Comparison of analgesic treatments used for ankle sprains in the emergency department.

Emine Sarcan; Ahmet B Erdem; Merve Yazla; Elif Celikel

doi:10.14744/tjtes.2026.94069

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42703669

Comparison of analgesic treatments used for ankle sprains in the emergency department.

Emine Sarcan·Ahmet B Erdem·Merve Yazla·Elif Celikel

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ankle sprains (ASs) account for approximately 5% of emergency department visits and 40% of all sports-related injuries, causing significant pain and restriction in the range of motion (ROM). This study aims to observe the clinical outcomes of early administration of intravenously administered paracetamol, ibuprofen, and dexketoprofen, which are frequently used in emergency department practice for ASs. For this purpose, pain monitoring and ROM measurements were performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of early functional analgesia. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted between December 2023 and May 2024 on patients diagnosed with grade 1-2 ASs in the emergency department. Patients were divided into three groups and received intravenous dexketoprofen (Group D, n=52), paracetamol (Group P, n=52), and ibuprofen (Group I, n=51). Pain assessment was performed using the numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale (WBS). ROM was evaluated by measuring dorsiflexion ROM (d-ROM) and plantar flexion ROM (p-ROM) angles using a semicircular goniometer. Pre-treatment and 1-h post-treatment measure-ments were compared. RESULTS: In the post-treatment pain assessment, no significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of NRS scores (p=0.352); however, Group I had the lowest WBS scores (p<0.001). Nevertheless, in all three groups, post-treatment pain scores (NRS and WBS) were significantly lower compared to pre-treatment values (p<0.001). Regarding ROM, pre-treatment d-ROM and p-ROM values were similar among the groups (p=0.196) and p=0.287, respectively). Post-treatment measurements revealed that d-ROM was lower in Group I (p=0.034), whereas p-ROM was higher (p=0.011). However, in all groups, ROM values significantly improved after treatment compared to baseline (p<0.001). When pre- and post-treatment changes (Δ) in pain scores and ROM values were compared, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups (ΔNRS p=0.264, ΔWBS p=0.965, Δd-ROM p=0.099, Δp-ROM p=0.073). CONCLUSION: Paracetamol, ibuprofen, and dexketoprofen demonstrated similar efficacy in reducing pain and improving ankle joint ROM during the acute phase of ASs. These findings suggest that the early initiation of analgesic treatment in ASs contributes to clinical recovery.

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Emine Sarcan, Ahmet B Erdem, Merve Yazla, Elif Celikel. 2026. Comparison of analgesic treatments used for ankle sprains in the emergency department.. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2026.94069

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Comparative Study resource Adult subject Analgesics subject Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal subject Comparative Study subject Double-Blind Method subject Female subject Humans subject Journal Article subject Male subject Pain Measurement subject Randomized controlled trials study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Impact of oliceridine versus sufentanil on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing thyroid surgery: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication following thyroid surgery, often exacerbated by opioid use. Oliceridine, a novel G protein-biased μ-opioid receptor agonist, may reduce opioid-related adverse events. This study aimed to compare the impact of oliceridine versus sufentanil on the incidence and severity of PONV in patients undergoing thyroid surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled trial conducted between May 2025 and February 2026, 232 patients scheduled for thyroid surgery were randomly assigned to receive either oliceridine or sufentanil for intraoperative analgesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV during the first 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included PONV severity, need for rescue anti-emetics, postoperative pain scores, recovery quality, and other adverse events. RESULTS: The incidence of PONV within 48 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the oliceridine group [13/107 (12%)] compared with the sufentanil group [31/110 (28%)] (OR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.17-0.72, p = 0.006). Postoperative pain scores, rescue analgesia requirements, and Quality of Recovery-15 scores were comparable between the two groups (p > 0.05). Besides, exploratory unadjusted analyses revealed fewer rescue anti-emetics: O group 8/107 (8%) vs S group 25/110 (23%) (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.12-0.64, p = 0.002); and less abdominal distension: O group 4/107 (4%) vs S group 19/110 (17%) (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.57, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: For young ASA I-II patients undergoing thyroid surgery, oliceridine yields adequate postoperative analgesia and lower PONV rates versus sufentanil. Additional trials involving high-intensity surgical procedures are needed to confirm consistent equivalence.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Improved quality of life and prolonged survival with add-on homeopathic treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, three-arm, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Alongside conventional anticancer treatment, add-on homeopathy might help to alleviate adverse effects of conventional therapy. AIM: The aim of this study was to replicate previous studies on the effect of adjunctive homeopathy on quality of life (QoL) and survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHOD: In this prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, three-arm multicenter phase III study with quadruple-checked data analysis, we investigated the potential effects of an add-on homeopathic treatment compared to placebo in patients with stage IV NSCLC in terms of QoL. Ninety-eight received either individualized homeopathic medicinal products (HMPs; n = 51) or placebo (n = 47) in a double-blinded fashion. Fifty-two control patients without homeopathic treatment were only observed in terms of their survival rate. The ingredients of the various HMPs were mainly prepared of plant, mineral, or animal origin. The data entry and statistical analysis were subject to an exceptional quadruple-checked data analysis process. The analysis presented in this article was inspired by our earlier report of this trial published in The Oncologist in 2020, which was retracted by that journal in November 2025 after two corrections; a majority of the co-authors disagreed with this decision. The present article is based on the same trial dataset but was deliberately designed to highlight the unique research methodology: design and preparation by a lead statistician, data entry, data clearing and independent statistical evaluation were performed in four mutually independent steps, reporting follows the CONSORT statement, and the interpretation of the findings has been reframed conservatively. RESULTS: Global health status (QoL) was higher in the homeopathy group than in the placebo group after 9 weeks and after 18 weeks (p < 0.001). With the exception of cognitive functioning at 9 weeks and of pain, diarrhea and financial difficulties at 9 weeks, all functional and symptom scales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 favored the homeopathy group (p < 0.001 for the multivariate comparisons), with between-group differences exceeding the threshold of 10 points that is generally regarded as clinically meaningful. Median survival time over the 730-day observation period was 435 days in the homeopathy group, 257 days in the placebo group (p = 0.010), and 228 days in the non-randomized control group (p < 0.001); the corresponding 2-year survival rates were 45.1%, 23.4%, and 13.5% (homeopathy vs. placebo p = 0.020; homeopathy vs. control p < 0.001). The difference between the placebo group and the non-randomized control group was not statistically significant (p = 0.154). CONCLUSION: In this trial, add-on homeopathy was associated with better quality of life across most functional and symptom domains, with clinically meaningful effect sizes congruently to a previous open study. Survival time was significantly longer in the homeopathy group compared to both the placebo and control groups. Independent replication, ideally within contemporary immuno-oncological treatment regimens is required. TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01509612; January 7, 2012.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Faecal Microbiota Transplantation Reduces Lesion Severity and Medication Use in Canine Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an established therapy for gastrointestinal disease, yet its role in canine atopic dermatitis (cAD) remains unclear. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: We hypothesised that adjunctive FMT improves clinical severity and reduces symptomatic medication use in dogs with cAD. The objective was to evaluate efficacy and safety versus placebo. ANIMALS: Forty-six client-owned dogs with naturally occurring cAD were enrolled from a referral hospital population; 40 completed the study (FMT n = 20, placebo n = 20). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial. Dogs received daily oral lyophilised FMT capsules for 90 days plus three monthly rectal FMT administrations (Day [D]0, D30, D60) or placebo capsules with sham handling. Concomitant symptomatic therapies were permitted. Outcomes included Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index, fourth iteration (CADESI-04), pruritus Visual Analog Scale (PVAS), Medication Score (D0-90) and Owner Global Assessment of Treatment Efficacy (OGATE, D90). RESULTS: CADESI-04 scores were lower with FMT at month (M) 2 (7 ± 6 vs. 16 ± 12; p = 0.006) and month 3 (8 ± 6 vs. 15 ± 12; p = 0.020). Sustained responders (≥ 50% CADESI-04 improvement at M2 and M3) were more frequent with FMT (35% vs. 5%; p = 0.044). In the FMT group, the medication scores were lower at M2 (16 ± 10 vs. 23 ± 11; p = 0.033) and M3 (13 ± 10 vs. 24 ± 15; p = 0.007) compared to placebo. PVAS decreased in both groups without between-group differences. OGATE favoured FMT (p = 0.028). FMT was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Adjunctive FMT reduced lesion severity and medication requirements, supporting its use as a safe microbiome-based add-on therapy in cAD.

Animals↗

Abstract

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Discover connections

Related citations

Impact of oliceridine versus sufentanil on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing thyroid surgery: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Improved quality of life and prolonged survival with add-on homeopathic treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, three-arm, multicenter study.

Faecal Microbiota Transplantation Reduces Lesion Severity and Medication Use in Canine Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial.