Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cisplatin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Proteomic analysis of cisplatin-induced spermatogenesis defects in mice.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is a crucial chemotherapeutic agent used for treating various cancers; however, its excessive use can cause irreversible damage to the reproductive system, and the protein expression profile of cisplatin-induced testicular injury remains unclear. METHODS: Male C57BL/6 mice were treated with cisplatin at various doses, and testes were collected for histological, immunofluorescence, and proteomic analyses. Germ cell loss and apoptosis were assessed using H&E staining, TUNEL assays, and immunofluorescence for LIN28A, SYCP3, MVH, and CDK1. Label-free quantitative proteomics identified differentially expressed proteins, which were analyzed for functional enrichment and protein-protein interactions. RESULTS: We observed that cisplatin treatment led to smaller testes, reduced sperm count, and a significant decrease in the number of spermatocytes and spermatids in mice. Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis revealed that cisplatin significantly reduced the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1), a key spermatogenesis regulator, in the testes. Reduction in CDK1 expression is correlated with spermatogenic arrest, particularly in spermatocytes. CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the critical role of CDK1 in cisplatin-induced spermatogenic dysfunction and provide new insights into fertility preservation strategies for patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

Animals↗
PubMed2026

Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss Prevention With Intratympanic Therapy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Cisplatin-induced hearing loss (CIHL) is a well-described, long-term consequence of cisplatin treatment for malignancy. Intratympanic (IT) injections have been trialed to prevent CIHL in humans. To provide clarity on which agents have been studied through IT injection and to review their efficacy for hearing loss prevention, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: OVID Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were queried. METHODS: Databases were searched in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Prospective randomized trials were included, and a systematic review was performed for all studies. Demographic, audiometric, and therapeutic data were collected. Random-effects models were used to compare across studies, and subgroup analyses were performed for each IT agent. RESULTS: The initial database search yielded 1017 articles, which were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Ten studies were identified, involving a total of 284 patients. Studies included data on IT dexamethasone, IT N-acetylcysteine (NAC), and IT sodium thiosulfate (STS). Pooled analysis across all agents and frequencies did not reveal a significant difference in hearing thresholds between treatment and control ears [prediction interval [-3.77, 3.20], negative favors treatment). Subgroup analysis of IT dexamethasone [-1.74, 3.80] and IT NAC [-1.02, 4.64] also did not demonstrate significant differences. STS data were not amenable to pooled analysis; however, one study demonstrated a significant decrease in ASHA-defined ototoxicity (40% vs. 85%, P =0.0027). CONCLUSIONS: To date, no IT agent has consistently prevented CIHL, although limited data suggest that IT STS may decrease ototoxicity. More trials are necessary to fully elucidate these effects.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Penpulimab and Gemcitabine With or Without Anlotinib in Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Phase 2 Study.

This prospective exploratory phase 2 study employed a three-cohort, two-phase design to evaluate the potential of anlotinib as a substitute for cisplatin in gemcitabine-penpulimab combinations for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who were previously treated with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy. Patients enrolled in the study were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio during the lead-in phase to one of three treatment arms: gemcitabine, cisplatin, penpulimab, and anlotinib (GP-PA, n = 8); gemcitabine, cisplatin, and penpulimab (GP-P, n = 6); or gemcitabine, penpulimab, and anlotinib (GAP, n = 6). The expansion phase enriched the optimal cohort, with stratification based on PD-L1 expression. The primary endpoints were safety and objective response rate (ORR), while the secondary endpoints included duration of response, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). In the lead-in phase, grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 87.5% (GP-PA), 100% (GP-P), and 66.7% (GAP) patients, predominantly hematologic toxicities. ORR/DCR were 62.5%/87.5% (GP-PA), 83.3%/100% (GP-P), and 100%/100% (GAP). At median 20.2-month follow-up, median PFS/OS were 4.1/18.4 months for GP-PA and not reached for GP-P/GAP. In the expansion phase, a total of 14 patients received GAP, with an ORR of 93.3% and grade ≥ 3 TEAEs in 71.4% of patients. At data cut-off point, the median PFS had not been reached, and the 12-month PFS and OS rates were 53.8% and 78.6%, respectively. The GAP regimen demonstrated a favorable safety and efficacy profile, compared to the GP-PA and GP-P regimens in patients with metastatic NPC. These findings suggest that substituting cisplatin with anlotinib may offer a viable therapeutic strategy for this patient population.

Humans↗