SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “frailty”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Prognostic Value of Frailty in Aortic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Frailty Assessment Tools.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is increasingly recognized as an important determinant of outcomes after aortic vascular surgery, but assessment methods vary substantially and the optimal tool for risk stratification remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the prognostic value of preoperative frailty and compared the predictive performance of different frailty instruments in aortic surgery. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to April 27, 2026. Eligible studies included patients undergoing open, endovascular, or hybrid aortic procedures involving abdominal, thoracic, thoracoabdominal, arch, and proximal aortic diseases, including aneurysms and dissections, assessed frailty preoperatively, and reported postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty studies comprising 419,459 patients were included. Frailty was associated with higher early mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54-3.14) and late mortality (hazard ratio 2.18; 95% CI 1.64-2.90). Frail patients also had increased risks of major complications (OR 2.52; 95% CI 1.22-5.19), acute kidney injury (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.34-2.02), and nonhome discharge (OR 5.50; 95% CI 3.05-9.92). Associations were consistent across surgical approaches and aortic segments. Judgment-based or phenotype-like tools yielded higher effect estimates than deficit-accumulation indices, although differences were not statistically significant; among index-based tools, Modified Frailty Index (mFI)-11 outperformed mFI-5. CONCLUSION: Preoperative frailty strongly predicts mortality, morbidity, and loss of functional independence after open, endovascular, and hybrid aortic surgery across different aortic segments and pathologies, including aneurysmal and dissecting aortic disease. Routine frailty assessment may improve risk stratification and perioperative decision-making.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Beyond multidimensionality: a systematic review of recurrent frailty archetypes in community-dwelling older adults.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a clinically heterogeneous geriatric syndrome commonly summarised using physical or multidomain severity scores. Whether person-centred analyses identify recurring within-frailty configurations has not been systematically examined in community-dwelling older adults. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL (January 2000-November 2025) for cross-sectional studies using latent class, latent profile, or analogous clustering methods to derive frailty subgroups. Quality was assessed using the AHRQ checklist and a purpose-built appraisal of person-centred model reporting. Study-derived classes were mapped in duplicate to a structured archetype framework developed through comparison of class-defining features across studies. RESULTS: Fourteen reports representing 12 independent datasets from eight countries were included. Six configurations were identified: minimally impaired reference, mobility-physical, nutritional-metabolic, cognitive-predominant, combined cognitive-physical, and psychosocial/mood-predominant. Convergence was measurement-dependent. The reference and mobility-physical configurations recurred across physical-only and multidomain indicator sets, while the combined cognitive-physical configuration appeared across several multidomain frameworks but required cognition to be measured. The remaining configurations emerged only when their defining domains were included. Evidence of prognostic value beyond aggregate frailty severity came from one deficit-index study. Collapsing shared-provenance reports and excluding the boundary-eligible study did not alter recurrence; excluding the Croatian dataset left five configurations recurrent, with the cognitive-predominant configuration supported by one independent dataset. CONCLUSIONS: Person-centred analyses identify recurring within-frailty configurations, but their apparent stability is partly measurement-dependent. A five-configuration core persisted after exclusion of the Croatian dataset, whereas the cognitive-predominant configuration remained weakly replicated. Harmonised indicators and rigorous external validation are needed before clinical application.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effectiveness of Multidomain Cardiac Rehabilitation After Myocardial Infarction by Patient Frailty: Prespecified Subgroup Analysis of the PIpELINe Trial.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is common among older patients surviving myocardial infarction, is associated with adverse outcomes, and is often perceived as a barrier to cardiac rehabilitation (CR). The aim of this study is to determine whether frailty influences prognosis after myocardial infarction, and whether frailty modifies the clinical benefit of multidomain CR. METHODS: We performed a prespecified subgroup analysis of the PIpELINe (Physical Activity Intervention in Elderly Patients With Myocardial Infarction) randomized clinical trial conducted in Italy, which enrolled 512 patients aged ≥65 years recovering from myocardial infarction and randomized them in a 2:1 ratio to CR or usual care. Frailty was assessed using the Fried Frailty Phenotype, and patients were categorized as nonfrail (robust) or prefrail/frail. Time-to-event outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models, including treatment-by-frailty interaction terms to evaluate effect modification of the multidomain CR. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death or unplanned hospitalization for cardiovascular causes within 1 year after randomization. RESULTS: Overall, 350 patients (68.4%) were classified as prefrail/frail, of whom 232 were randomized to intervention arm (66%). Frail patients were older (median age, 80 [75-85] years) and more frequently female (41.7% versus 24.7%). Compared with robust patients, prefrail/frail patients had a higher risk of the primary outcome (16 [9.9%] versus 62 [17.7%]; hazard ratio, 1.59 [95% CI, 0.89-2.82]; adjusted P=0.117). Among prefrail/frail patients, assignment to multidomain CR was associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome compared with usual care (hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.34-0.94]; P=0.028), with no statistically significant interaction in the treatment effect on the primary end point (P=0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Among older patients recovering from myocardial infarction, frailty is associated with worse prognosis but does not diminish the benefit of multidomain CR. These findings support the use of frailty assessment to guide rather than limit access to CR. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04183465.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Identifying biomarkers of accelerated ageing in cancer patients from routine clinical data.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer and ageing have a bidirectional relationship: age is the strongest risk factor for cancer, and cancer and treatments can accelerate ageing. Therefore, biological age can differ from chronological age; biomarkers are needed to stratify interventions to minimise accelerated ageing. METHODS: PhenoAge was calculated from routine blood test results of patients attending a Geriatric Oncology clinic. PhenoAgeAccel was the residual from a regression of PhenoAge against age. RESULTS: Data were available for 173 patients (62% male). Mean PhenoAge was higher than age (84.3 (12.6) vs 76.2 (7.24), p < 0.001), though the two were correlated (r = 0.579, p < 0.001). Unlike age, PhenoAge and PhenoAgeAccel were associated with one-year mortality (PhenoAge OR=1.083, 95% CI: 1.038-1.136; PhenoAgeAccel OR=1.096, 95% CI: 1.047-1.155). PhenoAge correlated with Clinical Frailty Score and Timed Up and Go (CFS: Rs=0.31, p < 0.001; TUG: Rs=0.25, p < 0.005); there were no correlations with age. PhenoAgeAccel correlated with the number of CGA interventions made (Rs=0.17, p < 0.05), unlike age and PhenoAge. Patients with diabetes mellitus had a higher PhenoAgeAccel compared to those without (3.40 vs -1.71, p = 0.002). In patients receiving systemic anti-cancer treatment, patients with PhenoAgeAccel calculated pre-treatment had less age acceleration than those with PhenoAgeAccel calculated post-treatment, both overall (2.18 vs -2.87; p = 0.048) and in matched samples (n = 21, 7.76 vs -2.87, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PhenoAgeAccel is a greater predictor of risk than chronological age in older people with cancer. This makes it a promising biomarker to stratify patients for holistic geriatric assessment, dose reductions, or future geroprotective measures which could be integrated within electronic healthcare record systems.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Beyond Glycaemia: Fear of Hypoglycaemia, Cognition and Functional Mobility After Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Therapy in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of a Randomised, Single-Centre Study.

BACKGROUND: Evidence on psychological, cognitive and functional outcomes of advanced diabetes technologies in older adults with long-standing type 1 diabetes (T1D) remains limited. We evaluated whether initiation of advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) therapy was associated with changes in fear of hypoglycaemia, diabetes distress, psychological well-being, cognition, frailty-related measures and mobility-related function in adults aged ≥ 65 years with T1D. METHODS: This prespecified, exploratory secondary analysis was conducted within a single-centre, open-label, randomised, controlled, parallel-group trial including adults aged ≥ 65 years with long-standing T1D. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to initiate AHCL therapy using the MiniMed 780G system or to continue standard diabetes treatment. The secondary outcomes included WHO-5, the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II (HFS-II), Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, Fried frailty phenotype and performance-based functional measures. No formal sample-size calculation was performed for these secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-one participants were randomised and 29 completed 12 months of follow-up and were included in the treatment-effect analyses. In the baseline-adjusted primary analysis, AHCL therapy was associated with a lower HFS-II score than standard treatment (adjusted mean difference -18.9; 95% CI: -32.4 to -5.4; nominal p = 0.008), although this finding did not remain statistically significant after Holm correction (adjusted p = 0.104) or in an exploratory model additionally adjusted for sex (difference -13.6; 95% CI: -32.2 to 5.0; p = 0.145). Diabetes distress, psychological well-being, global cognition and processing speed did not differ between groups. In sex-adjusted sensitivity analyses, the between-group differences remained statistically significant for 6-min walk distance (92.6 m; 95% CI: 36.8 to 148.3; p = 0.002) and Timed Up and Go performance (-2.27 s; 95% CI: -4.28 to -0.27; p = 0.028), but not for gait speed (0.27 m/s; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.59; p = 0.099). At 12 months, 12 of 14 AHCL participants were robust and 2 were pre-frail; in the control group, 11 of 15 were robust and 4 were pre-frail. No participant was classified as frail at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this small, selected cohort, AHCL therapy was associated with a nominally lower fear-of-hypoglycaemia score and better performance on selected mobility-related tests over 12 months. The fear-of-hypoglycaemia finding did not remain statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons or additional adjustment for sex. Six-minute walk distance and Timed Up and Go remained statistically significant in the exploratory sex-adjusted sensitivity analyses, whereas the gait-speed difference did not. No measurable between-group deterioration in global cognition or processing speed was observed. These exploratory findings require confirmation in larger studies with balanced representation by sex and direct measurement of physical activity. These findings also support a person-centred clinical message: older age alone should not be regarded as a barrier to AHCL when treatment is introduced with individualised education and appropriate ongoing support.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

New Evidence in Heart Failure: 2026 Update.

Heart failure (HF) remains a major cause of morbidity, mortality, impaired quality of life and healthcare expenditure worldwide. The global burden of HF continues to increase due to population aging, improved survival, and the growing prevalence of cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic comorbidities. Simultaneously, the pace of scientific progress in HF has accelerated considerably. Recent advances have refined our understanding of HF epidemiology, prognosis, and disease trajectories, including emerging concepts of HF improvement, remission, and recovery. The Second Universal Definition of HF has also updated the classification framework, moving beyond the traditional ejection fraction-based categories. HF is now broadly classified into two major phenotypes: heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Novel mechanistic insights highlight the role of inflammation, immune activation, metabolic dysfunction, mitochondrial biology, and multisystem interactions in HF progression. There has also been significant progress in the characterization and management of major comorbidities, including chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, obesity, atrial fibrillation (AF), pulmonary hypertension, frailty, malnutrition, and cancer. Diagnostic innovations include novel biomarkers, multi-omics technologies, artificial intelligence-based approaches, advanced imaging techniques, congestion assessment tools, and emerging digital health solutions. Important advances have occurred in specific HF aetiologies, including cardiomyopathies, cardiac amyloidosis (CA), myocarditis, arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AiCM), and Chagas cardiomyopathy. Therapeutic developments continue to reshape HF management across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction. Recent evidence has focused on optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy in HFrEF, expansion of evidence-based therapies in HFpEF, and growing roles for sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, finerenone, incretin-based therapies, and transcatheter valve interventions. Collectively, these advances support the transition from a predominantly phenotype-based approach towards a more personalized and biologically informed model of HF care, with the potential to further improve outcomes across the entire HF spectrum.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Oliceridine used for patient-controlled analgesia on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological tumour resection: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Oliceridine, a novel biased μ-opioid receptor agonist, is widely used perioperatively, yet limited data exists regarding its impact on postoperative quality of recovery. This study investigated the effect of oliceridine-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) on postoperative quality of recovery among patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological tumour resection. METHODS: Ninety‑four female patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic gynecological tumour resection were included. Patients were randomized to two groups: oliceridine group (loading dose 1.5 mg, PCIA 0.55 mg/kg) or sufentanil group (loading dose 10 μg, PCIA 3 μg/kg). The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) score on postoperative day 1. The secondary outcomes included the QoR-40 score, the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A) score, the Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illness and Loss of weight (FRAIL) index and adverse events within 3 postoperative days. RESULTS: Higher QoR-40 scores were found in the oliceridine group on postoperative day 1 (182.9 ± 3.1 versus 177.5 ± 3.9, p < 0.001). Compared with the sufentanil group, the oliceridine group showed better QoR-40 scores within 3 days after operation. No significant differences were observed in NRS pain scores or HADS-A scores between the two groups (all p > 0.05). However, the median FRAIL score in the oliceridine group was lower on postoperative day 2 (p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Oliceridine used in PCIA improves early postoperative recovery quality of patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological tumour resection. It provides analgesic effect comparable to sufentanil and lowers incidences of postoperative frailty, nausea and vomiting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR2400094271.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Sex Differences in Postoperative Recovery and Mortality After High-Risk Cardiac Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Post Hoc Analysis of the SUSTAIN-CSX Trial.

BACKGROUND: Sex-related differences after cardiac surgery remain controversial because women often present with higher baseline risk and complexity than men. We performed a post hoc propensity score-matched analysis of the SUSTAIN-CSX (Sodium Selenite Administration in Cardiac Surgery) trial to evaluate sex differences in mortality, postoperative complications, and recovery after high-risk cardiac surgery. METHODS: Of 1394 trial participants, 1386 had complete data. Women were matched 1:1 to men using nearest-neighbor propensity score matching based on age and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II), with exact matching on surgical category, yielding 327 female-male pairs. Prespecified sensitivity analyses adjusted for frailty, baseline hemoglobin, renal disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, previous myocardial infarction, preoperative medications, and baseline creatinine. RESULTS: In the primary matched analysis, 180-day survival did not differ between women and men (log-rank P=0.086; unadjusted hazard ratio, 1.80 [95% CI, 0.91-3.55]; P=0.091). In descriptive matched comparisons, women had numerically longer intensive care unit stay (median, 3 days [quartile 1, quartile 3 (Q1, Q3)=1, 6 days] versus 2 days [Q1, Q3=1, 5 days]) and hospital stay (median, 10 days [Q1, Q3=7, 18 days] versus 9 days [Q1, Q3=6, 16 days]; P=0.292), whereas major postoperative complications were similar. In adjusted sensitivity analyses accounting for the matched design and residual imbalance, female sex remained associated with longer intensive care unit stay (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.8 [95% CI, 1.2-2.9]; P=0.009) and hospital stay (adjusted IRR, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.0-1.9]; P=0.031). Mortality sensitivity analyses were model-dependent. CONCLUSIONS: In this propensity score-matched cohort of high-risk cardiac surgery patients, women showed a longer postoperative recovery trajectory in adjusted analyses, whereas mortality findings were sensitive to model specification and should be interpreted cautiously. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02002247.

Aged↗

PubMed2026

Impact of Commercial Artificial Intelligence on Radiologist Reading Time for Pulmonary Nodule Evaluation at Chest CT.

Background Chest CT is a primary method for identifying pulmonary nodules, yet interpreting scans remains time-intensive and demanding. Currently, artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to reduce reading times, but the effect of AI on reporting times in this setting is unknown. Purpose To evaluate the impact of a commercial AI software on radiologists' reading time for pulmonary nodule assessment on chest CT scans within a real-world clinical setting. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent chest CT examinations at a tertiary medical center between September 2021 and May 2024. The study period was divided into pre- and post-AI phases. The primary outcome was radiology reporting time. The association between AI implementation and reporting time was evaluated using a multivariable parametric Weibull shared frailty survival model adjusted for reader function, examination type, patient location, and requesting specialty, with clustering at the radiologist level. Interaction analyses assessed heterogeneity across prespecified subgroups. An exploratory extrapolation estimated projected workforce and financial impact. Results This study included 19 433 patients (mean age, 62 years ± 14.2 [SD]; 21 814 men; 39 323 chest CT examinations, 19 190 pre-AI, and 20 133 post-AI). AI implementation was associated with faster report completion (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.21; P < .001). The adjusted median reporting time decreased from 21.3 minutes pre-AI to 18.2 minutes post-AI (14.6% reduction; P < .001). Heterogeneity was observed across reader function (P < .001), examination type (P = .048), and requesting specialty (P = .03). The largest relative reductions were observed for CT thorax electrocardiogram-gated examinations (-41.1%; P < .001) and thoracic radiologists (-25.0%; P < .001), whereas emergency department examinations showed increased median reporting time (7.1%; P < .001). At institutional scan volumes (approximately 20 000-22 000 chest CT examinations annually), exploratory modeling suggested an approximate reduction of 0.5 full-time equivalent radiologist workload. Conclusion Implementation of commercial AI-assisted pulmonary nodule assessment on chest CT scans reduced radiologist reporting time in a real-world clinical setting. © The Author(s) 2026. Published by the Radiological Society of North America under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Iwasawa in this issue.

Humans↗