated and untreated animals. Animals vaccinated with GM-CSF or without GM-CSF had respectively a survival time of 26 +/- 2.1 and 25 +/- 4.4 days following tumor challenge versus 26.5 +/- 2.4 days for untreated rats. Fourteen days after the intracerebral tumor implantation, the tumors of vaccinated animals showed a robust infiltration by T lymphocytes, NK cells, dendritic cells, granulocytes and CD11b/c+ myeloid cells. This infiltration was nearly absent in untreated animals except for CD11b/c+ myeloid cells. This study shows that, contrary to the 9L glioma model, the F98 glioma model is resistant to syngeneic cellular vaccinations although a strong peripheral and intratumoral immune response can be induced. These results suggest that the F98 glioma is an attractive model to understand the mechanisms of glioma immunotherapy resistance.

Animals↗

The assembly of cancer-specific ribosomes by the lncRNA LISRR suppresses melanoma anti-tumor immunity.

Gains of chromosome 12p11.21, encoding for the cancer-specific lncRNA LISRR, correlate with poor survival across different cancers. In melanoma, LISRR is upregulated in immunotherapy-resistant patients to contribute to the generation of drug-tolerant cells by activating an immune-suppressive translational program, affecting the synthesis of PD-L1 and of the glycocalyx. Accordingly, downregulation of LISRR initiates robust immune responses and resensitizes to immunotherapy ex vivo and in vivo. The use of glycans to evade immunity exhibits shared characteristics with the testis, where defects in the glycocalyx cause infertility. Mechanistically, we showed that LISRR affects the ribosome core composition and recruits deleted in azoospermia-associated protein 1 to polysomes to prime the integrated stress response. Our study reveals the contribution of lncRNAs to the generation of cancer-specific ribosomes and identifies an RNA-based strategy to overcome resistance to immune checkpoint blockade.

RNA, Long Noncoding↗

Recent progress in chemotherapy and immunotherapy of sarcomas of bony origin, both as primary and adjunctive therapy.

Treatment for primary malignant tumors of bone, in the past several decades, has yielded uniformly poor results. Recent progress in chemotherapy and immunotherapy are detailed. An important advance in treating osteogenic sarcoma has been the application of adjuvant chemotherapy after initial amputation. CONPADRI-I and COMPADRI-II chemotherapy (a multiple drug approach) is discussed. Adriamycin in combination or alone has proved effective in treating osteogenic sarcoma. Ewing's tumor is showing increased survival rates from radiation therapy alone, as well as by use of systemic adjuvant chemotherapy combined with local radiation. Adjuvant triple chemotherapy with radiotherapy has resulted in pronounced improvement in survival. Chondrosarcomas are largely chemotherapy-resistant. Immunotherapy in bone tumors still is in the experimental stage and investigations with immunotherapy are preliminary. It appears, however, that the immunological status of a patient definitely relates to prognosis. Through increased sophistication in specific chemotherapy and magnitude of treatment, further advances in treatment of primary malignant bone tumors may be expected.

Amputation, Surgical↗

A serpin-myeloid axis in pancreatic cancer heterogeneity and immune evasion.

Pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by a highly immunosuppressive, extracellular matrix-rich microenvironment, yet tumours display marked heterogeneity1-4. This raises the question of whether immune resistance is a global tumour property or is organized within spatially restricted niches. Here, using Perturb-map spatial functional genomics, we determine how different genes shape the growth and cellular environments of PDAC clones across space and time. This analysis revealed early gene-driven remodelling of local immune neighbourhoods preceding late-stage spatial clonal dominance. We identify SERPINE1 (encoding plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI1)) and SERPINB2 (encoding PAI2) as dominant regulators of tumour microenvironment control and immune evasion. These serpins promote stabilization of fibrin-rich extracellular matrix niches that spatially retain and programme macrophages towards immunosuppressive states while excluding cytotoxic T cells. Loss of Serpine1 or Serpinb2, or pharmacological inhibition of PAI1 or CD18, improves tumour control&#xa0;in mice and synergizes with anti-PD-1. Multimodal spatial analysis of patient tumours revealed that immunosuppressive niches form around rare SERPINB2- and SERPINE1-expressing PDAC subpopulations, dominated by SPP1+/MARCO+ macrophages. These findings identify cancer-derived SERPINE1 and SERPINB2 as local spatial organizers of immune suppression, linking tumour-intrinsic heterogeneity to local microenvironmental control and immunotherapy resistance in PDAC.

Journal Article↗