Feasibility and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing guided by modified chest lead 1.

Shiho Wakasa; Tomotaka Yoshiyama; Shun Hirayama; Kohei Fukuda; Tomoya Yanagishita; Yusuke Hayashi; Daiju Fukuda

doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2026.154404

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42391834

Feasibility and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing guided by modified chest lead 1.

Shiho Wakasa·Tomotaka Yoshiyama·Shun Hirayama·Kohei Fukuda·Tomoya Yanagishita·Yusuke Hayashi·Daiju Fukuda

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) typically requires 12‑lead electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements using an electrophysiology (EP) recording system. However, a simplified approach using modified chest lead 1 (MCL1) is potentially feasible. This study aimed to compare the success rate and pacing outcomes of LBBAP guided by MCL1 with those guided by the 12‑lead ECG using an EP recording system. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study included patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction who underwent LBBAP for bradyarrhythmia. LBBAP was either guided by 12‑lead ECG using an EP recording system or by MCL1. In the MCL1 group, a follow-up examination with a 12‑lead ECG using an EP recording system was conducted within one week postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients underwent LBBAP (EP recording system group: n = 35; MCL1 group: n = 30). The overall success rate of LBBAP was 84.6%, with no significant difference between groups (88.5% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.49). No significant differences were observed in the paced QRS duration (140.4 ± 8.0 vs. 141.9 ± 13.1 ms, p = 0.54), V6-V1 interpeak interval (39.7 ± 16.5 vs. 38.3 ± 15.6 ms, p = 0.79), or V6 R-wave peak time (69.8 ± 12.3 vs. 71.5 ± 12.1 ms, p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: MCL1-guided LBBAP was feasible and achieved a high success rate, with outcomes comparable to those of conventional EP recording system-guided implantation. This simplified approach may reduce procedural complexity and may allow LBBAP implantation without the routine use of an EP recording system.

Explore related subjects

Humans Female Cardiac Pacing, Artificial Electrocardiography Feasibility Studies Treatment Outcome Male Retrospective Studies Bundle-Branch Block Aged Bradycardia Left bundle branch area pacing Modified chest lead Pacemaker implantation Journal Article

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Shiho Wakasa, Tomotaka Yoshiyama, Shun Hirayama, Kohei Fukuda, Tomoya Yanagishita, Yusuke Hayashi, Daiju Fukuda. 2026-06-28. Feasibility and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing guided by modified chest lead 1.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2026.154404

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article resource Aged subject Feasibility Studies subject Female subject Humans subject Journal Article subject Male subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Conduction System Pacing Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block and Anticipated High Pacing Burden.

Right ventricular pacing (RVP) in patients with atrioventricular (AV) block and high anticipated pacing burden is associated with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) in approximately 12% to 20% of patients, whereas conduction system pacing (CSP) preserves more physiologic ventricular activation and may mitigate these consequences; the totality of contemporary randomized evidence has not been systematically pooled. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CSP with RVP in patients with AV block or anticipated high ventricular pacing burden and a minimum 6-month follow-up, with co-primary outcomes of PICM incidence and change in left ventricular ejection fraction (ΔLVEF) and secondary outcomes of heart failure hospitalization (HFH), all-cause mortality, composite clinical endpoint, and paced QRS duration (PROSPERO CRD420261400227); random-effects meta-analysis used DerSimonian-Laird estimation. Five RCTs (LBBP-FAVOUR, CSPACE, Prague CSP, PACE-HF, STAY; N = 806) met inclusion criteria. CSP significantly reduced PICM (hazard ratio [HR] 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18 to 0.48; p <0.001; I² = 0%; k = 4), was associated with greater LVEF preservation (pooled mean difference [MD] +4.41%, 95% CI +1.82 to +6.99; p = 0.001; I² = 87%; k = 5), and reduced HFH (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.48; p <0.001; I² = 0%; k = 5). CSP shortened paced QRS duration (MD -27.5 ms, 95% CI -32.6 to -22.5; p <0.001; k = 5). All-cause mortality was numerically lower with CSP but did not reach significance (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.12; p = 0.10; k = 4). In a prespecified sensitivity analysis restricting to multicenter trials with N ≥ 150, all findings were concordant with the primary analysis. In conclusion, CSP substantially reduces PICM, preserves LVEF, and reduces HFH compared with RVP in patients with AV block and anticipated high pacing burden, supporting its consideration as the preferred pacing strategy in appropriately selected patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Fundamentals of pacemakers ECG interpretation - part 2.

BACKGROUND: Modern pacemakers incorporate arrhythmia-response algorithms, ventricular pacing minimization protocols, and safety mechanisms that generate ECG patterns indistinguishable from pathological AV block, sensing malfunction, or device-mediated tachycardia. Failure to recognize these algorithm-driven signatures leads to unnecessary interventions, misdiagnosis, and inappropriate device reprogramming. This manuscript is the second in a two-part series on pacemaker ECG interpretation. METHODS: We conducted a narrative review of peer-reviewed literature and device-specific documentation on algorithm-driven ECG behavior, synthesizing evidence across arrhythmia recognition, upper rate physiology, ventricular pacing minimization, mode switching, safety mechanisms, and hysteresis algorithms. RESULTS: Pacemaker-mediated tachycardia produces regular paced wide-complex tachycardia locked at the upper tracking rate, initiated by any event with retrograde VA conduction. Ventricular tachycardia is identified by QRS morphology diverging from the known paced pattern, absent pacing spikes, and AV dissociation. Upper rate Wenckebach behavior mimics Mobitz type I AV block; 2:1 upper rate response mimics second-degree AV block. Ventricular pacing minimization algorithms produce isolated nonconducted P waves and prolonged AV intervals that simulate pathological conduction disease. Mode switching causes abrupt rate drops misidentified as output failure. Ventricular safety pacing generates a conspicuously short, fixed AV interval. Three discrete pacing artifacts reflect AV-sequential cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), ventricular safety pacing in CRT, or His-bundle pacing with backup RV output. Rate and AV hysteresis produce pauses and wandering AV intervals mimicking oversensing or Wenckebach periodicity. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing algorithm-driven ECG patterns requires knowledge of device timing intervals and refractory periods, which lets clinicians distinguish programmed behavior from true malfunction or cardiac arrhythmia.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Ultra-high-frequency ECG quantifies residual electrical dyssynchrony during left bundle branch area pacing in patients with wide QRS: a paired within-patient study.

BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may restore a more physiological pattern of ventricular activation in patients with conduction delay; however, QRS narrowing alone may incompletely characterize electrical resynchronization. Ultra-high-frequency ECG (UHF-ECG) provides quantitative markers of ventricular activation timing and dyssynchrony. OBJECTIVE: To quantify paired OFF-to-ON changes in conventional ECG and UHF-ECG metrics during LBBAP in patients with baseline wide QRS and to assess the relationship between paced R-wave peak time (RWPT) and residual UHF-ECG dyssynchrony. METHODS: In this prospective single-center paired study, 21 patients with bradycardia and baseline wide QRS underwent standard ECG and UHF-ECG assessment during intrinsic rhythm (pacing OFF) and during LBBAP (pacing ON). Endpoints included QRS duration, signed VED16, absolute VED16 (|VED16|), mean ventricular delay (meanVD), and a clinically interpretable distance-to-normal metric defined as dist = max(|VED16|-20, 0). Paired changes were summarized as medians with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals and tested using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Associations between paced RWPT and residual dyssynchrony during pacing were evaluated using Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients. RESULTS: LBBAP significantly narrowed QRS duration from 136.8 [130.2-153.6] ms during intrinsic rhythm to 116.0 [107.8-125.6] ms during pacing (median Δ -21.0 ms; 95% CI -33.9 to -18.6; p < 0.001). Signed VED16 did not change significantly (median Δ 0.4 ms; p = 1.000), consistent with the mixed conduction-phenotype composition of the cohort. In contrast, severity-oriented UHF-ECG endpoints improved: |VED16| decreased numerically (median Δ -5.2 ms; p = 0.070), whereas dist decreased significantly (median Δ -0.7 ms; 95% CI -14.4 to 0.0; p = 0.015). The proportion of patients within the normal dyssynchrony band (|VED16| ≤ 20 ms) increased from 7/21 (33.3%) to 12/21 (57.1%). Median paced RWPT was 66.6 [58.6-74.6] ms, and shorter RWPT correlated with lower residual |VED16| during pacing (Pearson r = -0.45, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with baseline wide QRS, LBBAP produces marked QRS narrowing, whereas UHF-ECG provides complementary quantification of residual electrical dyssynchrony. Severity-oriented UHF-ECG endpoints, particularly a distance-to-normal metric, may offer an interpretable mechanistic framework beyond conventional ECG alone. Shorter paced RWPT was associated with lower residual dyssynchrony during pacing, supporting physiological coherence between procedural and high-resolution electrocardiographic markers.

Humans↗