Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “outcome measures”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

1,346 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2025

Selective Neurectomy Outcomes in Synkinesis Patients: The First 56 Consecutive Primary Cases with Minimum 1-Year Follow-Up.

INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of 1-year follow-up outcomes after selective neurectomy (SN) is essential to confirm sustained improvements in patient-reported, clinician-graded, and objective results. OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes of SN in synkinesis, using patient-reported outcomes (VAS), clinician-graded assessments (eFACE), and objective evaluations. METHODS: Synkinesis patients who underwent SN were included in the study. Patients with less than 12 months of follow-up were excluded. Visual analog scale (VAS) was assessed as patient-reported outcomes. The Electronic Clinician-Graded Facial Function Scale (eFACE) was also assessed. Objective evaluations were carried out via Emotrics Software. RESULTS: Fifty-six primary cases were included, with a mean patient age at surgery of 33.8&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;11.0 years. Of these, 45 patients (80.3%) were female. The average duration between paralysis and surgery was 124.3&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;103.3 months. The mean duration between surgery and evaluation was 19.7&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;7.5 months (mean/SD). Preoperative and postoperative mean aggregate VAS scores were 35.5&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;19.8 and 67.7&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;16.5, respectively (p < 0.001). However, two patients (3.7%) reported worsening in moving food around in the mouth, and four patients (7.5%) reported worsening in drooling. All postoperative eFACE subscores except periocular demonstrated significant improvement (p < 0.001). Emotrics analysis demonstrated improvement in all postoperative symmetry parameters, except in the periocular region. CONCLUSIONS: SN improves patient-reported outcomes, clinician-graded assessments, and objective measurements. However, periocular outcomes remain suboptimal, and functional deficits should be carefully considered.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Effect of Global Postural Re-Education in Individuals With Text Neck Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study investigated the effect of Global Postural Re-Education (GPR) versus conventional physical therapy in text neck syndrome (TNS). A prospective, single-blinded, parallel-group randomized controlled trial design was used. METHODS: Sixty participants with TNS (aged 18-40&#xa0;years) were randomly assigned to either conventional treatment or GPR plus conventional treatment. Both groups received supervised therapy for three sessions per week over 4&#xa0;weeks. Outcome measures included craniovertebral and shoulder angles assessed by photogrammetry, pain intensity via Visual Analog Scale, and Cervical Range of Motion via a smartphone application (Clinometer). Measured before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Within-group analyses showed significant improvements in pain and CROM in both groups (p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001). However, the between-group analysis revealed no superiority of GPR for pain or CROM (p&#xa0;>&#xa0;0.05). In contrast, GPR demonstrated statistically significant superiority in postural correction, with greater improvements in craniovertebral angle (MD: 2.14&#xb0;; 95% CI: 0.69-3.59; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.005) and shoulder angle (MD: 3.2&#xb0;; 95% CI: 0.33-6.07; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.03), exceeding MCID thresholds and indicating clinically meaningful benefits. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution because of the longer session duration in the GPR group. DISCUSSION: Incorporating Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) into conventional treatment provided significant additional benefits for postural parameters (craniovertebral and shoulder angles) in individuals with text neck syndrome. However, GPR demonstrated no added superiority over conventional treatment alone regarding pain intensity and cervical range of motion outcomes.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Clinical outcomes of fusion vs excision in the treatment of painful type II accessory naviculars: A matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: For painful Type II accessory naviculars, whether to remove or fuse them remains unclear based on the current literature. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of fusion versus excision in treating painful type II accessory naviculars. METHODS: This retrospective comparative study included and followed 54 eligible patients (from May 2017 to March 2023). After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 34 patients (17 fusion versus 17 excision) were analyzed. Outcomes included Visual Analog Scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score, Tegner score, complication rates, and radiographic measurements. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the appropriate accessory navicular size cutoff for predicting nonunion following fusion. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 35.0&#x202f;&#xb1;&#x202f;9.9 months. The fusion and excision groups showed significant and comparable VAS and AOFAS score improvements (p&#x202f;<&#x202f;.001). The fusion group had a higher complication rate (41.2% vs. 5.9%, p&#x202f;=&#x202f;.039), primarily nonunion and persistent pain. ROC curve analysis identified 50.3&#x202f;mm&#xb2; as the cutoff for nonunion risk; sizes <&#x202f;50.3&#x202f;mm&#xb2; predicted high nonunion likelihood. CONCLUSIONS: Both fusion and excision are effective treatments for painful type II accessory naviculars, demonstrating acceptable pain and functional improvement during midterm follow-up. However, the lower complication rate along with relatively superior functional recovery favors the excision technique. For accessory naviculars smaller than 50.3&#x202f;mm2, excision may be a better choice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Effects of erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction for breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy causes acute pain. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a single-shot T5 erector spinae plane block (ESPB) reduces postoperative pain. DESIGN: Single-center, RCT with allocation concealment; blinded assessors and statisticians. SETTING: Tertiary cancer center in China. PATIENTS: 100 adults scheduled for radical mastectomy with implant reconstruction were randomized (1:1); follow-up complete. INTERVENTION: Before induction, ESPB was given under ultrasound guidance at T5 with 30 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine 1 &#x3bc;g/kg; controls received no block. Standardized general anesthesia and postoperative PCA for both groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Resting NRS at 6 h (MCID=1). Secondary outcomes were opioid consumption, quality of recovery, and PONV. RESULTS: ESPB did not significantly reduce resting pain at 6 h at the median (&#x3c4; =0.50; adjusted difference -0.9; p = 0.08). At the upper tail, pain intensity was lower (&#x3c4; = 0.75; -1.8; p <0.01). Repeated measures provided additional time-point information, improving estimation precision and test sensitivity. ESPB get lower pain scores at 6, 12, and 24 hours (all p <0.01). But, the 95% CI includes the MCID, the clinical benefit remains uncertain. Opioid use decreased at 24 h (-13.5 mg; p <0.01) and 48 h (-6.6 mg; p <0.01). Quality of recovery improved at 24 h (difference 5 points; p <0.01), but not later. No differences were observed in intraoperative hemodynamics or PONV. CONCLUSIONS: Single-shot T5 ESPB with perineural dexmedetomidine may reduce postoperative pain and opioid requirements and improve early recovery. Further large trials are warranted. Clinical relevance remains to be confirmed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06143020.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Assessing time to symptomatic progression, a patient-relevant efficacy endpoint, in the MARIPOSA study in non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In the phase 3 randomized MARIPOSA study, amivantamab and lazertinib combination therapy demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) versus osimertinib in participants with previously untreated, epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Time to symptomatic progression (TTSP) was introduced to assess clinical worsening and complement endpoints that investigate radiographic disease progression and patient-reported outcomes. TTSP provides an easily interpretable measure of disease-specific symptom worsening to further support patient experience. METHODS: In MARIPOSA, TTSP was quantitatively assessed as a secondary efficacy endpoint and defined as the time from randomization until participants experience disease-specific symptom worsening requiring a clinical intervention or treatment change, or death. To evaluate the impact of amivantamab and lazertinib on TTSP considering its established OS benefit against osimertinib, an exploratory analysis censoring death events was performed. RESULTS: At the final protocol-specified OS analysis (median follow up: 37.8 months), median TTSP was 43.6 months with amivantamab and lazertinib versus 29.3 months with osimertinib (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.83; p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.0001). Amivantamab and lazertinib reduced deaths following a TTSP event compared to osimertinib. A strong correlation between TTSP and PFS or OS was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Amivantamab and lazertinib significantly delayed TTSP versus osimertinib. TTSP offers a clinician-validated measurement of disease-specific symptom worsening, capturing symptoms perceived by patients that prompt clinical action. TTSP is highly correlated with PFS and OS, providing complementary insights alongside traditional endpoints. TTSP enhances understanding of treatment benefit and supports informed clinical decision-making by integrating patient experience.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Total ankle replacement versus nonoperative management for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis: A comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis remains debated. This study compared short-term outcomes between non-operative treatment, total ankle replacement (TAR), and cases in which indicated surgery was delayed. METHODS: In this secondary analysis of prospectively collected data, treatment survival, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and patient satisfaction were assessed at baseline and at 1- and 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: In a total of 316 patients one-year treatment survival was highest for TAR (99.3%), followed by NOM (94.4%) and delayed surgery (80.9%). TAR demonstrated significantly superior FAOS pain and quality-of-life scores compared with NOM and delayed surgery. Delayed surgery was associated with significantly worse pain and quality-of-life outcomes. Patient satisfaction was highest in the TAR group and lowest in the delayed surgery group. CONCLUSIONS: TAR provides superior pain relief, quality of life, and satisfaction compared with non-operative management in end-stage ankle OA. While NOM remains a valid option for selected patients, delaying indicated surgery results in inferior outcomes, underscoring the importance of timely, shared decision-making.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Foot exercise plus education versus brief advice for the treatment of plantar heel pain (FEET Trial): a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite foot muscle strengthening being a target of exercise interventions for plantar heel pain (PHP) no study has measured foot muscle outcomes, and existing research is limited by a lack of control (no treatment) comparisons. OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial and investigate the acceptability and credibility of comprehensive progressive foot exercise and education compared to brief advice for PHP. DESIGN: Randomised parallel group feasibility trial. METHOD: People with PHP were randomised (1:1 concealed allocation) to receive either foot exercise plus education or brief advice for twelve weeks. Primary outcomes included willingness to enrol, recruitment rate, adherence, logbook completion, dropout rate, early withdrawal reasons, adverse events, additional treatments sought, and credibility/expectancy. RESULTS: Twenty people with PHP (16 women; age 50&#x202f;&#xb1;&#x202f;9 years; body mass index&#x202f;=&#x202f;30.7&#x202f;&#xb1;&#x202f;4.6&#x202f;kg/m2) were recruited over 15 weeks (1.3 participants per week). Primary outcomes were willingness to enrol (80%), adherence (physiotherapy sessions attended: foot exercise plus education 85%, brief advice 100%; home exercise program: 62% daily sessions completed, 72% thrice weekly sessions completed), logbook completion (foot exercise plus education 75%, brief advice 90%), dropout rate (15%), and additional treatments sought (69%). There were no intervention-related adverse events, and credibility scores were higher for foot exercise plus education. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms feasibility and acceptability of a protocol comparing foot exercise plus education with brief advice in individuals with PHP, generating key insights to inform future trial design.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Comparative efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation versus percutaneous vertebroplasty alone in the treatment of elderly osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

The study aimed to assess the comparative efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) combined with minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation versus PVP alone in elderly patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). Ninety-four elderly patients with OVCF were randomly classified into the control (47 patients) and combined (47 patients) groups. The control group received PVP, while the combined group received PVP combined with minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation. Perioperative indicators such as intraoperative blood lose, operative time, and hospitalization time were recorded. Pain was assessed using the VAS before and at baseline and 1, 3, and 7 days postoperatively. At 1 and 3 days postoperatively, Serum CRP levels, WBC, and neutrophil counts were measured postoperatively. Radiographic outcomes (vertebral height ratio and Cobb angle), ADL scores, JOA scores, and ODI were evaluated preoperatively and at 3 months post-operation. Postoperative complications were documented. Baseline characteristics were comparable. The combined group showed superior pain relief, vertebral height restoration, Cobb angle correction, functional recovery, and reduced inflammatory markers (CRP, WBC, neutrophils) postoperatively (all P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05). Blood loss and hospital stay were shorter in the combined group, though operative time was longer (P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05). Complication rates did not differ significantly (P&#x2009;>&#x2009;0.05). PVP combined with minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation yields better outcomes in elderly OVCF patients by enhancing pain control, vertebral height, and functional recovery without increasing perioperative risk.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Association between cumulative social disadvantage, as measured by the social determinants of health score, and epilepsy: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health (SDoH) shape access to care, health behaviors, and long-term outcomes, yet their cumulative relationship with epilepsy has not been well quantified. This study examined whether a composite SDoH score was associated with epilepsy in adults. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013-2018. The SDoH score ranged from 0 to 8 and summarized eight unfavorable social conditions. Epilepsy was identified using medication-based ascertainment. Survey-weighted logistic regression models were applied to evaluate the association between SDoH score and epilepsy. Restricted cubic spline, subgroup, sensitivity, and receiver operating characteristic analyses were also performed. RESULTS: A total of 13,119 participants were included, of whom 114 had epilepsy. Participants with epilepsy had a higher mean SDoH score than those without epilepsy (3.41&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;0.24 vs. 2.35&#xa0;&#xb1;&#xa0;0.06, P&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.001). In the fully adjusted model, each 1-point increase in SDoH score was associated with 31% higher odds of epilepsy (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.16-1.48). Compared with the low-score group (0-2), the adjusted odds ratios were 2.09 (95% CI 1.06-4.15) for scores of 3-5 and 2.67 (95% CI 1.34-5.33) for scores of 6-8. Spline analysis showed a significant overall association without evidence of nonlinearity. Adding SDoH components to demographic variables improved model discrimination (AUC 0.731 vs. 0.589, P for difference <0.001). CONCLUSION: Greater cumulative social disadvantage, as reflected by the SDoH score, was associated with higher odds of epilepsy.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

The Effect of Game-Based Virtual Reality Rehabilitation and Its Impact on Upper Extremity Function After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) often results in prolonged recovery and limited shoulder function. Conventional physical therapy rehabilitation programs require sustained patient engagement; however, adherence is frequently low. Game-based virtual reality (VR) offers an interactive and engaging environment that may enhance rehabilitation outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a game-based VR program on the function of the upper limb in patients following ARCR. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with patients who underwent ARCR. Participants were randomized into two groups: game-based VR or conventional rehabilitation. Outcomes were evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, pain severity by the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, range of motion measures, and muscle strength testing. Assessments were performed at baseline and at 6 weeks and 12 weeks post surgery. RESULTS: Results have shown significant within-group improvements in pain, function, range of motion, and isometric muscle strength across all time points (P < 0.05). Between-group analysis revealed greater improvements in pain, function, flexion range, and abduction and external rotation strength in the experimental group at both time points (P < 0.05). Abduction range improved significantly only at 12 weeks (P = 0.02), whereas external rotation range showed no significant difference between groups at either time point (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that integrating game-based VR rehabilitation provides additional benefits over conventional therapy in improving pain and upper extremity function following ARCR. These findings support the use of VR as an effective alternative to the conventional rehabilitation for postoperative rehabilitation.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Effects of Dynamic Neck Sensorimotor Biofeedback Training in Individuals With Mechanical Neck Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mechanical neck pain (MNP) is commonly accompanied by pain-related functional limitations, sensorimotor disturbances, and fear of movement, which together may contribute to persistent disability. This preliminary randomized controlled trial study investigated the short-term effects of dynamic neck sensorimotor-based biofeedback training in individuals with MNP. 20 MNP patients from outpatient clinics were assigned to a biofeedback training group or a control group. The training group underwent dynamic biofeedback exercises twice weekly for 2&#xa0;weeks, whereas the control group performed repeated cervical movements without biofeedback. Outcomes included cervical kinematics as repositioning errors (RPE), movement units (MU), maximal range of motion (ROM), and subjective measures, including pain intensity, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). All participants completed post-intervention assessments; adherence in the training group was 100%, with no missing data and no adverse events reported. Within the biofeedback training group, participants receiving biofeedback training demonstrated greater improvements in cervical repositioning accuracy during flexion (51.95%, p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.04) and extension (46.67%, p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.02), along with reductions in fear-avoidance beliefs related to physical activity and work (p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.05); these changes were less apparent in the active control group. Exploratory regression analyses suggested associations between improvements in repositioning accuracy and pain reduction, and between increased cervical range of motion and improvements in fear-avoidance beliefs related to physical activity. These pilot findings suggest that dynamic sensorimotor biofeedback training may improve proprioceptive acuity and fear-avoidance beliefs in individuals with MNP, supporting further evaluation in an adequately powered randomized trial.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Pain outcomes of pediatric circumcision patients following administration of pre-operative ketorolac: A randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Circumcision is a common surgical intervention, and pain is the most common complaint. Poorly managed pain can increase morbidity and reduce patient and parent satisfaction. Ketorolac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), provides analgesia and may be effective in reducing pain after circumcision in pediatric patients. STUDY OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine the effect of pre-operative intravenous ketorolac versus normal saline placebo on parental perception of postoperative pain at 24 h. We also explored the effect of ketorolac on postoperative pain scores, incidence of bleeding, incidence of vomiting, and analgesic use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial was conducted at a single tertiary children's hospital. Patients aged 1-17 presenting for circumcision were included and randomized to either normal saline injectate or ketorolac (0.5 mg/kg, maximum 30 mg). Postoperative delirium and pain scores were recorded in the post-anesthetic care unit. Parents completed the parents' postoperative pain measure (PPPM) at 24 h. The CONSORT criteria and checklist were used to guide reporting of this randomized controlled trial. RESULTS: A total of 100 participants were included. 50 participants were in each group. Mean (SD) PPPM score 24 h after normal saline and ketorolac was 6.1 (3.4) and 5.5 (3.3), respectively for a mean difference of -0.55 points [95% CI: -1.9 to 0.83; p = 0.427]. The mean (95% CI) fixed effect size of ketorolac on post anesthetic care unit reported Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability score was -0.17 (-0.77 to 0.43, p = 0.585) points, while the mean (95% CI) effect size of ketorolac on numerical rating scale was -1.2 (-2.2 to -0.18, p = 0.026) points. DISCUSSION: Pre-operative intravenous ketorolac, compared to normal saline placebo, did not result in a difference in parental perception of postoperative pain at 24 h after circumcision surgery. As part of exploratory analyses, those receiving ketorolac had modestly lower mean immediate postoperative pain scores, likely not of clinical importance. Ketorolac has often been avoided due to concerns of increased bleeding risk, however it is important to consider that there is no substantial evidence to support this. This is the first study to our knowledge evaluating the effect of ketorolac in pediatric circumcision patients. While the PPPM score is a family centered outcome, it is an indirect measurement of pediatric pain. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative intravenous ketorolac was not associated with lower parental reported pain scores at 24 h compared to normal saline placebo after pediatric circumcision surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02973958.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Analgesic effect of premixed nitrous oxide in postoperative rehabilitation for ankle fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The global incidence of ankle fractures is on the rise, effective postoperative rehabilitation is a crucial aspect of surgical management. However, the occurrence of severe pain during the rehabilitation continues to pose a substantial clinical challenge. METHODS: The study utilizes a dual-arm, single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial design. A total of 100 participants were enrolled. Participants included patients experiencing acute pain (self-reported pain score &#x2265;4) who underwent postoperative rehabilitation for ankle fractures. Participants undergoing rehabilitation training were randomized to receive either 65% nitrous oxide or 100% oxygen. The primary outcome measured was the pain score, while secondary outcomes encompassed anxiety scores, physiological indices, side effects, patient and therapist satisfaction, acceptance, and residual pain. RESULTS: Pain scores were found to be significantly lower in the nitrous oxide group than in the oxygen group (T1: median difference -3.0, [95% CI -3.4 to -2.6]; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001; T2: median difference -2.0, [95% CI -2.8 to -1.2]; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). Compared with the oxygen group, both therapists (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) and participants (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) in the nitrous oxide group reported significantly higher satisfaction levels. Acceptance rate showed significant intergroup differences (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). No severe adverse effects were observed in either group. Anxiety scores between the two groups did not show a significant difference (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.31, &#x3b7;2 = 0.027). CONCLUSION: The safety and analgesic profile of nitrous oxide renders it a suitable option for pain management in postoperative ankle fractures rehabilitation, thus providing a safe and easily manageable alternative to the current available strategies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: We have registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn and the registration number is: ChiCTR2400089379.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Individualized Physical Therapy on Pain and Function in Individuals With Chronic Knee Pain: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Noninvasive brain stimulation is a promising neuromodulatory intervention for chronic pain. This study aimed to determine the impact that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in combination with individualized physical therapy (PT) has on pain and function in individuals with chronic knee pain. METHODS: This study was a preliminary pragmatic, triple-blinded, randomized, and sham-controlled clinical trial performed in an outpatient orthopedic physical therapy clinic. Participants participated in 5 sessions of active or sham tDCS followed by individualized PT intervention. Pain outcomes included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Movement-Evoked Pain, pressure pain thresholds (PPT), and the Central Sensitization Inventory. Functional outcomes included the 2-minute walk test, 5-time sit-to-stand test, quadriceps strength, knee range of motion, Patient Specific Functional Scale, and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale. RESULTS: Thirty participants with chronic knee pain completed the study. There were no significant differences observed for primary patient-centered pain and functional outcomes. For secondary outcomes, the active tDCS group had a significant effect (p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.05) on percent change in lateral joint line PPT and a significant multivariate effect of group on PPT change scores for 3-site and 5-site clusters (p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.05). Exploratory responder analyses demonstrated that the active tDCS group was 12.8 times more likely to achieve the minimum detectable change in quadriceps strength improvement compared with the sham tDCS group (p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.05). DISCUSSION: There were no significant between-group differences for primary pain and functional outcomes. However, the active tDCS group showed improvements in pain sensitivity, as measured by PPT, and quadriceps strength, which were superior to those seen in the sham tDCS group. These preliminary findings provide insight into possible mechanisms of tDCS in addressing pain as opposed to efficacy. Given that there were no clear between-group differences in patient-centered outcomes, there is insufficient evidence for routine tDCS use for chronic knee pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT06132412.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Adding Rib Mobilization to Diaphragm Release Techniques in Patients With Non-Specific Neck Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Non-specific neck pain (NSNP) is a frequent issue that can negatively affect both mobility and function. Recently, there has been growing interest in newer therapeutic approaches, including rib mobilization and diaphragm release techniques, as potential ways to address NSNP and support better outcomes for those affected. PURPOSE: To find out the immediate effects of how (DRT) combined with (RMT) affects the level of pain and the extent to which patients' functional abilities are improved in cases of NSNP. METHODS: For this prospective RCT, 96 participants aged 20 to 45&#xa0;years were randomly assigned to one of three equal groups based on their pain score (VAS). Group B engaged in (DRT) for 40&#xa0;minutes, three times weekly for 8&#xa0;weeks, in contrast to Group A, which got both RMT combined with DRT. Group C (active control) received advice and some exercises. Measurements were collected before and after the intervention; the primary outcomes included pain severity, evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS); active neck range of motion (ROM), measured with a cervical range of motion (CROM) device; and neck flexion endurance. Additionally, the secondary outcome of neck-related disability was assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was identified among the three groups at baseline; nevertheless, a treatment effect emerged after 8&#xa0;weeks (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.001 and f-value&#xa0;=&#xa0;4.15, &#x19e;2&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.306). A statistically significant time-treatment interaction was seen when comparing the pre- and post-treatment periods in groups A and B (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.001, f-value&#xa0;=&#xa0;3.16, &#x19e;2&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.251). CONCLUSION: The addition of rib mobilization to diaphragm release techniques in patients with non-specific neck pain resulted in statistically significant improvements in pain intensity, cervical flexion, right lateral rotation, left lateral rotation, right rotation, and neck flexor endurance, with moderate to large effect sizes for pain reduction and cervical motion. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between groups for cervical extension, left rotation, or the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and only a marginal clinical improvement in NDI was noted in Group A. The observed benefits in the combined intervention group may not be attributable solely to rib mobilization. The increased treatment complexity and greater therapist interaction inherent in the combined approach could also have influenced the outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07133646.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Sensor-based measures of knee brace adherence have low agreement with self-report methods: A multi-measure study among knee osteoarthritis patients.

OBJECTIVE: To explore agreement between self-report and objectively measured adherence to brace wearing by patients with knee osteoarthritis. METHOD: A single-arm observational analysis nested within the PROP OA randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN28555470). Of 237 adults with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis randomised to brace treatment, 60 were included in this sub-study investigating three different methods of assessing knee brace wear time over 26 weeks: 1. Self-report questionnaires (SRQ) at 12 weeks and 26 weeks; 2. Short message service (SMS) questions (days worn in past week, typical hours per day when worn) administered from week 1 to week 24; 3. A skin temperature sensor embedded in the brace, sampling every 10&#x202f;min for 26 weeks. The presence and reason for the sensor were concealed from participants. The estimated proportion of participants meeting "minimum brace use", defined a priori as &#x2265;1&#x202f;h on &#x2265;2 days in past week, was described for each measurement method, overall and by brace type (unloader, neutral). For temperature sensor measurements, time spent above 24&#xb0;C and time spent above 25&#xb0;C were used. Agreement between the measures was summarised by percentage agreement and kappa (&#x138;). RESULTS: The estimated proportions of participants meeting "minimum brace use" at 12 weeks were 83% (SRQ), 83% (SMS), 60% and 58% (temperature sensor, 24&#xb0;C and 25&#xb0;C thresholds, respectively). At 26 weeks, the corresponding estimates reduced to 72%, 71% (SMS at 24 weeks), 43% and 37%. Sensor data suggested the sharpest decline in brace use occurred within the first 12 weeks. Agreement between self-report measures was higher than between self-report measures and sensor (SRQ vs SMS at 12 weeks: 92% agreement, &#x138;=0.67 (95%CI: 0.34, 1.00); SRQ vs Sensor at 12 weeks: 74%, 0.35 (0.10, 0.60); SMS vs Sens at 12 weeks: 76%, 0.36 (0.05, 0.66). Agreement between all measurement methods reduced at 26 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: This novel use of a temperature sensor to monitor brace adherence in knee osteoarthritis indicates that self-report adherence substantially overestimates knee brace wearing time, with implications for clinical trials and practice.

Humans↗