SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Accessory navicular”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Clinical outcomes of fusion vs excision in the treatment of painful type II accessory naviculars: A matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: For painful Type II accessory naviculars, whether to remove or fuse them remains unclear based on the current literature. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of fusion versus excision in treating painful type II accessory naviculars. METHODS: This retrospective comparative study included and followed 54 eligible patients (from May 2017 to March 2023). After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 34 patients (17 fusion versus 17 excision) were analyzed. Outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score, Tegner score, complication rates, and radiographic measurements. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the appropriate accessory navicular size cutoff for predicting nonunion following fusion. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 35.0 ± 9.9 months. The fusion and excision groups showed significant and comparable VAS and AOFAS score improvements (p < .001). The fusion group had a higher complication rate (41.2% vs. 5.9%, p = .039), primarily nonunion and persistent pain. ROC curve analysis identified 50.3 mm² as the cutoff for nonunion risk; sizes < 50.3 mm² predicted high nonunion likelihood. CONCLUSIONS: Both fusion and excision are effective treatments for painful type II accessory naviculars, demonstrating acceptable pain and functional improvement during midterm follow-up. However, the lower complication rate along with relatively superior functional recovery favors the excision technique. For accessory naviculars smaller than 50.3 mm2, excision may be a better choice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Male accessory gland proteins in Grapholita molesta: Identification and reproductive functional validation of four accessory gland-specific lipases.

Accessory gland proteins (Acps), synthesized in the male accessory glands (AGs), are transferred to females via spermatophores during mating and elicit diverse post-mating physiological and behavioral responses. However, Acps have not been comprehensively characterized in Grapholita molesta, a cosmopolitan orchard pest. Here, using data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry, we describe an integrated proteomic approach combining comparative AG analyses (virgin vs. newly mated) with spermatophore profiling to identify Acps in G. molesta. According to the established screening criteria, we identified 83 confirmed Acps, which were classified into nine categories. Tissue-specific expression patterns of 20 randomly selected Acp genes were evaluated, revealing that these genes were specifically or highly expressed in male AGs. Among the 83 confirmed Acps, four Acps harbored the PLN02872 superfamily domain and were classified into the canonical lipase family. Notably, their transcripts were all highly expressed in the AGs during the pre-maturation stage. These four Acps were selected for preliminary validation of their male reproductive functions. RNAi-mediated knockdown of three out of four lipase genes in G. molesta males significantly decreased the fertility of mated females, with phenotypes including a significant reduction in egg production and egg hatching rate. This study provides a comprehensive catalog of high-confidence Acps, lays a foundation for subsequent in-depth functional characterization of these reproductive proteins, and offers promising molecular targets for the development of novel genetic regulation-based integrated pest management strategies.

Animals↗

PubMed2026

Vertical distribution of accessory canals in different tooth types: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically analyze the vertical distribution of accessory canals and propose potential root-end resection levels in different tooth types. DATA: Proportional distribution of accessory canals (PD-AC) in 1 mm intervals, cumulative proportions within 2 mm and 3 mm (CP-AC0-2 and CP-AC0-3), mean distance from accessory foramen to root apex or main foramen (MD-AF), and prevalence of accessory canals in 2D cross-sections (PR-AC-2D). SOURCES: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted through December 25, 2025. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251107855). STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the AQUA tool. Nineteen studies were included for qualitative synthesis, of which eleven provided sufficient data for meta-analysis. A random-effects model was used, and subgroup analyses were stratified by tooth type, accessory canal type, and country. Within 0-1 mm, 1-2 mm, 2-3 mm, and 3-4 mm from the apex, 41.5%, 34.3%, 9.9%, and 4.4% of accessory canals were located, respectively. Molars had significantly higher proportions than anterior teeth both within 2 mm (90.0% vs. 72.4%) and 3 mm (96.9% vs. 87.5%). Of apical ramifications, 86.4% were within 2 mm. The pooled MD-AF was 1.472 mm. PR-AC-2D decreased from 29.3% at 1 mm to 1.3% at 5 mm. All studies presented moderate to high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: A 2 mm root-end resection level may be sufficient for molars, whereas anterior teeth may require a higher level. Further randomized controlled trials are needed. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A 2 mm resection may adequately expose or remove most accessory canals in molars, potentially preserving more root length while maintaining treatment efficacy. In anterior teeth, a traditional 3 mm resection remains advisable until further evidence becomes available.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A complete hlyCABD-like RTX operon marks a virulence-associated subset of trh-positive Vibrio parahaemolyticus from Hangzhou Bay, China.

Vibrio parahaemolyticus remains a major cause of seafood-associated gastroenteritis, yet routine surveillance still relies largely on the canonical hemolysin markers thermostable direct hemolysin (tdh) and tdh-related hemolysin (trh). To determine whether this framework overlooks accessory virulence determinants in trh-positive lineages, we analyzed 193 V. parahaemolyticus isolates collected between 2022 and 2025 from clinical, environmental, and seafood-associated sources in the Hangzhou Bay region of China. Serotyping identified 45 serotypes, with O10:K4 predominating among clinical isolates. Both clinical and non-clinical populations showed open pan-genomes, although the non-clinical group carried a larger accessory gene pool. We identified a complete hlyCABD-like RTX operon in 10 trh-positive isolates with T3SS2-associated virulence backgrounds. These RTX-positive isolates were distributed across seven sequence types and three of five phylogenetic groups. This distribution was lineage-restricted but non-clonal. In the representative hybrid-assembled genome, the operon occurred within a mosaic genomic region containing additional virulence- and mobility-associated genes, indicating a composite pathogenicity island-like element. In the tested subset, RTX-positive isolates showed significantly greater hemolytic activity than RTX-negative trh-positive isolates. This significant difference was consistently observed in both plate-based and liquid assays, and within the RTX-positive subset, hlyA expression correlated with hemolytic activity, whereas the trh gene and the tlh (thermolabile hemolysin) gene did not. A complete hlyCABD-like RTX operon therefore identifies a hemolysis-associated subset of trh-positive V. parahaemolyticus and supports its further evaluation as an additional target for food safety surveillance.

Vibrio parahaemolyticus↗

PubMed2026

Delphi study robot consenso: Strategies for the implementation of robotic surgery in general surgery in the Spanish hospital network.

INTRODUCTION: The implementation of robotic surgery in public hospitals presents multiple logistical, educational, and organizational challenges. In the absence of unified guidelines, a national consensus is required to optimize its safe and efficient adoption. This study aimed to establish a set of consensus-based and measurable recommendations for the implementation of robotic surgery programs in hospitals within the Spanish National Health System, based on the experience of centres with established robotic programs and intended to serve as guidance for hospitals that are initiating or planning their implementation. METHODS: A national Delphi study was conducted with the participation of robotic surgery experts from 26 public hospitals. The expert panel was composed exclusively of digestive surgeons with experience in robotic surgery. Three iterative rounds of expert panel evaluation were conducted between March 2024 and March 2025. The questions were grouped into five thematic blocks. Consensus was defined as an agreement level of ≥66.7%. Kendall's W coefficient was used to assess concordance. RESULTS: High levels of consensus were achieved on key aspects related to infrastructure, structured training, cost evaluation, and quality assurance mechanisms. Areas of disagreement were also identified, such as the need for a dedicated anaesthesiologist, purchase of accessory instruments during the initial phase, and official accreditation pathways. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a guideline for developing a national robotic surgery strategy focused on patient safety, program sustainability, and standardized training of surgical teams. These recommendations can guide hospitals at different stages of robotic technology adoption. Given that the consensus was reached from an exclusively surgical perspective, the recommendations focus on patient safety, program sustainability, and standardized training of the surgical team, and should be interpreted in an adaptable manner according to each centre's context, case volume, and available resources.

Cirugía Asistida por Robot↗