Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42268729

Analgesic effect of premixed nitrous oxide in postoperative rehabilitation for ankle fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

Xueling Qiu·Fei Wang·Yuchen Wang·Jiayi Dou·Wenjuan Cao·Liting Zhang·Chenxi Sun·Weifeng Wang·Lu Tang
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The global incidence of ankle fractures is on the rise, effective postoperative rehabilitation is a crucial aspect of surgical management. However, the occurrence of severe pain during the rehabilitation continues to pose a substantial clinical challenge. METHODS: The study utilizes a dual-arm, single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial design. A total of 100 participants were enrolled. Participants included patients experiencing acute pain (self-reported pain score &#x2265;4) who underwent postoperative rehabilitation for ankle fractures. Participants undergoing rehabilitation training were randomized to receive either 65% nitrous oxide or 100% oxygen. The primary outcome measured was the pain score, while secondary outcomes encompassed anxiety scores, physiological indices, side effects, patient and therapist satisfaction, acceptance, and residual pain. RESULTS: Pain scores were found to be significantly lower in the nitrous oxide group than in the oxygen group (T1: median difference -3.0, [95% CI -3.4 to -2.6]; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001; T2: median difference -2.0, [95% CI -2.8 to -1.2]; p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). Compared with the oxygen group, both therapists (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) and participants (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) in the nitrous oxide group reported significantly higher satisfaction levels. Acceptance rate showed significant intergroup differences (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). No severe adverse effects were observed in either group. Anxiety scores between the two groups did not show a significant difference (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.31, &#x3b7;2 = 0.027). CONCLUSION: The safety and analgesic profile of nitrous oxide renders it a suitable option for pain management in postoperative ankle fractures rehabilitation, thus providing a safe and easily manageable alternative to the current available strategies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: We have registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn and the registration number is: ChiCTR2400089379.

Explore related subjects

HumansNitrous OxideAnkle FracturesFemaleDouble-Blind MethodMalePostoperative PainMiddle AgedPain MeasurementAdultAgedTreatment OutcomePatient SatisfactionOxygenAnkle fracturesnitrous oxidepainpostoperative rehabilitationJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled TrialResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Xueling Qiu, Fei Wang, Yuchen Wang, Jiayi Dou, Wenjuan Cao, Liting Zhang, Chenxi Sun, Weifeng Wang, Lu Tang. 2026-06-10. Analgesic effect of premixed nitrous oxide in postoperative rehabilitation for ankle fractures: a randomized controlled trial.. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2026.2685317

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't resourceAdult subjectAged subjectAnkle Fractures subjectDouble-Blind Method subjectFemale subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectMale subjectMiddle Aged subjectNitrous Oxide subjectOxygen subjectPain subjectPain Measurement subjectPatient Satisfaction subjectRandomized controlled trials study

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2025

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns may have influenced the epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures, but results vary across regions and fracture types. The aim of this study was to provide evidence-based insights into the impact of the pandemic on osteoporotic fracture incidence. METHODS: We searched four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) up to August 2025 for observational or retrospective studies comparing osteoporotic fracture incidence during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020) with the pre-pandemic period (2019). The primary outcome of interest was the change in fracture incidence, analysed using risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) in Review Manager 5.4. Subgroup analyses were performed by sex, geographic region, and fracture type. RESULTS: Nine studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analysed. Overall, "all types" of osteoporotic fractures showed a significant decrease during the pandemic (RR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.80-0.91, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.0001). Specifically, forearm fractures decreased significantly (RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.96, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.002). However, for the most clinically significant fractures, no statistically significant global change was found for hip fractures (RR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.76-1.15, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.14) or vertebral fractures (RR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.85-2.15, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.20). In regional subgroup analysis, hip fracture incidence decreased significantly in South America (RR = 0.79, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.0004) and in both males and females, but no significant change was observed in Europe (RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.81-1.04, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.17). CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a decrease in the incidence of minor fractures, such as those of the forearm, likely due to reduced outdoor activity. However, the incidence of major osteoporotic fractures (hip and vertebral) remained stable globally, with significant reductions observed only in specific regions like South America.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Comparative efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation versus percutaneous vertebroplasty alone in the treatment of elderly osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

The study aimed to assess the comparative efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) combined with minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation versus PVP alone in elderly patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). Ninety-four elderly patients with OVCF were randomly classified into the control (47 patients) and combined (47 patients) groups. The control group received PVP, while the combined group received PVP combined with minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation. Perioperative indicators such as intraoperative blood lose, operative time, and hospitalization time were recorded. Pain was assessed using the VAS before and at baseline and 1, 3, and 7 days postoperatively. At 1 and 3 days postoperatively, Serum CRP levels, WBC, and neutrophil counts were measured postoperatively. Radiographic outcomes (vertebral height ratio and Cobb angle), ADL scores, JOA scores, and ODI were evaluated preoperatively and at 3 months post-operation. Postoperative complications were documented. Baseline characteristics were comparable. The combined group showed superior pain relief, vertebral height restoration, Cobb angle correction, functional recovery, and reduced inflammatory markers (CRP, WBC, neutrophils) postoperatively (all P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05). Blood loss and hospital stay were shorter in the combined group, though operative time was longer (P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05). Complication rates did not differ significantly (P&#x2009;>&#x2009;0.05). PVP combined with minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation yields better outcomes in elderly OVCF patients by enhancing pain control, vertebral height, and functional recovery without increasing perioperative risk.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Atopic dermatitis and the risk of osteoporosis and fractures: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the risk of osteoporosis and fractures in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) by synthesizing data from cohort studies. We also provide a comprehensive analysis of fracture risks across different severities of AD and anatomical sites. METHODS: Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to May 30, 2025. Studies that investigated the relationship between AD and osteoporosis or fractures were included in the analysis. Data extraction and screening were performed independently by two reviewers. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A random-effects meta-analysis was applied, alongside sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's test. RESULTS: Ten cohort studies, involving 368 to over 2 million AD patients, were included. NOS scores ranged from 7 to 8, indicating generally high study quality. The pooled analysis revealed a 56% increased risk of osteoporosis (OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.14-2.13; I2&#xa0;=&#xa0;99.9%, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.0001) and an 8% increased risk of all-cause fractures (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.05-1.10; I2&#xa0;=&#xa0;82.1%, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.0001) in AD patients. Subgroup analyses demonstrated a progressive increase in fracture risk with the severity of AD. Specific risks were significantly higher for vertebral fractures (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08-1.20; I2&#xa0;=&#xa0;67.3%, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.009) and lower limb fractures (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.08-1.13; I2&#xa0;=&#xa0;65.0%, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.014). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings, and no significant publication bias was detected (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.316). CONCLUSION: AD is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures, particularly among patients with severe AD and those experiencing vertebral or lower limb fractures. These findings highlight the importance of targeted bone health monitoring in the clinical management of AD patients.Registration: (PROSPERO: CRD420251066550).

Humans↗