Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Interview”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,477 records · Page 82Linked to original sources

Improving residents' interviewing skills by group videotape review.

OBJECTIVE: Internal medicine residency training programs typically emphasize biomedical learning, but relatively few provide opportunities for residents to improve outpatient interviewing skills or to address challenging patient encounters. Even fewer programs provide resources to assess patient-resident relationship skills. To address these issues, we developed a curriculum that is designed to enhance patient-centered interviewing techniques in residents. DESCRIPTION: At the UCSF-VA PRIME residency program, interns on ambulatory block attend three didactic sessions that introduce basic medical interviewing techniques, including elicitation of patient concerns and mutual agenda setting, biopsychosocial interviewing, and conflict resolution in the patient-physician relationship. These sessions are taught using role-play exercises and interactive, case-based discussions. Second- and third-year residents on ambulatory block participate in an ongoing small-group seminar in which they present videotapes of their interviews with patients. To make these tapes, residents arrange to see patients in a clinic room where a videotape recorder is mounted on the wall. Patients who consent to be videotaped complete a form stating that the tapes are to be used solely for educational purposes. Twice a year, each of our 16 residents selects one encounter that highlights personal learning goals related to interviewing and presents those learning goals with associated videotape clips in a 90-minute seminar. Each seminar is devoted to two residents, who facilitate a discussion of the effectiveness of the interview and solicit feedback about potential methods for improvement. DISCUSSION: When the seminars were originally developed, we anticipated that this innovative combination of traditional individual videotape review with small-group learning would encourage self-directed learning. Indeed, over the last three years, residents have become more confident with their interviewing capabilities and less self-conscious about showing their own videotaped interviews. As a result, the seminars have unexpectedly evolved into a highly sophisticated series of learning modules, in which residents seek their most challenging patient encounters to videotape and show to the group. Residents have presented complicated scenarios involving critical patient-physician conflicts, somatizing patients, cross-cultural communication difficulties, overzealous family members, patients with substance abuse, and bad-news interviews. These dilemmas represent fundamental management challenges that are difficult to discuss in a more didactic format, and the immediate case-based nature of the interviews makes these often-emotional issues come alive. The group videotape reviews also give residents opportunities to reflect on their own interviewing encounters, to observe other interviewing styles and techniques, and to provide support to their fellow residents after particularly emotional interviews. An ancillary benefit of these exercises is that we have now developed a library of challenging interviews, which are easily accessible for further teaching seminars. Our residents consider this learning experience to be one of the most positive of their residency and valuable for their professional development. Residents report that this small-group seminar series has markedly improved their communication with patients, and they now clamor for the opportunity to present interviewing dilemmas. We believe that similar curricula can be readily instituted at other residency programs.

Humans↗

The variability of practice in interviews used by professionals to investigate child sexual abuse.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to examine: (1) the variability of interview practice among professionals who interview children to investigate suspected sexual abuse; (2) the relationship between interview practice and respondent characteristics; (3) the characteristics of interviewers who used the anatomically correct dolls in the course of their interviews. METHOD: Sixty investigatory interviewers completed questionnaires focusing on professional background, training, and interview practice. RESULTS: Interview practice varied considerably and some practices were at odds with the recommendations of the literature. Most of this variability was not accounted for by the respondent variables examined. Where there was evidence for an association, the interviewers' professional background, number of interviews conducted in the previous year, and whether or not they used the anatomically correct dolls appeared to influence practice, whereas general training and specific training in child sexual abuse had no significant effect. Only a minority (36%) used the anatomically correct dolls and none of the interviewer characteristics evaluated differentiated them from non doll-users. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample interview practices varied considerably and did not appear to be influenced by the interviewer's specific or general training. Further research is needed to focus on the comparative effectiveness of different interview techniques and the comparative effectiveness of different training programs in influencing interviewing practice.

Child↗

The effect of data collection mode and ethnicity of interviewer on response rates and self-reported alcohol use among Turks and Moroccans in the Netherlands: an experimental study.

AIMS: To test the effects of data collection mode and ethnicity of interviewers on response rates and self-reported alcohol use among second-generation Turks and Moroccans in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-nine Turks and 271 Moroccans were interviewed face-to-face, and 475 Turks and 482 Moroccans received a mailed questionnaire. Half of the Turks and Moroccans randomly allocated to the interview mode were ethnically matched to the interviewer; the remainder were allocated to a Dutch interviewer. RESULTS: Turks and Moroccans more often responded to a face-to-face interview than to a mailed questionnaire. No effect of ethnicity of interviewer on response rates was demonstrated. With respect to the effects on alcohol reports, Turks and Moroccans tended to report a higher alcohol use in the mailed survey than in the face-to-face interview. They reported significantly more often excessive drinking in the mail survey than in the face-to-face interviews. Ethnicity of the interviewer resulted in Turks and Moroccans reporting a higher prevalence of alcohol use during the previous 6 months when interviewed by a Dutch interviewer compared with an ethnically matched interviewer. CONCLUSIONS: Among second-generation Turks and Moroccans, mail surveys seem most suitable to measure mean and excessive alcohol use. However, interviews held by Dutch interviewers seem to be the most appropriate method to study the prevalence of alcohol use during the previous 6 months.

Adolescent↗

The impact of the interview in pediatric residency selection.

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the impact of USMLE scores and interview scores on the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) rank of applicants to the residency program at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. METHODOLOGY: We evaluated 935 applicants' files from 2000, 2001, and 2002. For each candidate, one interviewer had access to the full application, while the other interviewer was blinded to USMLE scores and grades. Interview scores were generated by both interviewers. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate relationships between USMLE scores, interview scores, and NRMP rank list number. RESULTS: There were a wide range of USMLE scores among candidates who interviewed (range 181 to 269, 227.7 +/- 17.1, M +/- standard deviation). USMLE scores were weakly correlated to nonblinded interview scores (r = -0.17), final committee scores (r = -0.26), and NRMP ranking (r = -0.21): P < .0005. Blinded interviews did not correlate with USMLE scores. Both nonblinded and blinded interviews had stronger correlations with NRMP rank list number (r = 0.49, P < .0005 and r = 0.36, P < .0005, respectively). The nonblinded interview accounted for 20.6% of variance in the NRMP rank list order. CONCLUSIONS: Interview scores were the most important variable for candidate ranking on the NRMP list. Furthermore, when interviewers had access to board scores, there was a modest correlation to performance on the USMLE. While interviews may reflect a candidate's personality, they may not effectively measure desired characteristics when access to academic markers is unrestricted. We suggest incorporating blinded interviews into the selection process to give candidates a better opportunity to display communication skills, emotional stability, and "fit" for the program.

Adult↗

Medical student interviewing skills and mother-reported satisfaction and recall.

BACKGROUND: Providing feedback to medical students about their interviewing skills is an important component of teaching programmes. There is very little information about mothers' views of medical student consultations in paediatrics, and in particular about what mothers consider to be the key elements of a successful consultation. Patient-centred interviewing is a model which emphasizes the active seeking of patient views. In association with appropriate clinical skills, it is reported to promote improved health outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether greater medical student clinical competence and more frequent use of patient-centred techniques is associated with higher maternal satisfaction, higher maternal rating of the medical student's interpersonal skills, and greater maternal recall of relevant diagnosis and treatment recommendations. METHOD: Two standardized 'medical student' videotaped interviews were created based on actual senior medical student consultations. Interview A demonstrated both higher student clinical competence and higher patient-centredness compared with interview B. Both videotaped interviews were viewed and then rated, using a questionnaire, by 11 mothers attending a teaching general practice. RESULTS: Significantly higher mean scores, indicating greater maternal satisfaction, were associated with interview A (P < 0.01 for all measures). Accurate recall for diagnosis and management was also significantly greater after interview A (mean diagnosis recall, interview A 35%, interview B 14%, P < 0.01; mean management recall, interview A 95%, interview B 57%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Maternal satisfaction and recall were higher following a more clinically competent and patient-centred medical student interview. Maternal ratings of student interviews could be used as an additional method of assessment as well as providing feedback to medical students on their interview skills development.

Clinical Competence↗

Medical students taking the role of the mother in paediatric interview evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Medical students develop the skills required to interview parents and children through practice and by receiving feedback. Parental perceptions of medical student skills in child health interviews can be used to enhance student learning. OBJECTIVES: To integrate maternal perspectives of medical student interviews into student learning, and to compare student and maternal evaluations of simulated medical student interviews. METHODS: A sample of 45 medical students viewed 2 standardised videotapes in which a 'medical student' interviewed the mother of a sick child. The videotapes demonstrated contrasting levels of 'student' clinical competence and patient-centeredness. After each interview students were asked to rate their satisfaction and recall of information as if they were the mother in the interview. Student satisfaction was measured using the Interpersonal Skills Rating Scale (IPS). Recall of interview information was assessed by questionnaire, with student answers coded independently before analysis. Following both videotapes, students reviewed transcripts of the interviews and discussed their evaluations. Student responses were compared with maternal satisfaction and recall responses after viewing of the same videotapes. RESULTS: Student IPS ratings were higher following the high clinical competence, high patient-centred interview (P < 0.0001). Student recall of specific information was greater for some items following the high clinical competence, high patient-centred interview, but was lower for others. Maternal and student satisfaction and recall were similar following the 2 interviews. CONCLUSION: Students and mothers agreed on the qualities of a successful interview. Experiencing an interview through the 'eyes' of a mother provided students with valuable insights regarding interview skills.

Clinical Competence↗

Interviewer variability - quality aspects in a case-control study.

Quality assurance and quality control are important for the reliability of case-control studies. Here we describe the procedures used in a previously published study, with emphasis on interviewer variability. To evaluate risk factors for acute pancreatitis, information including previous diagnoses and medication was collected from medical records and by telephone interviews from 462 cases and 1781 controls. Quality assurance procedures included education and training of interviewers and data validity checks. Quality control included a classification test, annual test interviews, expert case validation, and database validation. We found pronounced variations between interviewers. The maximal number of interviews per day varied from 3 to 9. The adjusted average (95% CI) number of diagnoses captured per interview of cases was 4.1 (3.8-4.3) and of controls 3.5 (3.4-3.7) (excluding one deviating interviewer). For drugs, the average (95% CI) number per interview was 3.9 (3.7-4.1) for cases and 3.3 (3.2-3.4) for controls (excluding one deviating interviewer). One of the fourteen interviewers deviated significantly from the others, and more so for controls than for cases. This interviewer's data ;were excluded. Nonetheless, data concerning controls more frequently needed correction and supplementation than for cases. Erroneous coding of diagnoses and medication was also more frequent among controls. Thus, a system for quality control of coding practices is crucial. Variability in interviewers' ability to ascertain information is a possible source of bias in interview-based case-control studies when "blinding" cannot be achieved.

Acute Disease↗

Investigative interviewing with children: evaluation of the effectiveness of a training program for child protective service workers.

OBJECTIVE: Previous research suggests that training workshops on investigative interviewing conducted with front-line workers, such as police officers or child protective service (CPS) workers, may result in improved knowledge about appropriate strategies to use. Limited research has addressed whether such training programs result in improvements in actual interviewing skills. The present investigation assessed the impact of a training workshop on CPS workers' knowledge about conducting and behavior during investigative interviews. METHOD: Twelve CPS workers participated. To evaluate the impact of the training, a quasi-experimental design was used. Participants completed outcome measures prior to, immediately following, and 3 months following the training. Outcome measures included (a) a questionnaire to assess knowledge about interviewing practices, (b) simulated interviews with a confederate to assess participant behavior during an investigative interview, and (c) questionnaires to gather information related to the simulated interviews (e.g., materials requested for use during interview, abuse status of confederate). All participants completed 6 hours of training during 3 weekly 2-hour sessions. RESULTS: Participants' knowledge on the topic, as well as several interviewing skills during simulated interviews, improved following the training. However, the training failed to impact several key interviewing skills such as the types of questions asked or the length of the interview. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge-based workshop training programs may not adequately prepare CPS workers to conduct appropriate investigative interviews with children who were allegedly abused. Further, knowledge about how to conduct such interviews may not be the best indicator of whether someone is prepared for this aspect of the job.

Adult↗

The interview in the admission process.

Significant demographic, legal, and educational developments during the last ten years have led medical schools to review critically their selection procedures. A critical component of this review is the selection interview, since it is an integral part of most admission processes; however, some question its value. Interviews serve four purposes: information gathering, decision making, verification of application data, and recruitment. The first and last of these merit special attention. The interview enables an admission committee to gather information about a candidate that would be difficult or impossible to obtain by any other means yet is readily evaluated in an interview. Given the recent decline in numbers of applicants to and interest in medical school, many schools are paying closer attention to the interview as a powerful recruiting tool. Interviews can be unstructured, semistructured, or structured. Structuring involves analyzing what makes a medical student successful, standardizing the questions for all applicants, providing sample answers for evaluating responses, and using panel interviews (several interviewers simultaneously with one applicant). Reliability and validity of results increase with the degree of structuring. Studies of interviewers show that they are often biased in terms of the rating tendencies (for instance, leniency or severity) and in terms of an applicant's sex, race, appearance, similarity to the interviewer, and contrast to other applicants). Training interviewers may reduce such bias. Admission committees should weigh the purposes of interviewing differently for various types of candidates, develop structured or semistructured interviews focusing on nonacademic criteria, and train the interviewers.

Bias↗

Teaching interviewing skills to paediatric junior clerks using simulated mothers.

In this article a training programme is described for improving interviewing skills of students in the fifth year (junior clerkship) of the medical curriculum. Two interviews with a 'simulated mother' form the core of the programme. The interviews are immediately followed by a feedback session in which the simulated mother discusses the strong and the weak points of the interview. In the feedback she makes use of a checklist with relevant points concerning the content and the process of the interview. Where required the comments are substantiated with fragments of the videotaped interview. In a 2-hour theoretical session, students are told how to prepare themselves for the interview. The learning effects of the training programme using simulated mothers were evaluated in order to determine: (1) the subsequent improvement in interviewing skills; and (2) the effect of the feedback session. It was found that students' interviewing skills improved significantly on the content and the process aspects after one or two interviews. In addition the feedback sessions proved very helpful, although no significant differences were revealed, when comparing the mean group scores for students who had had feedback sessions with the scores for those who had not. The results also revealed that two interviews were insufficient and that the training should include at least three interviews. This was borne out by the large number of students who asked for more interviews with simulated mothers. In the training programme the simulated mothers perform two functions: (1) playing the role of the mother of a sick child; and (2) giving feedback to students regarding their interviewing skills.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical Clerkship↗

A short computer interview for obtaining psychiatric diagnoses.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a short computer interview could be used in place of a full diagnostic interview to obtain psychiatric diagnoses, the authors examined the short interview's sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic agreement with the full interview. METHODS: Patients recently discharged from a university psychiatric service were interviewed in two back-to-back sessions, one in which a full diagnostic interview was used and the other in which a short computer interview was used. Based on diagnoses derived from both interviews, the sensitivity and specificity of the short interview and kappa values reflecting the diagnostic agreement of the two interviews were calculated. RESULTS: The short interview had high sensitivity and specificity and excellent diagnostic agreement with the full interview for most disorders. It also had a significantly shorter administration time. However, it missed a substantial percentage of cases of generalized anxiety disorder and misclassified as in remission a substantial proportion of patients with active cases of post-traumatic stress disorder. CONCLUSIONS: With few exceptions, the short interview may be substituted for the full interview when missing an active case is not important or when a count of individual symptoms and subtyping of disorders are not needed. Such uses include screening subjects for inclusion in a study and obtaining an overview of a patient's lifetime psychiatric status.

Adult↗

Audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) may avert socially desirable responses about infant feeding in the context of HIV.

BACKGROUND: Understanding infant feeding practices in the context of HIV and factors that put mothers at risk of HIV infection is an important step towards prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV (PMTCT). Face-to-face (FTF) interviewing may not be a suitable way of ascertaining this information because respondents may report what is socially desirable. Audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) is thought to increase privacy, reporting of sensitive issues and to eliminate socially desirable responses. We compared ACASI with FTF interviewing and explored its feasibility, usability, and acceptability in a PMTCT program in Kenya. METHODS: A graphic user interface (GUI) was developed using Macromedia Authorware and questions and instructions recorded in local languages Kikuyu and Kiswahili. Eighty mothers enrolled in the PMTCT program were interviewed with each of the interviewing mode (ACASI and FTF) and responses obtained in FTF interviews and ACASI compared using McNemar's chi2 for paired proportions. A paired Student's t-test was used to compare means of age, marital-time and parity when measuring interview mode effect and two-sample Student's t-test to compare means for samples stratified by education level - determined during the exit interview. A Chi-Square (chi2test) was used to compare ability to use ACASI by education level. RESULTS: Mean ages for intended time for breastfeeding as reported by ACASI were 11 months by ACASI and 19 months by FTF interviewing (p < 0.001). Introduction of complementary foods at <or=3 months was reported more frequently by respondents in ACASI compared to FTF interviews for 7 of 13 complementary food items commonly utilized in the study area (p < 0.05). More respondents reported use of unsuitable utensils for infant feeding in ACASI than in FTF interviewing (p = 0.001). In other sensitive questions, 7% more respondents reported unstable relationships with ACASI than when interviewed FTF (p = 0.039). Regardless of education level, respondents used ACASI similarly and majority (65%) preferred it to FTF interviewing mainly due to enhanced usability and privacy. Most respondents (79%) preferred ACASI to FTF for future interviewing. CONCLUSION: ACASI seems to improve quality of information by increasing response to sensitive questions, decreasing socially desirable responses, and by preventing null responses and was suitable for collecting data in a setting where formal education is low.

Adolescent↗

The effectiveness of intensive training for residents in interviewing. A randomized, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Interviewing and the physician-patient relationship are crucial elements of medical care, but residencies provide little formal instruction in these areas. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of a training program in interviewing on 1) residents' attitudes toward and skills in interviewing and 2) patients' physical and psychosocial well-being and satisfaction with care. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled study. SETTING: Two university-based primary care residencies. PARTICIPANTS: 63 primary care residents in postgraduate year 1. INTERVENTION: A 1-month, full-time rotation in interviewing and related psychosocial topics. MEASUREMENTS: Residents and their patients were assessed before and after the 1-month rotation. Questionnaires were used to assess residents' commitment to interviewing and psychosocial medicine, estimate of the importance of such care, and confidence in their ability to provide such care. Knowledge of interviewing and psychosocial medicine was assessed with a multiple-choice test. Audiotaped interviews with real patients and videotaped interviews with simulated patients were rated for specific interviewing behaviors. Patients' anxiety, depression, and social dysfunction; role limitations; somatic symptom status; and levels of satisfaction with medical visits were assessed by questionnaires and telephone interviews. RESULTS: Trained residents were superior to untrained residents in knowledge (difference in adjusted post-test mean scores, 15.7% [95% CI, 11% to 20%]); attitudes, such as confidence in psychological sensitivity (difference, 0.61 points on a 7-point scale [CI, 0.32 to 0.91 points]); somatization management (difference, 0.99 points [CI, 0.64 to 1.35 points]); interviewing of real patients (difference, 1.39 points on an 11-point scale [CI, 0.32 to 2.45 points]); and interviewing (data gathering) of simulated patients (difference, 2.67 points [CI, 1.77 to 3.56 points]). Mean differences between the study groups were consistently in the appropriate direction for patient satisfaction and patient well-being, but effect sizes were too small to be considered meaningful. CONCLUSION: An intensive 1-month training rotation in interviewing improved residents' knowledge about, attitudes toward, and skills in interviewing.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Interviewing young children about body touch and handling.

Children aged 3-6 years were interviewed following a scheduled pediatric clinic visit to assess the efficacy of two independent variables--interview strategy and number of interviews--on the accuracy, completeness, and consistency of children's reports. Four experimental interviews were created--a verbal interview and three interviews enhanced with anatomically detailed cues (dolls, line drawings, and computer graphics), photographs, and props. Initially, 130 children were interviewed after the clinic event. One month later, 124 were interviewed again, and 74 were interviewed a third time after 6 months. Children's reports were compared to videotapes and medical records of their pediatric visit in order to create three dependent reporting variables--accuracy, completeness, and consistency. In addition, the predictive power of four sets of covariates on reporting was assessed: (1) age and gender, (2) ethnicity, medical history, family stress, and mother's education; (3) number of invasive medical procedures, number of body touches, health status, and child's pain judgments; and (4) number of outpatient and inpatient visits between the initial and the follow-up interviews at 1 and 6 months. Initially, children's spontaneous reports of body touch were highly accurate, but sparse. After a 1-month delay, accuracy and completeness dropped significantly: accuracy was stable from 1 to 6 months; completeness rebounded at 6 months. Three-year-olds' reports of body touch were less complete and less consistent, but rarely less accurate, than those of older age groups. After 1- and 6-month delays, consistently reported information was more accurate than new information. Children's pain ratings contributed positively to predictions of completeness at the initial and 1-month interviews and to completeness and accuracy at 6 months. Complex events were reported more accurately but less consistently. Anatomically detailed cues in the three enhanced interviews increased completeness of reporting of total body and genital touch. Photos elicited more useful information for identification of persons and places than did questions, while medical props initially offered no advantage and subsequently led to errors. Children's feelings also influenced reporting: higher ratings of anger, sadness, and fright were positively related to reporting of extremely painful touch, while some children who failed to report painful, invasive medical procedures displayed shame when interviewed. The relative privacy of the computer-assisted interview holds promise for disclosure of sexual topics.

Child↗

Interviewer effects on epidemiologic diagnoses of posttraumatic stress disorder.

In an epidemiologic study of 641 interviewed subjects in the Australian Vietnam Veterans Health Study, three diagnoses of Vietnam combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were obtained: lifetime prevalence using a variant of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule and lifetime and current (1-month) PTSD prevalence using the Standardized Clincical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Revision. Prevalence estimates using the Standardized Clinical Interview varied according to interviewer characteristics (female vs. male, clinician vs. nonclinician) but not for the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. The authors use a simple variant of logistic regression to distill estimates of two informative parameters characterizing interviewers' judgments: severity threshold (related to the individual interviewer's criterion of "caseness") and reliability (related to degree of classification error of the individual interviewers). Examination of these estimates shows that female clinicians adopted lower severity thresholds for diagnosis of PTSD than other interviewers and hence had higher prevalence estimates while being relatively reliable in their judgments. Examination also shows that nonclinician interviewers can perform at least as reliably as clinicians. The Diagnostic Interview Schedule measure of PTSD was not moderated by these interviewer aspects. This use of threshold and reliability parameters is offered for routine use in epidemiologic field studies to examine potential interviewer effects.

Australia↗

Selection, training, and quality control of Type A interviewers in a prospective study of young adults.

This paper describes Type A/B interviewer selection, training, and quality control results in a prospective study of coronary artery risk development in young adults (CARDIA). Interviewer behaviors from 152 CARDIA structured interviews were audited and compared with 747 Western Collaborative Group Study (WCGS) interviews and 577 Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT) interviews. The results show success in modeling the CARDIA interviewer behaviors on those of the WCGS. CARDIA interviews were very similar to WCGS interviews for interview length, number of questions asked, and speed of speaking; they were similar to MRFIT interviews in latency of asking questions. CARDIA interviewer behaviors remained fairly consistent over the four time periods. Comparing the clinics, there were regional differences in latency of asking and speed of speaking, with the Southern clinic having a longer asking latency and speaking more slowly. There were differences between individual interviewers in most characteristics, particularly those that were more free to vary. The study provides procedures and guidelines designed to maintain quality control of the structured interview process.

Adolescent↗

Diagnosing major depression in medical outpatients: acceptability of telephone interviews.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the acceptability to patients of a diagnostic interview for depression (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV; SCID) conducted over the telephone to their homes. METHOD: Postal questionnaire survey of patients who had attended an oncology outpatient clinic where they had scored high on a screening questionnaire and had subsequently undergone an SCID interview over the telephone. RESULTS: Of the 224 patients telephoned, five refused the diagnostic interview. Of the 219 who were interviewed, 184 satisfactorily completed and returned the postal questionnaire (84% response rate). Only 17% reported the interview to be distressing. Ninety-four percent of all questionnaire respondents and 84% (n=31) of those who reported the interview to have been distressing endorsed the item "Had I known in advance what answering the questions would have been like for me, I would still have agreed to take part". Perceiving the interview as distressing was associated with having major depression (P<.001). Forty-seven percent said that, given the choice, they would have preferred a face-to-face interview. CONCLUSION: Telephone-administered diagnostic interviews are acceptable to most cancer patients and may even be preferred to face-to-face interviews at the hospital. This finding, together with the existing evidence of its validity, should encourage the use of telephone diagnostic interviews for depression, particularly when face-to-face interviews are impracticable, in both research studies and clinical practice. Indeed, a substantial proportion of patients may actually prefer them.

Depressive Disorder↗

Residency selection: should interviewers be given applicants' board scores?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of advance knowledge of board scores on interviewers' assessments of residency applicants. STUDY DESIGN: During a 2-year period we prospectively evaluated our residency selection process. In year 1 interviewers were provided with each candidate's entire application, whereas in year 2 the United States Medical Licensing Examination scores were not included. In each year interviewers were asked to provide numerical assessments of the applicants solely on the basis of their own impressions of the interviews. Analysis was performed only for evaluations by interviewers who participated during both study periods under review. Interview scores were compared with United States Medical Licensing Examination part I scores within each year by means of a scatter plot and correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Applicant demographic characteristics were similar during years 1 and 2. Interview scores did not differ between year 1 (4.2 +/- 0.1) and year 2 (4.3 +/- 0.1; P > .05). During year 1 interview and board scores were significantly correlated (correlation coefficient, 0.64; slope of best-fit line, 13.9), whereas there was a negative correlation in year 2 (correlation coefficient, -0.06; slope, -1.3). CONCLUSION: When they are available to interviewers, markers of academic achievement such as United States Medical Licensing Examination scores may bias the interview evaluation. The interview process when conducted in this manner may simply be a validation process for candidates already judged on the basis of the application alone. Knowledge of United States Medical Licensing Examination scores by the interviewers may therefore negate the interview as an independent means of evaluating candidates.

Adult↗