Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Pacemaker”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Fundamentals of pacemakers ECG interpretation - part 2.

BACKGROUND: Modern pacemakers incorporate arrhythmia-response algorithms, ventricular pacing minimization protocols, and safety mechanisms that generate ECG patterns indistinguishable from pathological AV block, sensing malfunction, or device-mediated tachycardia. Failure to recognize these algorithm-driven signatures leads to unnecessary interventions, misdiagnosis, and inappropriate device reprogramming. This manuscript is the second in a two-part series on pacemaker ECG interpretation. METHODS: We conducted a narrative review of peer-reviewed literature and device-specific documentation on algorithm-driven ECG behavior, synthesizing evidence across arrhythmia recognition, upper rate physiology, ventricular pacing minimization, mode switching, safety mechanisms, and hysteresis algorithms. RESULTS: Pacemaker-mediated tachycardia produces regular paced wide-complex tachycardia locked at the upper tracking rate, initiated by any event with retrograde VA conduction. Ventricular tachycardia is identified by QRS morphology diverging from the known paced pattern, absent pacing spikes, and AV dissociation. Upper rate Wenckebach behavior mimics Mobitz type I AV block; 2:1 upper rate response mimics second-degree AV block. Ventricular pacing minimization algorithms produce isolated nonconducted P waves and prolonged AV intervals that simulate pathological conduction disease. Mode switching causes abrupt rate drops misidentified as output failure. Ventricular safety pacing generates a conspicuously short, fixed AV interval. Three discrete pacing artifacts reflect AV-sequential cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), ventricular safety pacing in CRT, or His-bundle pacing with backup RV output. Rate and AV hysteresis produce pauses and wandering AV intervals mimicking oversensing or Wenckebach periodicity. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing algorithm-driven ECG patterns requires knowledge of device timing intervals and refractory periods, which lets clinicians distinguish programmed behavior from true malfunction or cardiac arrhythmia.

Humans

Feasibility and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing guided by modified chest lead 1.

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) typically requires 12‑lead electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements using an electrophysiology (EP) recording system. However, a simplified approach using modified chest lead 1 (MCL1) is potentially feasible. This study aimed to compare the success rate and pacing outcomes of LBBAP guided by MCL1 with those guided by the 12‑lead ECG using an EP recording system. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study included patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction who underwent LBBAP for bradyarrhythmia. LBBAP was either guided by 12‑lead ECG using an EP recording system or by MCL1. In the MCL1 group, a follow-up examination with a 12‑lead ECG using an EP recording system was conducted within one week postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients underwent LBBAP (EP recording system group: n = 35; MCL1 group: n = 30). The overall success rate of LBBAP was 84.6%, with no significant difference between groups (88.5% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.49). No significant differences were observed in the paced QRS duration (140.4 ± 8.0 vs. 141.9 ± 13.1 ms, p = 0.54), V6-V1 interpeak interval (39.7 ± 16.5 vs. 38.3 ± 15.6 ms, p = 0.79), or V6 R-wave peak time (69.8 ± 12.3 vs. 71.5 ± 12.1 ms, p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: MCL1-guided LBBAP was feasible and achieved a high success rate, with outcomes comparable to those of conventional EP recording system-guided implantation. This simplified approach may reduce procedural complexity and may allow LBBAP implantation without the routine use of an EP recording system.

Humans