SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Acne Vulgaris”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Comparison of a 755-nm picosecond laser and a 1565-nm nonablative fractional laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scars: a 20-week prospective, randomized, split-face clinical study.

To compare the efficacy and safety of a 755-nm picosecond laser with a diffractive lens array (P-DLA) and a 1565-nm nonablative fractional laser (NAFL) for the treatment of atrophic acne scars. Twenty-seven patients with atrophic acne scars underwent three sessions of randomized split-face treatment with P-DLA and NAFL at 4-week intervals. Patients were followed up at 1, 2, and 3 months after the final treatment. Efficacy was assessed using the Échelle d'Évaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'Acné (ECCA) grading scale, the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score, patients' self-rated improvement, and overall satisfaction. Treatment-related adverse reactions were recorded daily by patients until resolution. Both modalities demonstrated significant improvements in scar appearance based on ECCA score, IGA score, and patients' self-rated improvement (P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences in efficacy were observed between the two treatments. However, the P-DLA group showed higher patient satisfaction (P = 0.035) and a more favorable safety profile, including shorter durations of erythema and edema and the absence of crusting. Both P-DLA and NAFL were effective and safe for the treatment of atrophic acne scars, with similar efficacy. P-DLA offered better tolerability.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Influence of microplastics on microalgal performance during wastewater polishing.

Microplastics (MPs) are emerging contaminants that are increasingly accumulating in aquatic ecosystems due to excessive anthropogenic activity and insufficient mitigation strategies, posing serious environmental and public health risks. Their impact on wastewater (WW) treatment processes remains poorly understood. This study evaluated the effects of five MPs commonly found in WW - polypropylene, polystyrene, polyamide, low-density polyethylene, and high-density polyethylene - on the physiology and bioremediation performance of the microalga Chlorella vulgaris in synthetic WW (SWW). Metabolic responses were assessed via esterase activity and intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), while nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and glucose removal were monitored to evaluate bioremediation efficiency. MPs inhibited esterase activity and elevated ROS levels, indicating oxidative stress. Nevertheless, C. vulgaris maintained a high bioremediation capacity (> 75 % N, > 60 % P, and > 70 % for glucose). Environmental conditions modulated microalga response to MPs exposure. Under N-limited conditions, C. vulgaris exhibited enhanced nutrient uptake and biomass production, but a 12 h/12 h light/dark photoperiod reduced N removal but stimulated glucose consumption via heterotrophic metabolism. In contrast, C-limited conditions exacerbated oxidative stress and compromised nutrient removal, resulting in residual concentrations exceeding legal limits. These findings highlight that environmental factors can either mitigate or exacerbate the physiological stress induced by MPs, ultimately affecting WW polishing. This work provides a comprehensive insight into the cellular and metabolic effects of MPs on microalgae and supports C. vulgaris as a resilient and sustainable approach for nutrient and carbon removal in MP-contaminated WW systems.

Microalgae↗

PubMed2026

Fractional laser therapy versus microneedling for non-acne scars and scar-like dermal fibrotic lesions.

BACKGROUND: Scarring caused by trauma, burns, surgery, and other dermal fibrotic conditions can lead to functional limitation and cosmetic distress. The comparative effectiveness of fractional laser therapy and microneedling for non-acne scars remains uncertain. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing fractional laser therapy with microneedling for non-acne scars and scar-like dermal fibrotic lesions. Following a PROSPERO-registered protocol and PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CNKI from inception to May 2026 without language restrictions. Parallel-group and split-body randomized trials were eligible. Random-effects models were used to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials were included. Fractional laser therapy showed a statistically significant advantage over microneedling in scar scores (SMD = -0.99, 95% CI [-1.83, -0.15], P = 0.02) and collagen fiber regeneration (SMD = -2.14, 95% CI [-3.57, -0.72], P = 0.03). No statistically significant differences were found between the two interventions for elastic fiber improvement, epidermal thickness, or adverse events. Subgroup analyses did not show clear or consistent significant differences according to laser type, including comparisons between traditional and non-traditional fractional lasers and between CO₂ and non-CO₂ fractional laser systems. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across several outcomes, indicating considerable between-study variability. CONCLUSION: Based on currently available randomized evidence, fractional laser therapy may provide superior improvement in overall scar severity and collagen fiber regeneration compared with microneedling for non-acne scars and scar-like dermal fibrotic lesions. However, no clear differences were observed for elastic fiber improvement, epidermal thickness, or adverse-event incidence. Given the substantial heterogeneity, limited sample sizes, and possible reporting bias, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Further large, standardized trials with longer follow-up are needed.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Do wound protectors reduce contamination in total shoulder arthroplasty? A randomized controlled trial.

HYPOTHESIS: Cutibacterium acnes is the most frequent cause of shoulder prosthetic joint infection with skin edges as a source of wound contamination. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if the use of a wound protector device decreases the deep wound bacterial colonization in primary shoulder arthroplasty. The secondary purpose was to assess the effect of device usage on deltopectoral muscle and cephalic vein injury. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial. A total of 100 patients undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty were enrolled and randomized into 2 groups: a wound protector group and a control group. Five patients withdrew from the study, leaving 48 patients in the wound protector group and 47 controls. Three deep wound culture swabs were taken after final arthroplasty implantation. The surgeon also graded deltoid, pectoralis major, and cephalic vein injury on a 0-3 scale based on modification to the Tscherne classification of soft tissue injury. The primary outcome of this study was positive culture results for C acnes. Secondary outcomes included total bacterial culture positivity as well as soft tissue injury grades. A subanalysis removing likely contaminant positive cultures (growth >7 days and 1 colony only) was also performed. Comparisons between groups were made using Fisher exact test for categorical outcomes and t tests and Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables. RESULTS: The use of a wound protector did not result in any significant differences compared with controls in the rate of positive cultures for C acnes (15% vs. 21%, P = .593) or all bacteria (15% vs. 26%, P = .304). Removing likely contaminant positive cultures did not demonstrate any significant difference in culture positivity (9% vs. 17%, P = .355, for C acnes; 9% vs. 19%, P = .231, for all bacterial species). The wound protector group had better soft tissue injury scores for the deltoid muscle (P < .001) and pectoralis muscle (P < .001). No difference in cephalic vein injury was noted between the 2 groups (P > .05). No difference in surgical time was noted. CONCLUSION: The use of a surgical wound protector device in total shoulder arthroplasty did not significantly decrease bacterial colonization of the deep wound. However, soft tissue damage to the deltoid and pectoralis muscle was less severe in the wound protector group. These findings suggest that this device reduces iatrogenic soft tissue injury.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Trio-based whole-exome sequencing identifies convergent epithelial junction-related pathways in syndromic hidradenitis suppurativa.

INTRODUCTION: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS)-related autoinflammatory syndromes, simply termed as syndromic HS (sHS), represent a group of rare immune-mediated inflammatory disorders in which HS coexists with systemic or cutaneous autoinflammatory features like PASH (pyoderma gangrenosum-PG-, acne and HS), PAPASH (PASH, pyogenic arthritis), PASS (PG, acne, HS, and ankylosing spondylitis), and SAPHO syndrome (synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis). In recent years, genetic studies identified several novel pathogenic variants underlying sHS; however, most investigations rely exclusively on affected individuals sequencing and the absence of parental genomic information limits the possibility to determine inheritance patterns. METHODS: To address these gaps, we performed trio-based whole-exome sequencing (WES) on five individuals diagnosed with sHS and their unaffected parents. RESULTS: The pathway related to epidermal adhesion and desmosome organization was the most represented across our cohort, encompassing seven genes: DSC3, DSG1, FAT1, LAMA3, MICALL2, PLEC and TJP2. Integrin-extracellular matrix (ECM) adhesion signaling pathway, represented by ten genes (CSPG4, FERMT3, ITGA3, LAMA3, LAMA5, LIMS2, LTBP3, PLEC, TGM2, TNC) was also retrieved. Also, variants affecting innate immune pathways, including cytokine signalling and antigen presentation, have been observed. CONCLUSION: Our exploratory findings suggest that genetically heterogeneous variants in syndromic HS converge on biological processes involving epithelial junction organisation, extracellular matrix interactions and innate immune regulation. Although not establishing a unique pathogenic mechanism, these observations identify epithelial barrier biology as a candidate pathway warranting validation in larger cohorts and functional studies.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Biologic-biologic and biologic-JAK inhibitor combination therapy in refractory systemic autoinflammatory diseases.

OBJECTIVES: Systemic autoinflammatory diseases (SAIDs) arise from genetic defects in innate immunity, leading to dysregulated activation of inflammatory pathways, including interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, TNF, and JAK/STAT. Clinical manifestations range from recurrent fever to severe complications such as encephalitis and AA amyloidosis. Management aims to control inflammation using immunosuppressive agents and targeted monotherapies (biologics or JAK inhibitors). Advanced combination therapy (ACT), defined as the use of biologics and/or JAK inhibitors in combination, has emerged as a strategy for refractory disease. METHODS: In this observational retrospective longitudinal cohort study, patients with SAIDs treated with ACT were included. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and safety data were collected. Treatment response was assessed using a composite outcome incorporating corticosteroid dose, C-reactive protein (CRP), and clinical improvement and categorized as non-response, partial response, or complete response. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (median age 30 years [range 4-76]) were included. The most common indications for ACT were pyogenic arthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum and acne (PAPA), mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD), and undifferentiated SAIDs. Most patients had disease-related complications and were dependent on glucocorticoids and/or opioids to control inflammation and pain, respectively. Following multiple ACT trials, complete response was observed in 21 patients (55.3%), partial response in 12 (31.6%), and no response in 5 (13.1%). Overall, 65 ACT regimens were administered, most commonly combining IL-1 and TNF inhibitors. Thirty-nine regimens were discontinued because of lack of efficacy, secondary loss of response, or adverse events. At the final follow-up, 26 patients (68%) remained on ACT, with a median treatment duration of 60 months (range, 11-186). CONCLUSIONS: ACT offers significant clinical benefits for patients with difficult-to-treat SAIDs, though challenges such as secondary loss of efficacy and infection risks remain.

Humans↗