Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42735966

Ultrashort vs Standard-Duration Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Undergoing PCI: A Meta-Analysis.

Hendrianus Hendrianus·Diana A Gorog·Udaya S Tantry·Eliano P Navarese·Sang Yeub Lee·Jun Hwan Cho·Jinhwan Jo·Jeonghoon Bae·Sam Yeol Ha·Satoshi Honda·Satoshi Yasuda·Bambang Widyantoro·Sunarya Soerianata·Paul A Gurbel·Sang-Wook Kim·Young-Hoon Jeong
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of ultrashort (&#x2264;1-month) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by antiplatelet monotherapy remain uncertain in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare ultrashort vs standard-duration DAPT in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials until February 15, 2026. Primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), major bleeding, and net adverse clinical event (NACE). Prespecified subgroup analyses examined by ethnicity (East Asian vs non-East Asian) and abbreviation strategy (intensive: &#x2264;1-week DAPT or clopidogrel/aspirin monotherapy vs moderate: &#x2265;2-week DAPT, followed by ticagrelor/prasugrel monotherapy). RESULTS: Across 10 trials (n = 29,232), ultrashort DAPT did not increase MACCE risk (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.93-1.20; P = 0.38; I2 = 24%), with higher MACCE risk observed in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) but not non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS), and significantly reduced major bleeding (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.35-0.64; P < 0.00001; I2 = 44%), resulting in a net clinical benefit (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72-0.97; P = 0.02; I2 = 61%). Bleeding reduction was more pronounced in East Asians (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.25-0.49; P < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) than non-East Asians (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.43-0.93; P = 0.02; I2 = 44%), with a significant interaction (P = 0.02). The abbreviation strategy significantly modified outcomes (P for interaction = 0.003): intensive abbreviation raised MACCE risk (HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.11-1.69; P = 0.003; I2 = 0%), while moderate abbreviation had no statistically significant difference (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.85-1.08; P = 0.47; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, ultrashort DAPT reduced bleeding without increasing ischemic events overall, although a signal of increased MACCE was observed in STEMI but not in NSTE-ACS. Bleeding reduction was greater in East Asians, while &#x2264;1-week DAPT or clopidogrel/aspirin monotherapy may increase ischemic risk.

Explore related subjects

HumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAcute Coronary SyndromePercutaneous Coronary InterventionDual Anti-Platelet TherapyTreatment OutcomeTime FactorsRisk FactorsHemorrhageRisk AssessmentDrug Administration ScheduleMaleAgedFemaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAspirinClopidogrelEast AsianP2Y(12) inhibitoracute coronary syndromedual antiplatelet therapymajor bleedingpercutaneous coronary interventionJournal ArticleMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hendrianus Hendrianus, Diana A Gorog, Udaya S Tantry, Eliano P Navarese, Sang Yeub Lee, Jun Hwan Cho, Jinhwan Jo, Jeonghoon Bae, Sam Yeol Ha, Satoshi Honda, Satoshi Yasuda, Bambang Widyantoro, Sunarya Soerianata, Paul A Gurbel, Sang-Wook Kim, Young-Hoon Jeong. 2026-09-14. Ultrashort vs Standard-Duration Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Undergoing PCI: A Meta-Analysis.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2026.07.012

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article; Meta-Analysis; Systematic Review resourceAged subjectFemale subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectMale subjectMeta-Analysis subjectMiddle Aged subjectPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors subjectSystematic reviews study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

The effect of zalunfiban on high sensitivity cardiac troponin and the association with clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI.

BACKGROUND: Among individuals with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), a single subcutaneous injection of the short-acting glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker antagonist zalunfiban at first medical contact significantly improved the primary outcome including clinical endpoints. The impact of zalunfiban on Myocardial Infarction (MI) size and association with downstream outcomes remains unclear. METHODS: In a prespecified analysis, we studied results among study participants treated with 2 doses of zalunfiban who had core laboratory measurements concentrations of hs-cTnT. RESULTS: More elevated hs-cTnT concentrations at presentation were associated with less resolution of ST deviation (P = .006) and more frequent Q wave development (P < .001). At coronary angiography more elevated hs-cTnT at presentation was associated with higher thrombus grade and worse epicardial and myocardial perfusion (all P < .05). In multivariable analyses, higher hs-cTnT concentrations at 24 hours were associated with greater adjusted risk for all-cause death (odds ratio [OR] 1.83 per log unit increase; P = .03), cardiovascular death (OR 1.83 per log unit increase; P = .03), heart failure (OR 2.74 per log unit increase; P < .001) or the composite of death and heart failure (P < .001) by 30 days. At 24 hours, those treated with zalunfiban had lower hs-cTnT compared to placebo (P = .04) and across multiples &#x2265; 10 to &#x2265; 1,000 times elevation, treatment with zalunfiban resulted in smaller hs-cTnT determined MI size. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with STEMI, more elevated concentrations of hs-cTnT are associated with worse measures of reperfusion and higher-risk for short-term death or heart failure. A single dose of zalunfiban at first medical contact reduced MI size. TRIAL REGISTRATION: A phase 3 study of zalunfiban in subjects with ST-elevation MI (CELEBRATE); NCT04825743.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Clopidogrel vs Aspirin According to Diabetes Mellitus: A Prespecified Analysis of the SMART-CHOICE 3 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Recent trials support the superior efficacy of clopidogrel compared to aspirin monotherapy after completion of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, limited evidence is available in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of clopidogrel vs aspirin monotherapy according to the presence of DM. METHODS: This was a prespecified analysis of the SMART-CHOICE 3 trial, which was a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing clopidogrel vs aspirin monotherapy in patients with complex coronary lesions or high-risk clinical characteristics. From August 2020 to July 2023, a total of 5,506 patients who underwent PCI and standard DAPT duration and had complex coronary lesions, DM, or previous myocardial infarction, were randomized to clopidogrel or aspirin monotherapy groups. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which was defined as a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or stroke. RESULTS: Of 5,506 patients, 2,089 had DM (1,039 in the clopidogrel group and 1,050 in the aspirin group). At a median follow-up of 2.3 years (IQR: 1.6-3.0 years), DM patients had a higher risk of MACCE compared to non-DM patients (6.8% vs 4.7%; HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.10-1.87; P = 0.008). Clopidogrel showed a significantly lower risk of MACCE than aspirin in DM patients (4.5% vs 9.1%; HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.38-0.86; P = 0.008). There was no significant interaction between DM and antiplatelet monotherapy regarding MACCE (P for interaction = 0.124). The risk of bleeding was comparable between the 2 groups in DM patients (2.9% vs 2.9%; HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.57-1.95; P = 0.855). CONCLUSIONS: Among DM patients who completed the standard duration of DAPT after PCI, clopidogrel monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, and stroke compared with aspirin monotherapy, without increased rates of bleeding. There was no significant interaction between DM and antiplatelet monotherapy with respect to MACCE. (SMART-CHOICE 3 [SMart Angioplasty Research Team: CHoice of Optimal Anti-Thrombotic Strategy in Patients Undergoing Implantation of Coronary Drug-Eluting Stents 3]; NCT04418479).

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Mechanistic Insights Into the Association Between Gut Microbiota Diversity and Atherosclerosis, Acute Coronary Syndrome, and Peripheral Arterial Disease Progression.

BACKGROUND: The gut microbiome has emerged as a potential contributor to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), including atherosclerosis, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and peripheral arterial disease (PAD). While observational studies link dysbiosis to CVD, causal relationships remain uncertain. METHODS: This narrative review synthesizes evidence from human observational studies, clinical interventions, and experimental models to distinguish association from mechanistic plausibility and clinical causality. Literature was searched through July 2026 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus. RESULTS: Microbial metabolites-including trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), bile acids, and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-modulate endothelial function, immune cell programming, platelet activity, and plaque stability through receptor-mediated signaling and epigenetic regulation. SCFAs demonstrate potentially protective effects via GPCR and HDAC pathways, while TMAO is associated with atherothrombotic risk. However, much mechanistic evidence derives from preclinical studies. Heterogeneity from diet, geography, host characteristics, renal function, and medications substantially influences microbiota-CVD associations. CONCLUSION: The gut-vascular connection is biologically plausible, but definitive clinical causality remains unproven. Microbiome-directed therapies (dietary modulation, pre/pro/synbiotics, targeted metabolite inhibition) are investigational. Prospective, standardized, adequately powered human studies with clinically meaningful outcomes are essential before routine cardiovascular application.

Gastrointestinal Microbiome↗