Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “mesoderm”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Xenopus Xlmo4 is a GATA cofactor during ventral mesoderm formation and regulates Ldb1 availability at the dorsal mesoderm and the neural plate.

We have identified and functionally characterized the Xenopus Xlmo4 gene, which encodes a member of the LIM-domain-only protein family. Xlmo4 is activated at gastrula stages in the mesodermal marginal zone probably in response to BMP4 signaling. Soon after, Xlmo4 is downregulated in the dorsal region of the mesoderm. This repression seems to be mediated by organizer-expressed repressors, such as Gsc. Xlmo4 downregulation is necessary for the proper formation of this territory. Increasing Xlmo4 function in this region downregulates Spemman Organizer genes and suppresses dorsal-anterior structures. By binding to Ldb1, Xlmo4 may restrict the availability of this cofactor for transcription factors expressed at the Spemman Organizer. In the ventral mesoderm, Xlmo4 is required to establish the identity of this territory by acting as a positive cofactor of GATA factors. In the neural ectoderm, Xlmo4 expression depends on Xiro homeoprotein activity. In this region, Xlmo4 suppresses differentiation of primary neurons and interferes with gene expression at the Isthmic Organizer, most likely by displacing Ldb1 from active transcription factor complexes required for these processes. Together, our data suggest that Xlmo4 uses distinct mechanisms to participate in different processes during development.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Nodal-related signals induce axial mesoderm and dorsalize mesoderm during gastrulation.

Mouse embryos homozygous for a null mutation in nodal arrest development at early gastrulation and contain little or no embryonic mesoderm. Here, two Xenopus nodal-related genes (Xnr-1 and Xnr-2) are identified and shown to be expressed transiently during embryogenesis, first within the vegetal region of late blastulae and later in the marginal zone during gastrulation, with enrichment in the dorsal lip. Xnrs and mouse nodal function as dose-dependent dorsoanterior and ventral mesoderm inducers in whole embryos and explanted animal caps. Using a plasmid vector to produce Xnr proteins during gastrulation, we show that, in contrast to activin and other TGF beta-like molecules, Xnr-1 and Xnr-2 can dorsalize ventral marginal zone explants and induce muscle differentiation. Xnr signalling also rescues a complete embryonic axis in UV-ventralized embryos. The patterns of Xnr expression, the activities of the proteins and the phenotype of mouse nodal mutants, all argue strongly that a signaling pathway involving nodal, or nodal-related peptides, is an essential conserved element in mesoderm differentiation associated with vertebrate gastrulation and axial patterning.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Inhibition of Xbra transcription activation causes defects in mesodermal patterning and reveals autoregulation of Xbra in dorsal mesoderm.

The Brachyury (T) gene is required for formation of posterior mesoderm and for axial development in both mouse and zebrafish embryos. In this paper, we first show that the Xenopus homologue of Brachyury, Xbra, and the zebrafish homologue, no tail (ntl), both function as transcription activators. The activation domains of both proteins map to their carboxy terminal regions, and we note that the activation domain is absent in two zebrafish Brachyury mutations, suggesting that it is required for gene function. A dominant-interfering Xbra construct was generated by replacing the activation domain of Xbra with the repressor domain of the Drosophila engrailed protein. Microinjection of RNA encoding this fusion protein allowed us to generate Xenopus and zebrafish embryos which show striking similarities to genetic mutants in mouse and fish. These results indicate that the function of Brachyury during vertebrate gastrulation is to activate transcription of mesoderm-specific genes. Additional experiments show that Xbra transcription activation is required for regulation of Xbra itself in dorsal, but not ventral, mesoderm. The approach described in this paper, in which the DNA-binding domain of a transcription activator is fused to the engrailed repressor domain, should assist in the analysis of other Xenopus and zebrafish transcription factors.

Animals↗

Myf-5 is transiently expressed in nonmuscle mesoderm and exhibits dynamic regional changes within the presegmented mesoderm and somites I-IV.

Myf-5 is one of four myogenic regulatory factors that play important roles in skeletal muscle development. This study provides detailed analysis of Myf-5 expression during early chick development using an in situ hybridization technique that has been optimized to detect low level Myf-5 transcripts. This facilitated detection of heretofore unrecognized dynamic changes in Myf-5 expression patterns. Myf-5 expression is first detected at stage 3 in the primitive streak and exhibits transient low-level expression in nonmyogenic mesoderm. Myf-5 is later expressed in the presegmented mesoderm (psm) in a reiterating pattern that is coordinated with somitogenesis and also colocalizes with the Notch ligand C-Delta-1. In somites (S) I-IV, Myf-5 expression exhibits dynamic regional changes, and in somites rostral to S IV, Myf-5 is expressed at higher levels in muscle precursors in the dorsomedial somite. Semiquantitative comparison of Myf-5 mRNA levels in the psm and in myotome-containing somites indicates about a 10-fold difference. The expression pattern of Myf-5 differs from that of MyoD, which we find is expressed only in the dorsomedial somite. These data reveal that Myf-5 is expressed at low levels several stages before muscle differentiation occurs and suggest that only a subset of cells that initially express Myf-5 will upregulate its expression and differentiate as muscle.

Animals↗

Zebrafish frizzled7b is expressed in prechordal mesoderm, brain and paraxial mesoderm.

Frizzled (fz) genes encode receptors for the Wnt signaling pathway. We describe a novel fz gene, zebrafish fz7b. Maternal fz7b mRNA is detectable by RT-PCR. Embryonic fz7b is widely distributed in early epiboly stage embryos. By shield stage, expression appears enriched around the blastoderm margin. During epiboly, expression becomes restricted to the prechordal plate, presumptive midbrain and hindbrain and paraxial mesoderm. As somites form, labeling is briefly present in a segmental pattern. By mid-somitogensis, expression is particularly enriched in the forebrain, the forebrain-midbrain boundary, and the anterior hindbrain, but appears at lower levels throughout much of the rostral CNS. The CNS expression is at ventral and medial positions. The paraxial mesoderm expression becomes restricted to the tailbud. This pattern continues through 26 h. At 48 h, weak expression is seen in the pharyngeal arches and developing fin.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

412-positive mesodermal cells and the gonadal mesoderm are separate from the fat-cell lineage.

The Drosophila retrotransposon, 412, is expressed in a cell-specific manner during embryogenesis. At stage 11, 412 transcripts are present in bilateral clusters of cells within the mesoderm. The posterior clusters of 412-positive cells become associated with the gonads at stage 13; however, the fate of the cells in the remaining clusters is unknown. We have tested by in situ hybridization to whole-mount embryos the possible identity of these cells with known precursor cell types present in bilateral clusters. We simultaneously located the 412-positive cells and the precursor cells to visceral muscle or the fat body. We have determined that the 412-positive cells do not correspond to these precursor cells and that the development of the visceral muscle or fat body does not affect the expression of 412 during embryogenesis.

Adipocytes↗

Distinct regulatory control of the Brachyury gene in axial and non-axial mesoderm suggests separation of mesoderm lineages early in mouse gastrulation.

Brachyury is required for the normal extension of the anteroposterior axis during mouse embryogenesis. A transgene comprising sequences from -500 to +150 relative to the start of Brachyury transcription, and the reporter gene lacZ, recapitulates some, but not all elements of Brachyury expression. Beta-Galactosidase expression is seen in the primitive streak from 6.5 d.p.c. but there is no detectable reporter expression in the node or notochord. Thus, the regulatory sequences required for the expression of Brachyury in the cells traversing the primitive streak are distinct from those required for the initiation of expression in the node. This suggests that different or additional signals are involved in activation of Brachyury in the node and notochord than those inducing Brachyury in the primitive streak. Additionally, the data suggest the possibility that axial and non-axial mesoderm are distinct from the earliest stages of Brachyury expression.

Animals↗

Mesoderm-inducing factors and mesodermal patterning.

Identification of the signalling molecules involved in mesoderm formation in amphibian embryos still presents problems. None of the original candidates, such as activin, have been definitively ruled out, and new factors, such as the nodal-related genes, have come on to the scene. Of the original candidates, activin has been definitively shown to act as a morphogen, whereas bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-4 has emerged as a ventral inducer and an inhibitor of neural differentiation. The effects of BMP-4 are antagonized by chordin, a molecule related to the product of the Drosophila gene short gastrulation.

Animals↗

Mesodermal cell migration during Xenopus gastrulation.

The adhesive glycoprotein fibronectin (FN), which is a component of the network of extracellular matrix fibrils on the inner surface of the blastocoel roof (BCR), has been proposed to play a major role in directing mesodermal cell migration during amphibian gastrulation. In the first part of this paper, the adhesion of Xenopus mesodermal cells to FN in vitro is examined. Cells from several mesoderm regions, which differ in developmental fate and morphogenetic activity, are able to bind specifically to the RGD cell-binding site of FN. Dorsal mesodermal cell adhesion to FN varies along the anterior-posterior (a-p) axis: adhesion is strongest in the anterior head mesoderm, and gradually decreases posteriorly. This a-p gradient of mesodermal adhesiveness to FN does not change during mesodermal involution, and is reflected in the morphology of mesodermal explants on FN. An a-p strip of mesoderm develops a spreading, leading anterior margin and a compact, retracting posterior end, thus moving slowly and directionally over the FN substrate at about 0.8 micron/min. Although dissociated cells from all levels of the dorsal mesodermal axis adhere to FN, only the anterior, leading prospective head mesoderm cells migrate as single cells on a FN substrate in vitro. Locomotion by means of lamelliform protrusions occurs at an average rate of about 1.5 micron/min. Cells of the more posterior axial mesoderm merely shift position at random without substantial net translocation, and preinvolution mesoderm cells are completely stationary. On the BCR, the in vivo substrate for mesodermal cell migration, dissociated prospective head mesoderm cells spread and migrate as on FN in vitro, at 2.2 microns/min. In the presence of an RGD peptide which inhibits cell-FN interaction, cells remain globular and do not spread. They are still motile, but change direction frequently, which leads to less efficient net translocation. Apparently, interaction with the RGD cell-binding site of FN and concomitant spreading of head mesoderm cells is required for the stabilization of cell locomotion. In contrast to the directional migration of the mesoderm cell population toward the animal pole in the embryo, the pathways of dissociated cells on the BCR are randomly oriented. Coherent explants of migratory mesoderm do not move at all on the BCR, although they translocate on FN in vitro.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Regionalisation of cell fate and morphogenetic movement of the mesoderm during mouse gastrulation.

The developmental fate of cells in the epiblast of early-primitive-streak-stage mouse embryos was assessed by studying the pattern of tissue colonisation displayed by lac Z-expressing cells grafted orthotopically to nontransgenic embryos. Results of these fate-mapping experiments revealed that the lateral and posterior epiblast contain cells that will give rise predominantly to mesodermal derivatives. The various mesodermal populations are distributed in overlapping domains in the lateral and posterior epiblast, with the embryonic mesoderm such as heart, lateral, and paraxial mesoderm occupying a more distal position than the extraembryonic mesoderm. Heterotopic grafting of presumptive mesodermal cells results in the grafted cells adopting the fate appropriate to the new site, reflecting a plasticity of cell fate determination before ingression. The first wave of epiblast cells that ingress through the primitive streak are those giving rise to extraembryonic mesoderm. Cells that will form the mesoderm of the yolk sac and the amnion make up a major part of the mesodermal layer of the midprimitive-streak-stage embryo. Cells that are destined for embryonic mesoderm are still found within the epiblast, but some have been recruited to the distal portion of the mesoderm. By the late-primitive-streak-stage, the mesodermal layer contains only the precursors of embryonic mesoderm. This suggests that there has been a progressive displacement of the midstreak mesoderm to extraembryonic sites, which is reminiscent of that occurring in the overlying endodermal tissue. The regionalisation of cell fate in the late-primitive-streak mesoderm bears the same spatial relationship as their ancestors in the epiblast prior to cell ingression. This implies that both the position of the cells in the proximal-distal axis and their proximity to the primitive streak are major determinants for the patterning of the embryonic mesoderm.

Animals↗

Mesoderm migration in the Xenopus gastrula.

During Xenopus gastrulation, the mesoderm involutes at the blastopore lip and moves on the inner surface of the BCR toward the animal pole of the embryo. Active cell migration is involved in this mesoderm translocation. In vitro, mesoderm cells migrate non-persistently and intermittently by extending and retracting multiple lamellipodia, which pull the cell body in their direction. Lamellipodia formation is induced by FN. FN fibrils are present on the BCR as part of the in vivo substrate of mesoderm migration. Mesoderm cells can attach to the BCR independently of FN, but interaction with FN is required for lamellipodia extension and cell migration on the BCR. In contrast to preinvolution mesoderm, involuted migrating mesoderm always stays on the surface of the BCR cell layer: migrating mesoderm cells do not mix with BCR cells, and a stable interface between tissues is maintained. A corresponding change in cell sorting behavior occurs during mesoderm involution. In Xenopus, the mesoderm moves as a multilayered coherent cell mass held together by cadherin-mediated cell adhesion. Aggregate formation changes mesoderm cell behavior, rendering it more continuous, persistent and directional, i.e. more efficient. The mesoderm possesses an intrinsic tissue polarity which biases the direction of its movement. In addition, the fibrillar FN matrix of the BCR contains guidance cues which also direct the mesoderm toward the animal pole. Haptotaxis is most likely not involved in this substrate-dependent guidance of the mesoderm, but intact FN fibrils seem to be required. A polarity of the BCR cell layer which underlies this anisotropy of the BCR matrix develops under the influence of the marginal zone in the late blastula. Although in other amphibian species, gastrulation depends critically on mesoderm cell migration, in Xenopus, convergent extension of the axial mesoderm seems to provide the main driving force for gastrulation.

Animals↗

tinman and bagpipe: two homeo box genes that determine cell fates in the dorsal mesoderm of Drosophila.

Whereas the mechanisms of early Drosophila mesoderm formation have been studied in much detail, the subsequent processes determining regional identities within the mesoderm remain largely unknown. Here, we describe two homeo box genes, tinman (tin) and bagpipe (bap), which spatially subdivide the mesoderm and determine cell fates in the dorsal mesoderm. These two genes are components of a cascade of genetic interactions that result in the spatial restriction of tin mRNA to the dorsal mesoderm and in the activation of bap in segmental clusters of cells in this region. A subset of cells from those clusters segregate to form visceral mesoderm that differentiates into gut musculature. This indicates that the visceral mesoderm is derived from metamerically repeated primordia. In embryos mutant for bap, visceral mesoderm formation is strongly disrupted. Most cells of the visceral mesoderm fail to differentiate properly, and a portion of them are transformed into body wall musculature and gonadal mesoderm. In tin mutant embryos, bap expression is not activated in the dorsal mesoderm. Probably as a consequence, neither visceral mesoderm nor midgut musculature are formed in these mutants, and the absence of visceral mesoderm results in strong disruptions of endoderm migration and midgut morphogenesis. In addition to visceral mesoderm development, tin is required for the formation of the heart from dorsal mesoderm and for the specification of founder cells for particular body wall muscles.

Amino Acid Sequence↗