Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Checklist”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,549 records · Page 86Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Knowledge and expectation of postconcussion symptoms in the general population.

OBJECTIVE: Beliefs about mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) may affect complaints and their persistence. This study investigates the relationships between knowledge, experience, and expectation in the general population. METHODS: One hundred seventy-one people reported symptoms expected from vignettes about MTBI, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and orthopedic injury. Then they completed a postconcussional syndrome (PCS) checklist about these vignettes and about personal symptoms. RESULTS: The ability to generate symptoms from vignettes was poor for PCS, depression, and PTSD, and was greatly improved using a PCS checklist, probably by symptom guessing. No postconcussion symptoms were associated specifically with MTBI. Those with more personal symptoms expected more symptoms. Past experience of MTBI did not improve symptom knowledge. Beliefs about the 'undesirability' of conditions were associated with expected outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: People know little about PCS. Expectations about MTBI are influenced by psychological factors that are relevant if we consider information given in hospitals. Symptom overlap means that psychological conditions such as depression may be misdiagnosed as PCS, and checklists should not be used for diagnosis.

Accidents, Traffic↗
PubMed2004

Selection of a substance use disorder diagnostic instrument by the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network.

Several instruments for diagnosing substance use disorders (SUD) have been developed, but to date none has emerged as the standard for community-based clinical studies. To select the most suitable SUD diagnostic instrument for its clinical trials, the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) implemented a procedure in which 36 university-based addiction researchers and 62 community-based addiction treatment providers evaluated and ranked five widely recognized diagnostic instruments: (1) the SUD section of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID); (2) the SUD section of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, 2nd ed. (CIDI-2); (3) the SUD section of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-IV Diagnosis (DIS-IV); (4) the Diagnostic Statistical Manual-IV Checklist (DSM-IV Checklist); and (5) the Substance Dependence Severity Scale (SDSS). To assist the evaluation and ranking process, key characteristics of each instrument were presented in tabular and narrative formats. Participants ranked each instrument from 1 (most preferred) to 5 (least preferred). The SCID received the best overall mean score (2.24) followed by the CIDI-2 (2.59), DIS (2.94), DSM Checklist (3.40) and the SDSS (3.83). After discussing the pragmatic and scientific advantages and disadvantages of each instrument, the CTN Steering Committee selected the CIDI-2. The selection of the CIDI-2 standardizes the collection of diagnostic data and provides a common diagnostic tool for practitioners and clinical researchers in the CTN. Implications for practice/research collaboration and initiatives are explored.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2006

The association between vision quality of life and academics as measured by the College of Optometrists in Vision Development Quality of Life questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Undetected visual problems are one of the causes of academic difficulties in the classroom. An easily administered screening device that identifies children who are likely to do poorly in school because of vision problems would be a valuable tool. The screening should be able to be performed by a classroom teacher or aide. The objective of this study was to determine if there was an association between vision-related quality-of-life factors (19-item College of Optometrists in Vision Development Quality of Life [COVD-QOL] questionnaire checklist) and academic performance. A secondary objective was to determine whether student and parent responses to the questionnaire would be similar. METHODS: Ninety-one parents or guardians and their children, attending the third, fifth, and seventh grades in a public school participated in this study. Both the parent or guardian and student independently completed the checklist. The scores of both groups were compared with the Stanford IX test scores for total reading, total math, total spelling, and total battery scores of the Stanford IX. The parent or guardian and student scores were compared to evaluate the agreement (intergroup reliability). RESULTS: Parent or guardian and student checklist scores were compared. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank test showed that the mean scores for the parent or guardian were significantly lower than for third grade students and also for the total sample. Visual symptoms were found to be inversely correlated to academic performance; the lower the academic score, the more symptoms were reported. Symptoms reported by third grade students and their parents tended to be more highly correlated with academic scores. In general, symptoms reported by the parent were more highly correlated with academic score than the symptoms reported by the student. CONCLUSION: The COVD-QOL questionnaire is a cost-effective, quick, and easy tool that may be used in school screening to identify possible visual symptoms that are correlated to academic performance.

Child↗
PubMedDate not supplied

An assessment tool for brachial plexus regional anesthesia performance: establishing construct validity and reliability.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Technical proficiency in regional anesthesia is often determined subjectively through in-training evaluations. Objective assessment tools improve these evaluations by providing criteria for measurement. However, any evaluation instrument needs to be valid and reliable before it is adopted into a curriculum. The purpose of this study is to determine the validity and reliability of a devised assessment of residents performing an interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB). METHODS: In this prospective study, 10 junior trainees and 10 senior trainees were videotaped performing an ISB. Junior trainees were defined as in their first year of anesthetic training and had performed less than 10 ISBs independently. Senior trainees had completed at least 1 year of anesthesia training and had performed greater than 10 ISBs independently. Two blinded expert raters independently evaluated the performance of the ISB using a checklist and global rating scale. Construct validity was established if the assessments were able to reliably discriminate between different levels of training. RESULTS: Senior trainees performed an ISB significantly better than junior trainees when assessed using the global rating scale (P < .05) and checklist (P < .001). The overall interrater reliability for the global rating scores was excellent (r = 0.85, P < .05) and was good for the checklist scores (r = 0.74, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Both assessment modalities were valid, in that they reliably discriminated between different levels of training. Objective measures of technical skills are feasible, timely, and improve the validity and reliability of competency assessments.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗
PubMed2005

Modeling instructor preferences for CPR and AED competence estimation.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) skills competency can be tested using a checklist of component skills, individually graded "pass" or "fail." Scores are typically calculated as the percentage of skills passed, but may differ from an instructor's overall subjective assessment of simulated CPR or AED adequacy. OBJECTIVE: To identify and evaluate composite measures (methods for scoring checklists) that reflect instructors' subjective assessments of CPR or AED skills performance best. METHODS: Associations between instructor assessment and lay-volunteer skill performance were made using 6380 CPR and 3313 AED skill retention tests collected in the Public Access Defibrillation Trial. Checklists included CPR skills (e.g., calling 911, administering compressions) and AED skills (e.g., positioning electrodes, shocking within 90 s of AED arrival). The instructor's subjective overall assessment (adequate/inadequate) of CPR performance (perfusion) or AED competence (effective shock) was compared to composite measures. We evaluated the traditional composite measure (assigning equal weights to individual skills) and several nontraditional composite measures (assigning variable weights). Skills performed out of sequence were further weighted from 0% (no credit) to 100% (full credit). RESULTS: Composite measures providing full credit for skills performed out of sequence and down-weighting process skills (e.g., calling 911, clearing oneself from the AED) had the strongest association with the instructor's subjective assessment; the traditional CPR composite measure had the weakest association. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that instructors in public CPR and AED classes may tend to down-weight process skills and to excuse step sequencing errors when evaluating CPR and AED skills subjectively for overall proficiency. Testing methods that relate classroom performance to actual performance in the field and to clinical outcomes require further research.

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Psychometric properties of ADHD rating scales among children with mental retardation I: reliability.

The reliability of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) rating scales in children with mental retardation was assessed. Parents, teachers, and teaching assistants completed ADHD rating scales on 48 children aged 5-12 diagnosed with mental retardation. Measures included the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Conners Rating Scales, the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Test (ADHDT), the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham (SNAP) Checklist, the Werry-Weiss-Peters Activity Rating Scale (WWPARS), the ADD-H Comprehensive Teacher's Rating Scale (ACTeRS), and the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community (ABC-C). The internal consistency, test-retest, and interrater reliability of each scale was examined. Results showed best support for teacher completed scales, followed by ratings made by teaching assistants, and parent-report scales. Strong support for the internal consistency of the teacher-report measures was found, and it was quite similar to previously reported internal consistencies with typically developing children. Test-retest reliabilities of the teacher report measures were also quite good but tended to be lower than those reported for typically developing children. For teaching assistant ratings, test-retest reliabilities were adequate to very good. The internal consistency reliabilities for parent completed measures were adequate to excellent, but test-retest reliabilities were low. Interrater reliability was best for teacher-teaching assistants. The ABC-C was the only measure on which the interrater reliability was adequate for clinical purposes.

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity↗
PubMedDate not supplied

CBCL in the assessment of psychopathology in Finnish children with intellectual disability.

Structured checklists have been used to supplement psychiatric assessment of children with normal intelligence, but for children with intellectual disability, only a few checklists exist. We evaluated the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) in the assessment of psychopathology in Finnish children with intellectual disability. The CBCL was completed by parents or other carers of 90 children aged 6-13 years. Of the 118 CBCL problem items, the lowest scores were for 'Suicidal talks' and 'Alcohol, drugs', and the highest score for 'Acts too young'. Total Problem, Internalizing, and Externalizing scores were highest among children with moderate intellectual disability and lowest among those with profound intellectual disability. Externalizing scores were significantly higher among children with mild or moderate intellectual disability than among those with severe or profound intellectual disability. Compared with the original normative samples, Total Problem scores were higher in the present study. With a T-score cut-off point of 60, the rated frequency of psychiatric disorders was 43%. We conclude that, despite certain limitations, the CBCL can be used in the assessment of psychopathology among children with mild intellectual disability but is less reliable for those with moderate, severe, or profound intellectual disability.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Persistence of early emerging aberrant behavior in children with developmental disabilities.

This study examined the persistence of early emerging aberrant behavior in 13 preschool children with developmental disabilities. The severity of aberrant behavior was assessed every 6 months over a 3-year period. Teachers completed the assessments using the Aberrant Behavior Checklist [Aman, M. G., & Singh, N. N. (1986). Aberrant Behavior Checklist: Manual. East Aurora, NY: Slosson Educational Publications; (1994). Aberrant Behavior Checklist--Community. East Aurora, NY: Slosson Educational Publications]. Problem behaviors were present in all children at the beginning of the study. Nine of the 13 children entered the study with relatively high levels of aberrant behaviors that showed little change over the 3 years. These data suggest that aberrant behaviors often emerge early and can be highly persistent during the preschool years. Prevention would, therefore, seem to require home-based interventions that begin before 4 years of age.

Child↗
PubMed2001

Measuring medical students' experience with surgical problems and procedures.

BACKGROUND: Measuring medical students' experience on their surgical clerkship rotations to assess the adequacy of the breadth of exposure is essential for producing generalist clinicians. METHODS: A Surgical Clinical Checklist was developed by surveying the surgical faculty for those surgical problems and procedures that every generalist physician should experience. The checklist was then distributed to 48 consecutive third-year medical students for completion during their core clerkship in surgery. RESULTS: Students reported encounters with surgical procedures more frequently than with surgical problems (64.3% of procedures versus 21.9% of problems were encountered by 80% of respondents). Students actively participated as often as they reported passive observation alone. Students assigned to two different teaching sites encountered similar numbers of items at each site although the distribution of individual items was different. CONCLUSIONS: The Surgical Clinical Checklist provides a valuable measurement tool to assess student experiences on their surgical clerkship and can be used to direct future teaching initiatives.

Clinical Clerkship↗
PubMed1997

Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination.

BACKGROUND: A new approach to testing operative technical skills, the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS), formally assesses discrete segments of surgical tasks using bench model simulations. This study examines the interstation reliability and construct validity of a large-scale administration of the OSATS. METHODS: A 2-hour, eight-station OSATS was administered to 48 general surgery residents. Residents were assessed at each station by one of 48 surgeons who evaluated the resident using two methods of scoring: task-specific checklists and global rating scales. RESULTS: Interstation reliability was 0.78 for the checklist score, and 0.85 for the global score. Analysis of variance revealed a significant effect of training for both the checklist score, F(3,44) = 20.08, P <0.001, and the global score, F(3,44) = 24.63, P <0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The OSATS demonstrates high reliability and construct validity, suggesting that we can effectively measure residents' technical ability outside the operating room using bench model simulations.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed1999

Assessing medical students' competence in obtaining informed consent.

BACKGROUND: Medical schools increasingly place emphasis on preparing students to perform routine, ethically important clinical activities with sensitivity and acumen. A method for evaluating students' skills in obtaining informed consent that was created at our institution is described. METHODS: Formal assessment of medical students' professional attitudes, values, and ethics skills occurs in the context of three required and developmentally attuned comprehensive examinations. A videotaped station tested senior medical students' ability to obtain informed consent from a standardized patient who expresses concern about undergoing cardiac catheterization. Two checklists were completed by the patient. Videotapes were reviewed by a faculty member, and students' reactions to the assessment experience were documented. RESULTS: Seventy-one senior students participated, and all performed well. Mean scores of 6.3 out of 7 (range 5 to 7, SD = 0.5) on the informed consent checklist and 8.7 out of 9 (range 6 to 9, SD = 0.5) on the communication skills checklist were obtained. Students endorsed the importance of the skills tested. CONCLUSIONS: This method of examining medical students' abilities to obtain informed consent has several positive features and holds promise as an ethics competence assessment tool.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.

OBJECTIVE: To improve the accuracy and completeness of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy in order to allow readers to assess the potential for bias in the study and to evaluate its generalisability. METHODS: The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) steering committee searched the literature to identify publications on the appropriate conduct and reporting of diagnostic studies and extracted potential items into an extensive list. Researchers, editors, and members of professional organizations shortened this list during a two-day consensus meeting with the goal of developing a checklist and a generic flow diagram for studies of diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: The search for published guidelines regarding diagnostic research yielded 33 previously published checklists, from which we extracted a list of 75 potential items. At the consensus meeting, participants shortened the list to 25 items, using evidence on bias whenever available. A prototypical flow diagram provides information about the method of patient recruitment, the order of test execution and the numbers of patients undergoing the test under evaluation, the reference standard or both. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of research depends on complete and accurate reporting. If medical journals adopt the checklist and the flow diagram, the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy should improve to the advantage of the clinicians, researchers, reviewers, journals, and the public.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2001

Treatment type and symptom severity among oncology patients by self-report.

Oncology patients receiving chemotherapy (n=109) and radiation therapy RT (n=161) reported symptom concerns and severity on the 25-item therapy-related symptom checklist (TRSC). Secondary analysis of the self-reports of the two treatment groups was done using the Mann-Whitney U Test. Thirteen symptoms differed significantly between the two groups. RT patients reported significantly greater severity of five symptoms (p<0.05) during therapy. Chemotherapy patients reported significantly greater severity of eight different symptoms. The other 14 items showed a heterogeneous pattern of self-reported patient symptom concerns. The TRSC appears to be a clinically useful self-report checklist that captures the more important symptom concerns of both RT and chemotherapy patients. Earlier efforts to develop this checklist are reviewed briefly.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1993

Maintenance of defibrillators in a state of readiness.

Since 1984, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has utilized the Medical Device Reporting system as a mechanism for reporting adverse incidents associated with the use of medical devices, including external defibrillators. The frequency and content of these reports prompted an FDA-conducted five-state study of defibrillator-user training and maintenance practices for both devices and batteries. The study also included inspection and testing of defibrillators and batteries to assess their state of maintenance. A detailed review of the reports and of the five-state data confirmed that in the majority of cases, adverse incidents were related to improper defibrillator operation and maintenance, prompting the FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health to launch an educational effort directed toward those who operate and maintain defibrillators. Proper maintenance of batteries (both nickel-cadmium and sealed lead-acid) was a major component of the educational thrust, because battery failure was identified as a recurrent and preventable problem. In an effort to correct the diverse types of incidents being reported, checklists were developed by the FDA for both manual and automated defibrillators. The checklists are designed to cover the spectrum of reported problems related to both device and user. The advent of more stringent FDA adverse incident-reporting regulations, coupled with increased use of defibrillators in diverse settings with varying usage frequencies, would seem to give a major impetus to the regular use of these checklists wherever defibrillators are employed.

Electric Countershock↗
PubMed1981

Computerized triage of pediatric patients: automated triage algorithms.

Pediatric triage algorithms which were prospectively and retrospectively validated in a pediatric acute care facility serve as the basis for the development of a simplified pediatric triage checklist. This checklist is used by minimally trained nonprofessionals to assign safely the care urgency categories of the chief complaints of pediatric "walk-in" patients. This article describes the background of the pediatric triage checklist and its adaptation to a computerized triage system. This system not only allows for safe triage, but also creates a mechanism for rapid, organized retrieval of data from individual and group patient triage encounters that is useful for the study and planning of health care delivery.

Child↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Psychosocial assessment in the general pediatric population: a multiple-gated screening and identification procedure.

This article describes a screening and assessment procedure to identify the need for psychologic and psychiatric services within the general pediatric population. This procedure is additionally designed to facilitate timely and focused treatment planning. It begins with a brief, user friendly instrument, the Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC), to routinely screen all pediatric patients. The procedure continues by asking parents of children who are identified as meeting cutoff criteria (on the PSC) or at-risk for psychosocial problems to complete a more sophisticated instrument, the Child Behavior Checklist. Using the PSC and the Child Behavior Checklist in this multiple-gated manner allows for screening and then identification of problem child behaviors, providing data necessary to complete an initial treatment plan. The procedure is proposed as an efficient means of routinely screening for, and then identifying, child psychosocial problems in general pediatric populations.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Validation of the Computerized Suicide Risk Scale--a backpropagation neural network instrument (CSRS-BP).

BACKGROUND: Medically serious suicide attempts have been recognized as the most important predictor of suicide. The Computerized Suicide Risk Scale based on backpropagation neural networks (CSRS-BP) has been recently found efficient in the detection of records of patients who performed medically serious suicide attempts (MSSA). OBJECTIVES. To validate the CSRS-BP by: 1) using the CSRS-BP with patients instead of records; 2) comparing the ability of expert psychiatrists to detect MSSA, using the CSRS checklist; and 3) comparing the results of the Risk Estimator for Suicide (RES) and the self-rating Suicide Risk Scale (SRS) with the CSRS-BP. METHODS: Two hundred fifty psychiatric inpatients (35 MSSA and 215 non-MSSA) were diagnosed by clinicians using the SCID DSM-IV. Three expert psychiatrists completed the CSRS checklist, and the RES for each patient, and the patients completed the self-report SRS assessment scale. The CSRS-BP was run for each patient. Five other expert psychiatrists assessed the CSRS checklists and estimated the probability of MSSA for each patient. Comparisons of sensitivity and specificity rates between CSRS-BP, assessment scales and experts were done. RESULTS: Initially, the CSRS-BP, RES, SRS, and experts performed poorly. Although sensitivity and specificity rates significantly improved (two to four times) after the inclusion of information regarding the number of previous suicide attempts in the input data set, results still remained insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: The CSRS-BP, which was very successful in the detection of MSSA patient records, failed to detect MSSA patients in face-to-face interviews. Information regarding previous suicide attempts is an important MSSA predictor, but remains insufficient for the detection of MSSA in individual patients. The detection rate of the SRS and RES scales was also poor and could therefore not identify MSSA patients or be used to validate the CSRS-BP.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To comprehend the results of diagnostic accuracy studies, readers must understand the design, conduct, and analysis of such studies. The authors sought to develop guidelines for improving the accuracy and completeness of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy in order to allow readers better to assess the validity and generalizability of study results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy group steering committee searched the literature to identify publications on the appropriate conduct and reporting of diagnostic studies and to extract potential guidelines for authors and editors. An extensive list of items was prepared. Members of the steering committee then met for 2 days with other researchers, editors, methodologists, statisticians, and members of professional organizations to develop a checklist and a prototypical flowchart to guide authors and editors of studies of diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: The search for published guidelines on diagnostic research yielded 33 previously published checklists, from which the group produced an initial list of 75 items. This list was honed to 25 key items by group consensus and on the basis of published research on bias. A prototypical flowchart was developed as a tool for conveying information about the method of patient recruitment, the order of test execution, and the numbers of patients undergoing the test under evaluation, the reference test, or both. Potential users reviewed the conference version of the checklist and flowchart and provided additional suggestions, which were then incorporated. CONCLUSION: Use of these carefully developed, consensus-based guidelines should enable clearer and more complete reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy, as well as better reader understanding of the validity and generalizability of study results.

Bias↗