Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Polygenic Risk Score”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2026

Comparison of Performance of Publicly Available Polygenic Risk Scores to Predict Clinically Actionable Coronary Artery Calcium Scores: The BioHEART-CT Cohort.

AIM: Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) have been trained against major adverse cardiovascular outcomes (MACE) in large cohorts. Few studies have examined the effectiveness of these CAD MACE PRS tools in detecting individuals with subclinical coronary calcification. An association would provide an opportunity for clinical translation and targeting of CT imaging to new patients at risk for subclinical disease. METHODS: An analysis of 53 publicly available CAD PRS tools was completed in participants of the BioHEART-CT Discovery 1000 cohort presenting for clinically referred CT coronary angiography (CCTA). Associations between PRS and two binary CACS outcomes reflecting clinically significant coronary calcification were assessed: a) Absolute CACS (CACS ≥100 Agatston units [AU]; and b) Percentile CACS (CACS ≥75th age-/sex-adjusted percentile). Models were adjusted for genetic principal components, modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, and age/sex (in Absolute CACS). A subgroup analysis was performed using Framingham Risk Score (FRS) at baseline. RESULTS: Among 803 BioHEART-CT Discovery 1000 participants, 487 (60.6%) had any detectable coronary calcium. Most PRS tools demonstrated significant association with CACS outcomes, particularly evident when PRS was modelled as a continuous predictor. For Percentile CACS, 94.3% of PRS tools were significantly associated after full adjustment (median OR per PRS SD 1.41 (IQR 1.23-1.60). Quintile-based analysis revealed that individuals in the Top Quintile PRS had up to 7.99-fold increased odds of Percentile CACS ≥75th compared to those in the Bottom Quintile. Analysis by FRS group revealed positive performance, especially in individuals of Low FRS wherein incorporating a PRS increased pre-test probability from 14% to 26%. CONCLUSION: Whilst most CAD PRS tools have been developed against clinical events, we show their ability to predict clinically relevant coronary calcification. Utility appears strongest in individuals traditionally considered lower risk, presenting an opportunity for clinical translation for improved diagnosis in the primary prevention setting, with the potential to triage individuals into a CACS screening pathway.

coronary artery disease↗
PubMed2025

Stratifying Lung Adenocarcinoma Risk with Multi-ancestry Polygenic Risk Scores in East Asian Never-Smokers.

BACKGROUND: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) in never-smokers is a major public health burden, especially among East Asian women. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are promising for risk stratification but are primarily developed in European-ancestry populations. We aimed to develop and validate single- and multi-ancestry PRSs for East Asian never-smokers to improve LUAD risk prediction. METHODS: PRSs were developed using genome-wide association study summary statistics from East Asian (8,002 cases; 20,782 controls) and European (2,058 cases; 5,575 controls) populations. Single-ancestry models included PRS-25, PRS-CT, and LDpred2; multi-ancestry models included LDpred2+PRS-EUR128, PRS-CSx, and CT-SLEB. Performance was evaluated in independent East Asian data from the Female Lung Cancer Consortium (FLCCA) and externally validated in the Nanjing Lung Cancer Cohort (NJLCC). We assessed predictive accuracy via AUC, with 10-year and (age 30-80) absolute risks estimates. RESULTS: The best multi-ancestry PRS, using East Asian and European data via CT-SLEB (clumping and thresholding, super learning, empirical Bayes), outperformed the best East Asian-only PRS (LDpred2; AUC=0.629, 95% CI:0.618,0.641), achieving an AUC of 0.640 (95% CI:0.629,0.653) and odds ratio of 1.71 (95% CI:1.61,1.82) per SD increase. NJLCC Validation confirmed robust performance (AUC =0.649, 95% CI: 0.623, 0.676). The top 20% PRS group had a 3.92-fold higher LUAD risk than the bottom 20%. Further, the top 5% PRS group reached a 6.69% lifetime absolute risk. Notably, this group reached the average population 10-year LUAD risk at age 50 (0.42%) by age 41, nine years earlier. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-ancestry PRS approaches enhance LUAD risk stratification in East Asian never-smokers, with consistent external validation, suggesting future clinical utility.

East Asian never smokers↗
PubMed2026

A multiancestry polygenic risk score for Alzheimer's disease is associated with cognitive decline and neuropathological hallmarks in diverse populations.

Previously derived polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) perform inconsistently across diverse ancestries. We developed an APOE-independent multiancestry AD PRS using genome-wide association study summary statistics applied to European ancestry, African American, Caribbean Hispanic and East Asian cohorts. PRS performance was evaluated in a large independent multiancestry dataset and validated in several additional multiancestry cohorts. The PRS was significantly associated with AD in European ancestry, African American, Caribbean Hispanic and Native American Hispanic groups with adjusted odds ratios between 1.14 and 1.52 per PRS standard deviation. PRS performance was validated in the replication cohorts (odds ratios: 1.21-1.65). The PRS was also associated with poorer memory, executive function and language performance, greater AD-related neuropathological burden, reduced hippocampal volume, lower cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β42 and elevated total tau and phosphorylated tau, with stronger phosphorylated tau associations observed in women. Our findings support the value of ancestry-aware PRSs as a component of broader multimodal risk stratification frameworks.

Aged↗
PubMed2026

Polygenic risk scores in major depressive disorder: A systematic review across diagnostic, treatment, course/severity, and subtype domains.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is heterogeneous across diagnostic, treatment-related, course/severity, and subtype domains. Polygenic risk score (PRS) studies have examined these domains, but differences in PRS sources, samples, methods, and endpoint definitions have fragmented the evidence. We synthesised findings and examined potential contributors to heterogeneity. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched for studies published from January 2016 through 25 November 2025. Result records were synthesised using SWiM, and certainty was assessed with an adapted GRADE framework. RESULTS: Sixty studies contributed 493 retained records; 450 were descriptively classified as positive, null, or reverse, although records were not independent. Positive findings accounted for 44/56 diagnostic, 61/273 treatment-related, 64/100 course/severity, and 14/21 subtype records. For MDD/depression-derived PRSs and case-control MDD status, all 10 contributing studies showed higher liability in cases (exploratory exact sign test p = 0.002; FDR q = 0.004). The same PRS group showed positive findings for overall depressive symptom severity (14/18), although the study-level test was imprecise (5/5 studies; p = 0.063). Pharmacological response/remission findings for these PRSs were mostly null or directionally mixed (10 positive, 18 null, and 9 reverse). Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) findings differed by operational definition. Atypical and psychotic subtype signals arose mainly from single-study PRS and endpoint contrasts. CONCLUSIONS: PRS evidence was clearest for MDD diagnostic status and showed a tentative pattern for overall symptom burden. Treatment and subtype findings were less consistent or less replicated. Larger, ancestrally diverse studies with standardised endpoints and transparent PRS methods are needed.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Evaluating the causal effect of mitochondrial dysfunction on Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease using Polygenic Risk Scores and Mendelian Randomization.

INTRODUCTION: Mitochondrial DNA copy number (mtDNAcn), a measure of mitochondrial genomes per nucleated cell, has an unclear causal relationship with AD and PD. We integrate genetic correlation, Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS), and Mendelian Randomization (MR) to assess whether mtDNAcn influences the risk of AD and PD, and evaluate how study-specific factors in mtDNAcn genome-wide association studies (GWAS) may distort these causal estimates. METHODS: Using GWAS of four mtDNAcn measures, AD, AD/dementia, and PD, we evaluated genetic correlations, generated ancestry-normalized PRS in the AD Genetics Consortium (N=27,383), and applied MR methods including Latent Heritable Confounder MR (LHC-MR). RESULTS: Across the four mtDNAcn GWAS, only one was consistently associated with AD/dementia and PD, with genetic correlations and PRS analysis showing negative correlations and MR indicating that higher mtDNAcn reduced AD/dementia and PD risk. DISCUSSION: Higher blood-based mtDNAcn was causally associated with reduced risk of AD/dementia and PD, with limited evidence to suggest a bidirectional effect.

Alzheimer’s disease↗
PubMed2026

Polygenic Risk Scores for Incident Dementia in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Over 75 Alzheimer's disease (AD) and dementia-associated variants have been identified through genome-wide association studies, but the utility of polygenic risk scores (PRS) for predicting AD and dementia in diverse and admixed populations remains unclear. We compared how PRS approaches differing in p-value thresholds, variant weights, and source ancestry perform in predicting dementia in 6338 African American, Chinese, Hispanic, and White individuals from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. We tested clumping and thresholding (C+T) methods with varying parameters against Bayesian approaches (PRS-CS, PRS-CSx). We compared the ability of each method to predict incident dementia in all participants and in groups stratified by self-reported race/ethnicity. We additionally analyzed performance across groups stratified by estimated proportion of non-Finnish European (NFE)-like ancestry. Including more variants does not improve performance. We found comparable associations between dementia and PRS when comparing a C+T method with only 15 SNPs and PRS derived from Bayesian models that include >&#x2009;800,000 SNPs (HR5e-08 = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.08-1.28; HRCSx = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.07-1.27). The p&#x2009;<&#x2009;5e-08 C+T method was more strongly associated with incident dementia in populations genetically dissimilar from the source data (HRlowNFE_5e-08 = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.08-1.50; HRlowNFE_CSx = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.94-1.33). More selective PRS models using genome-wide significant SNPs may be preferable for dementia prediction in diverse populations.

Aged↗
PubMed2026

Implementing a Multi-Ancestry Polygenic Risk Score for Coronary Heart Disease in a Diverse Cohort.

PURPOSE: We describe a prospective cohort study (NCT05277116) conducted in phase IV of the electronic MEdical Records and GEnomics (eMERGE) Network to implement a multi-ancestry polygenic risk score for coronary heart disease (PRSCHD: PGS004696) and assess outcomes after return of results (RoR). METHODS: PRSCHD was considered alongside family history (FamHxCHD), monogenic risk from familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), and clinical risk factors, to return CHD risk as part of a Genome Informed Risk Assessment (GIRA) report. Participants with high PRSCHD (top 5th percentile) or FH received their results from study personnel, while participants with FamHxCHD were informed by mail/email. Results were placed in the electronic health record and communicated to the primary care provider. The primary outcome of initiation/intensification of lipid lowering therapy within 12 months after RoR is compared between participants with PRSCHD &#x2265;95th percentile and those with PRSCHD 90th-94th percentile, using a regression discontinuity design. Secondary outcomes include ordering of screening tests, a new CHD diagnosis, and lifestyle changes. RESULTS: By April 2025, 20,421 adults were enrolled: mean age 50&#xb1;15 years (range 18-75 years), 68% female, 50% belonging to health disparity groups, and 40% non-White by self-report. Prevalence of CHD, FamHxCHD, high PRSCHD and FH was 4.0%, 10.2%, 4.3% and 0.7%, respectively; 14.3% had at least one of the three CHD genetic risk factors and CHD risk estimates were highest in those who self-reported as Black. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of increased genetic risk for CHD was high and at least one of the three genetic risk factors for CHD was present in 14.2% of the cohort. Analyses are underway to assess outcomes after PRSCHD implementation in the context of FamHxCHD, FH, and clinical risk, across the age spectrum in a diverse cohort.

PRS↗
PubMed2026

Harnessing Polygenic Risk Scores to Refine Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity in patients of all ages. Despite growing interest in polygenic risk scores (PRS) for VTE, their utility remains understudied. Our objective was to evaluate the independent impact of a PRS on VTE susceptibility in adults and children. METHODS: We completed a retrospective, case-control study of two separate cohorts with evaluation of three VTE PRS models, with the primary analysis focused on a 293 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) PRS. The adult cohort included 597 VTE cases and 31&#x2009;998 controls, and the pediatric cohort included 109 cases and 448 controls, both obtained from a de-identified databank with linked genetic data. Separate adult and pediatric multivariable logistic regressions were performed to measure the association of risk factors with VTE. RESULTS: Higher PRS in adults was significantly associated with increased odds of VTE, with each 1-standard deviation increase in PRS conferring an adjusted odds ratio of 1.25 (OR&#x2009;=&#x2009;1.25, 95% CI 1.15-1.36, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). Leading risk factors for adults were cancer (OR&#x2009;=&#x2009;2.43, 95% CI: 2.04-2.89, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) and recent surgery (OR&#x2009;=&#x2009;2.16, 95% CI: 1.83-2.54, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). The standardized PRS also exhibited increased risk for VTE in children (OR&#x2009;=&#x2009;1.38, 95% CI 1.10-1.74, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.003). Central venous catheterization (OR&#x2009;=&#x2009;5.65, 95% CI 3.40-9.50, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) was the foremost risk factor for pediatric VTE. CONCLUSION: VTE in adults and children is multifactorial, with clinical and genome-wide risk factors contributing. PRS may serve as a valuable adjunct to clinical risk factors for VTE risk stratification.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Psychological and emotional impacts of communicating breast cancer risk using multifactorial assessment with polygenic risk score: Findings from PERSPECTIVE I&I.

PURPOSE: To examine the psychological and emotional outcomes of personalized breast cancer risk communication up to 1 year after disclosure in a risk-stratified breast screening preimplementation study (Personalized Risk Assessment for Prevention and Early Detection of Breast Cancer: Integration and Implementation). METHODS: Among 3753 females aged 40 to 69, unaffected by breast cancer, with a prior mammogram, and who underwent multifactorial risk assessment to estimate their 10-year breast cancer risk, 2734 completed follow-up questionnaires up to 1 year after risk communication: 78.5% were at average risk, 16.5% at higher than average risk, and 5.0% at high risk. The impact of risk communication on breast cancer worry and psychological distress and factors associated with decisional regret were examined. RESULTS: Breast cancer worry and psychological distress scores remained low after risk communication and at 1 year follow-up. Up to 1 year after disclosure, small significant differences in breast cancer worry were observed between risk levels. Decisional regret was very low 1 year after risk communication. Lower levels of decisional regret were significantly associated with some factors, including higher satisfaction with the information received. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that personalized breast cancer risk communication has low negative psychological and emotional effects and highlights the importance of the information received for implementing this approach at population level.

Humans↗
PubMed2024

The expected polygenic risk score (ePRS) framework: an equitable metric for quantifying polygenetic risk via modeling of ancestral makeup.

Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) depend on genetic ancestry due to differences in allele frequencies between ancestral populations. This leads to implementation challenges in diverse populations. We propose a framework to calibrate PRS based on ancestral makeup. We define a metric called "expected PRS" (ePRS), the expected value of a PRS based on one's global or local admixture patterns. We further define the "residual PRS" (rPRS), measuring the deviation of the PRS from the ePRS. Simulation studies confirm that it suffices to adjust for ePRS to obtain nearly unbiased estimates of the PRS-outcome association without further adjusting for PCs. Using the TOPMed dataset, the estimated effect size of the rPRS adjusting for the ePRS is similar to the estimated effect of the PRS adjusting for genetic PCs. Similarly, we applied the ePRS framework to six cardiovascular-related traits in the All of Us dataset, and the results are consistent with those from the TOPMed analysis. The ePRS framework can protect from population stratification in association analysis and provide an equitable strategy to quantify genetic risk across diverse populations.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2026

Role of Polygenic Risk Scores in Predicting Cognitive Functioning after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study.

Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 13-15 (historically called mild TBI [mTBI]) commonly experience changes in cognitive functioning, including processing speed, memory, and executive functioning. In a prospective sample (N = 523) of individuals of European descent who had been treated in a U.S. level 1 trauma center for mTBI, we examined the prognostic value of four polygenic risk scores (PRS) for cognitive outcomes at 6-months postinjury. To estimate the impact of mTBI on cognition, primary cognitive outcomes were scaled as z-scores reflecting changes in performance relative to predicted preinjury performance. The PRS examined were previously developed and validated to predict cognition-related outcomes of educational attainment (Education-PRS), intelligence (Intelligence-PRS), and Alzheimer's disease (AD-mild traumatic brain injury (APOE)-PRS and AD + APOE-PRS). Both the Education-PRS and Intelligence-PRS displayed bivariate associations with all four cognitive outcomes (&#x3b2; = 0.19-0.32), whereas neither Alzheimer's disease PRS was significantly associated with any outcome. After controlling for other factors known to predict cognitive outcomes of TBI (e.g., sex, education, mTBI severity defined by a combination of Glasgow Coma Scale scores and the presence/absence of acute intracranial findings on clinical neuroimaging), the Education-PRS and Intelligence-PRS remained independently predictive of verbal episodic memory (&#x3b2; = 0.10-0.16), whereas their associations with processing speed and executive functioning were mostly nonsignificant and were mediated through educational attainment. Looking across primary z-score and secondary raw score outcomes, cognitive outcomes 6 months post-mTBI were good on average, and PRS made small independent contributions to outcome prediction. The mediation model findings may support theories of cognitive reserve, which propose that individuals with stronger preinjury cognitive processing abilities (often estimated by educational history) can better compensate for TBI. Moreover, findings indicate that PRS may contribute modestly to multivariable models predicting cognitive function after TBI.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Associations Between Polygenic Risk Score for Blood Pressure and Risk of Hypertension in Northeast Asian Individuals.

BACKGROUND: Data on associations between genetic predisposition to high blood pressure (BP) and hypertension and its complications in non-European populations are limited. The current study investigated associations between polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for BP and risks of hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease in Northeast Asian populations. METHODS: A genome-wide association study of systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) was conducted using data from the KoGES (Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study). Results were meta-analyzed using summary statistics from Biobank Japan to construct PRSs. RESULTS: Compared with a PRS in the lowest 5 percentiles, a PRS in the highest 5 percentiles was associated with an increased risk of hypertension (hazard ratio [HR], 2.44 [95% CI, 1.67-3.56] for PRS for SBP; and HR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.20-2.62] for PRS for DBP) and earlier onset of hypertension (by a median of 8.5&#x2009;years for PRS for SBP and 8.0&#x2009;years for PRS for DBP). These associations remained significant when continuous PRS was analyzed. The genetic risk of hypertension incidence was attenuated by moderate to vigorous physical activity. Adding the PRS for BP to the clinical risk factors improved the predictive value for hypertension (both area under the curve values, 0.787&#xa0;[95% CI, 0.771-0.803]; P=0.063 for PRS for SBP and [95% CI, 0.771-0.804]; P=0.031 for PRS for DBP). However, neither PRS for SBP nor PRS for DBP was associated with the incidence of cardiovascular or chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS: The PRS for BP was associated with a higher risk of incident hypertension and earlier-onset hypertension in a Northeast Asian population. PRS may facilitate early identification and targeted management of individuals at high risk of developing hypertension.

Adult↗
PubMed2026

Polygenic risk score for neurodevelopmental disorders and cognitive impairment at long-term follow-up of first-episode psychosis.

BACKGROUND: One of the most outstanding contributions to the understanding of the etiopathogenesis of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) was the neurodevelopmental hypothesis. SSD and neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) share pathogenetic mechanisms and overlapping clinical and cognitive impairment features. METHODS: We investigated whether polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for NDD are associated with cognitive performance in patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP). The sample comprised 127 patients with FEP who were followed up for a mean of 20.9&#xa0;years. Cognitive examination was performed using the MoCA test at follow-up. Pearson coefficient correlations and multiple regression analyses were performed to examine the contribution of the three PRSs for rare neurodevelopmental conditions (PRSNDD), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (PRSADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (PRSASD) to cognitive impairment after allowing for the effect of covariates. Furthermore, we examined the interconnections between the PRS for NDD and cognitive impairment using network analysis (NA), including core premorbid variables. RESULTS: PRSNDD showed significant associations with impairment on visuospatial/executive, attention, and language MoCA subtests, after allowing for the influence of covariates. PRSNDD and PRSADHD, but not PRSASD, were significantly associated with worse performance on the total MoCA score. Moreover, in the network analysis, the relationships between PRSs for NDD and cognitive impairment were highly interconnected with premorbid variables and PRSs for schizophrenia and educational attainment. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide evidence for a possible direct genetic effect on cognitive performance for the PRS of common genetic variations related to neurodevelopment and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in patients with FEP.

Cognitive impairment↗
PubMed2026

Cross-Ancestry and Phenome-Wide Associations of Cancer-Specific Polygenic Risk Scores.

PURPOSE: Genome-wide association studies have identified many common variants associated at low effect sizes with various cancers. Summing the effects of these variants into polygenic risk scores (PRS) can improve cancer risk prediction. However, cross-cancer and cross-phenotype pleiotropic associations of cancer-specific PRS are limited. METHODS: Using logistic regression models, we tested the association of 13 cancer-specific PRS with curated phenotypes representing the same 13 cancers and 340 cancer and cardiometabolic phecodes in 560,287 individuals (114,255 African ancestry [AFR] and 446,032 European ancestry [EUR]) from the Million Veteran Program. Models were stratified by ancestry and used age, principal components, and cancer-specific PRS per standard deviation as independent variables, and correction was applied for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: All 13 cancer-specific PRS were significantly associated with their respective cancers among EUR individuals with odds ratios per standard deviation of PRS (odds ratio [OR]) 1.05-1.70. Among AFR individuals, the effect sizes of the cancer PRS were lower, with OR 1.01-1.48, and cancer-specific PRS were significantly associated with their respective cancers for five of 13 cancers (bladder, breast in female patients, colorectal, prostate, and thyroid). In cancer-cancer pleiotropy studies, only the renal cancer-specific PRS was significantly associated with skin cancer (OR = 1.04, P = 4.5 &#xd7; 10-06) among EUR individuals. PheWAS demonstrated five positive pleotropic associations with cardiometabolic conditions (thyroid cancer PRS with thyroid goiter, oral cancer PRS with diabetes phenotypes, and hypothyroidism) and two negative associations (oral and lung cancer PRS separately with coronary artery disease). CONCLUSION: Cancer PRS have stronger associations per cancer among EUR versus AFR individuals. In contrast to PRS of other chronic diseases, the majority of cancer-related PRS are highly specific and pleiotropic associations with other cancers and cardiometabolic traits are uncommon.

Female↗
PubMed2025

A multi-ancestry polygenic risk score for Alzheimer disease is associated with cognitive decline, hippocampal atrophy and neuropathological hallmarks in diverse populations.

Alzheimer disease (AD) has a strong genetic basis, yet previously derived polygenic risk scores (PRS) are heavily weighted by the APOE locus and perform inconsistently across diverse ancestries. We developed an APOE-independent multi-ancestry AD PRS using genome-wide association study summary statistics from cohorts in the United States, Europe and East Asia that were applied to European ancestry (EA), African American (AA), Caribbean Hispanic (CH), and East Asian cohorts from the Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium. PRS performance was evaluated in the multi-ancestry Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP) dataset and validated in several additional multi-ancestry cohorts. The PRS was significantly associated with AD in the ADSP EA, AA, CH, and Native American Hispanic groups with adjusted odds ratios (ORs) between 1.14 and 1.52 per standard deviation of the PRS. PRS performance was validated in the replication cohorts (ORs 1.21-1.65). The PRS was also associated with poorer memory, executive function, and language performance; greater AD-related neuropathological burden (including CERAD, Braak stage, and Thal phase scores); reduced hippocampal volume; lower CSF A&#x3b2;42; and elevated total tau and phosphorylated tau (p-tau), with stronger p-tau associations observed in women. Longitudinal analyses revealed that individuals in the highest PRS decile exhibited the steepest cognitive decline, particularly among those who progressed to AD. Our findings demonstrate the utility of an ancestry-aware and APOE-independent PRS for advancing understanding of the genetic basis of AD across diverse populations. Associations observed with early biological and cognitive changes and potential sex-specific differences support the incorporation of a PRS in clinical trials and personalized intervention and prevention strategies.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2025

Integrating Imaging-Derived Clinical Endotypes with Plasma Proteomics and External Polygenic Risk Scores Enhances Coronary Microvascular Disease Risk Prediction.

Coronary microvascular disease (CMVD) is an underdiagnosed but significant contributor to the burden of ischemic heart disease, characterized by angina and myocardial infarction. The development of risk prediction models such as polygenic risk scores (PRS) for CMVD has been limited by a lack of large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS). However, there is significant overlap between CMVD and enrollment criteria for coronary artery disease (CAD) GWAS. In this study, we developed CMVD PRS models by selecting variants identified in a CMVD GWAS and applying weights from an external CAD GWAS, using CMVD-associated loci as proxies for the genetic risk. We integrated plasma proteomics, clinical measures from perfusion PET imaging, and PRS to evaluate their contributions to CMVD risk prediction in comprehensive machine and deep learning models. We then developed a novel unsupervised endotyping framework for CMVD from perfusion PET-derived myocardial blood flow data, revealing distinct patient subgroups beyond traditional case-control definitions. This imaging-based stratification substantially improved classification performance alongside plasma proteomics and PRS, achieving AUROCs between 0.65 and 0.73 per class, significantly outperforming binary classifiers and existing clinical models, highlighting the potential of this stratification approach to enable more precise and personalized diagnosis by capturing the underlying heterogeneity of CMVD. This work represents the first application of imaging-based endotyping and the integration of genetic and proteomic data for CMVD risk prediction, establishing a framework for multimodal modeling in complex diseases.

Cardiovascular Disease↗
PubMed2025

Polygenic Risk Scores and HLA Class II Variants are Biomarkers of Corticosteroid Response in Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Nephrotic syndrome (NS), a common glomerular disease in children, is classified based on response to corticosteroid therapy as either steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS), or steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). However, there are currently no reliable predictors of therapy response at initial clinical presentation. METHODS: We conducted genome-wide association studies, developed polygenic risk scores (PRS) for therapy response and analyzed classical HLA alleles in 1,997 (994 discovery and 1,003 replication/validation cohorts) previously unstudied children with NS and 3,558 ancestry-matched controls. RESULTS: A significant association with HLA loci defined by variants in HLA-DQB1, HLA-DRB1, and HLA-DQA1 were found for SSNS (but not SRNS), along with a second immune-related SSNS locus: CLEC16A. A PRS that discriminates between SSNS and SRNS was validated in two independent cohorts. The HLA haplotype HLA- DRB1*07:01~DQA1*02:01~DQB1*02:02 was associated with ~4 times the risk of developing SSNS. A model incorporating HLA haplotype, PRS score, and age at onset of the disease was the best predictor of steroid responsiveness with an AUC of 0.68-0.70 and an overall classification accuracy of SSNS versus SRNS of 67-71%. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm that SSNS (unlike SRNS) is an immune-mediated HLA-associated disorder. The PRS for therapy response and HLA haplotype can serve as biomarkers and provide a foundation for more accurate diagnoses and tailored and individualized treatment.

HLA haplotype↗
PubMed2025

Polygenic risk scores for rheumatoid arthritis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and associations with RA, interstitial lung abnormalities, and quantitative interstitial abnormalities among smokers.

OBJECTIVE: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) facilitate construction of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We investigated associations of RA and IPF PRSs with RA and high-resolution chest computed tomography (HRCT) parenchymal lung abnormalities. METHODS: Participants in COPDGene, a prospective multicenter cohort of current/former smokers, had chest HRCT at study enrollment. Using genome-wide genotyping, RA and IPF PRSs were constructed using GWAS summary statistics. HRCT imaging underwent visual inspection for interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) and quantitative CT (QCT) analysis using a machine-learning algorithm that quantified percentage of normal lung, interstitial abnormalities, and emphysema. RA was identified through self-report and DMARD use. We investigated associations of RA and IPF PRSs with RA, ILA, and QCT features using multivariable logistic and linear regression. RESULTS: We analyzed 9,230 COPDGene participants (mean age 59.6 years, 46.4 % female, 67.2 % non-Hispanic White, 32.8 % Black/African American). In non-Hispanic White participants, RA PRS was associated with RA diagnosis (OR 1.32 per unit, 95 %CI 1.18-1.49) but not ILA or QCT features. Among non-Hispanic White participants, IPF PRS was associated with ILA (OR 1.88 per unit, 95 %CI 1.52-2.32) and quantitative interstitial abnormalities (adjusted &#x3b2;=+0.50 % per unit, p = 7.3 &#xd7; 10-8) but not RA. There were no statistically significant associations among Black/African American participants. CONCLUSIONS: RA and IPF PRSs were associated with their intended phenotypes among non-Hispanic White participants but performed poorly among Black/African American participants. PRS may have future application to risk stratify for RA diagnosis among patients with ILD or for ILD among patients with RA.

Humans↗