Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Major adverse cardiovascular events”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

702 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Major cardiovascular event risk of advanced therapies in inflammatory bowel diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic immune-mediated disorders (IMIDs), including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. While advanced therapies show cardioprotective effects in other IMIDs, their impact on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in IBD remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating MACE risk with advanced therapies in IBD. METHODS: Systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials identified 43 studies (36 RCTs, including 9 long-term follow-up (LTF) studies, and 7 observational studies) published between 2002 and 2024. Primary analyses estimated odds ratios (OR) for MACE comparing advanced therapy to placebo, with secondary analyses stratifying studies by drug class and length of follow-up. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using alternative methods to account for zero-event data. RESULTS: Placebo-controlled RCTs showed a nonsignificant trend toward reduced MACE risk (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.24-1.51), with similar findings across sensitivity analyses accounting for sparse and zero-event data. Class-specific trends suggested lower MACE risk with IL-12/IL-23 inhibitors (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.05-2.21), JAK inhibitors (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.16-2.06), and a potential increase with Anti-TNF agents (OR: 3.04; 95% CI 0.31-29.47), though none reached statistical significance. LTF studies showed consistent findings. Observational studies suggested lower MACE risk with Anti-TNF therapies (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.21-0.40), but not with IL-12/IL-23 (OR 4.41; 95% CI 0.49-39.28) or JAK inhibitors (OR 1.57; 95% CI 0.86-2.84). CONCLUSION: Advanced therapies did not demonstrate a clear increase or decrease in cardiovascular risk in IBD. The discrepancies between RCTs and observational studies underscore the urgent need for rigorous-designed observational research with long-term follow-up to evaluate the real-world impact of advanced therapies on MACE risk.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Rationale, design, and experiences from the vanguard phase of the bariatric surgery for the reduction of cardiovascular events (BRAVE) trial.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest that metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS) reduces mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with obesity, but adequately powered randomized trials (RCTs) are lacking. The Bariatric Surgery for the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events (BRAVE) trial was designed to address this evidence gap. METHODS: BRAVE is an investigator-initiated, multi-center, open-label RCT with blinded endpoint adjudication comparing MBS vs guideline-based medical weight management (MWM) in adults with obesity and high-risk cardiovascular disease (CVD). Eligible participants have a body-mass index ≥35 kg/m² or ≥30 kg/m² with type 2 diabetes or age >55 years, and prior myocardial infarction (MI), coronary intervention, heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF) with elevated CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral arterial disease. Participants are randomized 1:1 to MBS (sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, or duodenal switch) or MWM, which includes dietary, behavioral, and pharmacologic therapies. The primary outcome is the composite of all-cause death, MI, stroke, HF events, coronary revascularization, AF hospitalization, and renal events. A vanguard phase of 200 participants was implemented to optimize recruitment and logistics. RESULTS: As of October 2025, 2,514 individuals have been screened from 17 centers in Canada, Brazil, Italy and Spain, with 444 entered MBS work-up, and 200 have been randomized. The randomized cohort (mean age 59.8 years; 37% female; mean BMI 44.0 kg m⁻²) has high burden of hypertension (82%), diabetes (45%), coronary artery disease (44%), HF (39%), and AF (48%). Recruitment barriers were identified and addressed through targeted education and enhanced patient engagement. CONCLUSIONS: BRAVE is the first large RCT evaluating whether MBS safely reduces major cardiovascular events compared with medical therapy in high-risk patients with obesity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05531474.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Bempedoic Acid and First and Recurrent Limb Outcomes in Statin-Intolerant Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights From the CLEAR Outcomes Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at high risk of major adverse limb events (MALE) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Recently, bempedoic acid was shown to reduce MACE in primary and secondary prevention patients. Whether bempedoic acid reduces the risk of MALE in patients with PAD is unknown. METHODS: CLEAR Outcomes (Cholesterol Lowering via Bempedoic Acid [ETC1002], an ACL-Inhibiting Regimen) randomized 13 970 patients to bempedoic acid 180 mg or placebo from December 22, 2016, to August 14, 2019. The trial primary end point was MACE-4, defined as death resulting from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or coronary revascularization. A clinical history of PAD was reported by investigators at baseline. Two blinded vascular medicine specialists independently adjudicated MALE, including adverse events indicating worsening PAD symptoms leading to revascularization, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia. Outcomes were assessed as time to first event and total (including recurrent) events with a negative binomial approach. RESULTS: A total of 1624 of the enrolled patients (mean±SD age, 63.9±9.9 years; 915 [56.3%] female) had PAD at baseline. In patients with PAD in the placebo group, 69 (8.3%) had MALE over a median of 40.6 months, with rate of recurrent events of 4.0%/y. Bempedoic acid reduced the risk of MALE by 36% (hazard ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.44-0.93]; P=0.018). Bempedoic acid reduced total MALE by 45% (relative risk, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.35-0.85]; P=0.007). First MACE-4 or MALE was reduced overall by 13% (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.80-0.95]) with consistent effects with PAD (hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.64-1.04]) and without PAD (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.79-0.86]; Pinteraction=NS) but not statistically significant within the PAD subgroup alone. Total MACE-4 or MALE was reduced (relative risk, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.73-0.90]) overall with consistent effects in PAD (relative risk, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.54-0.95]) and without PAD (relative risk, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.73-0.92]; Pinteraction=NS). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PAD are at high risk of MALE and MACE. Bempedoic acid reduces both MACE and MALE in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease, with notable absolute benefits in patients with PAD. These findings support (1) the importance of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with PAD to reduce overall vascular risk and (2) the benefits of bempedoic acid in this population.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Ultrashort vs Standard-Duration Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Undergoing PCI: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of ultrashort (&#x2264;1-month) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by antiplatelet monotherapy remain uncertain in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare ultrashort vs standard-duration DAPT in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials until February 15, 2026. Primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), major bleeding, and net adverse clinical event (NACE). Prespecified subgroup analyses examined by ethnicity (East Asian vs non-East Asian) and abbreviation strategy (intensive: &#x2264;1-week DAPT or clopidogrel/aspirin monotherapy vs moderate: &#x2265;2-week DAPT, followed by ticagrelor/prasugrel monotherapy). RESULTS: Across 10 trials (n = 29,232), ultrashort DAPT did not increase MACCE risk (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.93-1.20; P = 0.38; I2 = 24%), with higher MACCE risk observed in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) but not non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS), and significantly reduced major bleeding (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.35-0.64; P < 0.00001; I2 = 44%), resulting in a net clinical benefit (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72-0.97; P = 0.02; I2 = 61%). Bleeding reduction was more pronounced in East Asians (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.25-0.49; P < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) than non-East Asians (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.43-0.93; P = 0.02; I2 = 44%), with a significant interaction (P = 0.02). The abbreviation strategy significantly modified outcomes (P for interaction = 0.003): intensive abbreviation raised MACCE risk (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.11-1.69; P = 0.003; I2 = 0%), while moderate abbreviation had no statistically significant difference (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.85-1.08; P = 0.47; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, ultrashort DAPT reduced bleeding without increasing ischemic events overall, although a signal of increased MACCE was observed in STEMI but not in NSTE-ACS. Bleeding reduction was greater in East Asians, while &#x2264;1-week DAPT or clopidogrel/aspirin monotherapy may increase ischemic risk.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Impact of Diabetes on Outcomes of Contemporary PCI Guided by OCT vs Angiography: The ILUMIEN IV Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes are at higher risk for adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with patients without diabetes. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the influence of diabetes and complex lesions on the outcomes of patients undergoing PCI with and without optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance during a follow-up period of 2 years. METHODS: Patients in ILUMIEN IV randomized to OCT-guided vs angiography-guided PCI were grouped into those with (n = 1,044) and without diabetes (n = 1,443). Study endpoints were target vessel failure (TVF) and serious major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). RESULTS: After adjustment for differences in clinical and angiographic characteristics, the 2-year rates of both TVF (9.9% vs 6.3%; adjusted HR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.09-2.02; P = 0.01) and serious MACE (5.3% vs 2.7%; adjusted HR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.14-2.76; P = 0.01) were increased in diabetic compared with nondiabetic patients, consistently in patients with and without complex lesions (Pinteraction = 0.22 and 0.14, respectively), although the highest 2-year rates were in patients with diabetes and complex lesions. In all randomized patients, OCT guidance compared with angiography guidance did not reduce TVF or serious MACE. These effects were consistent in patients with and without diabetes (Pinteraction = 0.41 and 0.20, respectively), and were not modified by treatment of complex lesions. CONCLUSIONS: In the large-scale ILUMIEN IV trial, patients with diabetes remained at increased risk for adverse events after PCI compared with nondiabetic patients despite the use of OCT procedural guidance. Patients with diabetes and complex lesions were at particularly high risk for adverse outcomes after PCI.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Comparative safety of lipid-lowering drugs alone or in combination: insights from a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although the safety profile of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) is known, there are no comprehensive comparative assessments. We aimed to compare the risk of muscle-related events, diabetes, liver dysfunction, and cognitive disorders among LLTs through a network meta-analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Databases were searched from inception to May 2025. Eligible studies included adult patients, using statins, ezetimibe, PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9mAbs), inclisiran, bempedoic acid, or their combinations as intervention, reporting the information about any of the selected adverse events, a total sample size of &#x2265;200 subjects, and had &#x2265;1 month of intervention. Pooled estimates were assessed by fixed effects model within a frequentist setting. Pooled relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence interval were estimated. A total of 303,397 subjects from 153 RCTs were included. Bempedoic acid ranked the lowest risk of myalgia (vs PCSK9mAbs, RR 0.80 [0.69, 0.93]). PCSK9mAbs were associated with lower incidence of creatine kinase (CK) elevation, diabetes, and liver dysfunction comparing to statins (statins vs PCSK9mAbs, RR 1.44 [1.14, 1.81], RR 1.13 [1.05, 1.22], and RR 1.38 [1.17, 1.62], respectively). In terms of muscle-related events and cognitive disorders, no significant risk differences were found among treatments and their combinations. CONCLUSIONS: PCSK9mAbs appear to have a more favourable safety profile regarding the risk of CK elevation, diabetes, and liver dysfunction. Bempedoic acid seem to be a better choice for subjects with high risk of myalgia. This information can be valuable when selecting therapy for specific patient subgroups at higher risk of certain adverse events.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Effect of Semaglutide on the Inflammatory Biomarker High-Sensitivity CRP in Patients With Established Cardiovascular Disease and Overweight or Obesity in SELECT: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis.

BACKGROUND: In SELECT (Semaglutide Effects on Heart Disease and Stroke in Patients With Overweight or Obesity), among 17&#x2009;604 patients with known atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity, but not diabetes, randomization to the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist semaglutide significantly reduced the primary outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) compared with placebo (mean follow-up, 39.8 months). Inflammation, as indicated by plasma hsCRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) level, is implicated as a biomarker predicting cardiovascular risk in obesity and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. SELECT provides a unique opportunity to study the relationship among hsCRP, obesity, weight loss, and MACE outcomes in semaglutide versus placebo groups. METHODS: In this prespecified SELECT substudy, we evaluated whether baseline hsCRP levels predicted MACE risk and examined the relationships between changes in hsCRP levels and time to first MACE, baseline body weight, weight loss, and other clinical measures among treatment groups over time (104, 208 weeks) using multiple approaches, including Cox modeling. RESULTS: Baseline hsCRP level, which was similar in the semaglutide (geometric mean 1.96 mg/L) and placebo (geometric mean 1.91 mg/L) groups, was prognostic of future MACE. The risk of MACE increased across baseline hsCRP level <2, 2-<10, and &#x2265;10 mg/L subgroups, including significant associations with cardiovascular and all-cause death. Semaglutide reduced hsCRP levels (-37.8% [104 weeks]) and risk of MACE across all hsCRP subgroups. Greater reductions in ratio-to-baseline hsCRP with semaglutide were associated with greater weight loss, but preceded major weight loss, evident by 4 and 8 weeks, and occurred among those without weight loss. Semaglutide-associated changes in hsCRP were independent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, statin use, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease entry criteria. hsCRP reductions were found to be prognostic of decreased risk of MACE. Modeling suggests decreased inflammation as contributing in part to the benefits seen with semaglutide in SELECT. CONCLUSIONS: In SELECT, hsCRP data at baseline and in response to treatment with semaglutide support inflammation as a potential prognostic factor associated with cardiovascular risk in these generally well-treated patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and overweight or obesity but not diabetes. These findings suggest that the MACE reduction observed with semaglutide versus placebo in SELECT may have partially involved a decrease in inflammation. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03574597.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of revascularization in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia by kidney function.

BACKGROUND: The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unknown. We evaluated whether the efficacy and safety of surgical vs endovascular revascularization differ by kidney function. METHODS: In this post hoc secondary analysis of BEST-CLI trial (NCT02060630), 1,704 patients with CLTI were stratified by baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m&#xb2;): non-CKD (eGFR &#x2265; 90), mild-moderate CKD (eGFR 45-89), advanced CKD (eGFR < 45 or dialysis). The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse limb events (MALE) or death. We estimated the difference in restricted mean time lost (RMTL, in days) adjusted for inverse probability treatment weights. RESULTS: Surgical revascularization was significantly associated with fewer days with MALE or death in non-CKD (RMTL difference: -127.8 days; 95% CI -176.1, -79.6) and mild-moderate CKD (-63.2 days; 95% CI -104.7, -21.8) but not in advanced CKD (-16.4 days; 95% CI -78.8, 46.0; P interaction = .02). This attenuation reflected a diminishing mortality benefit with more severe CKD (P interaction = .01), whereas the association with fewer days with MALE remained consistent across CKD strata (P interaction = .34). Major adverse cardiovascular events and serious adverse events were more common with more severe CKD but did not differ significantly by treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical vs endovascular revascularization was consistently associated with fewer days with MALE across CKD strata. However, its association with mortality varied by kidney function, attenuating the overall benefit for the composite endpoint of MALE or death. These results support individualized revascularization strategies, but require prospective confirmation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The BEST CLI trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02060630).

Humans↗
PubMed2026

A polygenic risk score for peripheral artery disease and major adverse limb events.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Large-scale genome-wide association studies have identified common genetic variants that predict the risk of peripheral artery disease (PAD). This study assessed whether a polygenic risk score (PRS) is associated with PAD and the incidence of major adverse limb events (MALE) independent of clinical risk factors in patients with established cardiometabolic disease. METHODS: A genetic analysis was performed, pooling individual patient-level data from six TIMI trials. The association of a recently validated PAD PRS with prevalent PAD and the incidence of MALE (acute limb ischaemia, chronic limb-threatening ischaemia, major amputation, or peripheral revascularization) was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 68 816 patients were included in this analysis, with a median follow-up of 2.6 years. Of these, 5986 (8.7%) had known PAD at baseline. After adjusting for clinical risk factors, a higher PAD PRS was independently associated with a 15% greater odds of prevalent PAD (adjusted odds ratio per 1-SD: 1.15 [95% confidence interval 1.12-1.18], P < .0001), a magnitude of risk as strong as established clinical risk factors. A total of 577 patients experienced MALE during follow-up. A higher PAD PRS was associated with a 30% increased risk of MALE (adjusted hazard ratio per 1-SD: 1.30 [1.19-1.42], P < .0001). Adding the PAD PRS to clinical risk factors resulted in a statistically significant but modest improvement in discrimination (area under the curve went from 0.651 to 0.662 P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In a broad spectrum of patients with cardiometabolic disease, the PAD PRS is associated with an increased risk of PAD and the incidence of MALE beyond clinical risk factors; however, the improvement in discrimination was statistically significant but clinically modest.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Impact of subthreshold troponin levels and temporal trends on short term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients discharged from the emergency department: a RACE-IT trial substudy.

BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assays enable early exclusion of myocardial infarction in the emergency department. However, the clinical implications of detectable troponin values below the 99th percentile upper reference limit (4-18 ng/L) remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between subthreshold troponin levels and 30-day outcomes in patients from the RACE-IT trial, using exact troponin values when available. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis of the RACE-IT stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial included patients with troponin&#x2009;&#x2264;&#x2009;18 ng/L across nine EDs. Patients were stratified by initial troponin, peak value, absolute change, and percent change. The primary outcome was a 30-day composite of all-cause death, acute MI, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass grafting. Logistic regression analysis after adjusting for age, sex, race, and coronary artery disease was performed. RESULTS: Among 19,194 patients with troponin&#x2009;&#x2264;&#x2009;18 ng/L, 117 (0.6%) experienced the composite outcome. Higher troponin levels were associated with increased event rates in unadjusted analyses. Adjusted analyses showed no independent associations overall, though patients whose highest troponin values fell within the&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;11-&#x2009;&#x2264;&#x2009;18 ng/L range continued to demonstrate significantly worse outcomes than those with lower peak levels. Elevated troponin values correlated with older age, male sex, and greater comorbidity burden. CONCLUSION: In this post-hoc analysis of patients with troponin values below the 99th percentile URL, absolute levels and temporal changes were not independently associated with 30-day adverse outcomes. These findings support the use of subthreshold troponin values in rapid rule-out protocols, emphasizing the need to consider clinical context and comorbidities in risk assessment.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Effect of semaglutide on kidney outcomes in the SELECT, FLOW, and SOUL trials: a prespecified pooled analysis.

BACKGROUND: The GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide reduces clinically important kidney outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to assess the pooled effects of semaglutide on kidney outcomes in prespecified analyses of participant-level data from the diverse populations of the SELECT, FLOW, and SOUL randomised placebo-controlled trials. METHODS: Participants with CKD (FLOW) or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (SELECT and SOUL) were randomly assigned semaglutide (once-weekly subcutaneous 1&#xb7;0 mg [FLOW], once-weekly subcutaneous 2&#xb7;4 mg [SELECT], or once-daily oral 14 mg [SOUL]) or matching placebo, added to standard of care. The primary outcome in this pooled analysis was time to first occurrence of a kidney composite, defined as onset of persistent 50% or greater reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), kidney failure (persistent eGFR <15 mL/min per 1&#xb7;73 m2, or initiation of kidney replacement therapy), kidney-related death, or cardiovascular-related death. Safety was also assessed. FINDINGS: The pooled participants from the trials (N=30&#x2008;787) had a mean follow-up of 39&#xb7;5-47&#xb7;5 months. Among participants assigned to semaglutide, 973 first events of the primary kidney composite occurred compared with 1134 first events for placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0&#xb7;84 [95% CI 0&#xb7;77-0&#xb7;91]). First events of a narrower secondary kidney composite (excluding cardiovascular-related death from the primary outcome) were also reduced with semaglutide versus placebo (347 and 416, respectively; 0&#xb7;80 [0&#xb7;69-0&#xb7;92]). Safety outcomes were overall similar between groups, and in line with other GLP-1 receptor agonist trials. Serious adverse events were numberically lower with semaglutide than with placebo. INTERPRETATION: Data pooled from three large phase 3 trials suggest that semaglutide reduces the risk of major kidney outcomes in a broad population with cardio-kidney-metabolic disease while having a favourable risk-benefit profile. In people with cardio-kidney-metabolic disease, with and without diabetes, semaglutide (oral or injected) prevents kidney-related and cardiovascular complications and induces adverse events in line with GLP-1 receptor agonist studies, regardless of baseline characteristics within the cardio-kidney-metabolic spectrum. This was a participant-level analysis conducted in a large database of three randomised controlled trials of similar design and examining the same treatment, but there were some differences in participants' baseline characteristics, and in the dose and route of administration of treatment. This pooled analysis adds evidence for the benefit of GLP-1 receptor agonists in general, and semaglutide in particular, in a broad population of people with cardio-kidney-metabolic disease, suggesting that the benefit of semaglutide might not be explained only by its glycaemic effects, weight-management effects, or both. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Medication safety in older adults in India: an integrative PhD synthesis of direct evidence and contextual implementation evidence.

BACKGROUND: Unsafe medication practices among older adults are an important global health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where multimorbidity, fragmented care, self-medication, and informal healthcare provision intersect. OBJECTIVE(S): To synthesize direct evidence on medication safety among older adults in India and contextual evidence on deprescribing and community-level provider interventions relevant to safer medication use. METHODS: This PhD synthesis integrates four studies: a record-based cross-sectional study on polypharmacy and cardiovascular autonomic function in Kolkata; a six-city community study of 600 Indian older adults; a systematic review and meta-analysis on deprescribing preventive medications in frail or end-of-life older adults; and a systematic review of informal healthcare provider interventions in low- and middle-income countries. Studies I-II provided direct Indian older-adult evidence, while Studies III-IV provided indirect contextual evidence for their optimization and implementation. RESULTS: Polypharmacy was associated with higher anticholinergic burden and numerically higher cardiac autonomic neuropathy although residual confounding limits causal interpretation. In the multicity study, one-third had polypharmacy, while potentially inappropriate medications, prescribing omissions, and self-medication were common. Risks were higher with multimorbidity, recent hospitalization, care transitions, or living alone. Deprescribing showed no statistically significant increase in mortality, hospitalization, or major cardiovascular events, but heterogeneity was high and certainty low to very low. Informal-provider interventions showed the potential to improve knowledge, referral, case management, and medication-related practices. CONCLUSIONS: Medication safety among older adults in India requires an integrated continuum approach, but direct evidence supports only some components and implementation strategies that need prospective evaluation.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Higher versus Routine Intraoperative Blood Pressure Targets in Noncardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies consistently link intraoperative hypotension to adverse postoperative outcomes, leading guidelines to recommend maintaining mean arterial pressure 60 to 65 mmHg or greater during noncardiac surgery. Whether targeting higher intraoperative blood pressure values improves clinical outcomes remains uncertain. METHODS: The authors conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses-guided search on PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Embase from inception to April 2026. Randomized trials comparing higher intraoperative blood pressure targets, either as fixed absolute thresholds or personalized to preoperative baseline, versus routine blood pressure management in adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery with general anesthesia were included. Outcomes included in-hospital or 30-day mortality, postoperative delirium, acute kidney injury (AKI), 30-day major cardiovascular events, acute myocardial injury, stroke, length of stay, and intraoperative hypotension. RESULTS: Fifteen trials (15,603 patients) were included. Higher targets did not reduce AKI (risk ratio [RR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.06; P = 0.36; I 2 = 16%) or acute myocardial injury (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.12; P = 0.59; I 2 = 0%) compared with routine targets, with firm evidence from trial sequential analysis. Higher targets were associated with a significant reduction in postoperative delirium (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.98; P = 0.04; I 2 = 26%), although trial sequential analysis indicated the cumulative evidence remained insufficient to draw firm conclusions. No significant effect was observed on in-hospital or 30-day mortality (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.34; P = 1.00; I 2 = 0%); evidence on 30-day major cardiovascular events, stroke, and length of stay was similarly insufficient to draw firm conclusions. CONCLUSION: In adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery, targeting higher intraoperative blood pressure values does not improve major postoperative outcomes compared with routine management. A potential reduction in postoperative delirium warrants confirmation in adequately powered trials.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: A GRADE-assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a common atherosclerotic disorder characterized by progressive arterial narrowing in the limbs. This study aims to determine the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, focusing on major cardiovascular events, limb outcomes, and bleeding risks. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized comparative studies that compared rivaroxaban, either alone or in combination with aspirin, to placebo or standard care such as antiplatelet therapy. Risk ratios and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were pooled using R v4.5.1 with an appropriate random-effects model applied. Subgroup analyses were performed according to rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus rivaroxaban alone. RESULTS: A total of 39,991 participants across 6 studies were included. Compared with control, use of rivaroxaban was linked to a significant reduction in composite efficacy outcomes (relative risk [RR] = 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.91, P < 0.001), risk of acute limb ischemia (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.78, P < 0.001), and thromboembolism (RR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.38-0.97, P = 0.037). Although rivaroxaban plus aspirin failed to show a significant reduction in the risk of amputation, rivaroxaban alone reported a significant risk reduction (RR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.85, P = 0.003). However, its use was associated with a significantly higher risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.54, 95% CI 1.38-1.72, P < 0.001) and International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis-defined bleeding (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.19-1.76, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed for stroke, myocardial infarction, major adverse limb events, fatal bleeding, mortality, or cardiovascular mortality. CONCLUSION: Rivaroxaban-based therapy reduced the trial-defined composite efficacy outcome, acute limb ischemia, and thromboembolism in patients with PAD, but increased the risk of major bleeding. These findings support individualized use of rivaroxaban-based therapy in carefully selected patients, balancing ischemic and limb-protective benefits against bleeding risk.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Artificial intelligence-derived myocardial fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance for prognosis in cardiomyopathy: A systematic review of a sparse evidence base.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial fibrosis on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), assessed by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and parametric mapping, is an established predictor of adverse events in cardiomyopathy. We assessed whether artificial intelligence (AI) quantification of fibrosis adds independent prognostic value. METHODS: We searched six databases, a clinical-trials register, and a preprint server from inception to 13 June 2026. Eligible studies used AI to generate a fibrosis marker in adults with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy, with covariate-adjusted outcomes over &#x2265;12 months. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST, PROBAST+AI, and QUIPS. Fewer than three comparable studies precluded meta-analysis; certainty was rated using GRADE. RESULTS: Of 448 records (381 after de-duplication), 18 full texts were reviewed and two included, one peer-reviewed and one preprint. In an ischemic-cardiomyopathy registry (Ghanbari et al.; n = 216 analytic, 26 events), AI-derived dense LGE scar predicted arrhythmic events (univariable hazard ratio [HR] 2.35, 95% CI 1.33-4.15), and AI-derived but not manual scar improved discrimination beyond guideline criteria (area under the curve 0.63 to 0.68; p = 0.02). In a nonischemic dilated-cardiomyopathy preprint (Kim et al.; n = 347, 119 events), automated extracellular volume &#x2265;30% predicted cardiovascular death or heart-failure hospitalization (adjusted HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.32-3.03). Both were at high risk of bias, with data-derived thresholds and no external validation. CONCLUSIONS: Across only two studies, AI-derived fibrosis was independently associated with adverse cardiovascular events, but its added value over manual quantification remains unproven. Certainty was very low. The evidence base is sparse and not yet ready for clinical use.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Safety Profile of the Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Celecoxib in the Short-Term Management of Acute Non-cancer Pain: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To summarise the literature regarding the safety of short-term use of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug&#xa0;(NSAID) celecoxib. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised trials. Participants comprised individuals of all ages with acute non-cancer pain. Interventions included celecoxib at 200-400 mg/day for up to 10 days. The comparators were placebo, other NSAIDs (including cyclooxygenase-2 [COX-2] inhibitors and non-selective NSAIDS [nsNSAIDS]), or opioids. DATA SOURCES: Five databases were searched from inception to April 2025: Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus. Additionally, a registry was searched: ClinicalTrials.gov. DATA SYNTHESIS: Meta-analyses using Mantel-Haenszel and random-effects model were used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for severe cardiovascular, respiratory, and gastrointestinal adverse events and secondary outcomes. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomised trials (RoB-2) was used to assess bias risk. The Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was conducted to assess the certainty of evidence of each reported outcome. RESULTS: Title/abstract and full text screening comprised 3976 and 273 studies, respectively. Fifty studies were included with 10,693 participants. The RRs for adverse events were no different between celecoxib and placebo for severe events (3 studies) (RR 0.44 [95% CI 0.10-2.03]), cardiovascular (3 studies) (RR 0.84 [95% CI 0.24-2.92]), respiratory (4 studies) (RR 1.23 [95% CI 0.29-5.26]), and gastrointestinal events (33 studies) (RR 0.96 [95% CI 0.64-1.43]). There was no difference between celecoxib and NSAIDS for gastrointestinal adverse events, RR 0.89 (95% CI 0.68-1.17). Celecoxib had a lower risk compared to opioids for gastrointestinal events, RR 0.34 (95% CI 0.14-0.86), and showed a lower risk of nausea compared with placebo, RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.60-0.93), and nsNSAIDS, RR 0.80 (95% CI 0.64-0.99). Most studies had some risk of bias concerns, and the overall certainty of evidence for most outcomes was very low. Celecoxib appears to be safe for acute non-cancer pain when compared to placebo, NSAIDS, and opioids. It had a lower risk compared to opioids for gastrointestinal adverse events in general, nausea and vomiting, as well as a lower risk for nausea adverse events when compared to placebo and nsNSAIDS. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO-CRD42025642152.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2026

Glucocorticoid receptor antagonism in major depressive disorder with childhood trauma: a randomized controlled trial.

Childhood trauma (CT) is a key risk factor for major depressive disorder (MDD) onset and persistence. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation may underlie this link, and preclinical studies suggest glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonism can reverse early life stress effects. This study tested whether the GR antagonist mifepristone reduces depressive symptoms in adults with MDD and CT. The RESET-medication study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating a 7-day course of mifepristone (1200 mg/day) or placebo in 158 adults with MDD and CT, assessed at baseline, 1 week, 6 weeks (primary endpoint), 3 months, and 6 months. The primary outcome was depressive symptom severity (IDS-SR) at week 6; secondary outcomes included symptom severity at other timepoints, clinical response, remission, anxiety, sleep, stress, disability, and salivary cortisol. At week 6, depressive symptoms declined in both groups, with no significant difference between mifepristone and placebo (b=-0.25, d=-0.03, 95% CI [-0.42, 0.36], pnom=0.887), and no group differences were found for secondary outcomes. Morning and evening cortisol were significantly higher with mifepristone at week 1, consistent with GR antagonism, but not at week 6. Adverse events were more frequent with mifepristone; mild and severe events occurred significantly more often, while the proportion reporting at least one adverse event was numerically higher but not statistically significant (93.6%vs. 82.5%, &#x3c7;&#xb2;(1)=3.60, p=0.058). Mifepristone produced the expected endocrine response but did not lead to clinical improvements in individuals with MDD and CT compared to placebo.

Humans↗