Impact of BRCA2 pathogenic variants on outcomes to first-line CDK4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy in HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, three cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are approved in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) as first-line treatment of patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The impact of homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathogenic variants (PV) on outcomes with first-line CDK4/6i plus ET in HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC remains uncertain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, real-world, case-control study including 233 patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC treated with first-line CDK4/6i and ET. Among them, 116 presented HRR PVs and 117 were matched controls with negative germline testing. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival among germline-BRCA2 PV carriers, other HRR PV carriers, and controls. To minimize baseline differences in prognostic factors between PV carriers and controls, inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied. Molecular analyses in pre-CDK4/6i samples among patients with BRCA2 PV were carried out, including RAD51-foci, PAM50 intrinsic subtype, and RB1 loss of heterozygosity (LOH). RESULTS: Among the included 233 patients, median age at diagnosis was 45 years (interquartile range 39-56) and 33% had de novo metastatic disease. Primary resistance to adjuvant ET was present in 10% and secondary resistance in 27%. After a median follow-up of 44 months, patients with germline-BRCA2 PVs (n = 67) had significantly shorter PFS [11 versus 27 months; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.65-4.51, P < 0.001] compared with controls. Among patients with endocrine-sensitive disease, germline BRCA2 PV carriers had markedly shorter PFS (median PFS 12 versus 39 months; aHR 4.04; 95% CI 1.82-8.98, P < 0.001). Exploratory analyses revealed RB1 LOH before CDK4/6i-treatment in most evaluable BRCA2 tumors. CONCLUSIONS: BRCA2 PVs were independently associated with poorer outcomes to first-line CDK4/6i plus ET in HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC compared with controls, especially relevant among patients with endocrine-sensitive disease. These findings suggest that patients with a germline PV in BRCA2 may require alternative first-line strategies.