Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “mesoderm”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1985

Dorsal lateral plate mesoderm influences proliferation and differentiation of hemopoietic stem cells derived from ventral lateral plate mesoderm during early development of Xenopus laevis embryos.

The developmental pattern of dorsal and ventral lateral plate mesoderm was examined by explanting these regions and culturing them in serum-free conditions for 10 days. Under these circumstances, ventral lateral plate mesoderm gave rise to hemopoietic cells, and dorsal lateral plate mesoderm gave rise to stromal cells. Comparison of the differentiation pattern observed when dorsal and ventral mesoderm were cultured separately versus the pattern observed when dorsal and ventral mesoderm were cultured together revealed that dorsal mesoderm influenced the differentiation of ventral-derived hemopoietic cells. Ventral mesoderm cultured alone gave rise to erythrocytes and granulocytes. However, in the presence of dorsal mesoderm, ventral mesoderm gave rise to erythrocytes, monocytes, and granulocytes. Moreover, dorsal mesoderm functioned to maintain the proliferation and differentiation potential of progenitor cells as determined using a colony-forming cell assay (CFU-c).

Animals↗
PubMed1987

The organization of mesodermal pattern in Xenopus laevis: experiments using a Xenopus mesoderm-inducing factor.

In this paper, we study the mechanism by which a Xenopus cell line-derived mesoderm-inducing factor (MIF) might establish the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation in the mesoderm. The effects of the factor on competent animal pole tissue are consistent with it being identical to the natural mesoderm-inducing factor. The signal can only act on those membrane domains of the animal pole that face the blastocoel, but it can be stably recorded there, such that axial mesoderm is formed, after 15 min exposure or less. This exposure can end some hours, or several cell cycles, before the onset of RNA synthesis yet nevertheless be fully effective, although competence to respond also extends well after the onset of transcription. Exposure of the entire blastocoel lining of intact embryos to MIF causes a synchronous and sudden transformation of the behaviour and adhesive properties of all inner animal cap cells. This transformation mimics and is contemporaneous with the involution behaviour of normal mesoderm in the early gastrula marginal zone. Although high concentrations of MIF totally disorganize gastrulation, lower concentrations permit gastrulation to proceed. However, the pattern of mesoderm in these embryos is disrupted and ectopic mesoderm is formed around the blastocoel remnant. When MIF is injected directly into blastomeres, rather than into the blastocoel, it has no effect. This suggests that the molecule is secreted from source cells and affects target cells through an extracellular receptor. Finally, we show that small pieces of animal pole tissue recently exposed to MIF go on to produce morphogenetic signals perhaps distinct from MIF. We discuss the role of these signals in establishing and modifying the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation in the mesoderm of Xenopus.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Brown adipose tissue as a derivative of mesoderm grafted below the kidney capsule. A model for differentiation of isolated rat mesoderm.

During development, mesoderm differentiates into connective tissue, cartilage, bone, muscle and kidney. In experimental conditions the developmental spectrum of mesoderm grafted below the kidney capsule is reduced so that mostly brown adipose tissue (BAT) appears. Since BAT is a particular tissue with a specific developmental pattern, the structural and functional characteristics of experimentally developed BAT were analyzed in the present study. Mesoderm from nine-day-old rat embryos was grafted below the kidney capsule of adult rats and one month later the BAT-containing tumors were analyzed. The ultrastructural and morphometrical data of BAT-containing tumors were the same as in BAT developed in situ. Tissue-specific mRNA for uncoupling protein (UCP) was expressed in BAT-containing tumors, and immuno-electron microscopical analysis showed that mitochondria of these brown adipocytes contained UCP. Injections of noradrenaline and exposure of BAT-tumor-bearing rats to cold stress increased both the amount of UCP and the expression of UCP mRNA in tumors of BAT; i.e., experimentally developed BAT entirely resembled standard BAT. It is proposed that mesoderm isolated and displaced below the kidney capsule lacks the inductive stimuli of ectoderm and endoderm, and as a result mesoderm can not realize the natural pattern of differentiation. Here, in a new environment, mesoderm is exposed to new stimuli which induce differentiation of mesoderm into BAT, probably through neuro-vascular elements from the medial side of the kidney (BAT area). Thus, although mesoderm contains a wide differentiation capacity, it can differentiate into only one type of tissue, depending on the presence and range of inductive stimuli.

Adipose Tissue, Brown↗
PubMed1991

Xwnt-8, a Xenopus Wnt-1/int-1-related gene responsive to mesoderm-inducing growth factors, may play a role in ventral mesodermal patterning during embryogenesis.

In amphibian embryos, formation of the basic body plan depends on positional differences in the mesoderm. Although peptide growth factors involved in mesoderm induction have tentatively been identified, additional signals are required to generate pattern in this tissue. We have isolated a Xenopus cDNA for a Wnt-1 related gene, designated Xwnt-8, which is activated in response to mesoderm-inducing growth factors. Xwnt-8 transcripts are transiently expressed, being most abundant during gastrulation at which time expression is confined primarily to ventral mesodermal cells. Embryos dorsoanteriorized by exposure to lithium exhibit greatly reduced levels of Xwnt-8 mRNA, supporting a correlation between Xwnt-8 expression and a ventral mesodermal cell fate. Surprisingly, ectopic expression of Xwnt-8 in embryos causes a dorsoanterior-enhanced phenotype. These findings suggest that Xwnt-8 may be a secondary signalling agent which is produced in response to mesoderm-inducing factors and is involved in the early steps of mesodermal patterning.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Expression of tenascin mRNA in mesoderm during Xenopus laevis embryogenesis: the potential role of mesoderm patterning in tenascin regionalization.

In Xenopus embryos, the extracellular matrix (ECM) protein tenascin (TN) is expressed dorsally in a very restricted pattern. We have studied the spatial and temporal expression of TN mRNA in tailbud-stage embryos by RNAase protection and in situ hybridization using a cDNA probe for Xenopus TN obtained by PCR amplification. We report that TN transcripts are principally expressed in cells dispersed around the neural tube and notochord as well as in myotome and sclerotome cells. No TN mRNA could be detected in lateral plate mesoderm, but expression was detectable beneath tail fin epidermis. In a second series of experiments, we studied the expression of TN mRNA and protein in combinations between animal and vegetal stage-6 blastomeres and in stage-8 blastula animal caps treated with activin A or basic fibroblastic growth factor (b-FGF). Isolated animal cap tissue cultured alone differentiates into epidermis, which expresses neither TN protein nor TN mRNA. TN expression is, however, elicited in response to isolated dorsal vegetal blastomeres and in response to high concentrations of activin, both of which treatments lead to formation of muscle and/or notochord. Low concentrations of activin, and ventral vegetal blastomeres, treatments that induce mesoderm of ventral character, are poor inducers of TN. However, b-FGF, which also induces ventral mesoderm, elicits strong expression. These results indicate that TN regionalization is a complex process, dependent both on the pattern of differentiation of mesodermal tissues and on the agent with which they are induced. The data further show that "ventral mesoderm" induced by low concentrations of activin is distinct from that induced by b-FGF, and imply that activin induces ventral mesoderm of the trunk while b-FGF induces posterior mesoderm of the tailbud.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

Mesoderm induction in Xenopus laevis: responding cells must be in contact for mesoderm formation but suppression of epidermal differentiation can occur in single cells.

When Xenopus embryos are cultured in calcium- and magnesium-free medium (CMFM), the blastomeres lose adhesion but continue dividing to form a loose heap of cells. If divalent cations are restored at the early gastrula stage the cells re-adhere and eventually form muscle (a mesodermal cell type) as well as epidermis. If, however, the cells are dispersed during culture in CMFM, muscle does not form following reaggregation although epidermis does. This suggests that culturing blastomeres in a heap allows the transmission of mesoderm-induction signals from cell to cell while dispersion effectively dilutes the signal. In this paper, we have attempted to substitute for cell proximity by culturing dispersed blastomeres in XTC mesoderm-inducing factor (MIF). We find that dispersed cells do not respond to XTC-MIF by forming mesodermal cell types after reaggregation, but the factor does inhibit epidermal differentiation. One interpretation of this observation is that an early stage in mesoderm induction is the suppression of epidermal differentiation and that formation of mesoderm may require contact-mediated signals that are produced in response to XTC-MIF. We have gone on to study the suppression of epidermal differentiation in more detail. We find that this is a dose-dependent phenomenon that can occur in single cells in the absence of cell division. Animal pole blastomeres become more difficult to divert from epidermal differentiation at later stages of development and by stage 12 they are 'determined' to this fate. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) also suppresses epidermal differentiation in isolated animal pole blastomeres and transforming growth factor-beta 1 acts synergistically with FGF in doing so.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Mesoderm induction by the mesoderm of Xenopus neurulae.

Combinations were made between explants of mesoderm from the archenteron roof of early Xenopus neurulae and explants of ectoderm from mid-blastulae. In each combination one component was labeled with the fluorescent lineage label RDA (rhodamine-dextran-amine). Frequent and large mesoderm inductions, consisting mainly of muscle, were found where the presomite plate was used as the inducer. Less frequent and smaller mesoderm inductions were found when notochord was used as the inducer. We conclude that induced mesoderm can itself be active as a mesoderm inducing tissue. If this capability is acquired in the blastula then it follows that mesoderm induction must propagate from cell to cell and its spread be antagonized by some other factor.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Mesodermal cell migration during Xenopus gastrulation.

The adhesive glycoprotein fibronectin (FN), which is a component of the network of extracellular matrix fibrils on the inner surface of the blastocoel roof (BCR), has been proposed to play a major role in directing mesodermal cell migration during amphibian gastrulation. In the first part of this paper, the adhesion of Xenopus mesodermal cells to FN in vitro is examined. Cells from several mesoderm regions, which differ in developmental fate and morphogenetic activity, are able to bind specifically to the RGD cell-binding site of FN. Dorsal mesodermal cell adhesion to FN varies along the anterior-posterior (a-p) axis: adhesion is strongest in the anterior head mesoderm, and gradually decreases posteriorly. This a-p gradient of mesodermal adhesiveness to FN does not change during mesodermal involution, and is reflected in the morphology of mesodermal explants on FN. An a-p strip of mesoderm develops a spreading, leading anterior margin and a compact, retracting posterior end, thus moving slowly and directionally over the FN substrate at about 0.8 micron/min. Although dissociated cells from all levels of the dorsal mesodermal axis adhere to FN, only the anterior, leading prospective head mesoderm cells migrate as single cells on a FN substrate in vitro. Locomotion by means of lamelliform protrusions occurs at an average rate of about 1.5 micron/min. Cells of the more posterior axial mesoderm merely shift position at random without substantial net translocation, and preinvolution mesoderm cells are completely stationary. On the BCR, the in vivo substrate for mesodermal cell migration, dissociated prospective head mesoderm cells spread and migrate as on FN in vitro, at 2.2 microns/min. In the presence of an RGD peptide which inhibits cell-FN interaction, cells remain globular and do not spread. They are still motile, but change direction frequently, which leads to less efficient net translocation. Apparently, interaction with the RGD cell-binding site of FN and concomitant spreading of head mesoderm cells is required for the stabilization of cell locomotion. In contrast to the directional migration of the mesoderm cell population toward the animal pole in the embryo, the pathways of dissociated cells on the BCR are randomly oriented. Coherent explants of migratory mesoderm do not move at all on the BCR, although they translocate on FN in vitro.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1987

Regional specification within the mesoderm of early embryos of Xenopus laevis.

We have further analysed the roles of mesoderm induction and dorsalization in the formation of a regionally specified mesoderm in early embryos of Xenopus laevis. First, we have examined the regional specificity of mesoderm induction by isolating single blastomeres from the vegetalmost tier of the 32-cell embryo and combining each with a lineage-labelled (FDA) animal blastomere tier. Whereas dorsovegetal (D1) blastomeres induce 'dorsal-type' mesoderm (notochord and muscle), laterovegetal and ventrovegetal blastomeres (D2-4) induce either 'intermediate-type' (muscle, mesothelium, mesenchyme and blood) or 'ventral-type' (mesothelium, mesenchyme and blood) mesoderm. No significant difference in inductive specificity between blastomeres D2, 3 and 4 could be detected. We also show that laterovegetal and ventrovegetal blastomeres from early cleavage stages can have a dorsal inductive potency partially activated by operative procedures, resulting in the induction of intermediate-type mesoderm. Second, we have determined the state of specification of ventral blastomeres by isolating and culturing them in vitro between the 4-cell stage and the early gastrula stage. The majority of isolates from the ventral half of the embryo gave extreme ventral types of differentiation at all stages tested. Although a minority of cases formed intermediate-type and dorsal-type mesoderms we believe these to result from either errors in our assessment of the prospective DV axis or from an enhancement, provoked by microsurgery, of some dorsal inductive specificity. The results of induction and isolation experiments suggest that only two states of specification exist in the mesoderm of the pregastrula embryo, a dorsal type and a ventral type. Finally we have made a comprehensive series of combinations between different regions of the marginal zone using FDA to distinguish the components. We show that, in combination with dorsal-type mesoderm, ventral-type mesoderm becomes dorsalized to the level of intermediate-type mesoderm. Dorsal-type mesoderm is not ventralized in these combinations. Dorsalizing activity is confined to a restricted sector of the dorsal marginal zone, it is wider than the prospective notochord and seems to be graded from a high point at the dorsal midline. The results of these experiments strengthen the case for the three-signal model proposed previously, i.e. dorsal and ventral mesoderm inductions followed by dorsalization, as the simplest explanation capable of accounting for regional specification within the mesoderm of early Xenopus embryos.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Positional control of mesoderm movement and fate during avian gastrulation and neurulation.

Segments of primitive streak from donor quail embryos at stages of gastrulation and neurulation were transplanted heterotopically and isochronically to primitive streaks of host chick embryos. The subsequent movement and fate of grafted cells was determined using the quail nucleolar marker to define grafted cells. The pattern of movement of grafted cells depended on their new position within the primitive streak, not on their original position. When cells of cranial regions were placed more caudally, they moved to mesodermal subdivisions that were located lateral to those they would have populated if left in their original position. When caudal segments were placed more cranially, they moved to more medial mesodermal subdivisions. Whether the fate of grafted cells corresponded to their original location or their new location depended on both their level of origin and their new position. Cells from heterotopically transplanted Hensen's nodes, which migrated to the somitic and more lateral mesoderm, self-differentiated notochords. Similarly, in some cases, heterotopically transplanted prospective somitic cells, which migrated to lateral plate mesoderm, formed ectopic somites. In other cases, however, grafted cells contributed to the host's somites, intermediate mesoderm, and lateral plate mesoderm. Moreover, prospective somitic cells, which migrated to the extraembryonic lateral plate mesoderm, changed their fate and formed extraembryonic lateral plate mesoderm; and prospective lateral plate mesoderm cells, which migrated to the somitic mesoderm, formed somites as well as intermediate mesoderm and lateral plate mesoderm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Leg bud mesoderm retains morphogenetic potential to express limb-like characteristics ("limbness") in collagen gel culture.

Recent in situ hybridization studies have correlated expression of potential regulatory genes with pattern formation in limb bud mesoderm (Tabin: Cell 66:199-217, 1991); however, the mechanism(s) controlling their expression in mesoderm and their relevance to the establishment of a limb morphogenetic pattern remain unknown. One likely candidate for regulating patterning events in limb mesoderm is the apical ectodermal ridge, as its removal in ovo results in a graded truncation of limb skeletal elements in the proximal-distal axis dependent upon the time of excision (Rowe and Fallon: J Embryol Exp Morph 68:1-7, 1982). In the present study, we investigate whether the hypothetical imprint of ridge ectoderm is retained in cultured mesoderm. Specifically, we sought to determine if a subpopulation of limb mesoderm that forms in collagen gel culture (Markwald et al: Anat Rec 226:91-107, 1990), retains any expression of "limbness" in the absence of limb ectoderm as characterized by the formation of a predictable number and distribution of limb-like chondrogenic elements in comparison to the temporal and spatial relationships of the in situ proximal, hindlimb skeletal structures. Accordingly, explants of undissociated mesoderm from stage 18-22 chicken leg buds were cultured without ectoderm on collagen gel lattices and the central subpopulation of mesoderm was examined morphologically. We show that this central subset of mesoderm will form chondrogenic cells which were not expressed uniformly throughout the subset, but rather distinct nodules or elements of cartilage were elaborated. Moreover, the number of elements expressed by the central subset increased with the age of the mesoderm at the time of explantation; spatially and temporally, the sequence of elements that formed always proceeded from the proximal, anterior margin of the subset to its distal, posterior border. The shapes of the initial elements (designated I and II) resembled the forms of in situ proximal skeletal structures (girdle and femur-like), whereas more distal elements (III-V) were often fused and without structural similarity to in situ skeletal structures. When cultures were established from the posterior mesoderm of stage 19/20 or 21 mesoblasts, the frequency of element I formation was reduced approximately one-half, whereas formation of more distal elements was unaffected. Conversely, element formation from the central subset established from isolated anterior mesoderm was virtually identical to intact mesoblasts, indicating a capacity to regulate for the loss of mesoderm as occurs in situ (Hampé: Archs Anat Microsc Morph Exp 48:345-378, 1959).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Directional mesoderm cell migration in the Xenopus gastrula.

The movement of the dorsal mesoderm across the blastocoel roof of the Xenopus gastrula is examined. We show that different parts of the mesoderm which can be distinguished by their morphogenetic behavior in the embryo are all able to migrate independently on the inner surface of the blastocoel roof. The direction of mesoderm cell migration is determined by guidance cues in the extracellular matrix of the blastocoel roof and by an intrinsic tissue polarity of the mesoderm. The mesodermal polarity shows the same orientation as the external guidance cues and is strongly expressed in the more posterior mesoderm. The guidance cues of the extracellular matrix are recognized by all parts of the dorsal mesoderm and even by nonmesodermal cells from other regions of the embryo. The extracellular matrix consists of a network of fibronectin-containing fibrils. The adhesiveness of this matrix does not vary along the axis of mesoderm movement, excluding haptotaxis as a guidance mechanism in this system. However, an intact fibronectin fibril structure is necessary for directional mesoderm cell migration. When the assembly of fibronectin into fibrils is inhibited, mesoderm explants still migrate on the amorphous extracellular matrix, but no longer directionally. It is proposed that polarized extracellular matrix fibrils may normally guide the migrating mesoderm to its target region.

Animals↗
PubMed1991

Retinoic acid modifies mesodermal patterning in early Xenopus embryos.

Treatment of early Xenopus embryos with retinoic acid (RA) produces a concentration-dependent series of defects in anterior axial structures that range from small deletions to embryos lacking heads. The graded series of axial defects obtained after RA administration to early embryos appears to result, in part, from actions of RA on embryonic mesoderm. RA modifies the differentiation of anterior dorsal mesoderm from animal cap ectoderm induced by mesoderm-inducing peptide growth factors (PGFs). Concentrations of RA that suppress anterior dorsal mesoderm result in the differentiation of mesoderm of more posterior or ventral character. The suppression of anterior dorsal mesoderm may account for the absence of anterior neural ectoderm after RA treatment. Although RA changes the character of mesoderm, it does not seem to affect mesodermal induction by PGFs or the levels of Xhox3 mRNA induced in the mesoderm by PGFs. RA therefore appears to affect steps downstream from those involved in the initial induction of mesoderm. In experiments to examine the possible physiological role of RA in early Xenopus development, dorsal and ventral ectoderm were found to respond differently to identical concentrations of PGFs. One potential basis for this heterogeneity is the existence of a localized inhibitor, possibly RA, in the early Xenopus embryo. RA could therefore contribute to axial patterning by inhibiting the development of mesoderm of different character induced by PGFs.

Animals↗
PubMed1988

A test of positional properties of avian wing-bud mesoderm.

Supernumerary wing structures are readily produced by grafting pieces of wing-bud mesoderm into different locations of host wing buds, but the mechanism underlying their formation remains obscure. The major aim of this study was to examine the ability of posterior quail wing-bud mesoderm, cultured in vitro long enough to lose ZPA (zone of polarizing activity) activity, to stimulate or participate in the formation of supernumerary structures when grafted into anterior slits of host chick wing buds. Small pieces of anterior and posterior quail wing-bud mesoderm (HH stages 21-23) were placed in in vitro culture for up to 3 days. After 2 days, ZPA activity of cultured mesoderm was lost. After the grafting of 2- to 3-day cultured anterior quail wing-bud mesoderm into posterior slits of host chick wing-buds, a consistently high percentage (70%-90%) of grafts result in formation of supernumerary cartilage; in this experiment, however, only a low percentage of grafts resulted in supernumerary cartilage when 2- to 3-day cultured posterior mesoderm was grafted into anterior slits. Taken with controls, these results show that positional differences exist between cultured anterior and posterior wing-bud mesoderm. Serial-section analysis of numerous operated wings has shown several patterns of contribution to supernumerary structures by cells of graft and host. Single supernumerary digits induced by grafts of ZPA mesoderm into anterior slits were normally composed entirely of host cells, but graft cells regularly contributed to skeletal elements of more complex supernumerary structures. Cartilage rods produced by anterior-to-posterior grafts were composed mostly of graft cells, but cartilage nodules and the bases of some rods were often mosaics of chick and quail cells. The results support the proposition that mesodermal cells of the quail wing-bud possess a form of anteroposterior positional memory, but its nature and the means by which the memory of grafted cells interacts with host mesoderm are still not clear.

Animals↗