Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42603344

Integration of single-cell transcriptomics and genomic mutation analysis identifies an immunotherapy-resistant tumor subcluster and validates ARNTL2 as a malignant driver in lung adenocarcinoma.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy resistance in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains a critical clinical challenge, and the mechanisms underlying resistance-associated intratumoral heterogeneity are poorly characterized. METHODS: We performed single-cell RNA sequencing of LUAD patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy (responders vs. non-responders), integrating inferCNV, GSVA, and differential expression analyses. Cluster-specific genes were validated across seven independent cohorts (TCGA-LUAD, GSE13213, GSE26939, GSE29016, GSE30219, GSE31210, GSE42127). A multi-algorithm machine learning framework was used to construct a prognostic model, and the immune microenvironment was characterized using TCIA scoring, seven infiltration algorithms, and ESTIMATE. ARNTL2 function was assessed by CCK-8 and Transwell assays in A549 and H1299 cells. RESULTS: Non-responders showed significant enrichment of epithelial cells, depletion of cytotoxic T/NK cells, and elevated copy number variation burden versus responders (p < 0.0001). A resistance-enriched malignant subcluster (Cluster 2) exhibited hyperproliferative and metabolic reprogramming signatures with upregulated KRT17, S100A2, and CST6, which showed tumor-specific overexpression, adverse prognostic value, and genomic amplification across cohorts. CoxBoost combined with survivalSVM achieved optimal predictive performance (C-index = 0.686), yielding robust risk stratification (HR: 2.54-10.51, all p < 0.05). Low-risk patients showed greater immune infiltration and higher TCIA immunophenoscores. ARNTL2 was an independent prognostic factor (HR: 2.07-4.64) strongly correlated with risk score (r = 0.69), and its knockdown suppressed proliferation and invasion in both LUAD cell lines (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study identifies a resistance-associated malignant subcluster in LUAD, constructs a validated CoxBoost + survivalSVM prognostic model with robust immune stratification, and establishes ARNTL2 as a core oncogenic driver and therapeutic target.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zhengang Qiu, Hui Zhao, Qiong Lyu, Zhigang Li, Qiujiang Xi, Bingqing Ye, Qianshan Long, Zhengxin Lai, Xiang Cao, Wenjuan Zhong, Yu Zhang, Rongrong Liu. 2026-08-15. Integration of single-cell transcriptomics and genomic mutation analysis identifies an immunotherapy-resistant tumor subcluster and validates ARNTL2 as a malignant driver in lung adenocarcinoma.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2026.102971

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Dynamic evolution of chaperone-mediated autophagy is associated with tumor microenvironment remodeling and prognostic stratification in lung adenocarcinoma: insights from single-cell transcriptomics, ensemble machine learning, and experimental validation.

BACKGROUND: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) shows prognostic heterogeneity, and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging is limited for individualized management. Chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) maintains proteostasis, but its role during adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)-minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA)-invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) progression remains unclear. METHODS: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data from GSE189357 and bulk transcriptomes from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-LUAD and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) cohorts were integrated. CMA activity, cell-cell communication, weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), tumor-normal differential expression, machine-learning survival modeling, tumor microenvironment (TME) features, drug sensitivity, and EPC1 function were analyzed. RESULTS: CMA-high tumor epithelial cells increased from AIS (58.1%) to MIA (65.7%) but declined in IAC (44.4%; p < 0.001). CMA-low cells preferentially received fibroblast-derived extracellular matrix cues. A CMA-negatively correlated module identified 69 core genes. Random survival forest (RSF) performed best among 117 machine-learning combinations (mean concordance index > 0.873). High-risk patients had worse survival across cohorts, and the risk score was independently associated with overall survival (hazard ratio = 16.013, 95% confidence interval: 9.579-26.768, p < 0.001). High-risk tumors showed proliferative activation and M0 macrophage enrichment, whereas low-risk tumors showed stronger immune-related signaling. EPC1 overexpression suppressed malignant phenotypes in A549 cells. CONCLUSION: CMA dynamics are associated with stromal and immune remodeling during LUAD progression. A CMA-based model provides robust prognostic stratification and may offer a basis for future TME-guided studies.

Chaperone-mediated autophagy

Lactylation-related immune-metabolic dysregulation defines prognostic and therapeutic stratification in lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Lactylation links lactate metabolism with inflammatory signaling and immune regulation in tumors. However, its cellular distribution and translational value in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remain unclear. METHODS: Single-cell RNA-sequencing datasets GSE189357 and GSE171145 were integrated to characterize lactylation-related activity, intercellular communication, and malignant epithelial cell states in LUAD. Single-cell-derived lactylation-related differentially expressed genes were mapped to TCGA-LUAD and multiple GEO cohorts. Univariate Cox regression and machine learning algorithms were used to construct a lactylation-related prognostic signature (LRPS). The associations of LRPS with prognosis, immunotherapy response, drug sensitivity, genomic alterations, immune infiltration, and inflammation- and metabolism-related pathways were evaluated. KRT7 was further validated using virtual knockout analysis, spatial transcriptomics, and in vitro and in vivo experiments. RESULTS: lactylation-related transcriptional activity showed heterogeneous distribution across LUAD cell populations and was associated with altered cell-cell communication. In malignant epithelial cells, LRTS-high and LRTS-low states exhibited distinct metabolic, inflammatory, and tumor-related pathway activities. LRPS showed stable prognostic performance in TCGA-LUAD and multiple GEO cohorts and remained an independent prognostic factor. Low LRPS was associated with greater potential benefit from immunotherapy, whereas different LRPS groups displayed distinct drug sensitivity, genomic alteration, and immune microenvironment patterns. KRT7 was highly expressed in LUAD and associated with poor prognosis. KRT7 knockdown suppressed LUAD cell proliferation, migration, invasion, colony formation, and tumor growth in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies lactylation-related immune-metabolic dysregulation as a clinically relevant feature of LUAD and develops a single-cell-guided LRPS for prognosis and therapeutic stratification. KRT7 emerged as an LRPS-related functional candidate with experimentally supported roles in malignant LUAD phenotypes.

Immunotherapy

Stage shift, histological differentiation, and survival patterns of lung squamous cell carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma in low-dose CT screening.

BACKGROUND: Whether LDCT-associated stage shift translates into similar survival patterns across lung cancer histologies remains uncertain. We compared stage shift, histological differentiation, tumor characteristics, and survival between lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) and adenocarcinoma (LUAD) in the National Lung Screening Trial. METHODS: Among participants diagnosed with LUSC or LUAD, stage distribution and histological differentiation were compared between LDCT and chest X-ray (CXR) arms. Survival among diagnosed cases was measured from randomization. Multivariable models tested screening arm-by-histology interactions. Screen-detected LDCT tumors were compared by histology. RESULTS: During 6.5 years of median follow-up, 498 LUAD and 249 LUSC cases were diagnosed in the LDCT arm, and 374 and 212, respectively, were diagnosed in the CXR arm. LDCT was associated with higher odds of stage I disease for LUAD (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.48; 95% CI 1.88-3.28) and LUSC (aOR, 1.71; 95% CI 1.17-2.48), without significant interaction (P&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.116). LDCT was associated with lower hazard of lung cancer-specific death among diagnosed LUAD cases (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.54; 95% CI 0.43-0.66), but not among diagnosed LUSC cases (aHR, 1.04; 95% CI 0.78-1.39; P for interaction<0.001). LUSC had lower screening sensitivity, more frequent detection in annual screening rounds, greater prediagnostic tumor size increase, and fewer well-differentiated stage I tumors than LUAD. CONCLUSION: LDCT was associated with stage shift for both subtypes, but favorable survival patterns among diagnosed cases were mainly observed for LUAD. Lower screening sensitivity, greater prediagnostic tumor size increase, and poorer histological differentiation may help explain why stage shift did not translate into similar survival patterns for LUSC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00047385.

Humans