SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Atlanto-Axial Joint”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

77 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Comparison of analgesic treatments used for ankle sprains in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Ankle sprains (ASs) account for approximately 5% of emergency department visits and 40% of all sports-related injuries, causing significant pain and restriction in the range of motion (ROM). This study aims to observe the clinical outcomes of early administration of intravenously administered paracetamol, ibuprofen, and dexketoprofen, which are frequently used in emergency department practice for ASs. For this purpose, pain monitoring and ROM measurements were performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of early functional analgesia. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted between December 2023 and May 2024 on patients diagnosed with grade 1-2 ASs in the emergency department. Patients were divided into three groups and received intravenous dexketoprofen (Group D, n=52), paracetamol (Group P, n=52), and ibuprofen (Group I, n=51). Pain assessment was performed using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale (WBS). ROM was evaluated by measuring dorsiflexion ROM (d-ROM) and plantar flexion ROM (p-ROM) angles using a semicircular goniometer. Pre-treatment and 1-h post-treatment measure-ments were compared. RESULTS: In the post-treatment pain assessment, no significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of NRS scores (p=0.352); however, Group I had the lowest WBS scores (p<0.001). Nevertheless, in all three groups, post-treatment pain scores (NRS and WBS) were significantly lower compared to pre-treatment values (p<0.001). Regarding ROM, pre-treatment d-ROM and p-ROM values were similar among the groups (p=0.196) and p=0.287, respectively). Post-treatment measurements revealed that d-ROM was lower in Group I (p=0.034), whereas p-ROM was higher (p=0.011). However, in all groups, ROM values significantly improved after treatment compared to baseline (p<0.001). When pre- and post-treatment changes (Δ) in pain scores and ROM values were compared, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups (ΔNRS p=0.264, ΔWBS p=0.965, Δd-ROM p=0.099, Δp-ROM p=0.073). CONCLUSION: Paracetamol, ibuprofen, and dexketoprofen demonstrated similar efficacy in reducing pain and improving ankle joint ROM during the acute phase of ASs. These findings suggest that the early initiation of analgesic treatment in ASs contributes to clinical recovery.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

[Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness evaluation of acupoint thread-embedding for knee osteoarthritis of early to middle stage].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of acupoint thread-embedding and electroacupuncture for knee osteoarthritis (KOA) of early to middle stage, and to evaluate their economic benefits based on cost-effectiveness analysis. METHODS: A total of 66 patients with KOA of early to middle stage were randomized into an acupoint thread-embedding group (33 cases, 1 case dropped out) and an electroacupuncture group (33 cases, 2 cases dropped out). In the acupoint thread-embedding group, acupoint thread-embedding was applied at Xuehai (SP10), Liangqiu (ST34), Weizhong (BL40), etc.on the affected side, once a week. In the electroacupuncture group, electroacupuncture was applied at Xuehai (SP10),Liangqiu (ST34), Zusanli (SP36), etc. on the affected side, with disperse-dense wave, in frequency of 2 Hz/100 Hz, once every other day, 3 times a week. Both groups were treated for 4 weeks. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities arthritis index(WOMAC) score was observed before and after treatment, as well as at the follow-up of 4 weeks after treatment completion,the visual analogue scale (VAS) score of pain and the Lysholm score were observed before and after treatment in the two groups. The clinical efficacy was evaluated between the two groups, and the cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted based on WOMAC score. RESULTS: After treatment, the WOMAC and pain VAS scores were decreased compared with those before treatment (P<0.001), and the Lysholm scores were increased compared with those before treatment (P<0.001) in both groups. At follow-up, the WOMAC score in the acupoint thread-embedding group was decreased compared with that before treatment (P<0.001), and was lower than that in the electroacupuncture group (P<0.05). The total effective rates were 93.8% (30/32) in the acupoint thread-embedding group and 87.1% (27/31) in the electroacupuncture group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) and the total cost of the acupoint thread-embedding group were lower than those in the electroacupuncture group. CONCLUSION: Both acupoint thread-embedding and electroacupuncture can improve knee joint function, pain and stability in patients with KOA of early to middle stage, with comparable efficacy, and the acupoint thread-embedding group shows better long-term efficacy, lower cost and higher economic benefit.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

No association between alcohol consumption and hip osteoarthritis: a diverse national analysis of 87,585 adults from the "All of Us" research program.

INTRODUCTION: Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is estimated to affect 62.6 million individuals by 2050. A probable link exists between alcohol use and hip OA. However, the results are inconsistent, and the relationship between alcohol and hip OA remains speculative. To address these gaps, this study aimed to utilize the diverse, nationally representative All of Us Research Program dataset to explore the association between alcohol consumption and hip OA. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study utilized data from the All of Us Research Program Controlled Tier Dataset v8. 17,517 hip OA cases and 70,068 controls were identified. A 1:4 case-to-control matching ratio was applied based on age and sex. Alcohol use frequency was categorized into five levels: Never, Monthly or Less, Two to Four Times per Month, Two to Three Times per Week, and Four or More Times per Week. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the association between alcohol use frequency and hip OA after adjusting for demographic and clinical variables. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis found that alcohol use frequency was not significantly associated with hip OA. Compared to never users, participants with low (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.93-1.04, P = 0.583), moderate (OR 0.99-1.01, all P > 0.05), and high (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95-1.09, P = 0.599) levels of alcohol consumption had no statistically significant differences in odds of hip OA. Female sex, Asian race, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and nicotine dependence increased the odds of hip OA. CONCLUSION: Any level of alcohol consumption was not significantly associated with the odds of hip OA. This study adds valuable insight to the current body of conflicting evidence. Further prospective studies appear warranted to shed light on the long-term effects of different alcoholic beverages on different joints. Key Points • This study found no significant association between any degree of alcohol consumption and the odds of developing hip osteoarthritis. • Utilizing data from 87,585 adults in the NIH "All of Us" Research Program, this is the first study to analyze this relationship in a large, nationally representative population. • The research provides clarity to previously conflicting literature by demonstrating that alcohol lacks a clear harmful or protective effect on the clinical course of the disease. • The analysis highlights that independent risk factors such as Asian race, nicotine dependence, and components of metabolic syndrome increase the odds of hip osteoarthritis.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A narrative systematic review of definitions and diagnostic criteria for disordered eating and eating disorders in type 1 diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Type 1 diabetes and disordered eating (T1DE) affects 8-37.1% of adults and is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. The absence of a standardised case definition of T1DE and its severity hinders effective screening, diagnosis and treatment. This systematic review aimed to (1) synthesise existing case definitions and diagnostic criteria for T1DE in adults and (2) identify key characteristics to inform consensus for future diagnostic criteria. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible studies involved adults (≥18 years) with type 1 diabetes assessing disordered eating; paediatric studies, mixed samples without disaggregated data, non-empirical designs and non-English publications were excluded. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched up to November 2025 for peer-reviewed studies involving adults with T1DE. Qualitative and quantitative data on definitions, diagnostic criteria and assessment tools were extracted. Study quality was appraised using a modified Graphical Appraisal Tool for Epidemiological studies (GATE) checklist. Due to heterogeneity of data, a narrative synthesis of findings was performed to describe current definitions of T1DE. RESULTS: Sixty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, with a pooled sample of 111,208 participants (76% women) from over 22 countries. T1DE was defined using a heterogeneous array of terms, diagnostic frameworks and assessment tools (29 distinct methods). The Diabetes Eating Problem Survey-Revised (DEPS-R) was the most used questionnaire, but many studies relied on criteria adapted from general eating disorder classifications or generic questionnaires. Approximately three-quarters of the studies assessed insulin omission behaviours, but the operationalisation of the cognitions for insulin omission varied widely. Beyond physiological markers such as HbA1c and BMI, studies explored various diabetes-related and psychological constructs, although often considering diabetes and disordered eating separately rather than as an integrated condition. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: This systematic review highlights the lack of a unified, evidence-based definition of T1DE, resulting in inconsistent screening, diagnostic and reporting practices. Establishing clear, consistent, evidence-based diagnostic criteria and screening questionnaires for T1DE is critical to improving early detection and developing targeted interventions. These findings provide a foundation for refining T1DE definitions as a stepping stone to an international consensus definition. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration no. CRD420250223622 FUNDING: King's College London and King's College Hospital through the KMRT KCH Joint Research Committee studentship. This work was also conducted as part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR; CS-2017-17-023)-funded STEADY project (Safe management of people with Type 1 diabetes and EAting Disorders studY). NZ's salary was part-funded by the NIHR via the NIHR Clinician Scientist award to MS; JT and KI are part-funded by the NIHR Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. MS was funded through her NIHR Clinician Scientist Fellowship (CS-2017-17-023).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Adjuvant alectinib versus chemotherapy in resected ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ALINA): health-related quality-of-life and safety outcomes from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with resected, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), adjuvant alectinib significantly improved disease-free survival versus platinum-based chemotherapy in the global, phase 3, open-label, randomised ALINA trial. We report safety and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes from the ALINA trial. METHODS: Eligible patients aged 18 years or older with resected, ALK-positive, stage IB (≥4 cm)-IIIA NSCLC (per the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union for International Cancer Control Cancer Staging Manual 7th edition) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were randomly assigned (1:1) via a block-stratified randomisation method to receive oral alectinib (600 mg twice daily) for 24 months or intravenous platinum-based chemotherapy for four 3-week cycles. Randomisation was stratified according to disease stage and race. The primary endpoint, previously reported, was disease-free survival. Safety was a secondary endpoint and HRQoL was an exploratory endpoint. Safety was assessed by the investigator as per the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5·0 until 28 days after the last alectinib dose or chemotherapy cycle. HRQoL was assessed via the Short-Form 36-item health survey version 2 (SF-36v2) questionnaire at baseline, every 3 weeks to week 12, then every 12 weeks until disease recurrence, consent withdrawal, death, or week 96. Norm-based scoring was applied; clinically meaningful changes were defined using the SF-36v2 manual. Safety was assessed in the safety-evaluable population and HRQoL in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03456076) and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Aug 16, 2018, and Dec 8, 2021, 257 patients were assigned to receive alectinib (n=130) or chemotherapy (n=127). 123 (48%) patients were male and 134 (52%) were female; 143 (56%) were Asian. The safety-evaluable population comprised 128 patients who received alectinib and 120 patients who received chemotherapy; median duration of safety follow-up was 24·8 months (IQR 22·0-24·9) in the alectinib group and 3·7 months (IQR 3·7-3·8) in the chemotherapy group. The safety of adjuvant alectinib was generally consistent with its known profile. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were blood creatine phosphokinase increased (eight [6%] of 128), alanine aminotransferase increased (two [2%] of 128), and blood bilirubin increased (two [2%] of 128) in the alectinib group, and neutrophil count decreased (12 [10%] of 120), neutropenia (ten [8%] of 120), and nausea (five [4%] of 120) in the chemotherapy group. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in two (2%; one each with appendicitis and pneumonitis) of 128 patients in the alectinib group and eight (7%) of 120 patients in the chemotherapy group ( most common were gastrointestinal disorders in three [3%] patients). No deaths due to adverse events were reported in either group. There were fewer discontinuations due to adverse events with alectinib (seven [5%]) versus chemotherapy (15 [13%]). A clinically meaningful difference in improvement from baseline was seen at week 12 for bodily pain, role physical, mental health, social functioning, and vitality SF-36v2 domains with alectinib; improvements in physical and mental HRQoL were maintained over 2 years of active treatment (at week 96, mean Mental Component Summary score: 49·9 [SD 10·4]; mean Physical Component Summary score: 48·8 [SD 7·2]) and reached levels similar to the general population (population norm: 50). INTERPRETATION: For patients with resected ALK-positive NSCLC, adjuvant alectinib had a manageable safety profile; HRQoL improved and was maintained over 2 years of active treatment. Together with the disease-free survival benefit seen in ALINA, these data support adjuvant alectinib as an important new standard-of-care for patients with resected ALK-positive NSCLC. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Adult↗