SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Drug Interactions”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

623 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Identification of molecular subtypes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma based on chromatin regulators and tumor immune microenvironment profiling.

In the histological classification of renal cell carcinoma, clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) accounts for the highest proportion and is the most common subtype. Despite advances in management, it continues to be associated with considerable incidence and mortality. Although surgery and systemic therapies are available, their efficacy is constrained by pronounced intratumoral heterogeneity and treatment resistance. Identifying robust biomarkers and clarifying the underlying biological mechanisms are therefore essential to improving diagnosis, risk stratification and therapeutic decision-making. In this work, we identified two ccRCC molecular subtypes displaying divergent chromatin regulator (CR) profiles and different clinical prognoses. Using the genes differentially expressed between these subgroups, we constructed a CR-related score (CRS) that effectively stratified patients according to survival. More analysis concluded that the low expression of CR was more linked with the immune-activated tumors, which encompassed the immune pathway enrichment, as well as the elevation of numerous immune cell subtypes. Moreover, elevated CRS was associated with improved immunotherapy responsiveness. Drug-sensitivity analyses nominated several candidate agents, and SMARCD3 knockdown in 786-O cells inhibited proliferation and migration and reduced sensitivity to masitinib. Collectively, these findings support the prognostic and therapeutic relevance of CR-related states in ccRCC and provide a framework for future experimental validation of chromatin-regulated tumor-immune interactions.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Policy pathways and historical insights: Canada's evolving approach to psychedelic access for end-of-life distress.

Canada's evolving attitudes toward psychedelic interventions in palliative and end-of-life care reflect a departure from historically prohibitionist policies and an emerging recognition of their therapeutic potential for individuals facing end-of-life distress. This shift parallels international regulatory developments in jurisdictions such as the United States, Australia and parts of Europe, where cautious policy liberalization has signaled growing acceptance of psychedelics within clinical contexts. Canada is also a relevant case because of its formative role in the development of modern palliative care, its contemporary frameworks emphasizing holistic approaches to suffering at the end of life, and its experience with medical assistance in dying, all of which have shaped national conversations about suffering, autonomy, and end-of-life care. Additionally, Canada's distinctive historical approach to drug regulation-marked by federal flexibility, mechanisms for compassionate access, and responsiveness to patient advocacy-combined with rising public demand and incremental provincial changes, may uniquely position the country along a transitional pathway toward clinical integration of psychedelics in palliative care. At the same time, Canadian drug policy remains heterogeneous across substances and provinces, underscoring the political contingency of reform. Within this dynamic landscape, Canada's psychedelic drug policy trajectory aligns with broader international trends toward cautious medicalization and regulated access to psychedelic therapies, while also offering an instructive case for how end-of-life frameworks and federal-provincial governance shape policy development.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Cardiovascular Drug Access in Australia and New Zealand: New PBS and PHARMAC Listings, 2023-2025.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death in Australia and New Zealand. Publicly subsidised access to new cardiovascular medications is governed by the PBS (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme) in Australia and PHARMAC (Pharmaceutical Management Agency) in New Zealand, yet no consolidated resource catalogues recent listings across both jurisdictions. METHODS: We reviewed all new cardiovascular drug listings and indications on the PBS and PHARMAC schedules from 1 January 2023 to 31 December 2025. PBS data were obtained from the PBS Pricing and Policy Branch through the Cardiac Society for Australia and New Zealand. PHARMAC data were obtained via direct communication with PHARMAC and cross-referenced with public schedule information. Pivotal trial evidence, restriction criteria, and prescribing considerations were extracted from published literature and regulatory documents. RESULTS: Five new cardiovascular drugs were PBS-listed (inclisiran, mavacamten, tafamidis, icosapent ethyl and migalastat), two existing drugs received new cardiovascular indications (empagliflozin and dapagliflozin for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction) and prasugrel was relisted for acute coronary syndrome. One major change occurred on the PHARMAC schedule (empagliflozin for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction). CONCLUSIONS: The 2023-2025 period has seen notable additions to cardiovascular pharmacotherapy in Australia, including the first cardiac myosin inhibitor, the first transthyretin stabiliser, expanded lipid lowering therapy options, and extension of SGLT2 inhibitor coverage across the heart failure ejection fraction spectrum. A pronounced access disparity persists between Australia and New Zealand.

New Zealand↗

PubMed2026

MIC-based tuberculosis drug susceptibility testing using Sensititre MYCOTB: a diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis.

Accurate drug susceptibility testing (DST) is crucial for designing effective regimens for multidrug-resistant (MDR) and pre-extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (pre-XDR TB). Sensititre MYCOTB enables simultaneous determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for multiple drugs, but its diagnostic performance varies across studies. This meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic performance of Sensititre MYCOTB for key MDR and pre-XDR TB drugs. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251230599). PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Scopus, ONOS, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and registries were systematically searched for studies published between 2010 and 2025. Studies comparing the Sensititre MYCOTB with reference DST for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) were included. Bias assessment and pooled diagnostic accuracy estimates were generated. Fourteen studies, including 1,728 isolates, were analyzed. Rifampicin and isoniazid demonstrated high sensitivity (0.976 [95% CI: 0.94-0.99] and 0.977 [95% CI: 0.95-0.99]) and specificity (0.958 [95% CI: 0.84-0.98] and 0.957 [95% CI: 0.83-0.99], respectively) with low heterogeneity. Amikacin, kanamycin, and ofloxacin demonstrate good diagnostic accuracy, with high specificity (>0.98 [95% CI]). Moderate diagnostic accuracy was observed for ethambutol, streptomycin, ethionamide, and rifabutin. Cycloserine, moxifloxacin, and para-aminosalicylic acid showed inconsistent performance despite excellent specificity (>0.97 [95% CI]). Sensitivity analysis partially improved pooled sensitivity for moxifloxacin 0.801 (95% CI: 0.585-0.924) and para-aminosalicylic acid 0.76 (95% CI: 0.518-0.894), whereas cycloserine remained at 0.436 (95% CI: 0.190-0.725), although heterogeneity persisted. Sensititre MYCOTB DST demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for MDR-TB and pre-XDR-TB drugs, while caution is required with cycloserine, moxifloxacin, and para-aminosalicylic acid. These findings support the integration of MIC-based testing into clinical decision-making.

Microbial Sensitivity Tests↗

PubMed2026

Chalcone-indole hybrid scaffolds as promising anticancer drug candidates: a mini-review.

Cancer treatment is hampered by severe systemic side effects, poor tumor selectivity, and multidrug resistance (MDR). Molecular hybridization integrates chalcone and indole, two privileged antitumor pharmacophores, into one scaffold to generate chalcone-indole hybrids that synergistically enhance antitumor potency, improve tumor targeting, and reverse MDR. This mini-review analyzes literature from 2020 to 2026 on chalcone-indole anticancer hybrids. Based on structural modification patterns, the reported hybrids are categorized into four subgroups: simple substituted, α/β-position modified, N-1 fatty acid-substituted, and multi-pharmacophore fused hybrids. For each category, we summarize structure-activity relationships (SARs), antiproliferative activity, selective toxicity, molecular mechanisms, and in vivo xenograft performance. Most lead compounds exert tumor-suppressive effects via tubulin polymerization inhibition, G2/M cell cycle arrest, ROS overaccumulation, and mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis. Representative hybrids 10a, 12a, 21a, and 25a exhibit remarkable efficacy against drug-resistant colorectal, lung, and breast tumors with favorable in vivo safety. We highlight the application potential of different subtypes for specific malignancies, including α/β-modified analogues for resistant colorectal cancer, N-1 fatty acid-platinum conjugates for platinum-resistant lung cancer, NLRP3 inhibitor 7a for oral cancer, and multi-pharmacophore fused derivatives for broad-spectrum activity. Current bottlenecks limiting clinical transformation are discussed. This review provides structural design rules for developing novel chalcone-indole targeted anticancer agents.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comparative safety of lipid-lowering drugs alone or in combination: insights from a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although the safety profile of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) is known, there are no comprehensive comparative assessments. We aimed to compare the risk of muscle-related events, diabetes, liver dysfunction, and cognitive disorders among LLTs through a network meta-analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Databases were searched from inception to May 2025. Eligible studies included adult patients, using statins, ezetimibe, PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9mAbs), inclisiran, bempedoic acid, or their combinations as intervention, reporting the information about any of the selected adverse events, a total sample size of ≥200 subjects, and had ≥1 month of intervention. Pooled estimates were assessed by fixed effects model within a frequentist setting. Pooled relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence interval were estimated. A total of 303,397 subjects from 153 RCTs were included. Bempedoic acid ranked the lowest risk of myalgia (vs PCSK9mAbs, RR 0.80 [0.69, 0.93]). PCSK9mAbs were associated with lower incidence of creatine kinase (CK) elevation, diabetes, and liver dysfunction comparing to statins (statins vs PCSK9mAbs, RR 1.44 [1.14, 1.81], RR 1.13 [1.05, 1.22], and RR 1.38 [1.17, 1.62], respectively). In terms of muscle-related events and cognitive disorders, no significant risk differences were found among treatments and their combinations. CONCLUSIONS: PCSK9mAbs appear to have a more favourable safety profile regarding the risk of CK elevation, diabetes, and liver dysfunction. Bempedoic acid seem to be a better choice for subjects with high risk of myalgia. This information can be valuable when selecting therapy for specific patient subgroups at higher risk of certain adverse events.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Adherence and efficacy of the 0 - 7 - 21-day versus the 0 - 1 - 6-month hepatitis B vaccination schedules among people who use drugs: a two-year randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: To compare the adherence and efficacy between the 0 - 7 - 21-day and the 0 - 1 - 6-month hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination schedules among people who use drugs (PWUD) in China. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 1261 HBV-susceptible PWUD from compulsory isolated detoxification centers (CIDCs) and methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) clinics in Xi'an. A 20 µg per-dose vaccine was used. HBV surface antibody (anti-HBs), surface antigen, and core antibody were tested at months 7, 15, and 22 after the first dose. RESULTS: Third-dose coverage was significantly higher in the 0 - 7 - 21-day group (74.40%) than in the 0 - 1 - 6-month group (51.58%, p < 0.001), mainly driven by participants from CIDCs (77.75% vs. 45.69%). Anti-HBs positive rates at months 7, 15, and 22 among participants who completed all three doses were significantly higher for the 0 - 1 - 6-month schedule (90.71%, 76.82%, and 67.35%) than for the 0 - 7 - 21-day schedule (74.23%, 49.40%, and 40.95%; all p < 0.001). HBV infection incidence was similar between schedules, but significantly different between vaccinees and non-vaccinees (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: The 0 - 7 - 21-day schedule substantially enhances three-dose completion in PWUD, but induces a notably weaker anti-HBs response and persistence. Schedules should be selected based on the management models for PWUD and their individual characteristics. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900022403).

Humans↗

PubMed2026

MET-Aberrant non-small cell lung cancer: from kinase dependence to cell-surface targetability-mechanistic basis and biomarker framework for bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates.

MET-aberrant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not a uniform therapeutic entity. Its biology, diagnostic pathways, and treatment sensitivity differ across MET exon 14 skipping alteration (METex14), MET amplification, and MET overexpression. This heterogeneity cannot be fully explained by conventional event-based classification and is reflected in the distinct clinical activity of MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (MET-TKIs), bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). With the emergence of antibody-based therapies, MET has evolved from a signaling driver to a cell-surface target for receptor modulation and payload delivery. We therefore propose a clinically anchored two-dimensional framework for interpreting therapeutic relevance in MET-aberrant NSCLC: kinase dependence and cell-surface targetability. Neither dimension should be regarded as a directly measurable binary variable. Kinase dependence is inferred from genomic and treatment-contextual proxies, most strongly METex14 and, more conditionally, high-level focal MET amplification. Cell-surface targetability is approximated by drug-specific IHC assessment of assay-defined c-MET protein expression; however, receptor internalization, intracellular trafficking, and payload delivery capacity remain incompletely measurable in routine clinical practice. Within this framework, MET-TKIs have the most evidence-supported established role in tumors with evidence of MET-driven kinase dependence. EGFR × MET BsAbs have demonstrated clinical activity in broad post-osimertinib EGFR-mutant NSCLC, while EGFR/MET co-dependence or MET-mediated bypass activation provides a mechanistic rationale for their use; MET-defined preferential benefit remains to be prospectively established. MET-directed antibody-drug conjugates (MET-ADCs) are supported in drug- and assay-defined populations with high c-MET protein overexpression, although the predictive relevance of delivery-related factors remains hypothesis-generating. Accordingly, MET testing should shift from single-event detection to platform-oriented stratification: next-generation sequencing (NGS) for driver alterations and resistance profiles, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for high-level focal amplification, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for surface expression relevant to antibody-based therapies. This framework is intended to organize current biological and clinical evidence rather than to replace drug-specific companion diagnostics, regulatory indications, or prospectively validated treatment-selection algorithms. Precision treatment of MET-aberrant NSCLC is thus moving from event-based drug selection toward mechanism-based therapeutic matching. Future priorities include standardizing biomarkers, defining optimal target populations, and aligning biological subtypes, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic platforms.

Antibody-drug conjugate↗

PubMed2026

Estimating absenteeism associated with alcohol, illicit substance, and tobacco use: A nationally representative study of Australian workers.

INTRODUCTION: Substance use is common among employed people and has the potential to negatively impact productivity and worker health. However, the literature is inconclusive regarding the extent to which substance use impacts absenteeism. This study sought to extend the literature by investigating the relationship between substance use and absenteeism in the Australian workforce. METHODS: The analysis included N = 12,557 employed respondents of the 2022-23 National Drug Strategy Household Survey. We employed quasi-Poisson models to examine the impact of heavy episodic drinking (HED), illicit substance use, and tobacco smoking on work absences. RESULTS: In fully adjusted models, workers who engaged in weekly illicit substance use exhibited significantly elevated absenteeism rates (OR = 1.48, 95% CI [1.08, 2.03]) when compared to abstainers. This finding suggests that each worker who used illicit substances weekly was absent from work for an additional 3.6 days (95% CI [0.52, 6.61]) annually in comparison to those who abstained. HED engagement and smoking were not significantly associated with absenteeism. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: This contemporary Australian study provides more refined insights into the relationship between varying levels of substance use and absenteeism at the population level. Findings illustrate the substantial productivity burden attributable to substance use, reinforcing the importance of workplace-targeted interventions and health policies to mitigate substance use and its effects on productivity and worker health.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comparative Efficacy of Non-opioid Analgesic Drugs for Chronic Cancer Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: While opioids remain the primary pharmacological intervention for cancer pain management, their clinical utility is frequently compromised by dose-limiting toxicities. This study aimed to determine the comparative efficacy, opioid-sparing potential, and clinical hierarchy of non-opioid adjuvant drug classes. The study was structured around the PICO framework to evaluate the pharmacological strategies currently utilized in multimodal clinical oncology. METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane) was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2000 and 2025. The primary outcome was global analgesic efficacy (standardized mean difference [SMD]), while secondary outcomes included the opioid-sparing effect, defined as the percentage reduction in morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) and the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (Harms). A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to rank treatments using SUCRA values. The methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) tool. RESULTS: Twenty-three RCTs (n = 1845) met the inclusion criteria. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (-1.10) and anticonvulsants (-1.06) demonstrated the most robust analgesic effects. The SUCRA ranking confirmed a clear hierarchy, with the combination of anticonvulsants and antidepressants showing the highest probability of efficacy. A significant opioid-sparing effect was observed for gabapentinoids and ketamine, facilitating MEDD reduction. While serious adverse events were rare, minor harms (somnolence, dizziness) were more frequent in the most effective classes. CONCLUSION: Our NMA provides a robust evidence base for a "Clinical Tier" system, ranking adjuvants by their balance of efficacy and safety. These findings support the early integration of Tier I agents (anticonvulsants and NSAIDs) to optimize pain control and reduce opioid-related toxicities in chronic cancer pain management.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Same-day initiation of tenofovir alafenamide-based pre-exposure prophylaxis with drug-level feedback for transgender women in Uganda.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of same-day initiation of emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (F/TAF) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and test the impact of drug-level feedback on PrEP adherence among transgender women (TGW) in Uganda. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: HIV-negative TGW were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to intervention (drug-level feedback with tailored adherence counseling) or standard-of-care (SOC), and followed quarterly for 12 months (November 2021-July 2023; NCT04491422). Quarterly clinic visits included demographic and socio-behavioral data collection, PrEP refills, STI testing, and quarterly PrEP adherence assessment using tenofovir levels in dried blood spots (DBS; long-term) and urine (short-term). RESULTS: We enrolled 200 TGW (100 per arm), median age 21 years. Same-day F/TAF PrEP initiation was 100%. Tenofovir detection in urine (intervention arm) was 79, 80, 85, and 70% at the 3, 6, 9, and 12-month visits, respectively. Tenofovir detection in DBS was 46, 40, 35, and 31% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. Median tenofovir DBS concentrations were 40.6 and 47.0 fmol/punch in intervention and SOC arms, respectively. There was no intervention effect on PrEP adherence (DBS tenofovir levels) [adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) 1.06; 95% CI: 0.82-1.37]. Never being harassed by police for being transgender (aIRR 1.66; 95% CI: 1.24-2.23), history of taking daily medication for more than 7 days (aIRR 1.51; 95% CI: 1.18-1.93) and higher monthly income (aIRR 1.44; 95% CI: 1.10-2.04) were associated with PrEP adherence. CONCLUSION: Oral F/TAF PrEP adherence among TGW in Uganda was low and not affected by drug-level feedback or tailored adherence counseling. Long-acting injectable PrEP formulations should be considered for this population.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Systematic meta-analysis of the toxicities and side effects of the targeted drug lenvatinib.

BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib, an effective targeted drug for various cancers, has clinical medication safety concerns due to its toxicities and side effects. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated lenvatinib-induced any adverse events (any AEs) and nine aspects: vascular toxicities related to the circulatory system (vascular toxicities, blood system, and heart), toxicities of the skin and its appendages (skin/subcutaneous tissue and taste system), toxicities of the respiratory system (respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal and respiratory tract), toxicities of the nervous system (nervous system and general), toxicities of the digestive system (gastrointestinal and liver), toxicities of the urinary system, toxicities of the endocrine and metabolic system (endocrine and metabolism/nutrition), toxicities of the musculoskeletal system, and other severe toxicities. Toxicities and side effects were stratified by severity into any and ≥3 grades for analysis. PATIENTS/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for lenvatinib cancer clinical studies (cohort studies and randomized controlled trials) from inception to December 31, 2024; toxicity and side effect data were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: Nine high-quality studies were included, showing that lenvatinib is effective in cancers but has notable toxicities. Taking hypertension as an example, for any grade, the risk ratio (RR) was 2.34 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of [2.09, 2.62], a Z-value of 14.74, and a P-value <0.00001; for grade ≥3, the RR was 2.60 with a 95% CI of [2.21, 3.06], a Z-value of 11.44, and a P-value <0.00001. CONCLUSION: Lenvatinib is effective for cancer but toxic, and this study supports its rational clinical use.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Real-world clinical utility of exome sequencing in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy: Experience from a tertiary center in Thailand.

BACKGROUND: Genomic testing has increasingly contributed to the diagnosis and management of pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), particularly in patients with suspected genetic etiologies. This study evaluated the diagnostic yield and real- world clinical utility of whole-exome sequencing (WES) in children with DRE. METHODS: Children with DRE and seizure onset before 15 years of age were enrolled between January 2020 and December 2023. Clinical data, including demographics, seizure characteristics, developmental history, electroencephalography (EEG), brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and prior investigations, were reviewed. WES was performed in all probands and, when available, their parents. Variants were interpreted according to standard guidelines. Clinical utility and 1-year seizure and developmental outcomes were assessed from follow-up records. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (23 males, 33 females) were included. The median age at seizure onset was 1 year (interquartile range [IQR] 0.3-4 years), and 96.4% had developmental comorbidities. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in 39% (22/56), with the highest diagnostic yield in children with seizure onset before 3 years of age. Channelopathies accounted for most genetically solved cases (68%), predominantly involving sodium channel genes. Genetic diagnoses provided clinical utility in 73% (16/22) of solved cases by guiding treatment and precision management. At 1-year follow-up, genetically solved patients showed more favorable seizure and developmental outcomes than those with genetically unsolved patients. CONCLUSION: WES achieved a 39% diagnostic yield and substantial clinical utility in pediatric DRE, particularly in early-onset and channelopathy-related disorders. These findings support early molecular diagnosis to facilitate genotype-informed management in appropriately selected children. However, the more favorable developmental and seizure outcomes observed in genetically solved patients should be interpreted with caution, as they may have been influenced by multiple factors beyond genetic diagnosis. In resource-limited settings, careful clinical phenotyping remains essential for treatment decisions and for prioritizing children for genomic testing.

Clinical utility↗

PubMed2026

Therapeutic-drug-monitoring-based ATG Targeted Dosing Strategy in Unmanipulated Haploidentical Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: a randomized, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial.

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) has been a standard prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). However, the pharmacokinetics of ATG in vivo vary significantly, and weight-based fixed dosing may not optimize efficacy while minimizing toxicity. We investigated the clinical results of a therapeutic-drug-monitoring (TDM)-based, dose-optimized ATG strategy versus weight-based fixed dosing in haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (NCT05166967). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a targeted dose of ATG or a fixed dose of 10 mg/kg. The primary endpoint was the 365-day graft-versus-host disease-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS). From January 1, 2022, to January 16, 2024, 204 patients were enrolled, with 102 patients in each group. The 365-day GRFS was higher in the targeted dose group (66.7%) than in the fixed dose group (50.0%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.666; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4456 to 0.9954; P = 0.048). The cumulative incidence of moderate to severe chronic GVHD at day 365 was significantly lower in the targeted dose group (9.8%; 95% CI, 5.0 to 16.5) compared with the fixed dose group (22.5%; 95% CI, 15.0 to 31.1; P = 0.026). Fewer grade 3-5 infections were reported in the targeted dose group (44.1%) than in the fixed dose group (70.6%; P < 0.001). More patients in the targeted dose group achieved optimal ATG exposure (P = 0.007) and superior CD4+ T-cell reconstitution (P = 0.002). These findings support the clinical utility of a TDM-based individualized ATG dosing strategy that balances efficacy and toxicity for GVHD prophylaxis in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05166967.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Whole genome sequencing of unusual Hepatitis C virus subtypes and drug resistance analysis during direct-acting antiviral therapy in India.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals (DAA) are effective against highly prevalent Hepatitis C virus (HCV) subtypes, but have been clinically validated almost exclusively in high-income countries. Unusual HCV subtypes may carry natural polymorphisms, potentially impacting DAA susceptibility. We conducted full-genome characterization and resistance analysis of unusual HCV subtypes in patients receiving DAA treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective hospital-based study, eligible patients were screened for anti-HCV antibodies and active infection was confirmed by diagnostic 5'NCR-based HCV RNA detection. Genotyping was performed by core region sequencing, and viral load quantified by real-time PCR. For whole genome sequencing, multiplex primers were designed using alignments of global reference sequences. Sequencing was carried out using the Oxford Nanopore Technology platform. Phylogenetic analysis used multiple sequence alignment and the HCV-GLUE resource for resistance-associated substitution (RAS) analysis. RESULTS: Predominant genotype was genotype 3 in 64.3% (n = 45); genotype 6 in 21.4% (n = 15); and genotype 1 in 14.2% (n = 10). Unusual HCV subtype 6xa was detected in two patients and showed no NS5A resistance mutations. One genotype 3b patient relapsed at 24 weeks post-DAA treatment completion and carried NS5A resistance-associated substitutions 30 K and 31 M both at baseline and at relapse, conferring high-level resistance to NS5A inhibitors. CONCLUSION: This is the first report from India of whole genome sequencing of HCV subtype 6xa. The identification of NS5A resistance mutations in the 3b relapse case underscores challenges for global HCV elimination strategies.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A machine learning-derived and functionally validated circadian rhythm signature predicts clinical outcomes and in silico drug sensitivity in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) displays considerable heterogeneity in clinical outcomes, highlighting the need for reliable prognostic biomarkers. While the aberrant expression of circadian rhythm-related genes has been implicated in cancer pathogenesis, its comprehensive role in CRC progression and predicted therapeutic vulnerabilities remains inadequately characterized. METHODS: Bulk and single-cell RNA-sequencing data were integrated from multiple CRC cohorts. A circadian rhythm signature (CRS) was developed through machine learning algorithms and validated for prognostic value. Comprehensive analyses of tumor microenvironment, genomic alterations, and drug sensitivity were performed. Furthermore, the biological function of the core gene, BHLHE40, was validated in CRC cell lines through CCK-8, EdU, and wound healing assays. RESULTS: Single-cell analysis demonstrated an elevated expression signature of circadian rhythm-related genes in dendritic cells. The optimized CRS, comprising 14 circadian rhythm-related genes, successfully categorized patients into high- and low-risk groups. Patients with a high CRS showed markedly poorer overall survival and computationally inferred immunosuppressive features, including reduced CD8+ T cell infiltration and increased M2 macrophage polarization. Genomic analysis revealed enhanced mutation burden in TP53 and alterations in RTK-RAS/WNT pathways. Notably, in vitro assays confirmed that BHLHE40 is significantly overexpressed in CRC cells. Knockdown of BHLHE40 markedly inhibited tumor cell proliferation and migration. Drug sensitivity profiling identified bexarotene and SMER-3 as potential therapeutic options for high-CRS patients. A nomogram integrating CRS with clinical parameters demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: The CRS represents a promising prognostic biomarker that reflects tumor immune status and genomic features, providing valuable insights for personalized treatment strategies in CRC.

Circadian rhythm↗

PubMed2026

Safety Profile of the Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Celecoxib in the Short-Term Management of Acute Non-cancer Pain: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To summarise the literature regarding the safety of short-term use of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) celecoxib. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised trials. Participants comprised individuals of all ages with acute non-cancer pain. Interventions included celecoxib at 200-400 mg/day for up to 10 days. The comparators were placebo, other NSAIDs (including cyclooxygenase-2 [COX-2] inhibitors and non-selective NSAIDS [nsNSAIDS]), or opioids. DATA SOURCES: Five databases were searched from inception to April 2025: Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus. Additionally, a registry was searched: ClinicalTrials.gov. DATA SYNTHESIS: Meta-analyses using Mantel-Haenszel and random-effects model were used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for severe cardiovascular, respiratory, and gastrointestinal adverse events and secondary outcomes. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomised trials (RoB-2) was used to assess bias risk. The Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was conducted to assess the certainty of evidence of each reported outcome. RESULTS: Title/abstract and full text screening comprised 3976 and 273 studies, respectively. Fifty studies were included with 10,693 participants. The RRs for adverse events were no different between celecoxib and placebo for severe events (3 studies) (RR 0.44 [95% CI 0.10-2.03]), cardiovascular (3 studies) (RR 0.84 [95% CI 0.24-2.92]), respiratory (4 studies) (RR 1.23 [95% CI 0.29-5.26]), and gastrointestinal events (33 studies) (RR 0.96 [95% CI 0.64-1.43]). There was no difference between celecoxib and NSAIDS for gastrointestinal adverse events, RR 0.89 (95% CI 0.68-1.17). Celecoxib had a lower risk compared to opioids for gastrointestinal events, RR 0.34 (95% CI 0.14-0.86), and showed a lower risk of nausea compared with placebo, RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.60-0.93), and nsNSAIDS, RR 0.80 (95% CI 0.64-0.99). Most studies had some risk of bias concerns, and the overall certainty of evidence for most outcomes was very low. Celecoxib appears to be safe for acute non-cancer pain when compared to placebo, NSAIDS, and opioids. It had a lower risk compared to opioids for gastrointestinal adverse events in general, nausea and vomiting, as well as a lower risk for nausea adverse events when compared to placebo and nsNSAIDS. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO-CRD42025642152.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide 2.0 mg as an Add-On to Dose-Reduced Insulin Glargine versus Dose-Titrated Insulin Glargine in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Overweight (SUSTAIN OPTIMIZE).

AIMS: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) management with basal insulin can lead to hypoglycaemia and weight gain. SUSTAIN OPTIMIZE compared once-weekly semaglutide 2.0 mg as add-on to dose-reduced insulin glargine (Sema+IGlarreduced) versus dose-titrated IGlar (IGlartitrated) on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight (BW), daily insulin dose, and participant satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SUSTAIN OPTIMIZE was a 40-week, phase 3b, open-label, randomised study. Adults with T2D, overweight (body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2), and treatment with basal insulin ≤ 40 units/day were randomised 1:1 into Sema+IGlarreduced or IGlartitrated. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c using a non-inferiority approach. Secondary endpoints assessed superiority of Sema+IGlarreduced versus IGlartitrated in reducing HbA1c, BW, daily insulin dose, and improving Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change version (DTSQc) scores. RESULTS: Overall, 573 participants were randomised. Sema+IGlarreduced achieved both non-inferiority and superiority versus IGlartitrated in HbA1c reduction (estimated treatment difference [ETD]: -0.74%; 95% confidence interval [CI95]: -0.90, -0.59) and superiority in BW change (ETD: -8.5 kg; CI95: -9.5, -7.4), relative daily insulin dose change (ETD: -121.9%; CI95: -143.1, -100.6), and DTSQc scores (ETD: 2.6; CI95: 1.6, 3.5) (p < 0.0001 for all endpoints). No new safety concerns were identified. Severe hypoglycaemia was reduced (rate ratio: 0.45; CI95: 0.23, 0.87; p = 0.02), while gastrointestinal events were higher for Sema+IGlarreduced (310 vs. 32 events). CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2.0 mg as add-on to dose-reduced IGlar achieved superior reductions in HbA1c, BW, and daily insulin dose in people with T2D and overweight, while reducing their risk for severe hypoglycaemia compared to dose-titrated IGlar alone.

Adult↗