SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “clinical trials”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Network-Integrated Platform for Clinical Trial Navigation from the New South Wales Early Phase Clinical Trials Alliance.

PURPOSE: Access to early-phase clinical trials (EPCT) is increasingly constrained by delays in genomic testing and lack of coordinated system-level navigation. The New South Wales Early Phase Clinical Trials Alliance (NECTA) was established to improve EPCT access. Practical Assessment of NECTA Network Assistance in Cancer Outpatient Trials Access (PANNA-COTA) prospectively evaluated whether integrating circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiling with a real-time, cross-site molecular tumor board (MTB) facilitates EPCT enrollment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter prospective study across nine NECTA sites, patients referred for EPCT consideration underwent ctDNA testing using the Guardant360 74-gene assay. The results were reviewed at a fortnightly MTB incorporating cross-site trial mapping and dynamic eligibility review. The primary endpoint was proportion enrolled into EPCTs. Secondary endpoints included ctDNA findings and trial outcomes. RESULTS: Of 104 consented participants, 101 were eligible. Participants had advanced, heavily pretreated solid tumors; 48% lacked prior tumor next-generation sequencing. ctDNA alterations were detected in 85%, with actionable alterations in 44%. Therapeutic options were identified in 88%, and EPCTs were recommended in 76%. Despite this, only 7% of participants received genomically matched therapy. In contrast, 37% enrolled in EPCTs within 3 months and 47% overall [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.56]. Among evaluable participants on trial, the disease control rate was 81% and objective response rate was 33%. CONCLUSIONS: PANNA-COTA demonstrates that integrating liquid biopsy with real-time, network-level trial navigation enables high rates of EPCT enrollment despite low rates of genomically matched therapy. These findings indicate that clinical trial access is influenced by navigation, eligibility, and system-level coordination rather than genomic actionability alone.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A novel neoadjuvant immunotherapy confers improved overall survival in oral cancer patients with low tumor PD-L1 expression The IT-MATTERS Clinical trial - Prognostic role of tumor PD-L1 expression.

OBJECTIVE: Five-year overall survival (OS) remains < 50% for patients with resectable, locally advanced (LA) primary oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and soft palate, receiving current standard of care (SOC). The aim of our study was to examine neoadjuvant Leukocyte Interleukin Injection (LI) with CIZ (intravenous low dose cyclophosphamide, indomethacin and zinc multivitamins) effect on OS, in low-risk (LR) OSCC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a randomized, controlled Phase 3 trial, treatment-naïve locally advanced patients, with stage III/IVa OSCC and soft-palate cancer, had surgical tumor samples assessed for pre-defined thresholds of PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS). OS was analyzed using proportional hazard models for LI + CIZ + SOC vs SOC, in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. RESULTS: OS was superior in low risk (LR) patients receiving LI + CIZ + SOC compared to SOC; OS advantage hazard ratio (HR) 0.64, p = 0.0569 (without selecting for N0, PD-L1 TPS < 10%), and the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) lifetable achieved significance (log rank p = 0.0340) favoring LI + CIZ + SOC vs SOC. Applying the selection criteria (cN0 and TPS < 10%) to ITT, OS reached HR 0.34p = 0.0012, Kaplan-Meier log rank p = 0.0015. The ITT LR cohort (cN0 and TPS < 10%) achieved a HR 0.26 (p = 0.0023), Kaplan-Meier log rank p = 0.0013, supported by progression free survival (PFS) HR 0.43, p = 0.0178, Kaplan-Meier log rank p = 0.0431, with 32% absolute survival advantage over control at 60 months. CONCLUSIONS: Significant OS prolongation was observed in ITT population for LI + CIZ + SOC vs SOC, in LR and in ITT LR cN0, PD-L1TPS < 10% cohort having locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma tumors in oral cavity/soft-palate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01265849; EudraCT (Identifier: 2010-019952-35).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Addition of High-Dose Vitamin D3 to Standard Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The SOLARIS Randomized Clinical Trial (Alliance A021703).

IMPORTANCE: In a phase 2 randomized clinical trial, high-dose vitamin D3 added to standard treatment improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with standard-dose vitamin D3 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). OBJECTIVE: To determine if high-dose vitamin D3 added to standard chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with previously untreated mCRC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolling 455 patients with previously untreated mCRC, conducted in the US through the National Clinical Trials Network from October 2019 to December 2022 (database freeze: July 15, 2024). INTERVENTIONS: mFOLFOX6 (modified FOLFOX6 [5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin]) or FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab every 2 weeks with either high-dose vitamin D3 (8000 IU daily × 14 days as loading dose followed by 4000 IU daily) or standard-dose vitamin D3 (400 IU daily) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was PFS assessed by the unstratified log-rank test. Secondary end points included objective response rate, overall survival, and toxicity. Prespecified subgroup analyses of PFS were performed according to known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 455 randomized patients (median age, 59 years; 181 [40%] female) with median follow-up 20 months, the median PFS for high-dose vitamin D3 (n = 228) was 11.8 months (95% CI, 10.3-13.3) vs 10.3 months (95% CI, 9.4-12.2) for standard-dose vitamin D3 (n = 227) (1-sided log-rank P = .25). There were no significant differences in objective response rate between high-dose and standard-dose vitamin D3 (51% [95% CI, 44%-58%] vs 44% [95% CI, 37%-50%], respectively; P = .12), or in overall survival (median, 25.6 vs 27.0 months; 1-sided log-rank P = .66). There were no clinically meaningful differences in the most common grade 3 or greater adverse events between the high- and standard-dose groups, including neutropenia (n = 67 [32%] vs n = 62 [30%]) and hypertension (n = 42 [20%] vs n = 49 [23%]) or in incidence of vitamin D-associated toxicities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with previously untreated mCRC, addition of high-dose vitamin D3, vs standard-dose vitamin D3, to standard chemotherapy plus bevacizumab did not improve PFS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04094688.

Aged↗

PubMed2026

Subgroups and Special Populations in Heart Failure Clinical Trials: Insights From the HFC-ARC Expert Consensus Panel.

In the evolving landscape of heart failure (HF) management, the identification and analysis of subgroups and special populations within clinical trials are crucial for enhancing clinical decision-making, guiding further research, and understanding heterogeneity in study outcomes. This expert consensus document results from the collaborative efforts of the Heart Failure Collaboratory and the Heart Failure Collaboratory Academic Research Consortium, which brought together stakeholders from academia, industry, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and patient representatives. The purpose of this assembly was to propose standardized definitions and critical endpoint considerations essential for shaping the design and conduct of clinical trials for drugs and devices in the field of HF. In this context, we propose definitions and endpoints for specific subgroups and special populations in the spectrum of HF. We enhanced the precision, efficacy, and applicability of clinical research and promote more "personalized" approaches to interpretation of clinical trials. Furthermore, we explore the burgeoning field of gene therapy as a promising avenue for addressing the genetic basis of certain cardiomyopathies within these specialized patient groups. We focus especially on methodological considerations for subgroup analyses in large-scale trials, highlighting the importance of proper interpretation of subgroups and best practices for identifying heterogeneity suggestive of differential treatment effects, including when these analyses should be considered hypothesis-generating and requiring subsequent validation. We advocate for a methodical approach to clinical trial design, one that prioritizes the strategic identification of subgroups and employs appropriate statistical methodologies to ensure the reliability and clinical relevance of findings. Through this lens, we envision a pathway toward more personalized and effective treatments for HF, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes by leveraging the insights garnered from meticulously designed and comprehensively analyzed clinical trials.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Systemic Proteomic Alterations and Predictive Biomarkers of Paroxetine Response in Refractory Rosacea: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory cutaneous disorder characterized by persistent erythema and vascular dysregulation. While paroxetine has shown clinical efficacy in reducing these symptoms, the systemic molecular mechanisms underlying its therapeutic response remain poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: To investigate systemic proteomic alterations and identify potential predictive biomarkers in patients with refractory erythematous rosacea following paroxetine treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective plasma proteomic analysis was nested within a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (Prospective Rosacea Refractory Erythema Randomized Clinical Trial [PRRERCT]). Participants included patients aged 18 to 65 years with refractory rosacea (Clinician's Erythema Assessment [CEA] score ≥3). Plasma samples were collected at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. The data for this study were analyzed between September 2025 and November 2025. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received oral paroxetine, 25 mg per day, for a 12-week treatment period. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Systemic protein expression profiles were analyzed using data-independent acquisition liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Clinical response was evaluated using CEA and the Flushing Assessment Tool. Correlations between proteomic changes and clinical improvements were assessed, and predictive biomarkers were identified using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Among 24 participants (mean [SD] age, 35 [11] years; 24 [100%] female), paroxetine treatment significantly reduced mean (SD) CEA scores from 3.1 (0.3) to 2.3 (0.7) and Flushing Assessment Tool scores from 3.1 (0.6) to 2.0 (0.9) (P < .001). Exploratory proteomic analysis revealed 497 candidate differentially expressed proteins after treatment. Downregulated proteins showed preliminary enrichment in pathways related to immune response activation, insulin receptor signaling, and neuronal remodeling. A subset of 98 reversed-response proteins was observed, primarily linked to synaptic vesicle cycles and vascular smooth muscle contraction. Proteomic alterations were associated with clinical improvement (65 proteins for erythema; 73 for flushing). Candidate biomarkers, notably OLFML3 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.87 [95% CI, 0.70-1.00]) and IGFBP2 (AUC, 0.80 [95% CI 0.55-1.00]), demonstrated high predictive value for clinical response. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, paroxetine treatment was associated with modulation of systemic neuro-vascular-immune networks in patients with rosacea. These exploratory findings provide preliminary mechanistic clues regarding the possible disease-modifying potential of paroxetine and point to circulating protein signatures that may facilitate personalized therapeutic strategies for rosacea management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000031479.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Effects of sub-anesthetic doses of esketamine on immune function and postoperative negative emotions in acoustic neuroma patients: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing acoustic neuroma (AN) surgery often experience postoperative negative emotions, including anxiety, depression, and immune function suppression. This trial evaluated whether perioperative sub-anesthetic esketamine improves early postoperative negative emotions and immune function. METHODS: In this single-center, double-blind, randomized trial, 84 patients scheduled for AN surgery were assigned to esketamine (n = 42) or placebo (n = 42). The esketamine cohort received a continuous intravenous infusion of esketamine at 0.2 mg·kg-1·h-1 during anesthesia, followed by 1 mg·kg-1 esketamine as an adjuvant in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). The placebo group received saline. The primary outcome was the incidence of depression on postoperative day (POD1), defined as a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression subscale (HADS-D) score > 7. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients completed the study (39 in the esketamine group, 38 in the placebo group). Esketamine significantly reduced the incidence of depression at POD1 (7.7% versus 31.6%; relative risk 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08-0.80, p = 0.008) and POD3 (0.0% versus 15.8%, relative risk 0.00, 95% CI: 0.00-0.47, p = 0.031) compared with placebo. The incidences of anxiety on POD1 and 3 and sleep disturbances on POD1 were also significantly reduced (p < 0.05). Notably, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of immune function, postoperative pain scores, or intraoperative morphine equivalent. Adverse events did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: Perioperative sub-anesthetic esketamine reduced postoperative depression and anxiety, and improve sleep quality after AN surgery, without significant effects on early immune function or acute postoperative analgesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2400084537.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Oliceridine used for patient-controlled analgesia on postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological tumour resection: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Oliceridine, a novel biased μ-opioid receptor agonist, is widely used perioperatively, yet limited data exists regarding its impact on postoperative quality of recovery. This study investigated the effect of oliceridine-based patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) on postoperative quality of recovery among patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological tumour resection. METHODS: Ninety‑four female patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic gynecological tumour resection were included. Patients were randomized to two groups: oliceridine group (loading dose 1.5 mg, PCIA 0.55 mg/kg) or sufentanil group (loading dose 10 μg, PCIA 3 μg/kg). The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) score on postoperative day 1. The secondary outcomes included the QoR-40 score, the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A) score, the Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illness and Loss of weight (FRAIL) index and adverse events within 3 postoperative days. RESULTS: Higher QoR-40 scores were found in the oliceridine group on postoperative day 1 (182.9 ± 3.1 versus 177.5 ± 3.9, p < 0.001). Compared with the sufentanil group, the oliceridine group showed better QoR-40 scores within 3 days after operation. No significant differences were observed in NRS pain scores or HADS-A scores between the two groups (all p > 0.05). However, the median FRAIL score in the oliceridine group was lower on postoperative day 2 (p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Oliceridine used in PCIA improves early postoperative recovery quality of patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological tumour resection. It provides analgesic effect comparable to sufentanil and lowers incidences of postoperative frailty, nausea and vomiting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR2400094271.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Genotype-Guided Antidepressant Prescribing for Patients With Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: The effectiveness of pharmacogenetics to guide prescribing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for depression remains unclear, despite the well-established association between SSRI pharmacokinetics and genetic variation. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pharmacogenetic-guided prescribing of SSRIs improves treatment response in patients with depression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The ADOPT PGx (A Depression and Opioid Pragmatic Trial in Pharmacogenetics) Depression pragmatic randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 10, 2021, through April 27, 2024, at primary care, psychiatry, or family medicine clinics at enrolling sites throughout the US. Patients were aged 8 years or older and had experienced depression for 3 months or longer. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to genotype-guided SSRI prescribing (intervention group) or usual care (control group). Actionable drug metabolism phenotypes were defined as those for which pharmacogenetic clinical guidelines recommend alternative medication selection or dose adjustment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression T scores at 3 months among patients with the actionable phenotype. Secondary end points included adverse effect severity of SSRIs at 3 months and depression remission (measured with PROMIS depression scores and Patient Health Questionnaire-8 [PHQ-8] scores) at 6 months. RESULTS: This study of 1460 patients included 1239 adults (84.9%) (mean [SD] age, 40.6 [16.7] years) and 221 children (15.1%) (mean [SD] age, 14.6 [1.8] years). Most patients were female (1096 [75.1%]). A total of 692 patients (47.4%) had an actionable phenotype; 351 (50.7%) were assigned to the intervention, and 341 (49.3%) were assigned to usual care. At baseline, 463 of the 692 patients (66.9%) reported having depressive symptoms for more than 2 years, 603 (87.1%) were receiving pharmacologic treatment, and 354 (51.2%) were receiving nonpharmacologic treatment. At 3 months, no significant differences were observed between the intervention and usual care groups in change in PROMIS depression T scores (mean [SD] change, -4.3 [8.4] vs -4.0 [8.1]; P = .68), medication adverse effect burden (mean [SD] change, 8.2 [4.3] vs 7.8 [4.5]; P = .37), or Patient Health Questionnaire-8 score change (mean [SD] change, -3.3 [5.2] vs -2.7 [4.8]; P  = .13). However, at 6 months, the PROMIS depression T-score remission rate (score ≤16) was higher in the intervention group compared with the usual care group (153 of 317 patients [48.3%] vs 122 of 310 patients [39.4%]; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, genotype-guided prescribing of SSRIs did not improve control of depression symptoms at 3 months compared with usual care but was associated with higher depression remission rates at 6 months. These findings suggest a possible longer-term clinical benefit and indicate that future studies should focus on the durability and long-term impact of genotype-guided prescribing in the management of depressive symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04445792 (Master Protocol Research Program platform trial) and NCT05966155 (ADOPT PGx Depression trial).

Humans↗

PubMed2025

CancerTrialMatch: a computational resource for the management of biomarker-based clinical trials at a community cancer center.

MOTIVATION: The widespread implementation of next-generation sequencing in cancer care has enabled routine use of molecular and biomarker profiling. At our cancer center, as with many others, biomarker-based clinical trials are increasingly available to oncologists as potential treatment options via molecular tumor boards. To better support this effort, we developed CancerTrialMatch, a systematic approach to capture structured clinical trial data and match patients to trials based on their disease characteristics and sequencing profiles. RESULTS: CancerTrialMatch is an open-source application designed to streamline clinical trial curation and patient trial matching, while also enabling an institution's curated trial portfolio to be distributed across the institution for easy access to providers, care teams and researchers. It facilitates curating, updating, and searching for trials through a semi-automated interface built using R Shiny, MongoDB, and Docker. While much of the trial data is retrieved via the clinicaltrials.gov Application Programming Interface, certain items like biomarkers and disease subtypes are entered manually. The user inputs disease type using the OncoTree classification, and provides relevant biomarker details, such as mutations, copy numbers, fusions, and other disease-specific markers. This resource reduces the time required for institutional trial management and helps to identify potential clinical trials for patients, ultimately supporting larger clinical trial enrollment and enhancing the clinical application of precision oncology. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: CancerTrialMatch was implemented and tested on Windows 11 (64-bit, 32 GB RAM) using WSL2 with Ubuntu 22.04. Docker 27.0.3 and Docker Compose 2.28.1 were used to build images and containers. Users can build it by cloning the repo and following the README instructions and supplemental file (cancertrialmatchsupplemental.pdf) . The source code and example data are available in GitHub and Figshare at https://github.com/AveraSD/CancerTrialMatch and 10.6084/m9.figshare.28447367 respectively.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Desmodium styracifolium Total Flavone Capsules for Urolithiasis: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: No oral medication is currently approved for the management of urolithiasis. Guang Jing Qian Cao (Desmodium styracifolium total flavone capsules; hereinafter, Guang Jing), a traditional Chinese herbal extract, has shown clinical benefits for urolithiasis, but randomized clinical trials are needed to assess its effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether Guang Jing improves stone passage rates (SPRs) compared with placebo in adults with urolithiasis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 34 sites in China from December 2017 to April 2020. Participants included adults (aged 18-70 years) with diagnosed ureteral stones. Data analysis was conducted on November 4, 2020. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized 3:1 to receive oral Guang Jing (0.6 g) or matching placebo 3 times daily for 28 days, in addition to investigator-prescribed background medication. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was SPR by day 28, confirmed by computed tomography. Secondary outcomes included SPR by day 14, stone migration rate, and stone migration distance. Between-group comparisons were performed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for categorical outcomes and t tests for continuous outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 606 participants were randomly assigned to receive Guang Jing (n = 458) or placebo (n = 148). Their mean (SD) age was 43.0 (12.0) years, 474 (78.2%) were male, and the mean (SD) stone size was 0.6 (0.1) cm. The SPR by day 28 was significantly higher for the Guang Jing group compared with the placebo group (204 of 457 [44.6%] vs 50 of 148 [33.8%]; relative risk, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.03-1.69]; P = .03), with an absolute risk difference of 10.9 (95% CI, 2.0-19.7) percentage points. No significant between-group differences in SPR by day 14 (Guang Jing vs placebo: 133 [29.1%] vs 33 [22.3%]; P = .14) or stone migration distance (mean [SD], 29.5 [51.8] mm vs 29.7 [43.8] mm; P = .11) were observed. Adverse event rates were similar for the Guang Jing and placebo groups (88 [19.3%] vs 27 [18.2%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, treatment with Guang Jing significantly increased the expulsion of 5- to 10-mm ureteral stones by day 28, with a favorable safety profile. These findings suggest that Guang Jing may be an additional medical expulsive therapy option for appropriately selected patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR-IIR-17013275.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The Potential Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human Clinical Trials.

Despite currently available treatment options for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), some patients fail to achieve adequate disease control. Emerging evidence suggests that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may represent a promising therapeutic option. This systematic review and meta-analysis included four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one non-randomized clinical trial. Eligible studies evaluated patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with MSCs derived from human umbilical cord blood, autologous adipose tissue, and allogeneic bone marrow. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from inception to December 2025. Primary outcomes included the proportion of patients achieving ≥50% and ≥75% improvement from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and safety outcomes. The meta-analysis included 236 participants. The pooled EASI-50 response rate at week 12 was 46.76% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32.36% to 61.72%). EASI-75 response rates were 17.41% (95% CI: 5.56% to 43.03%) at week 12 and 23.97% (95% CI: 16.48% to 33.50%) at week 16. The pooled incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 26.86% (95% CI: 19.56% to 35.68%), with infections and infestations 7.97% (95% CI: 4.11% to 14.88%) and gastrointestinal disorders 3.52% (95% CI: 1.33% to 9.01%) being the most frequently reported. MSC-based therapy shows early promise as a potential treatment for moderate-to-severe AD, offering a possible alternative to traditional therapies. However, the current evidence is largely based on small clinical trials, underscoring the necessity for large-scale RCTs to establish the efficacy and safety of MSC-based therapy in broader patient populations.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Characterizing Time Toxicity in Lung Cancer Clinical Trials: Development and Application of a Novel Time Burden Metric.

PURPOSE: Participation in clinical trials imposes additional time commitments beyond routine care; however, trial-associated time toxicity (TT) remains underinvestigated and poorly characterized. The purpose of this study was to develop a scalable, procedure-based metric to quantify total time required for trial participation using the protocol schedule of events. We applied this framework to lung cancer clinical trials to estimate trial-associated burden and explore changes in TT over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Protocols for clinical trials associated with United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of oral lung cancer therapies were obtained from public sources. Using each protocol's schedule of events, study-mandated procedures were assigned time toxicity units (TTUs) based on standardized time estimates. TTUs for each procedure were multiplied by their frequency and summed for screening through cycle 5 to determine a trial's total time toxicity (TTT). Days with health care contact (DHC) were summed over the same period to determine total DHC (TDHC). Median (m) TTT and TDHC were compared between studies published in 2005-2014 and 2015-2024 to assess temporal trends. Two-sample Mann-Whitney U tests were used for nonparametric comparisons. RESULTS: Thirty-two phase-specific protocols from trials published between 2005 and 2024 were included. Among studies published in 2005-2014 (n = 7), the median TTT (mTTT) was 63.8 (41.8-109.3) versus 82 (50.3-139.5) in 2015-2024 (n = 25) (P = .042). Corresponding median TDHC values were 14 (10-21) versus 15 (11-44), respectively (P = .16). CONCLUSION: More contemporary studies demonstrated higher TTT, with significantly greater mTTT observed in studies published in 2015-2024 versus 2005-2014. TDHC demonstrated less sensitivity in capturing differences in time burden. These findings demonstrate the feasibility and practical applicability of the proposed TT framework for characterizing protocol-associated time burden. Prospective validation and broader implementation may help inform patients and encourage streamlined protocol development.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Family-Wise Error Rate Control in Clinical Trials With Overlapping Populations.

We consider clinical trials with multiple, overlapping patient populations that test multiple treatment policies specifically tailored to these populations. Such designs may lead to multiplicity issues, as false statements will affect several populations. For type I error control, often the family-wise error rate (FWER) is controlled, which is the probability to reject at least one true null hypothesis. If the joint distribution of the test statistics is known, the FWER level can be exhausted by determining critical values or adjusted-levels. The adjustment is typically done under the common ANOVA assumptions. However, the performed tests are then only valid under the rather strong assumption of homogeneous null effects, that is, when the null hypothesis applies to all subpopulations and their intersections. We show that under cancelling null effects, when heterogeneous effects cancel out in some or all subpopulations, this procedure does not provide FWER control. We also suggest different alternatives and compare them in terms of FWER control and their power.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Pitavastatin, Procollagen Pathways, and Plaque Stabilization in Patients With HIV: A Secondary Analysis of the REPRIEVE Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: In a mechanistic substudy of the Randomized Trial to Prevent Vascular Events in HIV (REPRIEVE) randomized clinical trial, pitavastatin reduced noncalcified plaque (NCP) volume, but specific protein and gene pathways contributing to changes in coronary plaque remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: To use targeted discovery proteomics and transcriptomics approaches to interrogate biological pathways beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), relating statin outcomes to reduce NCP volume and promote plaque stabilization among people with HIV (PWH). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a post hoc analysis of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, REPRIEVE randomized clinical trial. Participants underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA), plasma protein analysis, and transcriptomic analysis at baseline and 2-year follow-up. The trial enrolled PWH from April 2015 to February 2018 at 31 US research sites. PWH without known cardiovascular diseases taking antiretroviral therapy and with low to moderate 10-year cardiovascular risk were eligible. Data analyses were conducted from October 2023 to February 2024. INTERVENTION: Oral pitavastatin calcium, 4 mg per day. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Relative change in plasma proteomics, transcriptomics, and noncalcified plaque volume among those receiving treatment vs placebo. RESULTS: Among 558 individuals (mean [SD] age, 51 [6] years; 455 male [82%]) included in the proteomics assessment, 272 (48.7%) received pitavastatin and 286 (51.3%) received placebo. After adjusting for false discovery rates, pitavastatin increased abundance of procollagen C-endopeptidase enhancer 1 (PCOLCE), neuropilin 1 (NRP-1), major histocompatibility complex class I polypeptide-related sequence A (MIC-A) and B (MIC-B), and decreased abundance of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 10 (TRAIL), angiopoietin-related protein 3 (ANGPTL3), and mannose-binding protein C (MBL2). Among these proteins, the association of pitavastatin with PCOLCE (a rate-limiting enzyme of collagen deposition) was greatest, with an effect size of 24.3% (95% CI, 18.0%-30.8%; P < .001). In a transcriptomic analysis, individual collagen genes and collagen gene sets showed increased expression. Among the 195 individuals with plaque at baseline (88 [45.1%] taking pitavastatin, 107 [54.9%] taking placebo), changes in NCP volume were most strongly associated with changes in PCOLCE (%change NCP volume/log2-fold change = -31.9%; 95% CI, -42.9% to -18.7%; P < .001), independent of changes in LDL-C level. Increases in PCOLCE related most strongly to change in the fibro-fatty (<130 Hounsfield units) component of NCP (%change fibro-fatty volume/log2-fold change = -38.5%; 95% CI, -58.1% to -9.7%; P = .01) with a directionally opposite, although nonsignificant, increase in calcified plaque (%change calcified volume/log2-fold change = 34.4%; 95% CI, -7.9% to 96.2%; P = .12). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results of this secondary analysis of the REPRIEVE randomized clinical trial suggest that PCOLCE may be associated with the atherosclerotic plaque stabilization effects of statins by promoting collagen deposition in the extracellular matrix transforming vulnerable plaque phenotypes to more stable coronary lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02344290.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Harnessing metabolomics and proteomics in a clinical trial for pulmonary arterial hypertension: insights from post-hoc analysis of the REHAB-PH trial.

BACKGROUND: The significant clinical and molecular heterogeneity of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) poses challenges in identifying effective therapies. Advanced multidimensional profiling offers an opportunity to capture molecular responses and assess biomarker stability, yet its application in randomised trials remains limited. METHODS: We evaluated the multi-omic profiles of participants with PAH in a randomised, placebo-controlled trial of famotidine. Plasma metabolomic and proteomic profiling was performed at enrolment and 24 weeks. Baseline profiles were compared between treatment arms to assess randomisation balance. Intraclass correlation coefficients quantified within-subject stability over time. Linear regression models adjusting for age, sex, body mass index and PAH aetiology evaluated famotidine's molecular effects. False discovery rate was controlled for multiple comparisons. FINDINGS: For the 79 participants, baseline multi-omic profiles were similar between groups. At 24 weeks, 34 and 37 participants remained in the famotidine and placebo groups respectively. The placebo group showed high molecular stability, while greater variability was observed in the famotidine group. Famotidine treatment was associated with significant changes across 191 proteomic pathways (q-value <0.05), but no metabolomic changes remained significant after multiple-testing correction. INTERPRETATION: Integrating multi-omics into a prospective clinical trial is feasible and yields stable longitudinal profiles in the absence of intervention. While famotidine did not yield clinical benefit, associated proteomic changes illustrate how molecular profiling can reveal treatment-related biology and inform future trial design. These findings highlight the broader utility of multi-omics for evaluating drug responses and identifying molecular endotypes in PAH and beyond. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Mode of Death in Patients With Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: The FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: The mode of death in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains poorly understood and may vary by EF. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the mode of death according to EF and the treatment effect of finerenone on cause-specific mortality in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) randomized clinical trial, which evaluated clinical outcomes in 6001 patients with HF and EF greater than or equal to 40% randomly assigned to finerenone or placebo. The mode of death in relation to baseline EF categories (<50%, ≥50-<60%, and ≥60%) was examined, and the effect of randomized treatment on cause-specific death in Cox regression models was assessed. Data analysis was conducted between September 2024 and January 2025. INTERVENTIONS: Finerenone vs placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mode of death as centrally adjudicated by a clinical end points committee. RESULTS: Of 1013 patients (16.9%; median [IQR] age, 76 [69-82] years; 594 male [58.6%]) who died during median (IQR) follow-up of 32 (23-36) months, mode of death was ascribed to cardiovascular causes in 502 (49.6%), noncardiovascular causes in 368 (36.3%), and undetermined cause in 143 (14.1%). Of cardiovascular deaths, 215 (42.8%) were due to sudden death, 163 (32.4%) to HF, 48 (9.6%) to stroke, 25 (5.0%) to myocardial infarction, and 51 (10.2%) to other cardiovascular causes. The proportion of all-cause, cardiovascular, and sudden death was higher in those with EF less than 50%. The proportion of deaths related to HF was similar across EF categories, and the proportion of deaths due to myocardial infarction, stroke, and other cardiovascular causes was low regardless of EF. Randomization to finerenone did not significantly reduce death or cause-specific death compared with placebo in any EF category. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF in the FINEARTS-HF randomized clinical trial, higher proportions of cardiovascular and overall mortality in those with EF less than 50% were related principally to higher proportions of sudden death. A clear treatment effect of finerenone on cardiovascular or cause-specific mortality was not identified, although the trial was likely underpowered for these outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

TIDIER Trial: A Randomized, Phase II Clinical Trial of Time-Restricted Eating Versus Dietary Counseling to Improve the Effect of Radiotherapy.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

A translational framework for early-phase inner-ear gene therapy: clinical trial design, regulatory strategy, and ethical considerations.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hereditary hearing loss has historically been approached as a diagnostic category rather than a therapeutically modifiable disease. Recent advances in molecular genetics, cochlear gene delivery, and first-in-human clinical trials are changing that. This review summarizes contemporary progress in the genetics of hearing loss, with emphasis on emerging gene-based therapies, clinical trial design, regulatory and ethical considerations, and practical implications for otolaryngologists as biologic treatment enters clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Early clinical trials targeting OTOF -related DFNB9 deafness have demonstrated satisfactory safety profiles and meaningful auditory recovery, establishing the first proof-of-concept for cochlear gene therapy in humans, culminating in the April 2026 FDA approval of Otarmeni. Genetic diagnoses are increasingly informing prognosis, cochlear implant counseling, and therapeutic candidacy. Preclinical research continues to expand toward recessive, dominant, and syndromic hearing loss using gene replacement, antisense, RNA interference, and genome-editing strategies. Substantial challenges remain, including heterogeneous outcome measures, uncertain long-term efficacy, regulatory complexity, and inequitable global access. SUMMARY: The genetics of hearing loss is transitioning from a diagnostic modality to an interventional one. Widespread clinical impact will require advances in vector engineering, equitable implementation, multidisciplinary counseling, and integration with established rehabilitation pathways. For otolaryngologists, genetic literacy is becoming essential to contemporary hearing care.

Humans↗