Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “psychotic disorders/schizophrenia”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

389 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2026

Causal Relationship of Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids With Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Mental disorders (MDs) pose a important global health challenge, with a complex pathogenesis complicating treatment development. Nutritional interventions, particularly polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), have gained attention as potential therapeutic options. OBJECTIVE: This Mendelian randomization (MR) meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the potential causal relationship between PUFAs and MDs. DATA SOURCES: Genome-wide association study data were utilized to analyze the association between PUFAs (including omega-3, omega-3 percentage [omega-3%], omega-6, omega-6 percentage [omega-6%], and omega-6 to omega-3 ratio) and 12 major MDs. DATA EXTRACTION: Two-sample MR technology was used to assess the role of PUFAs in MDs. DATA ANALYSIS: The MR analysis revealed that genetically predicted omega-3 was causally linked to MDs, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder. Omega-3% exhibited protective effects against emotional personality disorder. Conversely, omega-6 was inversely correlated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder risk, while a high omega-6 to omega-3 ratio was associated with an increased risk of depression and other mood disorders. CONCLUSION: High omega-3 levels and omega-3% may reduce the risk of MDs, whereas a high omega-6:omega-3 ratio may elevate the risk. These findings highlight the potential of PUFAs, particularly omega-3, in MD prevention and treatment, while underscoring the need for further research into the complex interactions between omega-3 and omega-6. The study provides a scientific foundation for future clinical trials and dietary intervention strategies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO no. CRD42024598472.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Applications of quantum AI in brain disorder diagnosis: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Brain disorder diagnosis and prediction remain challenging because neuroimaging, electrophysiological, behavioral, and multimodal data are high-dimensional, noisy, heterogeneous, and limited by small clinical cohorts. This systematic review synthesised applications of quantum artificial intelligence (QAI) for brain disorder diagnosis, prediction, detection, and monitoring. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, studies published from 2016 to 13 January 2026 were retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore. After screening, 36 studies met the eligibility criteria and were qualitatively analysed according to disorder category, data modality, QAI method, implementation setting, validation strategy, and performance. RESULTS: At the broader disease-group level, neurodegenerative disorders were the most frequently investigated, followed by mental health and psychiatric disorders. At the individual level, Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia were the leading applications, followed by depression, anxiety, Alzheimer's disease, and stress-related tasks. MRI-based modalities were the most frequently used data source, followed by multimodal data and EEG. Methodologically, primary QAI approaches were dominated by quantum neural and QDL architectures, followed by quantum-inspired optimization or feature-selection methods and quantum-kernel/conventional QML classifiers. Qiskit/IBM Quantum and PennyLane were the most frequently reported quantum software frameworks. However, most studies relied on simulators, classical quantum-inspired implementations, or unclear implementation settings, with limited real-hardware evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: QAI shows emerging potential for brain disorder analysis, particularly through hybrid quantum-classical learning, quantum neural architectures, quantum-kernel methods, and quantum-inspired optimization. Nevertheless, current evidence remains preliminary and requires larger datasets, subject-level and external validation, fair classical benchmarking, noise-resilient circuits, real quantum hardware evaluation, explainability, and clinical validation.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Evaluation of Sexual Function With Adjunctive Lumateperone in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.

Objective: Lumateperone is an atypical antipsychotic to treat schizophrenia, bipolar I or II depression, and major depressive disorder (MDD). Randomized phase 3 Study 502 (NCT05061706) investigated the impact of adjunctive lumateperone 42 mg/day on sexual functioning, per Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire 14-item version (CSFQ-14). Methods: Adults meeting DSM-5 criteria for MDD with inadequate response to 1-2 antidepressant therapies (ADTs) in the current depressive episode, Montgomery-&#xc5;sberg Depression Rating Scale Total score &#x2265;24, Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity score &#x2265;4, and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Report-16-item score &#x2265;14 were randomized to 6-week lumateperone 42 mg+ADT or placebo+ADT. Sexual function was assessed by CSFQ-14 Total and domain scores in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and subgroups. Results: Of 480 patients in the ITT population, 82.5% had sexual dysfunction at baseline (women=284; men=112). Lumateperone+ADT significantly improved CSFQ-14 Total score at Day 43 vs placebo+ADT (least squares mean difference [LSMD]=2.7; effect size [ES]=0.38; P<.0001). Significantly greater improvements were observed in patients with baseline sexual dysfunction (LSMD=3.1; ES=0.42; P<.0001), with no change in those without. Improvements were observed in women (LSMD=3.5; ES=0.47; P<.0001) and in men (LSMD=1.9; ES=0.33; P=.08). Significant improvements in CSFQ-14 Total score at Day 43 were observed across age groups and CSFQ domain scores, with both sexes having significant improvements in pleasure and arousal/ excitement. Improvements in depressive symptoms may be linked to improvement in sexual functioning. Conclusions: Adjunctive lumateperone 42 mg did not worsen sexual functioning and was not associated with treatment-related sexual dysfunction in patients with MDD with inadequate response to ADT. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05061706.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Complexity in disguise: a systematic review of fractal analysis in psychiatric neuroimaging.

OBJECTIVES: Psychiatric diagnosis and fractal studies are complex processes that extend beyond clinical evaluation and require careful methodological considerations in neuroimaging. Over the years, fractals have helped reduce these complexities in research, but they still cannot grant clinical diagnoses. Thus, the main objective was a systematic review exploring the potential applications of fractal analysis in characterizing psychiatric conditions through neuroimaging techniques-including both functional and structural MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed, identifying thirty-nine original studies that met the inclusion criteria. Areas showing statistical significance (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05) were reported. These studies were categorized according to DSM-V classification and examined for the description of psychiatric conditions through the fractal analysis. RESULTS: The review primarily focuses on young adults with psychiatric conditions compared to control groups. Schizophrenia and Autism Spectrum Disorder are major areas of investigation, and fractal dimension (FD) is the primary analysis method used to reflect brain patterns. Studies that calculated whole-brain FD may have underestimated local abnormalities due to the inclusion of a high percentage of tissue, potentially resulting in overlooked findings. Notably, abnormalities in the frontal cortex represent a common neurobiological feature across several psychiatric conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this systematic review shed light on the use of fractal analysis to quantify complex brain patterns in both psychiatric patients and healthy individuals. However, it is essential to recognize the need for further research to elucidate a fractal analysis protocol that allows for optimal extraction of psychiatric insights. KEY POINTS: Question Fractal analysis applied to structural and functional MRI help characterize brain alterations across psychiatric conditions. Findings This review shows consistent fractal patterns across multiple psychiatric disorders, especially in frontal regions. Despite heterogeneous methodologies, results highlight shared structural and functional abnormalities. Clinical relevance Fractal analysis may offer complementary characterization of subtle brain organization across psychiatric disorders. Its potential clinical utility-such as improving diagnostic characterization, earlier detection, among others-remains limited by the current absence of a standardized protocol.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Cardiovascular risks in psychiatric disorders and psychiatric risks in cardiovascular disorders: implications for prevention and clinical management - a large-scale umbrella review encompassing 76 meta-analyses.

OBJECTIVE: Psychiatric and cardiovascular disorders often co-occur, complicating their assessment and management. No umbrella review(UR) has summarized the meta-analytic evidence on the co-occurrence of psychiatric and cardiovascular disorders and assessed its credibility. METHODS: Meta-analytic systematic reviews of observational studies documenting the prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with the co-occurrence of cardiovascular and psychiatric disorders, indexed from inception through March.16.2026, and meeting established diagnostic criteria, were included. Meta-analytic association and prevalence estimates were recalculated and graded based on established or adapted criteria. The AMSTAR-2 assessed the quality of the meta-analyses, while several subgroup analyses and meta-regressions aimed to explain the heterogeneity. RESULTS: We included 76 meta-analyses yielding 131 meta-analytic estimates. Based on pre-existing meta-analytic evidence, 22/24 prevalence estimates (91.7%) met moderate/strong credibility criteria. Strong credibility emerged for: orthostatic hypotension in Lewy body(58%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;50-66%) and Alzheimer's dementias(28.0%&#xa0;=&#xa0;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;17.0-40.0%); pericardial effusion in anorexia nervosa(25.0%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;17.0-34.0%); in heart failure(HF): major depressive disorder(MDD)(41.9%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;36.7-47.1%), mild cognitive impairment(MCI)(41.4%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;38.3-45.6%), anxiety(32.0%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;26.5-37.6%), MDD&#xa0;+&#xa0;anxiety(24.7%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;17.9-34.3%), and dementia(19.8%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;12.9-27.8%); in atrial fibrillation(AF): MCI(26.0%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;21.0-30.0%), anxiety in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation(PVI)(25.0%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;12.0-46.0%), MDD in PVI patients (20.0%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;13.0-29.0%); in coronary artery disease: MDD&#xa0;+&#xa0;anxiety(19.8%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;16.0-24.6%): in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: clozapine-associated-cardiomyopathy(0.6%;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.2-2.3%); clozapine-associated-cardiomyopathy absolute death rates (0.0003;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0001-0.0012); clozapine-associated-cardiomyopathy case fatality rate (0.078;95%C.I.&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.018-0.285). Several additional disorders were multimorbid in>5% of people, yet with a lower credibility rating. No re-pooled risk factors/outcomes reached strong credibility criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides an atlas of cardiovascular and psychiatric multimorbidity across varying levels of credibility, reinforcing the need for an integrated, multidisciplinary approach to patient care and for more research on actionable risk/protective factors and outcomes.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Ictal electroencephalography and heart rate as treatment criteria in electroconvulsive therapy: a systematic review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Decades before the emergence of precision medicine, psychiatrists raised the question of whether specific seizure characteristics could help optimize electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), as relationships between some of these characteristics and better outcomes were found. From 1990 onward, researchers focused on electroencephalography (EEG) and cardiovascular markers, which were broadly adopted by guidelines worldwide. However, the prognostic value of these markers is still controversial. Here, we provide a systematic summary of the studies on this topic. METHODS: We conducted a literature review on the use of ictal EEG and heart rate as outcome predictors in ECT using the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and PsycINFO databases. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies addressing more than 100 quality markers fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Single EEG markers were assigned to five categories (postictal inhibition, amplitude, coherence, regularity, and seizure duration). Heart rate and composite markers were considered separately. In contrast to single EEG markers, heart rate and composite markers could be consistently linked to better outcomes in patients with depression. Only a few studies on schizophrenia could be retrieved. CONCLUSION: Multiparametric markers outperformed single markers. Furthermore, changes in heart rate during seizures were related to better outcomes. Although clinical assessment remains the cornerstone of treatment guidance decisions, EEG and cardiac monitoring could help prevent insufficient seizures during the period preceding clinical improvement. Evidence on schizophrenia remains limited. More randomized trials are needed to analyze the role of composite markers as prognostic tools.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Memantine Augmentation for Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms in Bipolar Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Obsessive-compulsive symptoms are frequently observed in patients with bipolar disorder and present a significant therapeutic challenge. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of memantine as an adjunctive therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder in patients with bipolar disorder. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 46 patients with bipolar disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder, stabilized on quetiapine and lithium, were randomly assigned to receive either memantine (n = 23) or placebo (n = 23) for 6 weeks. RESULTS: The memantine group showed a significant reduction in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale scores compared with the placebo group (Cohen d = 1.57 vs 0.42, P < 0.001). Nausea was the most common side effect, but overall adverse effects were minimal. CONCLUSION: Memantine appears to be a safe and effective adjunctive treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder in patients with bipolar disorder, warranting further investigation.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

New Horizons in the Development of Treatments for Substance Use Disorders.

Substance use disorders (SUDs) are a major public health problem in the United States and cause substantial morbidity and mortality. There are meaningful gaps in the available SUD treatment options, and the development of new therapies is urgently needed. While medications with U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval are available for alcohol, nicotine, and opioid use disorders, there are no approved pharmacotherapies for cannabis, cocaine, or methamphetamine use disorders. Behavioral treatments for SUDs have significant limitations in effectiveness and accessibility, and there is a need for the development of both new behavioral treatment options and new models of treatment delivery. The next generation of treatments for SUDs will likely come from a diverse set of interventions, including new drug classes, new technologies, and new methods of delivery.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Perioperative care for patients with opioid exposure and opioid use disorder: screening and treatment strategies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The prevalence of opioid tolerance, dependence, and use disorder is increasing among patients presenting for surgical care, yet perioperative management strategies for these patients remain inconsistent. This review examines the impact of preoperative opioid exposure on surgical outcomes, the scope of untreated opioid use disorder (OUD) among surgical patients, and advances in clinical and systems-level approaches to perioperative care. RECENT FINDINGS: Preoperative opioid exposure independently predicts worse surgical outcomes, including higher opioid consumption, readmissions, complications, and mortality, in a dose-dependent manner. Perioperative opioid exposure predicts persistent opioid use after surgery, with the duration of exposure a stronger predictor of subsequent OUD than daily dose. Data-driven prescribing guidelines and structured opioid tapering reduce overprescribing without compromising pain control. Among surgical patients with diagnosed OUD, approximately two-thirds do not receive medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), though treatment engagement and maintenance substantially improve outcomes. Evidence now clearly supports perioperative buprenorphine continuation over interruption. SUMMARY: Effective perioperative management of opioid-complex surgical patients requires systematic screening, evidence-based prescribing, MOUD continuation, and institutional infrastructure. The primary barrier is shifting from evidence generation to implementation.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Feasibility and effectiveness of the Bergen 4-Day Treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder in Australia: A pilot comparison with 3-week inpatient obsessive-compulsive disorder treatment.

OBJECTIVES: Obsessive-compulsive disorder is a debilitating and chronic condition that, when untreated or unresponsive to treatment, imposes a significant health and economic burden on individuals and families. This prospective non-randomised inpatient study compared the acceptability and clinical outcomes of the Bergen 4-Day Treatment programme with those of a standard 3-week specialised treatment programme for obsessive-compulsive disorder in Australia. METHOD: Twenty-five participants diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive disorder were non-randomly assigned to Bergen 4-Day Treatment (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;12) or a 3-week standard (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;13) inpatient programme. Independent assessments were completed at pre-treatment, 10&#x2009;days post treatment and at 3-month follow-up. The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale was rated to assess obsessive-compulsive disorder severity, while secondary measures of depression, anxiety, obsessive beliefs and wellbeing were self-rated by participants. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable, with obsessive-compulsive disorder symptom severity within the moderate to severe range. After treatment, obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms as well as secondary depression and anxiety symptoms were reduced in both treatment groups. Participants receiving Bergen 4-Day Treatment had significantly lower Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale scores at 10&#x2009;days (M&#x2009;=&#x2009;13.46) and 3&#x2009;months (M&#x2009;=&#x2009;11.84), compared to standard treatment (M&#x2009;=&#x2009;19.04 and M&#x2009;=&#x2009;19.15, respectively). Response (91.9%) and remission (45.8%) rates for the Bergen 4-Day Treatment group were significantly higher at both post-treatment timepoints, compared to the standard treatment group. No dropouts occurred in the Bergen 4-Day Treatment group, and participant satisfaction was high. CONCLUSION: The findings of this pilot open-label study suggest that Bergen 4-Day Treatment shows promise as an acceptable, efficient and effective treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder, warranting further investigation as a scalable alternative for improving access to specialised obsessive-compulsive disorder treatment in Australia.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Atomoxetine Versus Placebo for Cognitive Deficits in Stimulant Use Disorder: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Stimulant use disorder (StUD), particularly involving cocaine and amphetamines, is associated with significant cognitive impairments that impede recovery and increase relapse risk. Atomoxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, has been proposed as a potential treatment given its role in enhancing executive function and its established efficacy in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy, cognitive, and mood effects of atomoxetine compared with placebo in individuals with StUD. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating atomoxetine for StUD. Eligible studies compared atomoxetine with placebo and assessed outcomes related to cognition (attention and response inhibition), stimulant use or abstinence, mood symptoms, and safety. Data were extracted and synthesized qualitatively due to methodological heterogeneity across studies. RESULTS: Nine RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Findings on cognitive outcomes were inconsistent: Some studies reported improvements in attentional bias and inhibitory control, while others showed no significant effects. Atomoxetine did not significantly reduce stimulant use, craving, or sustain abstinence compared with placebo. Limited mood-related benefits were observed, particularly among male participants, although results were variable. Across studies, atomoxetine was well tolerated, with most adverse events mild and transient. CONCLUSION: Despite a compelling neurobiological rationale and evidence of modest cognitive and mood benefits, atomoxetine has not demonstrated consistent efficacy as a monotherapy for StUD. Its favorable safety profile may warrant further investigation in carefully defined populations, such as individuals with comorbid ADHD or in combination with behavioral interventions.

Atomoxetine Hydrochloride↗
PubMed2026

Shared Medical Appointments for Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Shared medical appointments (SMAs) integrate group-based clinical care with individual medical management and are increasingly used in the treatment of substance use disorders (SUDs) to improve access, engagement, and care coordination. However, their use, outcomes, and implementation in SUD care have not been systematically synthesized. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review registered with PROSPERO (CRD42025639504). MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Cochrane Central were searched from database inception through September 2025. Randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and qualitative studies examining SMAs among adults with SUDs were included. Outcomes of interest included treatment engagement and retention, substance use outcomes, mental health and patient-reported outcomes, and implementation characteristics. Study quality was assessed across quantitative and qualitative designs, and findings were synthesized descriptively. RESULTS: Fourteen studies, representing approximately 578 participants, met inclusion criteria. Twelve studies focused exclusively on opioid use disorder, 1 included both alcohol and opioid use disorders, and 1 did not specify substance type. Treatment retention was reported in 6 studies, with a median 6-month retention of 72.9%. Three studies reported reductions in substance use outcomes, and 2 reported improvements in depression or anxiety. Qualitative studies consistently described high patient satisfaction, peer support, and shared accountability. Implementation studies demonstrated feasibility across diverse outpatient settings, with substantial heterogeneity across study designs and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: SMAs appear feasible and acceptable for addiction care and may support treatment retention and patient experience. Evidence remains heterogeneous and largely observational, highlighting the need for rigorous comparative studies to better define effectiveness and implementation.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Clinical and psychological characteristics of adolescents at risk of mood disorders compared with adolescents with suicidal behavior.

Suicide is one of the leading causes of death among adolescents, yet little is understood about the biopsychosocial factors related to suicidality. The demographic, clinical, and biological characteristics of adolescents with and without psychiatric histories may help inform mechanistic approaches to treatment of mood disorders and suicidality. The 'characterizing the inflammatory profile and suicidal behavior in adolescents' and 'RAD arm of the Texas Resilience Against Depression' studies aimed to characterize the clinical and biological profiles of youth with suicidal behavior and youth at risk for mood disorders, compared to healthy adolescents (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;75 in each group). Here, we report the descriptive baseline clinical and psychological characteristics of adolescents at risk of mood disorders and those with suicidal behavior. The adolescents with suicidal behavior reported 3.53 lifetime suicidal events on average, predominantly reported moderate to very severe depression (34.7%, 24%, to 9.3%), moderate to severe anxiety (58.6%), low optimism (91.9%), and mild (39.2%) to moderate (28.4%) degree of hopelessness. The at-risk adolescents predominantly reported no depression (60%) or anxiety (68.9%), moderate optimism (50%), and a positive outlook (85.7%). Healthy adolescents predominantly reported no depression (88.3%) or anxiety (93.2%), moderate optimism (59%), and a positive outlook (87%). The adolescents with suicidal behavior and those at risk of mood disorders exhibited significantly higher irritability and borderline personality disorder features (uncorrected p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.02 to p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001) and lower resilience compared to healthy adolescents. Ongoing investigations using the longitudinal clinical and biological data will help identify the immune biosignatures of suicidality in youth.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Cannabis and cannabinoids for the treatment of mental and substance use disorders and symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental and observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Interest in cannabinoids for mental and substance use disorders is increasing. We examined experimental and observational evidence for treating these disorders and their symptoms. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42023467536). We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO to May 2025 for studies of cannabinoids in adults (&#x2265;18 years) with ADHD, anxiety, depression, PTSD, psychosis or Tourette syndrome, or alcohol, cannabis, opioid or tobacco use disorders. Two reviewers screened, extracted and assessed quality using a risk-of-bias tool and GRADE. RESULTS: We included 82 experimental and 118 observational studies. In RCTs, cannabinoids reduced anxiety symptoms (SMD=-0.40; 95% CI: -0.57, -0.23; I&#xb2;=90%) and, in one small trial, PTSD symptoms (SMD=-2.60; 95% CI: -4.58, -0.62; n=20), with trivial-to-no effect on depression (SMD=-0.20; 95% CI: -0.43, 0.04; I&#xb2;=91.6%), ADHD, psychosis and Tourette syndrome. Much anxiety and depression evidence came from symptoms measured as secondary outcomes in other primary conditions. Cannabinoids worsened cannabis use disorder severity in one RCT (SMD=2.35; 95% CI: 1.49, 3.21), with no effect on craving or withdrawal; evidence for alcohol, opioid and tobacco use disorders was very limited. Observational studies suggested improvements but had high risk of bias. The only significant safety finding was increased withdrawals due to adverse events with THC (OR=2.78; 95% CI: 1.66, 4.65). Certainty was predominantly very low. DISCUSSION: The evidence base shows very low certainty, high heterogeneity and methodological limitations, and is insufficient to support cannabinoids as first-line treatment. Signals for anxiety and PTSD are limited by indirectness and low certainty; no benefit was evident for depression; THC-related safety signals warrant careful consideration.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in functional motor disorders: A systematic review of effects and targets.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and potential mechanistic implications of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in adults with functional motor disorders (FMD), focusing on possible phenotype-specific responses and stimulation protocols. METHODS: Seven databases were searched from inception to July 2026. Randomised and non-randomised interventional studies were included. Risk of bias and evidence certainty were assessed using PEDro, RoB 2, JBI tools, and GRADE. Because of substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, findings were synthesised qualitatively. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included. The primary motor cortex was targeted in 11 studies. Functional tremor showed the most consistent evidence with inhibitory stimulation: one small sham-controlled trial found a significant group-by-time effect on tremor severity (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.007), while an uncontrolled prospective series reported 40&#xa0;% reduction in postural tremor amplitude (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.05). Evidence for functional weakness was conflicting: excitatory M1 stimulation increased objective strength by 25&#xa0;% versus 10&#xa0;% with sham (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.004), whereas the largest inhibitory sham-controlled trial found no benefit (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.80). No severe adverse events were reported, but safety reporting was incomplete. GRADE certainty was moderate for tremor and very low for all other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence is insufficient to establish the efficacy of rTMS in FMD or to recommend phenotype-specific protocols. Preliminary findings support further investigation of inhibitory stimulation for functional tremor, whereas evidence for excitatory stimulation in functional weakness remains uncertain. SIGNIFICANCE: The possible interaction between phenotype and stimulation direction is hypothesis-generating. rTMS should currently be considered an experimental, context-sensitive adjunct within multidisciplinary care, pending adequately powered phenotype-stratified sham-controlled trials. Prospero Registration Number: CRD420251250969.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Impaired toilet training and bladder and bowel dysfunction in children with developmental coordination disorder - an underreported issue.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) face significant, yet often overlooked, challenges beyond motor impairments, including difficulties with toilet training and bladder and bowel dysfunctions (BBD). This study aims to explore whether children with DCD exhibit greater difficulties in these areas compared to typically developing children (TDC). METHOD: This cross-sectional case-control study included 84 children aged 5-8 years (42 DCD, 42 TDC), matched by school-grade and sex (33 boys and 9 girls per group). Parents completed the Vancouver Symptom Score for Dysfunctional Elimination Syndrome (VSSDES) to assess BBD symptoms, the Dutch DCD-questionnaire (DCD-Q) to evaluate motor coordination, and additional questions regarding toilet training, elimination diagnosis, and co-occurring conditions. Correlations and exploratory group differences were analysed. RESULTS: Parents of children with DCD reported significantly more toilet training difficulties than parents of controls (p < 0.001), including persistent accidents (47.6% vs. 9.5%), prolonged training (45.2% vs. 4.8%), and difficulties recognizing urination urgency (40.5% vs. 2.4%). The parental report of delayed attainment of bowel and bladder control (p < 0.05) and BBD rates (p < 0.001) was also significantly higher in children with DCD. Exploratory analyses indicated that the prevalence of these outcomes was not significantly different between children with DCD with and without co-occurring ADHD or autism, suggesting a possible primary association with DCD. Additionally, across both children with DCD and TDC, poorer motor skills were associated with more BBD symptoms (r = -0.474, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Children with DCD have a higher prevalence of toilet training difficulties and BBD compared to TDC, potentially affecting their psychosocial well-being. Greater awareness is crucial for timely and targeted care. Notably, the study's design, directly comparing children diagnosed with DCD to matched TDC, provides new insights into the prevalence of elimination difficulties in this population.

Humans↗