SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Endpoint Determination”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

498 records · Page 7Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Understanding and Usefulness of Effect Size and Certainty of Evidence: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Evidence-Based Practice Competencies Among US Registered Dietitians.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding of absolute and relative effect estimates, and determining effect size and certainty of evidence corresponding to effect estimates, represent fundamental evidence-based practice competencies that promote informed clinical decision-making. While research has been conducted in the medical profession, based on our literature review there is no published research on these competencies in the nutrition and dietetics profession. METHODS: Among registered dietitians, our main objectives were to assess (1) their understanding and perceived usefulness of three absolute and two relative effect estimate approaches to determine effect size, (2) their perceived usefulness of certainty of evidence, and (3) factors influencing their understanding and perceived usefulness. We conducted a web-based, cross-sectional survey by recruiting dietitians from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (United States). Participants received effect estimates based on hypothetical dietary interventions vs. usual diet for reducing myocardial infarction risk. RESULTS: Of the 11,050 dietitians who received the survey link, 210 participated, and only completers (n = 114) were included in our analysis. Participants demonstrated a similar understanding of the relative (27.6%) and absolute (27.5%) effect estimates, with Risk Difference being the best understood approach and Number Needed to Treat being the least (30.7% vs. 24.6% correct responses). While perceived usefulness scores were similar between five approaches, they were highest when data was presented as Relative Risk [mean (SD): 4.82 (1.50)]. Dietitians rated the usefulness of certainty of evidence favorably [mean (SD): 5.07 (1.83), on a 7-point scale], and no factors were associated with correct understanding. CONCLUSION: Dietitians may have limited understanding of effect size thresholds presented in our survey, a finding mostly consistent with surveys of other health professionals. To optimize informed decision-making between dietitians and clients, dietetic programs and continuing education platforms should consider additional training on effect estimate approaches (relative and absolute), and determining effect sizes and certainty of evidence for effect estimates.

Clinical nutrition↗

PubMed2026

High-dose radiotherapy in patients with high-risk prostate cancers treated with long-term androgen deprivation therapy (GETUG AFU 18): a randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with high-risk prostate cancer, the role of dose-escalated radiotherapy in combination with long-term androgen deprivation treatment (ADT) is controversial, without any demonstrated benefit on cancer-specific or overall survival. We aimed to evaluate the effect of a 10 Gy dose increase, from 70 Gy to 80 Gy, on progression-free survival in men with high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients with high-risk prostate cancer, defined as prostate-specific antigen of 20 ng/mL or more, Gleason score of at least 8, or clinical stage T3-T4, from 25 centres in France. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by minimisation, stratified by centre and previous pelvic lymph node dissection, to receive prostate-targeted dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (80 Gy; 2 Gy per fraction for 8 weeks) or standard-dose external beam radiotherapy (70 Gy; 2 Gy per fraction for 7 weeks), combined with long-term ADT. Neither the participants nor the investigators were masked to the allocated treatment. The primary endpoint was 5-year progression-free survival defined as the time from randomisation to first biochemical (defined as prostate-specific antigen >nadir plus 2 ng/mL) or clinical (ie, local, regional, or metastatic) disease progression, analysed in the intention-to-treat population, with 197 events required. 5-year progression-free survival was the prespecified endpoint, and 10-year progression-free survival was additionally reported (post hoc) in view of the low number of events at 5 years. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00967863, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between April 6, 2009, and Jan 24, 2013, 505 patients with high-risk prostate cancer were enrolled; 250 were assigned to receive dose-escalated radiotherapy (80 Gy) and 255 to receive standard dose radiotherapy (70 Gy). All participants were male and ethnicity data were not collected. At a median follow-up of 9·5 years (IQR 8·5-10·3), 5-year progression-free survival was 91·4% (95% CI 87·0-94·4) in the dose-escalation group versus 88·1% (83·2-91·6) in the control group, and 10-year progression-free survival was 83·6% (77·8-88·0) versus 72·2% (65·3-78·0; stratified HR 0·56, 95% CI 0·40-0·78, p<0·0001). Grade 3 or worse adverse events assessed at 6 months (acute toxicity) were observed in 60 (24%) of patients in the dose-escalation group and 62 (25%) in the control group. The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events were sexual disorders (28 [11%] in the dose-escalation group vs 20 [8%] in the control group) and bladder or urethra disorders (12 [5%] vs 19 [8%]). Adverse events assessed at 5 years (late toxicity) occurred in 118 (70%) of 168 in the dose-escalation group and 122 (73%) of 168 in the control group; grade 3 or worse late toxicities occurred in 19 (8%) participants in the dose-escalated radiotherapy group versus 17 (7%) participants in the control group. The most common late grade 3 adverse event was bladder or urethra disorders (seven [4%] vs three [2%], respectively). Serious adverse events occurred in nine (4%) patients in the dose escalation group and nine (4%) in the control group; none were considered to be treatment related. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: For patients with high-risk prostate cancer, radiotherapy at a total dose of 80 Gy, in combination with long-term ADT, improved progression-free survival and could be a potential option in this situation. However, given the low number of events, further research is needed to consolidate and confirm the benefit in dose-escalation in prostate cancer-specific survival and overall survival. FUNDING: French National Cancer Institute and AstraZeneca.

Aged↗

PubMed2026

Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: current evidence, controversies, and future directions.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) remains controversial in the management of prostate cancer. Although it provides the most accurate pathological staging, its therapeutic value beyond staging has long been debated due to conflicting evidence and concerns regarding procedure-related morbidity. OBJECTIVE: To critically evaluate the contemporary role of PLND, particularly extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND), in prostate cancer management in the context of modern imaging, risk stratification tools, and evolving oncologic endpoints. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A narrative review of recent literature was conducted, focusing on high-level evidence including randomized trials, observational studies, and contemporary guideline recommendations addressing the indications, extent, oncologic outcomes, and complications of PLND. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Recent randomized and observational studies suggest that ePLND improves nodal staging accuracy and may be associated with modest improvements in metastasis-free survival (MFS) in selected patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer, although the absolute benefit remains limited and causality is not definitively established. Advances in molecular imaging, particularly prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT, together with multiparametric MRI, validated nomograms, and emerging genomic classifiers, now allow more precise identification of patients most likely to benefit from ePLND. The integration of these tools supports a more individualized surgical strategy, including image-guided and sentinel lymph node approaches designed to maximize staging accuracy while minimizing unnecessary dissection. CONCLUSIONS: In the contemporary PSMA imaging era, ePLND continues to play an important role in nodal staging and may contribute to improved oncologic outcomes in carefully selected patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

To Treat or Not to Treat: Navigating Early-Stage CLL in the Era of Targeted Therapy.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is most frequently diagnosed at early, asymptomatic stages (Rai 0/Binet A), in which a watch-and-wait strategy remains the standard of care, based on historical trials demonstrating no overall survival benefit from early treatment. Over the past two decades, however, substantial advances in genomic profiling-including immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region (IGHV) mutational status, TP53 disruption, recurrent gene mutations, and complex karyotype-have uncovered marked biological heterogeneity among early-stage patients and substantially improved prediction of disease progression. In parallel, targeted therapies such as Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors and venetoclax-based combinations have transformed the management of symptomatic CLL, raising renewed interest in whether early intervention might favorably alter the natural history of biologically high-risk disease. In this review, we critically examine the evolution of prognostication in early-stage CLL, integrate contemporary molecular and clinical risk models, and summarize evidence from both historical chemotherapy-era studies and modern early-intervention trials. We discuss key unresolved controversies, including reliance on surrogate endpoints, the risks of overtreatment, and the persistent absence of an overall survival benefit across all early-treatment strategies. Finally, we outline future research priorities, including refined genomic stratification, minimal residual disease-driven (MRD)-driven approaches, and combination targeted therapies currently under investigation. Despite renewed interest in preemptive treatment, available evidence supports continued observation for asymptomatic patients outside clinical trials.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The Statistical Fragility of Saline Nasal Irrigation for Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the statistical fragility of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating high-volume saline nasal irrigation (SNI) for rhinosinusitis using fragility analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase were searched for RCTs published between May 1976 and January 2026. REVIEW METHODS: This study was reported as per PRISMA guidelines. RCTs that compared high-volume SNI to non-irrigation standard care for acute, recurrent, or chronic rhinosinusitis, and reported ≥ 1 dichotomous outcome, were included. Fragility index (FI), the minimum number of event reversals needed to alter statistical significance, and fragility quotient (FQ), FI normalized to sample size, were calculated for statistically significant dichotomous outcomes. Reverse FI (rFI) and reverse FQ (rFQ) were calculated for non-significant outcomes. RESULTS: Eight RCTs were included, yielding 38 dichotomous outcomes. Eight outcomes (21.1%) were statistically significant. The overall combined median FI was 5 (FQ 0.062), with similar FI values between significant and non-significant outcomes. In over one-fifth of outcomes, loss to follow-up exceeded FI. Analysis of principal dichotomous outcomes from studies demonstrated a median FI of 6 (FQ 0.092), with five of eight (62.5%) outcomes non-significant. CONCLUSION: RCTs evaluating SNI for rhinosinusitis exhibit moderate-to-high statistical fragility, with small outcome changes capable of reversing study conclusions. Because fragility analysis was limited to dichotomous outcomes while many primary endpoints were continuous, our findings should be interpreted as complementary rather than comprehensive appraisals of RCTs. Future RCTs with larger sample sizes, reduced bias, and pre-specified fragility considerations are needed to better define the clinical role of SNI.

Rhinosinusitis↗

PubMed2026

Self-selected goals outperform assigned goals in reducing mobile phone usage: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial.

Excessive smartphone use is increasingly recognized as a public-health concern, yet scalable approaches to help individuals regulate daily use remain limited. We examine whether allowing individuals to self-select reduction goals improves behavioral and psychological outcomes when incentives and average goal levels are held constant across conditions. In a twelve-week randomized controlled trial, (N = 149; over 9000 person-day observations), participants were assigned to (i) a self-selected condition (choosing a 10%, 20%, or 30% reduction in daily phone use), (ii) an assigned condition (assigned a 14% reduction goal), or (iii) a no-goal control condition. Participants who selected their own goals reduced phone use by 26 min more per day (73% larger reduction) and achieved their goals 11 percentage points more often than those assigned goals, despite identical incentives and average goal levels. Reductions in phone use and higher goal achievement were associated with improvements in perceived addiction, depressive, and anxiety symptoms. These psychological outcomes were secondary endpoints. Although the between-group estimates generally followed the same directional pattern as the behavioral outcomes, the sample size for these analyses was limited and the between-group differences were not statistically significant. These findings should therefore be interpreted with caution. Overall, the results provide causal field evidence that self-selection under this goal-setting design can improve behavioral outcomes. Allowing individuals to choose their own goals may strengthen engagement and support healthier digital behavior. Incorporating opportunities for goal-selection may represent a simple addition to digital-health and public-health interventions aimed at helping individuals moderate smartphone use and improve well-being.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Robust optimisation for photon radiotherapy: A scoping review of models, paradigms, and reporting.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Robust optimisation offers an alternative to conventional margin-based photon radiotherapy planning by explicitly modelling uncertainty, but practice is variable and not standardised. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A scoping review was conducted to map robust optimisation for photon external beam radiotherapy. Electronic searches of Scopus, PubMed and Google Scholar (2000-2025, English language) identified planning studies that incorporated modelled uncertainties into the optimisation process and reported at least one robustness-related outcome. Data were charted on clinical context, uncertainty models, optimisation paradigms, robustness metrics and evidence for clinical implementation. RESULTS: Seventy-one studies were included. Most investigated prostate, breast or lung cancer and used intensity-modulated radiotherapy or volumetric-modulated arc therapy in commercial or research treatment planning systems. Scenario-based worst-case (minimax) optimisation was the dominant paradigm in clinically oriented work, while chance-constrained, conditional value at-risk, distributionally robust and adaptive formulations were confined to small methodological series. Uncertainty modelling focused mainly on rigid set-up error; fewer studies incorporated respiratory motion, inter-fraction anatomical change, dose-calculation uncertainty or biological variation. Robustness was evaluated with diverse scenario-based dose-volume metrics, probabilistic coverage measures, composite robustness indices and, less often, biological endpoints. Direct clinical implementation reports were scarce. CONCLUSION: Robust photon planning is technically feasible and generally maintains or improves target coverage and organ sparing compared with margin-based planning. However, heterogeneity in uncertainty models, optimisation configuration and robustness reporting limits comparison and synthesis. Pragmatic minimum standards are proposed to support future consensus and wider clinical adoption.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

CAR-T Cell Therapy: Manufacturing Platforms and Clinical Consequences.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed hematological cancer care, yet variability in efficacy, durability, and safety cannot be explained solely by antigen selection or patient factors. We propose that manufacturing platforms are active biological determinants of outcome. Viral vectors, used in all licensed products, provide stable genomic integration and durable expression but are limited by cost, cargo capacity, and centralized production. Nonviral strategies, including transposons, CRISPR knock-ins, and messenger RNA delivery, enable faster, less-expensive manufacturing with larger payloads, while introducing distinct safety and persistence profiles. This review presents a three-layer mechanistic framework that reframes manufacturing as biology: integration biology determines genomic risk and transgene stability; clonal fitness shapes persistence, dominance, and exhaustion; and epigenomic imprinting, influenced by gene transfer method, cytokines, and culture stress, preconfigures functional trajectories. Clinical observations link platform choice to immune recovery, where prolonged B-cell aplasia and delayed T-cell reconstitution contribute to infection-related nonrelapse mortality, and hematopoietic reserve at apheresis emerges as a practical predictor. Finally, manufacturing is positioned as the key to democratizing cell therapy. Decentralized, nonviral production aligned with regulatory standards may enable equitable access and transition CAR-T therapy from innovation to sustainable global care.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Meta-analysis of growth and inactivation kinetics of Legionella.

Quantitative risk assessments intended to inform evidence-based water management plans and public health targets for Legionella in engineered water systems are constrained by fragmented and heterogeneous growth and inactivation kinetics. We conducted a meta-analysis of 25 growth and 39 thermal- and chemical-inactivation studies, fitting microbial persistence models to harmonize parameters. Nonlinear models outperformed first-order formulations, indicating that lag phases and resistant or protected subpopulations are central to Legionella persistence. Random forest analysis identified environmental and methodological drivers of variability based on 226 growth rates and reduction times for thermal (209) and chemical (135) inactivation. Growth was primarily governed by temperature, nutrient availability, and compatible Legionella-host pairings; thermal inactivation by quantification method, temperature, and turbidity; and chemical inactivation by inoculum size, disinfectant type, concentration, and host-associations. Accordingly, temperature-dependent growth parameters and exposure metrics for heat, free-chlorine, and monochloramine, expressed as TT (Temperature×time) and CT (Concentration×time), were derived as condition-specific inputs for predictive models. Growth optima around 37-40 °C, together with lag-time estimates, indicate that hot-water temperature setbacks and energy-saving practices may favor Legionella proliferation under repeated or prolonged lukewarm exposure. Culture- and viability-based TT differences highlight the need to consider viable‑but-non-culturable persistence in monitoring programs. CT comparisons suggest monochloramine may be advantageous because of its lower apparent sensitivity to host-associated protection. Although limited by restricted experimental conditions, the findings show that predictive models should account for microbial ecology, water matrix effects, and quantification endpoints. Future kinetic studies should prioritize realistic multi-host systems, strain pre-adaptation, complementary viability measurements, and standardized protocols and reporting to ensure reproducibility and enable robust system-level predictive modeling.

Legionella↗

PubMed2026

Autophagy activation in granulosa cells as a mechanism of astaxanthin action: evidence from a pilot randomised trial in PMOS-associated infertility.

Astaxanthin (AST) has been reported to influence oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and apoptosis in women with polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS), formerly referred to as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), but its effects on granulosa-cell (GC) autophagy remain unclear. Given the central role of autophagy in follicular development, this triple-blind, placebo-controlled pilot randomised trial evaluated whether AST modulates autophagy-related signalling in GCs and how these molecular effects relate to ovarian response. Fifty women with PMOS-related anovulatory infertility were enrolled between November 2023 and September 2024 and received AST (12 mg/day) or placebo for six weeks prior to oocyte retrieval; forty-four completed the study (21 AST, 23 placebo). Primary exploratory endpoints were molecular markers of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-autophagy signalling, and primary clinical outcomes included ovarian response indicators and cleavage stage embryo quality. AST supplementation increased autophagy-related gene 7 (ATG7) expression, enhanced autophagy flux, reduced apoptosis, and showed a trend toward increased AMPK activation. Before adjustment, AST improved oocyte maturity rate (OMR) and increased mature (metaphase II; MII) oocyte yield. After adjusting for age, body mass index, and anti-mullerian hormone level, total oocyte and MII oocyte yields remained significantly higher with AST, while OMR became non-significant. Among embryology outcomes, both the top-ranking embryo rate and the number of embryos suitable for cryopreservation were significantly higher with AST after adjustment. Pregnancy outcomes were numerically higher but not statistically significant. This pilot trial suggests that AST activates autophagy- and apoptosis-related pathways in GCs and may enhance oocyte competence and embryo quality in PMOS. Larger studies are needed to confirm these mechanistic and clinical effects.

Female↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and safety of human albumin combined with furosemide in acute decompensated heart failure with hepatic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Congestion is the most common clinical presentation on admission of patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Finding effective ways to alleviate congestion has become a pivotal management step. This study sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) albumin use in conjunction with furosemide in patients hospitalized for ADHF with hepatic dysfunction in terms of subjective regression of congestion symptoms and worsening renal function. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, randomized-pragmatic trial recruited 241 patients with hepatic dysfunction hospitalized for ADHF. Patients (78 years, 54% female) were assigned to receive IV albumin with furosemide or IV furosemide alone. The coprimary study endpoints were patients' global assessment of symptoms score, quantified as the area under the curve (AUC) of the score on a visual analog scale, and the change in creatinine levels over 72 hours from admission. RESULTS: The experimental treatment group demonstrated a greater improvement in patients' global assessment of symptoms scores (AUCbaseline-72 h 3,767 vs 3,457 points; P < .001) and a milder increase in creatinine levels (0.07 vs 0.18 mg/dL; P = .045) than the IV furosemide group. The length of stay was 1 day shorter (4 vs 5 days; P < .001) and the incidence of worsening renal function was lower (25% vs 38%; P = .037) in the experimental treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: In this hypothesis generating study, among patients with ADHF and hepatic dysfunction, concomitant use of IV albumin and furosemide for the first 72 hours resulted in a significant improvement in subjective perception symptoms of decongestion and a milder increase in creatinine levels than IV furosemide alone.

Aged↗

PubMed2026

Continuous Intravenous Lidocaine for Refractory Cancer Pain in Palliative Care: A Multicenter Feasibility Study.

ObjectivesTo assess the feasibility and tolerability of continuous low-dose intravenous lidocaine infusion in patients with opioid-refractory cancer pain receiving palliative care, and to explore its potential impact on pain outcomes in real-world clinical conditions.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled feasibility study in palliative care units to evaluate continuous intravenous lidocaine infusion in patients with opioid-refractory cancer pain. Patients were randomized to receive lidocaine (5 mg/kg/day, increased to 8 mg/kg/day if pain reduction was <30% after 24 h) or placebo for 48 h. Pain intensity was assessed using the Numeric Pain Intensity Scale, with a clinically meaningful response defined as a ≥30% reduction from baseline at 40 min. Secondary outcomes included pain evolution over time, neuropathic pain, symptom burden, and tolerability.ResultsThirty-five patients were included in the final analysis (18 lidocaine, 17 placebo). No significant difference was observed between lidocaine and placebo for the primary endpoint or for secondary pain outcomes. Reductions in pain intensity were observed in both groups. In the lidocaine group, 61% of patients required dose escalation to 8 mg/kg/day. Continuous intravenous lidocaine infusion was generally well tolerated, with mostly mild adverse events and no unexpected toxicity.ConclusionIn this multicenter feasibility study, continuous low-dose intravenous lidocaine did not demonstrate a clinically meaningful analgesic benefit over placebo. As the planned sample size was not reached, the study was underpowered. These findings highlight the challenges of randomized trials in palliative care and may inform future feasibility-oriented designs.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The Effect of Pain Catastrophizing on Acupuncture Treatment for Chronic Pain in Cancer Survivors.

CONTEXT: Pain catastrophizing (PC) predicts worse pain outcomes in cancer survivors. However, little is known whether PC influences pain outcomes of nonpharmacological treatments such as acupuncture. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the impact of PC on acupuncture efficacy for chronic pain in cancer survivors. METHODS: This secondary analysis of PEACE trial used two-sample t-test and Pearson's chi-squared test to analyze the pain outcomes of cancer survivors who received electroacupuncture (EA) or battlefield acupuncture (BFA). PC was measured using Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) was used to measure pain severity and interference at the primary endpoint (week 12). RESULTS: Among 266 participants, 41 (15.41%) had a high baseline PC. Among those receiving EA, high PC patients had greater reductions in pain severity (-3.9 vs. -2.1, P = 0.006) and pain interference (-3.8 vs. -2.6, P = 0.04) than low PC. PC was not associated with pain outcomes in BFA group (P > 0.05 for both severity and interference). Among patients with high PC, a greater proportion were responders in the EA group than those in BFA group (83.3% vs. 43.5%, P = 0.009). Among low PC patients, there was no significant difference in the proportion of responders between the EA and BFA groups (66.1% vs. 64.5%, P = 0.8). CONCLUSION: We found that cancer survivors with high baseline PC had greater pain reductions with EA than BFA and compared to low PC patients. These findings suggest that EA may serve as a targeted treatment option for vulnerable patients with high PC and further support precision pain management.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Early Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel Versus an Anthracycline-Free Regimen With Docetaxel, Cyclophosphamide-Results From a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains an important side effect despite new antiemetic drugs. This study tried to understand the occurrence of CINV in patients receiving two different chemotherapy regimens. As part of the randomized controlled clinical trial SUCCESS C (NCT00847444), 1582 of the 3463 patients completed CINV diaries. Patients were randomized to receive either chemotherapy with FEC (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel) or TC (docetaxel, cyclophosphamide). CINV was evaluated hourly using a specially designed questionnaire. Endpoints of the study were complete response (no emesis) and total control (no nausea and no emesis) and were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses over three chemotherapy cycles. Eight hundred fourteen patients received FEC and 768 received TC; patients and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. Patients receiving FEC had significantly more nausea and vomiting, with the main difference in the first 12 h. In the first cycle, the 0-12-h nausea/emesis-free rates were 70%/41% for FEC and 91/76% for TC. By 24 h after chemotherapy, the rates were 65%/33% (FEC) and 85%/60% (TC). The differences were similar in cycles 2 and 3. The detailed analysis of CINV in the study is unique and paves the way for modern CINV analysis of new therapeutics such as antibody-drug conjugates.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Glucocorticoid receptor antagonism in major depressive disorder with childhood trauma: a randomized controlled trial.

Childhood trauma (CT) is a key risk factor for major depressive disorder (MDD) onset and persistence. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis dysregulation may underlie this link, and preclinical studies suggest glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonism can reverse early life stress effects. This study tested whether the GR antagonist mifepristone reduces depressive symptoms in adults with MDD and CT. The RESET-medication study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating a 7-day course of mifepristone (1200 mg/day) or placebo in 158 adults with MDD and CT, assessed at baseline, 1 week, 6 weeks (primary endpoint), 3 months, and 6 months. The primary outcome was depressive symptom severity (IDS-SR) at week 6; secondary outcomes included symptom severity at other timepoints, clinical response, remission, anxiety, sleep, stress, disability, and salivary cortisol. At week 6, depressive symptoms declined in both groups, with no significant difference between mifepristone and placebo (b=-0.25, d=-0.03, 95% CI [-0.42, 0.36], pnom=0.887), and no group differences were found for secondary outcomes. Morning and evening cortisol were significantly higher with mifepristone at week 1, consistent with GR antagonism, but not at week 6. Adverse events were more frequent with mifepristone; mild and severe events occurred significantly more often, while the proportion reporting at least one adverse event was numerically higher but not statistically significant (93.6%vs. 82.5%, χ²(1)=3.60, p=0.058). Mifepristone produced the expected endocrine response but did not lead to clinical improvements in individuals with MDD and CT compared to placebo.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

RR-interval-based atrial fibrillation detection and burden estimation: cross-dataset validation and calibration-aware probability analysis.

Objective.Atrial fibrillation (AF) burden has become an increasingly important endpoint in long-duration rhythm monitoring, but reliable burden estimation requires more than accurate AF detection alone. In particular, when burden is derived by aggregating predicted AF probabilities over time, probability calibration may directly affect burden validity under external dataset shift.Approach.This study developed an interpretable-interval feature model for AF detection and evaluated it using record-wise cross-validation on a development cohort and independent cross-dataset external validation on public Holter electrocardiographic databases. Window-level performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), area under the precision-recall curve (PR-AUC), Brier score, expected calibration error (ECE), and calibration intercept and calibration slope. Recording-level AF burden was estimated using both probability-based and hard-label aggregation and evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and agreement analyses.Main results.The model showed high discrimination in both development and external evaluation, with external ROC-AUC ofand PR-AUC of. However, external calibration deteriorated despite preserved ranking performance, with Brier score of, ECE(15) of, calibration intercept of, and calibration slope of. In the external cohort, probability-based burden estimation preserved strong association with reference burden but showed weaker raw agreement than hard-label aggregation, with MAE ofversus, consistent with systematic probability underprediction. Repeated external recalibration across record-level splits substantially improved probability quality and probability-based burden estimation. Median probability-burden MAE decreased fromwithout recalibration toafter Platt recalibration andafter isotonic recalibration, while median ECE(15) decreased fromtoand, respectively.Significance.These findings indicate that-interval-based AF detection maintained strong ranking performance in the tested external cohort, but probability calibration should be evaluated explicitly when predicted probabilities are aggregated into AF-burden estimates.

Atrial Fibrillation↗

PubMed2026

Methods for defining equity-stratifying variables: a systematic review of validation studies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Disease burden is often disproportionally higher among those who are socially disadvantaged by factors defined in the PROGRESS-Plus framework (ie, Place of residence, Race/ethnicity/culture/language, Occupation, Gender/sex, Religion, Education, Socioeconomic status, and Social capital, with "Plus" covering features like age and disability). The accuracy and applicability of case definitions to identify these variables from administrative and clinical health data are unknown. We conducted a systematic review to explore how equity-stratifying variables, as categorized by the PROGRESS-Plus framework, have been defined and validated in epidemiologic studies using administrative health, population-level, or electronic health record (EHR) data. METHODS: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched from the inception of the databases to 2024 for validation studies of equity-stratifying variables in adults using administrative health datasets, health registries, or EHR data. Titles and abstracts, followed by relevant full-text articles, were screened in duplicate by two reviewers for eligibility. The data sources utilized, algorithms employed, and their associated performance measures were extracted and synthesized from included studies. Given substantial heterogeneity in study design, equity-stratifying variable definition, and performance metrics, meta-analysis was not possible. RESULTS: Of the 9099 unique citations screened, 188 full texts were reviewed and 116 were included in this review. Most studies were published between 2019 and 2024 (n = 64, 55%) and were validation studies of race/ethnicity definitions that used race/ethnicity codes or surname list algorithms (n = 66, 57%). No studies examined religion. Regarding the reported performance measure estimates, the race/ethnicity/culture/language equity-stratifying variables category had the largest variability across sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and Cohen's Kappa. Occupation validation studies had the lowest variation in sensitivity and PPV. CONCLUSION: Despite an increasing number of publications reporting on the validation of equity-stratifying variables relevant to the PROGRESS-Plus framework, performance measures varied widely across studies. The significant heterogeneity in equity-stratifying variable definitions and methods used to validate them support the need for further rigorous validation of equity-stratifying variables in administrative and clinical health data. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Disease burden is often higher in people who experience financial hardships, lower level of education, discrimination due to race/ethnicity, and unstable housing. These social factors can be considered health equity factors and are important for understanding health inequalities. Health researchers often use large datasets, such as hospital or electronic health records (EHRs), to study these health equity factors. However, it is not clear how accurately these data sources capture information about people's social circumstances and how these factors are defined. In this study, we reviewed existing research to understand how health equity factors have been defined across health data sources and how accurate they are at measuring aspects of health equity and social disadvantage. Of the more than 9000 studies we identified, we included 116 that met our criteria for this systematic review. Most included studies focused on identifying race and ethnicity, often using codes or surname-based methods. We found that the accuracy of these methods varied widely across studies, meaning results may not always be reliable or comparable. Overall, our findings show that there are inconsistencies in how social factors are defined and measured in health data. This makes it difficult to fully understand and address health inequalities using routinely collected health data. More work is needed to develop and validate better quality and more consistent methods for capturing these important social factors.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Moxifloxacin Versus Azithromycin for the Treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium: The FARTHEST Study.

BACKGROUND: Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) is increasingly characterized by high rates of macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance. International guidelines recommend resistance-guided therapy; however, access to genotypic testing is limited, and randomized trial evidence is lacking. We assessed the efficacy of moxifloxacin and azithromycin without resistance assays. METHODS: This monocentric, open-label, superiority, randomized controlled trial enrolled adults with MG infection detected by multiplex PCR, randomized 1:1 to receive moxifloxacin 400 mg daily for 10 days or azithromycin 500 mg daily for 6 days. A test of cure was performed ≥28 days after treatment completion. The primary endpoint was microbiological cure in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations. Subgroup analyses assessed symptomatic versus asymptomatic infections, doxycycline exposure, re-treatment, and sexual behavior. RESULTS: Among 358 randomized participants, 87.0% of those treated with moxifloxacin and 61.2% of those treated with azithromycin achieved microbiological cure in the ITT analysis (absolute risk difference 25.8%, 95% CI 16.5, 35.2). The superiority of moxifloxacin was confirmed in the ITT and PP populations. Moxifloxacin remained superior across most subgroups, whereas azithromycin showed comparable efficacy only among heterosexual individuals. Doxycycline coadministration did not improve outcomes. Both regimens were well tolerated, with only one case of discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin demonstrated superior efficacy compared to azithromycin for treating MG infection in the absence of resistance testing. These randomized data support the use of moxifloxacin as a first-line option when resistance assays are unavailable and may inform treatment strategies.

Humans↗