Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “systematic review and meta‐analysis”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2,992 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed2026

Adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of eight randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials suggest that adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) may reduce recurrence in chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), but potential sources of variability in treatment effects across studies remain poorly understood. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMAE and to explore potential study-level sources of between-study heterogeneity. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing MMAE plus surgery versus surgery alone, following PRISMA guidelines. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was prespecified to assess the robustness of pooled findings. Exploratory mixed-effects meta-regression was performed to examine whether aggregate study-level mean age and anticoagulation use were associated with variability in recurrence outcomes. RESULTS: Eight trials including 1961 patients were analyzed. MMAE plus surgery was associated with a reduction in recurrence compared with surgery alone (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.46-0.85; I² = 0%), and TSA supported this finding. Although conventional meta-analysis suggested a reduction in reoperation, the TSA findings were more sensitive to analytical assumptions and less robust. Exploratory study-level meta-regression analyses suggested possible associations between recurrence outcomes and mean age or anticoagulation use, although these findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating only. Safety outcomes were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive MMAE was associated with reduced recurrence in CSDH. Exploratory analyses evaluating aggregate study-level characteristics were limited by the small number of included trials and the use of aggregate-level data, and should be considered hypothesis-generating only. Further prospective studies are needed to better understand variability in treatment effects.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Should we consider excessive weights in pediatric kidney transplant recepient candidates?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of kidney transplantation outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: In adult populations, excess body weight has been associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes and mortality following kidney transplantation. In contrast, the influence of obesity on transplantation outcomes among pediatric populations is not yet fully understood. This study aimed to evaluate the association between pre-transplant excess weight and post-transplant outcomes in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. MATERIAL & METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library, covering publications up to December 31, 2025. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the ROBINS-E tool. Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager version 5.4. RESULTS: From a total of 1465 records screened, six studies that included 65,483 participants were selected in the meta-analysis. The results indicated that pre-transplant excess weight was significantly associated with an increased risk of acute rejection (OR = 1.09; P = 0.009), delayed graft function (OR = 1.17; P < 0.00001), 1-year graft failure (OR = 1.16; P = 0.0002), and 5-year graft failure (OR = 1.13; P = 0.009). Although 5-year mortality was also higher among recipients with excess weight, this association was not statistically significant (OR = 1.08; P = 0.11). CONCLUSION: Pediatric patients with pre-transplant excess weight had higher post-transplant odds of acute rejection, delayed graft function, and both 1-year and 5-year graft failure compared to those without excess weight. These findings highlight the importance of assessing and managing excess weight prior to kidney transplantation to help prevent adverse outcomes in the future.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

The relationship between composite dietary antioxidant index and odds of depression: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the association between the composite dietary antioxidant index (CDAI) score and depression has received special attention from researchers. However, this possible association has not been comprehensively examined. Thus, the present study aims to comprehensively assess the relationship between CDAI score and depression odds. METHODS: A thorough literature search was performed using Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science up to November 2025. Observational studies assessing the relationship between CDAI score and depression odds were included. The odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) reported in each study were extracted, and a pooled effect size was calculated using a random-effects model with inverse-variance weighting. RESULTS: Four observational studies were included in the current systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled effect size indicated that a higher CDAI score was associated with lower odds of depression (OR:0.62; 95%CI: 0.51-0.76, I2&#xa0;=&#xa0;48.5%; P-value&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.121). In an exploratory linear dose-response analysis based on two eligible studies, no significant association was observed between a one-unit increase in CDAI score and the odds of depression (OR&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.96; 95% CI: 0.91-1.02; I2&#xa0;=&#xa0;92.2%; P-value<0.001). Given the limited number of studies and substantial heterogeneity, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that higher CDAI scores, reflecting greater adherence to antioxidant-rich dietary patterns, are associated with lower odds of depression.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Teach-Back in Clinical Communication: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Teach-back has been identified as a high-quality clinical communication strategy. Our aim was to synthesize current literature on teach-back effectiveness. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL Complete databases to identify relevant studies published between 2018 and 2026. We also included pre-2018 studies identified in prior systematic reviews. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they involved adult patients and/or care partners, delivered teach-back in a single encounter, had a comparator group, and reported proximal/intermediate patient outcomes (as defined in our conceptual model). Two independent investigators screened each citation at the title/abstract and full-text levels and assessed risk of bias. Study characteristics and results were extracted. When meta-analysis was performed, we used standardized mean differences (SMD) to estimate summary effects. We assessed certainty of evidence (COE) using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) domains. RESULTS: Our systematic review included 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1985 participants. Across 9 RCTs assessing knowledge acquisition, conceptual inconsistencies precluded meta-analysis. Overall, there was no clear pattern of the effect of teach-back on knowledge (very low COE). In a meta-analysis of 5 RCTs assessing self-efficacy (416 participants), we found that teach-back interventions led to a large increase in self-efficacy relative to usual care (SMD&#x2009;=&#x2009;2.40; 95%CI 0.37-4.44) (very low COE). In a meta-analysis of 7 RCTs assessing adherence to health behaviors (571 participants), teach-back interventions led to a large increase in adherence (SMD&#x2009;=&#x2009;1.04; 95%CI 0.45-1.64) (low COE). Meta-analyses for both self-efficacy and adherence had large confidence intervals that ranged from small to large effect sizes and had substantial heterogeneity. DISCUSSION: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we did not identify a clear benefit of teach-back on knowledge acquisition but did find evidence that teach-back improves self-efficacy and self-reported, short-term adherence to health behaviors.

clinical communication↗
PubMed2026

Comparative effectiveness and safety of pharmacological interventions for sleep outcomes in chronic non-cancer pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Sleep disturbances are highly prevalent among individuals with chronic non-cancer pain and are associated with worse pain severity and poorer prognosis. The comparative trade-offs between the effectiveness and safety of available pharmacotherapies for sleep outcomes in this population remain poorly defined. Ninety-eight RCTs involving 28,920 participants (mean age 53.2 years, 71.2% female) were included. Moderate-certainty evidence demonstrated that melatonin significantly improved sleep quality compared with placebo (standardized mean difference [SMD]&#x202f;=&#x202f;-0.60, 95%CI: -0.98, -0.22). Ten agents (e.g., amitriptyline, oxycodone, gabapentin, pregabalin, duloxetine) also showed statistically significant improvements in subjective sleep quality (SMD&#x202f;=&#x202f;-0.24 to -1.07), but most effects were supported by low-certainty evidence and were accompanied by an increased risk of adverse events (odds ratio [OR]&#x202f;=&#x202f;1.90 to 37.00). Conversely, melatonin was not associated with an increased risk (OR&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.88, 95%CI: 0.19, 3.94). Our findings indicate that melatonin shows promise as a safe, adjunctive option for improving sleep quality in this population, but larger, condition-specific trials are warranted to confirm these effects. Other pharmacological agents are limited by lower-certainty and unfavorable safety profiles. These results should be interpreted cautiously given limited direct comparisons, heterogeneous chronic pain populations, the high proportion of trials at high risk of bias, and the predominance of subjective sleep outcomes.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Updated adjunctive minocycline for schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and cognitive outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Minocycline has been proposed as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia due to its anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties. However, evidence regarding its efficacy across clinical and cognitive outcomes remains inconsistent. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind RCTs was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2000 to August 2025. Eligible studies included patients with schizophrenia receiving adjunctive minocycline plus stable antipsychotics. Primary outcomes were PANSS total and subscale scores and overall cognitive performance. Secondary outcomes included SANS, CDS, CGI, GAF, and seven cognitive domains. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs were calculated. RESULTS: Ten RCTs involving 895 participants were included. Adjunctive minocycline was associated with improvements in negative symptoms (PANSS negative: SMD = -0.55, 95% CI: -0.96 to -0.13; SANS: SMD = -0.75, 95% CI: -1.00 to -0.49) and overall psychopathology (PANSS total: SMD = -0.49, 95% CI: -0.80 to -0.18). Cognitive benefits were limited to a modest improvement in working memory (SMD = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.39), with no significant effects in other cognitive domains. Subgroup analyses suggested that illness stage, antipsychotic regimen, treatment duration, sample size, and geographic region may contribute to variability in treatment effects. Adverse event rates were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive minocycline may improve negative symptoms and provide modest working memory benefits in schizophrenia. However, the evidence is limited by substantial heterogeneity, potential small-study effects, and inconsistent findings. Although short- to medium-term tolerability appeared comparable to placebo, larger, longer-term RCTs are needed to confirm its efficacy and safety.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Early Analgesia for the Management of Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early analgesic interventions, particularly NSAIDs versus opioids, in reducing pain and improving clinical outcomes among adults with AP. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov from database/registry inception to December 2025 to obtain relevant data. Randomized controlled trials involving adults aged 18 years or older diagnosed with AP, irrespective of the etiology and severity, who were administered analgesics (opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, epidural anesthesia, local anesthesia, and paracetamol) and compared with placebo, conventional treatment, or another analgesic modality were included in this review. The primary outcome assessed was pain reduction. The secondary outcomes assessed were the need for rescue analgesia, length of hospital stay, complications (local and/or systemic), mortality, and adverse drug effects. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. Effect estimates were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis (DerSimonian-Laird approach), while nonpooled outcomes were summarized narratively. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included in the analysis. NSAIDs provided pain relief comparable to opioids, with a lower incidence of local complications (RR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37-0.94). No significant differences in the need for rescue analgesia (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.33-2.35), length of hospital stay (MD: -2.68&#xa0;d, 95% CI: -6.27 to 0.91), mortality (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.19-3.05), and adverse drug effects (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.17-1.76) were observed. However, the findings are limited by study bias and heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Early analgesia with NSAIDs has efficacy and safety comparable to opioids in adults with AP, with the advantage of reducing local complications.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Diagnostic accuracy of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid-based testing for pulmonary cryptococcosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary cryptococcosis(PC) presents diagnostic challenges because of its non-specific clinical and radiological manifestations. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF)-based testing, which includes latex agglutination (LA) and lateral flow assay (LFA), offers a minimally invasive diagnostic method, yet its pooled diagnostic accuracy remains unclear. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception to May 2026. Studies evaluating BALF-based testing for PC with extractable 2 &#xd7; 2 data were included. The methodological quality of relevant studies was assessed by the QUADAS-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were estimated using a bivariate random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed by testing method and reference standard type. Heterogeneity was evaluated through paired forest plots, HSROC visualization, and exploratory bivariate meta-regression. RESULTS: The pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81-0.91), and the specificity was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.982 - 0.995). The pooled positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 88.00 (95% CI: 47.39 - 163.42), the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.13 (95% CI: 0.09 -0.20), and the DOR was 658.50 (95% CI: 285.36-1519.55). No significant threshold effect or publication bias was detected. Exploratory meta-regression suggested a possible assay-method effect in the joint model (P = 0.03), mainly driven by specificity (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates the high accuracy of CrAg in BALF for the diagnosis of pulmonary cryptococcosis, supporting its role as an important adjunctive diagnostic tool, particularly when tissue biopsy is not feasible or rapid results are needed. Larger prospective studies with standardized protocols are needed to validate these estimates.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and epigenetic age acceleration: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) represents somatic mutations in haematopoietic stem cells that drive clonal expansion. Epigenetic age acceleration (EAA), estimated from DNA methylation (DNAm) clocks, may capture age-related changes in haematopoiesis. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to synthesise evidence on associations between CHIP and EAA and explore shared biological mechanisms that may underlie this relationship. Six databases were searched from January 1, 2011, to June 6, 2025, adhering to PRISMA 2020. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed. Five studies comprising 7483 individuals (ages 55-79, 67.1% female) assessing associations between CHIP and DNAm clocks were included. Across studies, CHIP individuals had higher EAA than no-CHIP individuals, and larger clones were associated with higher EAA. Meta-analysis of three cross-sectional studies (n&#x202f;=&#x202f;6946) showed that CHIP had higher EAA versus no-CHIP for Horvath1Age IEAA (mean difference, MD=2.84 years, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.49-4.19), HannumAge EEAA (MD=2.31 years, 95% CI: 1.14-3.49), PhenoAge (MD=1.84 years, 95% CI: 0.96-2.71), and GrimAge (MD=1.20 years, 95% CI: 0.80-1.61). Both DNMT3A- and TET2-mutated CHIP were associated with higher EAA with TET2-mutated CHIP showing larger effect sizes and more consistent associations than DNMT3A-mutated CHIP across DNAm clocks tested. Higher EAA may also act as an effect modifier for morbidity and mortality in CHIP. Larger longitudinal studies are needed to verify a temporal relationship and determine whether EAA provides incremental prognostic value for morbidity and mortality in CHIP.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

A systematic review and meta-analysis of visuospatial attentional deficits in Parkinson's patients.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative condition primarily characterized by motor deficits, yet cognitive impairments are increasingly recognized. While deficits in executive functioning are well documented even in the absence of cognitive decline, evidence of attentional deficits in PD remains inconsistent, and the role of motor symptom lateralization is unclear. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we examined visual attention in right-handed, cognitively unimpaired idiopathic PD patients, focusing on the canonical attentional domains (sustained, selective, divided) and processes (alerting, endogenous and exogenous orienting, reorienting), as well as visuospatial bias. Four databases were searched for studies comparing PD patients with healthy controls. Meta-analytic estimates were derived using Hedges' g within random-effects models, and studies that could not be quantitatively integrated were summarized narratively. In addition, studies directly comparing patients with left- and right-predominant motor symptoms (LPD vs. RPD) were reviewed qualitatively. Across 51 studies, PD patients exhibited deficits in sustained, selective, and divided attention. Among attentional processes, only exogenous orienting was impaired, whereas alerting, endogenous orienting, and reorienting were preserved. Findings from the few studies examining visuospatial bias indicated small, context-dependent shifts in spatial attention rather than a consistent directional bias. These findings indicate that PD patients show visual-attentional impairments, particularly under high-demand conditions, while basic alertness and voluntary orienting appear preserved. Exogenous orienting deficits and subtle rightward spatial tendencies in LPD suggest disruption of right-hemisphere attentional networks. These results have implications for early cognitive assessment, rehabilitation strategies, and understanding the neural bases of attentional dysfunction in PD.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Prevalence and risk factors of nutritional anaemia among adolescents in India: a systematic review with meta-analysis of prevalence.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional anaemia is a major public health concern among adolescents in India, threatening physical growth, cognitive development, and future maternal health. This systematic review with meta-analysis of prevalence aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of nutritional anaemia among Indian adolescents aged 10-19&#x2009;years and identify key associated risk factors. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus up to February 2025. Data were extracted on study design, setting, diagnostic methods, prevalence, and risk factors. Quality was assessed with a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled prevalence, with subgroup analyses by state and gender, and pooled odds ratios for risk factors. RESULTS: Forty-five studies encompassing diverse Indian regions and 159,979 adolescents were included. The pooled prevalence of nutritional anaemia was 56% (95% CI: 49%-63%), with higher rates among girls (62%) than boys (39%). Iron deficiency (OR 2.38-4.68), other micronutrient deficiencies, low socioeconomic status, poor dietary diversity, female gender, and inadequate supplementation were consistently associated with higher anaemia risk. CONCLUSION: Nutritional anaemia impacts more than half of Indian adolescents, with notable regional and gender differences. Its complex nutritional, socioeconomic, and behavioural causes demand targeted, context-specific interventions to enhance adolescent health nationwide.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Global prevalence and associated factors of turnover intention among intensive care nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the global prevalence of two distinct turnover intentions among intensive care unit (ICU) nurses-intention to leave the ICU and intention to leave the nursing profession-identify significant sources of heterogeneity, and synthesise associated psychosocial factors. METHODS: Ten databases were systematically searched from inception to September 28, 2025. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection, data extraction, and quality appraisal using Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled prevalence and associated factors. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses explored potential sources of heterogeneity. Associated factors were pooled as odds ratios (ORs) and interpreted within an integrated Job Demands-Resources and Theory of Planned Behavior framework. RESULTS: Forty-six studies published between 2007 and 2025, involving 39,246 ICU nurses, were included. The pooled prevalence was 30.7% for intention to leave the ICU and 27.5% for intention to leave the nursing profession. Significant sources of heterogeneity included ICU type, geographic region, publication year, study design, measurement tool, and sampling method. Depression, burnout, high workload, and unsafe patient-to-nurse ratios were associated with increased turnover intention, whereas positive work environments, perceived organisational support, and nursing competence were protective factors. No significant publication bias was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Turnover intention affects approximately one-third of ICU nurses globally and varies across clinical and geographical contexts. Excessive workload, inadequate organisational support, and unfavourable work environments appear to be important contributors to turnover intention among ICU nurses. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Strategies to reduce turnover intention among ICU nurses should focus on reducing excessive workload, improving staffing conditions, strengthening organisational support, and fostering positive work environments. Promoting supportive and sustainable ICU work environments may help improve nurse retention and maintain the quality of critical care services.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Comparing the efficacy and safety of unilateral versus bilateral spinal anesthesia: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral spinal anesthesia has gained increasing attention in recent years. Emerging evidence suggests that it provides comparable analgesia to conventional bilateral spinal anesthesia while reducing adverse effects, and its efficacy and safety compared to bilateral spinal anesthesia remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of unilateral versus bilateral spinal anesthesia. DESIGN: Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception to December 10, 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Included studies were randomized controlled trials involving adult patients (&#x2265;18&#x2009;years) undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia, comparing unilateral versus bilateral spinal anesthesia for efficacy and adverse effects. Studies that focused exclusively on either unilateral or bilateral spinal anesthesia were excluded. The comparator group used the same local anesthetic as the experimental group, with no restrictions on adjuncts (e.g. fentanyl, morphine). RESULTS: Nineteen randomized controlled trials including 1191 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with bilateral spinal anesthesia, unilateral spinal anesthesia has a longer onset of sensory blockade (MD = 2.58, 95% CI: 0.93 to 4.22, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.002), a shorter duration of sensory blockade (MD&#x2009;=&#x2009;-27.83, 95% CI: -39.25 to -16.42, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.00001). In addition, unilateral spinal anesthesia significantly reduced the incidence of hypotension (RR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.52, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.0001), nausea and vomiting (RR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.56, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.002), and post-dural puncture headache (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.81, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.009). No statistically significant differences were observed in bradycardia and urinary retention. Collectively, these findings support unilateral spinal anesthesia as a strategy that may enhance perioperative safety while maintaining adequate anesthetic efficacy in appropriately selected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral spinal anesthesia may offer a favorable balance between anesthetic efficacy and safety compared with bilateral spinal anesthesia, although its clinical utility may depend on surgical duration and patient characteristics.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Auditory brainstem response in the identification of cochlear synaptopathy in aged rodents: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of auditory brainstem response (ABR) for identifying age-related cochlear synaptopathies in rodents. METHOD: Following PRISMA guidelines, searches were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, SciELO, LILACS, and gray literature. Studies evaluating CS in naturally aged rodents using short-latency auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) were included. Study selection, data extraction, risk-of-bias (JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies), and certainty of the evidence (GRADE&#xae; system) assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model, with standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. ABR wave I amplitudes were analyzed for click (80 and 90&#xa0;dB SPL) and tone-burst stimuli stratified by frequency. RESULTS: Among 3,008 identified records, 12 studies were included in the review and five in the meta-analysis. All included studies used ABR measures to investigate CS, with wave I amplitude being the most frequently evaluated biomarker. Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in ABR wave I amplitude in aged rodents compared with young controls for both click- and tone-burst-evoked responses. Tone-burst ABR showed no significant differences among the evaluated frequencies. These findings should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of studies and the methodological heterogeneity, which may have reduced statistical power and comparability. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence supports ABR wave I amplitude as a sensitive electrophysiological marker of age-related CS in rodents. Nevertheless, further studies with standardized protocols are needed to strengthen its diagnostic utility and improve comparability across studies.

Animals↗
PubMed2026

Comparison of immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of EVA71 vaccine in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Enterovirus 71 (EV-A71) is a principal cause of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD), potentially leading to severe neurological complications in children. Inactivated EV-A71 vaccines have been introduced. This study compares the immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of EV-A71 vaccines versus placebo in pediatric populations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Following a PROSPERO-registered protocol, RCTs involving EV-A71 in children were identified via PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Two independent reviewers performed screening, extraction, and RoB assessments (RoB 2.0). RESULTS: Five phase III RCTs involving 36,659 children were included. EV-A71 vaccination significantly increased seropositivity across follow-up periods, including early (RR 5.8), medium-term (RR 3.09), and long-term (RR 2.95) response. Seroconversion was significantly higher in the vaccinated group (pooled RR 13.04, 95% CI 2.80-60.61; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). Geometric mean titers, analyzed using the ratio of means approach, were significantly higher in the vaccinated group during early and medium-term follow-up. Vaccine efficacy against EV-A71-associated HFMD exceeded 98% (pooled RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01-0.09; p = 0.0028; I2&#x2009;=&#x2009;50%). Solicited local and systemic adverse events were mild and comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Inactivated EV-A71 vaccines robust immunogenicity, high clinical efficacy, and an acceptable safety profile in children. Future studies should explore long-term protection, booster schedules, and multivalent formulations against non-EV-A71 serotypes.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Prognosis of Neuroblastoma - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To synthesizes evidence on artificial intelligence (AI) performance in neuroblastoma (NB) diagnosis, risk stratification, prognosis, and genomic characterization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42024539475) across five databases. Meta-analyses used random-effects models with logit-transformed Area Under the Curve (AUCs) and cluster-robust standard errors. AI models were classified as Machine Learning Models (MLM) or Hybrid Nomograms (HN) based on their construction methodology. RESULTS: Of 3,742 articles identified, 53 were included. MLMs demonstrated higher point estimates than radiologists in differential diagnosis (AUC: 0.87 vs. 0.83), though this difference was not statistically significant and carried substantial uncertainty. HNs achieved stronger performance in risk stratification (AUC: 0.87). AI-derived nomograms (AUC: 0.9) and gene signatures (AUC: 0.8) outperformed conventional prognostic markers descriptively. Chemotherapy response prediction remained below clinical utility thresholds across all model types. Only 33.9% of models reported calibration and 24.5% underwent external validation. CONCLUSIONS: AI demonstrates proof-of-concept across multiple NB clinical domains. However, clinical adoption remains premature given persistent gaps in external validation, calibration, dataset size, and pediatric-specific model development. Future studies should test these models prospectively in multicenter pediatric cohorts, ideally through COG or SIOPEN, using shared definitions for diagnosis, risk group, treatment response, and survival outcomes.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Mul-PheG2P: decoupled learning and prediction-space fusion enables robust and interpretable multi-phenotype genomic prediction.

Genomic prediction of multiple phenotypes is crucial in modern plant breeding; however, existing methods struggle with negative transfer and lack interpretability, particularly across high-dimensional small-sample data and diverse species. To address this, we propose Mul-PheG2P, a novel paradigm based on decoupled learning and predictive space fusion. It employs a two-stage design: first training phenotype-specific encoders using genetic data, then decoupling phenotype-specific learning from cross-phenotype aggregation via an interpretable prediction layer. Mul-PheG2P outperforms existing methods across diverse crop datasets, including maize (Zea mays), wheat (Triticum aestivum), and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). It provides a multi-scale interpretability chain: at the macro level, it quantifies phenotypic contributions via attention-based weighting; at the micro level, Integrated Gradients reveal the genetic basis of predictions. Notably, the model successfully identified the CCT (CONSTANS, CO-like, and TOC) motif regulating photoperiodism and the SQUAMOSA (SQUAMOSA promoter binding protein) promoter for inflorescence development, confirming its ability to capture functional biological mechanisms. These results highlight the high performance and interpretability of Mul-PheG2P, showcasing its value for low-cost, large-scale screening to advance precision breeding.

Phenotype↗
PubMed2026

Comparative effects of pharmacological interventions in the prophylactic treatment of tension-type headache: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tension-type headache (TTH) is the most common neurological disorder. The comparative effect of pharmacological interventions for TTH prophylaxis remains unclear. We aimed to assess the comparative effects of pharmacological interventions in the prophylactic treatment of TTH. METHODS: Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from inception to 12 December, 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of medications compared to placebo or another medication for preventing TTH were included. The primary outcome was headache days per month. A Bayesian random-effect model was employed as the primary analysis of chronic TTH. RESULTS: Thirty-five RCTs were included, 33 (88.6%) RCTs involved chronic TTH patients, and 24 RCTs provided available data for meta-analysis. Amitriptyline 100&#x2009;mg presented more reduction of monthly headache days than placebo at 4&#x2009;and 8&#x2009;weeks (4&#x2009;weeks: MD -6.59, 95% CrI -11.22 to -0.64; 8&#x2009;weeks: MD -6.14, 95% CrI -10.27 to -0.87). BTX-A 100&#x2009;U can reduce monthly headache days (MD -3.79, 95% CrI -7.16 to -0.33). Amitriptyline 100&#x2009;mg was the highest-ranked treatment for monthly headache days at 4 (SUCRA 0.85), 8 (SUCRA 0.85), and 24 (SUCRA 0.87) weeks; 12&#x2009;weeks was lidocaine 25&#x2009;ml (SUCRA 0.75). Amitriptyline 100&#x2009;mg and BTX-A 500&#x2009;U showed a higher adverse event rate than placebo. CONCLUSION: Amitriptyline 100&#x2009;mg and BTX-A 100&#x2009;U may be options to reduce monthly headache days in patients with chronic TTH. Given the low to very low certainty of evidence, high risk of bias, and high heterogeneity, more studies are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42025639586).

Humans↗