SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “BRCA2”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2018

Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

BACKGROUND: The presence of deleterious mutations in breast cancer 1 gene (BRCA1) or breast cancer 2 gene (BRCA2) significantly increases the risk of developing some cancers, such as breast and high-grade serous cancer (HGSC) of ovarian, tubal and peritoneal origin. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is usually recommended to BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers after completion of childbearing. Despite prior systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the role of RRSO in reducing the mortality and incidence of breast, HGSC and other cancers, RRSO is still an area of debate and it is unclear whether RRSO differs in effectiveness by type of mutation carried. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of RRSO in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 7) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid and trial registries, with no language restrictions up to July 2017. We handsearched abstracts of scientific meetings and other relevant publications. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included non-randomised trials (NRS), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case series that used statistical adjustment for baseline case mix using multivariable analyses comparing RRSO versus no RRSO in women without a previous or coexisting breast, ovarian or fallopian tube malignancy, in women with or without hysterectomy, and in women with a risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) before, with or after RRSO. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data and performed meta-analyses of hazard ratios (HR) for time-to-event variables and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). To assess bias in the studies, we used the ROBINS-I 'Risk of bias' assessment tool. We quantified inconsistency between studies by estimating the I2 statistic. We used random-effects models to calculate pooled effect estimates. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 cohort studies, comprising 8087 participants (2936 (36%) surgical participants and 5151 (64%) control participants who were BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. All the studies compared RRSO with or without RRM versus no RRSO (surveillance). The certainty of evidence by GRADE assessment was very low due to serious risk of bias. Nine studies, including 7927 women, were included in the meta-analyses. The median follow-up period ranged from 0.5 to 27.4 years. MAIN OUTCOMES: overall survival was longer with RRSO compared with no RRSO (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.54; P < 0.001; 3 studies, 2548 women; very low-certainty evidence). HGSC cancer mortality (HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.17; I² = 69%; P < 0.0001; 3 studies, 2534 women; very low-certainty evidence) and breast cancer mortality (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.88; I² = 65%; P = 0.009; 7 studies, 7198 women; very low-certainty evidence) were lower with RRSO compared with no RRSO. None of the studies reported bone fracture incidence. There was a difference in favour of RRSO compared with no RRSO in terms of ovarian cancer risk perception quality of life (MD 15.40, 95% CI 8.76 to 22.04; P < 0.00001; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). None of the studies reported adverse events.Subgroup analyses for main outcomes: meta-analysis showed an increase in overall survival among women who had RRSO versus women without RRSO who were BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.52; P < 0001; I² = 23%; 3 studies; very low-certainty evidence) and BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.85; P = 0.01; I² = 0%; 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence). The meta-analysis showed a decrease in HGSC cancer mortality among women with RRSO versus no RRSO who were BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.41; I² = 54%; P = 0.001; 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence), but uncertain for BRCA2 mutation carriers due to low frequency of HGSC cancer deaths in BRCA2 mutation carriers. There was a decrease in breast cancer mortality among women with RRSO versus no RRSO who were BRCA1 mutation carriers (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.67; I² = 0%; P < 0.0001; 4 studies; very low-certainty evidence), but not for BRCA2 mutation carriers (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.87; I² = 63%; P = 0.75; 3 studies; very low-certainty evidence). One study showed a difference in favour of RRSO versus no RRSO in improving quality of life for ovarian cancer risk perception in women who were BRCA1 mutation carriers (MD 10.70, 95% CI 2.45 to 18.95; P = 0.01; 98 women; very low-certainty evidence) and BRCA2 mutation carriers (MD 13.00, 95% CI 3.59 to 22.41; P = 0.007; very low-certainty evidence). Data from one study showed a difference in favour of RRSO and RRM versus no RRSO in increasing overall survival (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.98; P = 0.0001; I² = 0%; low-certainty evidence), but no difference for breast cancer mortality (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.19; P = 0.25; very low-certainty evidence). The risk estimates for breast cancer mortality according to age at RRSO (50 years of age or less versus more than 50 years) was not protective and did not differ for BRCA1 (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.11; I² = 16%; P = 0.23; very low-certainty evidence) and BRCA2 carriers (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.87; I² = 63%; P = 0.75; very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is very low-certainty evidence that RRSO may increase overall survival and lower HGSC and breast cancer mortality for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Very low-certainty evidence suggests that RRSO reduces the risk of death from HGSC and breast cancer in women with BRCA1 mutations. Evidence for the effect of RRSO on HGSC and breast cancer in BRCA2 carriers was very uncertain due to low numbers. These results should be interpreted with caution due to questionable study designs, risk of bias profiles, and very low-certainty evidence. We cannot draw any conclusions regarding bone fracture incidence, quality of life, or severe adverse events for RRSO, or for effects of RRSO based on type and age at risk-reducing surgery. Further research on these outcomes is warranted to explore differential effects for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Adult↗

PubMed2020

Distinct roles of BRCA2 in replication fork protection in response to hydroxyurea and DNA interstrand cross-links.

DNA interstrand cross-links (ICLs) are a form of DNA damage that requires the interplay of a number of repair proteins including those of the Fanconi anemia (FA) and the homologous recombination (HR) pathways. Pathogenic variants in the essential gene BRCA2/FANCD1, when monoallelic, predispose to breast and ovarian cancer, and when biallelic, result in a severe subtype of Fanconi anemia. BRCA2 function in the FA pathway is attributed to its role as a mediator of the RAD51 recombinase in HR repair of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSB). BRCA2 and RAD51 functions are also required to protect stalled replication forks from nucleolytic degradation during response to hydroxyurea (HU). While RAD51 has been shown to be necessary in the early steps of ICL repair to prevent aberrant nuclease resection, the role of BRCA2 in this process has not been described. Here, based on the analysis of BRCA2 DNA-binding domain (DBD) mutants (c.8488-1G>A and c.8524C>T) discovered in FA patients presenting with atypical FA-like phenotypes, we establish that BRCA2 is necessary for the protection of DNA at ICLs. Cells carrying BRCA2 DBD mutations are sensitive to ICL-inducing agents but resistant to HU treatment consistent with relatively high HR repair in these cells. BRCA2 function at an ICL protects against DNA2-WRN nuclease-helicase complex and not the MRE11 nuclease that is implicated in the resection of HU-induced stalled replication forks. Our results also indicate that unlike the processing at HU-induced stalled forks, the function of the SNF2 translocases (SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, or HLTF), implicated in fork reversal, are not an integral component of the ICL repair, pointing to a different mechanism of fork protection at different DNA lesions.

BRCA2 Protein↗

PubMed2026

Impact of BRCA2 pathogenic variants on outcomes to first-line CDK4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy in HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Currently, three cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are approved in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) as first-line treatment of patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The impact of homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathogenic variants (PV) on outcomes with first-line CDK4/6i plus ET in HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC remains uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, real-world, case-control study including 233 patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC treated with first-line CDK4/6i and ET. Among them, 116 presented HRR PVs and 117 were matched controls with negative germline testing. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival among germline-BRCA2 PV carriers, other HRR PV carriers, and controls. To minimize baseline differences in prognostic factors between PV carriers and controls, inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied. Molecular analyses in pre-CDK4/6i samples among patients with BRCA2 PV were carried out, including RAD51-foci, PAM50 intrinsic subtype, and RB1 loss of heterozygosity (LOH). RESULTS: Among the included 233 patients, median age at diagnosis was 45 years (interquartile range 39-56) and 33% had de novo metastatic disease. Primary resistance to adjuvant ET was present in 10% and secondary resistance in 27%. After a median follow-up of 44 months, patients with germline-BRCA2 PVs (n = 67) had significantly shorter PFS [11 versus 27 months; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.65-4.51, P < 0.001] compared with controls. Among patients with endocrine-sensitive disease, germline BRCA2 PV carriers had markedly shorter PFS (median PFS 12 versus 39 months; aHR 4.04; 95% CI 1.82-8.98, P < 0.001). Exploratory analyses revealed RB1 LOH before CDK4/6i-treatment in most evaluable BRCA2 tumors. CONCLUSIONS: BRCA2 PVs were independently associated with poorer outcomes to first-line CDK4/6i plus ET in HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC compared with controls, especially relevant among patients with endocrine-sensitive disease. These findings suggest that patients with a germline PV in BRCA2 may require alternative first-line strategies.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Moss BRCA2 lacking the canonical DNA-binding domain promotes homologous recombination and binds to DNA.

BRCA2 is crucial for mediating homology-directed DNA repair (HDR) through its binding to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and the recombinases RAD51 and DMC1. Most BRCA2 orthologs have a canonical DNA-binding domain (DBD) with the exception of Drosophila melanogaster. It remains unclear whether such a noncanonical BRCA2 variant without DBD possesses a DNA-binding activity. Here, we identify a new noncanonical BRCA2 in the model plant Physcomitrium patens (PpBRCA2). We establish that PpBRCA2 is essential for genome integrity maintenance, somatic DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair, HDR-mediated gene targeting, and RAD51 foci recruitment at DNA break sites. PpBRCA2 is also critical for DSB repair during meiosis. Interestingly, PpBRCA2 interacts strongly with RAD51 but weakly with DMC1, suggesting a distinct meiotic function compared to other BRCA2 homologs. Despite lacking the canonical DBD, PpBRCA2 binds ssDNA through its disordered N-terminal region and efficiently promotes HDR. Our work highlights that the ssDNA binding capacity of BRCA2 homologs is conserved regardless of the presence of a canonical DBD and provides a deeper understanding of BRCA2's functional diversity across species.

BRCA2 Protein↗

PubMed2026

STN1 upregulation promotes PARPi resistance in BRCA2-deficient cancer cells via replication fork protection and suppression of ssDNA gap formation.

PARPi are effective therapy for BRCA1/2 mutant cancers, yet recurrent PARPi resistance frequently develops. The underlying mechanism of PARPi resistance remains largely unresolved. Here, we identify STN1, a component of the CTC1/STN1/TEN1 (CST) complex, as a modulator of PARPi resistance in BRCA2-deficient cells. RNA-seq analysis of PARPi-resistant cancer cells from BRCA2-mutated backgrounds shows largely distinct transcriptomic profiles with limited overlap, suggesting multiple routes to resistance. Notably, STN1 is consistently upregulated in resistant cells. We observe that overexpression of STN1 enhances Olaparib resistance in multiple BRCA2-deficient cell lines and alleviates DNA damage under replication stress. Mechanistically, we find that STN1 overexpression increases RAD51 loading to stalled replication forks while restricting MRE11 recruitment in BRCA2-deficient cells, thereby protecting stalled forks from nascent-strand degradation. Furthermore, STN1 overexpression rescues the accumulation of ssDNA gaps, a major determinant of PARPi sensitivity in BRCA2-deficient cells. Taken together, these findings suggest that elevated STN1 levels can partially compensate for BRCA2 loss by stabilizing stalled replication forks and limiting ssDNA gap accumulation. Our study uncovers a STN1-dependent pathway of replication stress tolerance that promotes PARPi resistance independently of homologous recombination restoration, highlighting STN1 as a potential biomarker and mechanistic contributor to therapeutic resistance in BRCA2-mutated cancers.

PARPi resistance↗

PubMed2026

Risks of non-breast, non-ovarian cancers for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The non-breast non-ovarian cancers associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PVs) are controversial. We aimed to examine this using a prospective cohort design. METHODS: This study included 1260 BRCA1 and 1058 BRCA2 PV carriers (91% were females) from two consortia: the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR) and the Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer Follow-Up Study (kConFab-FUS). The carriers were free of cancer other than breast or ovarian cancer at baseline and had a median baseline age of 45.5 years. For 16 types of non-breast, non-ovarian cancers, standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) relative to population incidence, the probabilities of relative risk effect size > 2 (i.e., moderate risk) and cumulative risks to age 80 years were estimated. RESULTS: During a median follow-up time of 11.4 years, 161 non-breast, non-ovarian cancers were observed. For BRCA1 PV carriers, little evidence of increased risk was observed. The prostate, pancreatic, and all non-pancreatic cancer SIRs were 1.7 (95% CI 0.7-4.2), 1.1 (95% CI 0.3-4.6) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.68-1.06), respectively; the probabilities of relative risk > 2 were 0 and 67% for prostate and pancreatic cancers, respectively. For BRCA2 PV carriers, increased risks of pancreatic (SIR = 6.6, 95% CI 3.8-11.6), prostate (SIR = 3.6, 95% CI 1.9-6.8) and stomach (SIR = 3.1, 95% CI 1.01-9.8) cancer were observed, with a cumulative risk to age 80 years of 8.3, 82.0, and 1.6%, respectively. For all the other non-breast, non-ovarian cancers combined, the SIR was 0.85 (95% CI 0.66-1.10). CONCLUSIONS: Apart from pancreatic, prostate, and possibly stomach cancers for BRCA2 PV carriers, and possibly pancreatic cancer for BRCA1 PV carriers, there is no evidence that BRCA1 and BRCA2 PV carriers have substantially increased risks of other non-breast, non-ovarian cancers. Our prospective risk estimates are informative for cancer risk assessment for people with BRCA1 and BRCA2 PVs.

Humans↗

PubMed2023

DNA binding and RAD51 engagement by the BRCA2 C-terminus orchestrate DNA repair and replication fork preservation.

The tumor suppressor BRCA2 participates in DNA double-strand break repair by RAD51-dependent homologous recombination and protects stressed DNA replication forks from nucleolytic attack. We demonstrate that the C-terminal Recombinase Binding (CTRB) region of BRCA2, encoded by gene exon 27, harbors a DNA binding activity. CTRB alone stimulates the DNA strand exchange activity of RAD51 and permits the utilization of RPA-coated ssDNA by RAD51 for strand exchange. Moreover, CTRB functionally synergizes with the Oligonucleotide Binding fold containing DNA binding domain and BRC4 repeat of BRCA2 in RPA-RAD51 exchange on ssDNA. Importantly, we show that the DNA binding and RAD51 interaction attributes of the CTRB are crucial for homologous recombination and protection of replication forks against MRE11-mediated attrition. Our findings shed light on the role of the CTRB region in genome repair, reveal remarkable functional plasticity of BRCA2, and help explain why deletion of Brca2 exon 27 impacts upon embryonic lethality.

DNA Replication↗

PubMed2026

Real-World Outcomes of Olaparib in Japanese Patients With BRCA-Mutated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Exploratory Analysis of BRCA2 Loss and Microsatellite Instability Status.

OBJECTIVES: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer has a poor prognosis. Although olaparib has demonstrated efficacy in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations, real-world data in Japanese patients remain limited. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of olaparib in patients with BRCA-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and explore the association of BRCA2 loss and microsatellite instability status with treatment outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of 34 patients with BRCA-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with olaparib between December 2020 and December 2024. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, prostate-specific antigen-50 response rate, and safety. Exploratory analyses were performed. RESULTS: Among the 34 patients, 33 had a BRCA2 mutation and one had a BRCA1 mutation. Prostate-specific antigen reduction was observed in 76.4% of patients; prostate-specific antigen-50 response rate was 58.8%. Median progression-free and overall survival were 15.8 and 35.1 months, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (most commonly anemia) occurred in 17.6% of patients. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in one patient. Exploratory analyses were performed in 23 BRCA2-mutated patients who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling. BRCA2 loss was observed in 39.1% of patients and showed a trend toward prolonged progression-free survival, whereas microsatellite instability-high status was observed in 13.0% and was associated with shorter progression-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Olaparib demonstrated efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with BRCA-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Exploratory analyses revealed that BRCA2 loss may be associated with prolonged progression-free survival, whereas microsatellite instability-high status may be associated with shorter progression-free survival. These findings require validation in larger cohorts.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Distinct roles of the two BRCA2 DNA-binding domains in DNA damage repair and replication fork preservation.

Homologous recombination (HR) removes DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and preserves stressed DNA replication forks. Successful HR execution requires the tumor suppressor BRCA2, which harbors distinct DNA-binding domains (DBDs): one that possesses three oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding (OB) folds (OB-DBD) and another residing in the C-terminal recombinase binding domain (CTRB-DBD). Here, we employ multi-faceted approaches to delineate the contributions of these domains toward HR and replication fork maintenance. We show that OB-DBD and CTRB-DBD confer single-strand DNA (ssDNA)- and dsDNA-binding capabilities, respectively, and that BRCA2 variants mutated in either domain are impaired in their ability to load the recombinase RAD51 onto ssDNA pre-occupied by RPA. While the CTRB-DBD mutant is modestly affected by DNA break repair, it exhibits a strong defect in the protection of stressed replication forks. In contrast, the OB-DBD is indispensable for both BRCA2 functions. Our study thus defines the unique contributions of the two BRCA2 DBDs in genome maintenance.

BRCA2 Protein↗

PubMed2024

Surviving without BRCA2: MLH1 gets R-looped in to curtail genomic instability.

While breast cancer 2 (BRCA2) loss of heterozygosity (LOH) promotes cancer initiation, it can also induce death in nontransformed cells. In contrast, mismatch repair gene mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) is a tumor-suppressor gene that protects cells from cancer development through repairing mismatched base pairs during DNA mismatch repair (MMR). Sengodan et al., in this issue of the JCI, reveal an interplay between the 2 genes: MLH1 promoted the survival of BRCA2-deficient cells independently of its MMR function. MLH1 protected replication forks from degradation, while also resolving R-loops, thereby reducing genomic instability. Moreover, MLH1 expression was regulated directly by estrogen, shedding light into the hormone-responsive nature of many BRCA2 mutant breast cancers. These results provide important insight into the genetics that drive the initiation of BRCA2-mutated breast cancers.

Humans↗

PubMed2023

Structural basis for stabilisation of the RAD51 nucleoprotein filament by BRCA2.

The BRCA2 tumour suppressor protein preserves genomic integrity via interactions with the DNA-strand exchange RAD51 protein in homology-directed repair. The RAD51-binding TR2 motif at the BRCA2 C-terminus is essential for protection and restart of stalled replication forks. Biochemical evidence shows that TR2 recognises filamentous RAD51, but existing models of TR2 binding to RAD51 lack a structural basis. Here we used cryo-electron microscopy and structure-guided mutagenesis to elucidate the mechanism of TR2 binding to nucleoprotein filaments of human RAD51. We find that TR2 binds across the protomer interface in the filament, acting as a brace for adjacent RAD51 molecules. TR2 targets an acidic-patch motif on human RAD51 that serves as a recruitment hub in fission yeast Rad51 for recombination mediators Rad52 and Rad55-Rad57. Our findings provide a structural rationale for RAD51 filament stabilisation by BRCA2 and reveal a common recruitment mechanism of recombination mediators to the RAD51 filament.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Copy number variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Polish patients with breast and ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: BRCA1 and BRCA2 are key susceptibility genes in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), with mutational status guiding PARP inhibitor therapy. While single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) predominate, the prevalence of copy number variants (CNVs) varies significantly across different populations. This study aims to determine the incidence of BRCA1/2 CNVs in the Polish population, where data remain scarce due to non-mandatory CNV testing. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the results of genetic tests assessing the presence of BRCA1/2 CNVs performed in 2720 individuals tested at the Lower Silesian Oncology Centre (2021-2024), including 2702 breast/ovarian cancer patients and 18 unaffected relatives. The mean age was 54.7 ± 15.15 years. Genetic testing involved DNA extraction, NGS, and MLPA for CNV confirmation. Variants were classified according to ACMG-AMP guidelines and verified through independent testing. RESULTS: In this study, no BRCA2 CNVs were identified, consistent with previous Central European findings. Pathogenic BRCA1 CNVs were detected in 0.85% of the analyzed cohort and in 0.52% of the cancer patient subgroup, affecting 23 individuals from 13 families. Eight distinct BRCA1 CNVs were detected, the most common being exon 21 deletion. Affected families exhibited a high incidence of HBOC-related cancers, with early-onset breast cancer and a notable proportion of triple-negative breast cancer cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the clinical significance of BRCA1 CNVs in Polish patients with HBOC-spectrum cancers and their families. Although rare, these variants were associated with aggressive cancer phenotypes and early onset. Given their diagnostic and therapeutic implications, BRCA1 CNVs should be routinely analysed in high-risk families to ensure accurate detection and personalised treatment planning.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Targeting RAD52 overcomes PARP inhibitor resistance in preclinical Brca2-deficient ovarian cancer model.

BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer commonly develops resistance to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Here, we investigated the DNA repair protein RAD52 as a potential target to overcome resistance. In analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas datasets and immunohistochemistry of tissue microarrays, elevated RAD52 expression correlated with poor overall survival in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancers. We tested two PARP inhibitor-resistant Brca2-deficient mouse ovarian cancer models, ID8-OR and HGS2-OR. HGS2-OR cells had higher RAD52 expression than parental lines. Rad52 knockout or knockdown restored PARP inhibitor sensitivity in both models. In syngeneic mice, ID8-OR cells in which Rad52 was knocked out yielded lower tumor burden and longer overall survival than control cells. Rad52 depletion impaired single-strand annealing and homologous recombination and led to accumulation of DNA double-strand breaks after PARP inhibitor treatment. RNA sequencing demonstrated that PARP inhibitor treatment induced Polq expression in Brca2- and Rad52-deficient cells, suggesting a switch to microhomology-mediated end joining. Finally, the RAD52 inhibitor D-I03 synergized with a PARP inhibitor to reduce cell viability and tumor burden and prolong survival. Collectively, our findings establish RAD52 as a promising therapeutic target to overcome PARP inhibitor resistance in BRCA2-mutated ovarian cancer and offer mechanistic insights to inform future clinical strategies.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

The Clinical Application of Refined Risk Estimates Study in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

UNLABELLED: Individuals with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PV) may struggle with risk management decision-making. Advancements in technology could provide more specific risk information to patients, but the impact of this information is unknown. The Clinical Application of Refined Risk Estimates Study is a two-arm randomized controlled trial in women with a BRCA1/BRCA2 PV. The primary objective was to determine whether genotype-informed personalized cancer risk estimates (GRE) compared with standard lifetime cancer risk estimates (SRE) decreased decisional conflict related to cancer risk management decision-making. Women were recruited following the disclosure of their PV results. Participants completed a baseline survey and were randomized 1:1 to receive a GRE or SRE. After receiving their results, participants completed a follow-up survey. Likert and continuous data measures were analyzed using linear regression. There were no differences in decisional conflict between study arms at follow-up. However, individuals in the SRE arm showed an increased need for personal structure compared with those in the GRE arm (P = 0.02). Compared with baseline, individuals within the SRE arm showed decreased decisional conflict (P = 0.003) and increased perceived stress (P = 0.02) at follow-up. A more personalized cancer risk estimate did not decrease decisional conflict in women with BRCA1/BRCA2 PVs. Future studies will determine whether a GRE affects actual decision-making behaviors. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Women with a germline PV in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have significantly elevated risks of developing breast and ovarian cancers. This randomized controlled trial evaluates the impact of polygenic risk scores on decisional conflict related to breast and ovarian cancer prevention and risk management in those with BRCA1/BRCA2 PVs.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Preimplantation genetic testing for concurrent Meckel Syndrome and hereditary breast cancer in a Chinese family harboring a novel NPHP3 pathogenic variant and a canonical BRCA2 frameshift variant.

Meckel syndrome (MKS) is a lethal autosomal recessive disease with high phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity. Defects in NPHP3 cause MKS type 7. Herein, we report a case of a Chinese family with a newborn male proband presenting with occipital encephalocele and polycystic kidneys. Whole-exome sequencing was performed on genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood. Potential variants were assessed for pathogenicity. Two compound heterozygous variants of NPHP3 (c. 950T>C, p. Phe317Ser, and c.2694-2_2694-1delAG) were identified, which were inherited from both parents, with c.950T>C representing a novel variant. Two BRCA2 variants (c.5576_5579delTTAA, p. Ile1859Lysfs*3, and c.9357A>C,p. Leu 3119 Phe) were identified, which were inherited from the father. After the proband was diagnosed with MKS7, the couple chose preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) to simultaneously prevent the transmission of NPHP3 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants, leading to a successful pregnancy. Our study expands the NPHP3 variant spectrum and contributes to the molecular diagnosis and genetic counseling of MKS. This case indicates that PGT-M is a viable option for NPHP3-related MKS and BRCA-positive patients to avoid transmission while maintaining their families. Successful application of PGT-M provides a potential approach for treating other monogenic diseases.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2021

K3326X and Other C-Terminal BRCA2 Variants Implicated in Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: A Review.

Whole genome analysis and the search for mutations in germline and tumor DNAs is becoming a major tool in the evaluation of risk as well as the management of hereditary cancer syndromes. Because of the identification of cancer predisposition gene panels, thousands of such variants have been catalogued yet many remain unclassified, presenting a clinical challenge for the management of hereditary cancer syndromes. Although algorithms exist to estimate the likelihood of a variant being deleterious, these tools are rarely used for clinical decision-making. Here, we review the progress in classifying K3326X, a rare truncating variant on the C-terminus of BRCA2 and review recent literature on other novel single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs, on the C-terminus of the protein, defined in this review as the portion after the final BRC repeat (amino acids 2058-3418).

BRCA2↗

PubMed2026

Reply to: Role of Risk-Reducing Bilateral Mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Homologous recombination-deficient high-grade serous ovarian cancers exhibit distinct morphological features.

OBJECTIVE: Access to homologous recombination testing remains limited in many centers. We aim to correlate the morphology and immunophenotype of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with homologous recombination statuses. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma tumors with known homologous recombination status. A pathological review of morphology was performed for each tumor, along with immunohistochemical profiling. Tumor morphology was classified as (1) solid, pseudo-endometrioid, or transitional (2) micropapillary or nested. RESULTS: Overall, 81 tumors were included. The median age was 62 (interquartile range; 52-71). Of those, 27 (33.3%) tumors were BRCA1mut, 19 (23.5%) were BRCA2mut, 15 (18.5%) tumors had no BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations but exhibited a genomic instability score ≥42 and were classified as BRCA1/2-wild-type with homologous recombinant deficient. The remainder 20 (24.7%) cases were homologous recombinant proficient. The proportion of tumors with solid transitional-like morphology was higher in BRCA1 (12/21, 57%) and BRCA2 (12/18, 67%) compared to the tumors with homologous recombinant proficient (3/17, 18%), p =.019. When stratified by genomic instability score, tumors with low score (genomic instability score <26) exhibited 0% solid transitional-like morphology versus 43% solid transitional-like morphology in high-score (genomic instability score >26), p =.03. PAX8 diffuse expression was detected in 71% of BRCA1, 65% of BRCA2, 92% of BRCA-wild-type homologous recombinant deficient tumors, and 100% of homologous recombinant proficient tumors, p =.071. The proportion of diffuse expression was higher in homologous recombinant proficient (100%) versus BRCA2 (65%) (Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: Homologous recombinant deficient tumors are associated with the solid transitional-like morphology, with the BRCA1/2-mutated homologous recombinant deficient cases showing the strongest correlation. Genomic instability score alone may not fully capture the spectrum of homologous recombinant deficient-related phenotypes. The variation in solid transitional-like morphology features among BRCA1- or BRCA2-mutated, BRCA1/2- wild-type with homologous recombinant deficient, and homologous recombinant proficient cases may reflect the diverse biological spectrum of different homologous recombination alterations.

Humans↗