Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 42093615

Harnessing Polygenic Risk Scores to Refine Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification.

Katlyn G McKay·Oliver S Zhao·Samaya S Badrieh·Lisa Bastarache·Xinnan Niu·Jing He·Prince J Kannankeril·Jamie R Robinson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity in patients of all ages. Despite growing interest in polygenic risk scores (PRS) for VTE, their utility remains understudied. Our objective was to evaluate the independent impact of a PRS on VTE susceptibility in adults and children. METHODS: We completed a retrospective, case-control study of two separate cohorts with evaluation of three VTE PRS models, with the primary analysis focused on a 293 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) PRS. The adult cohort included 597 VTE cases and 31&#x2009;998 controls, and the pediatric cohort included 109 cases and 448 controls, both obtained from a de-identified databank with linked genetic data. Separate adult and pediatric multivariable logistic regressions were performed to measure the association of risk factors with VTE. RESULTS: Higher PRS in adults was significantly associated with increased odds of VTE, with each 1-standard deviation increase in PRS conferring an adjusted odds ratio of 1.25 (OR&#x2009;=&#x2009;1.25, 95% CI 1.15-1.36, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). Leading risk factors for adults were cancer (OR&#x2009;=&#x2009;2.43, 95% CI: 2.04-2.89, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) and recent surgery (OR&#x2009;=&#x2009;2.16, 95% CI: 1.83-2.54, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). The standardized PRS also exhibited increased risk for VTE in children (OR&#x2009;=&#x2009;1.38, 95% CI 1.10-1.74, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.003). Central venous catheterization (OR&#x2009;=&#x2009;5.65, 95% CI 3.40-9.50, p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) was the foremost risk factor for pediatric VTE. CONCLUSION: VTE in adults and children is multifactorial, with clinical and genome-wide risk factors contributing. PRS may serve as a valuable adjunct to clinical risk factors for VTE risk stratification.

Explore related subjects

HumansVenous ThromboembolismGenetic Risk ScoreFemalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdultGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseMiddle AgedRisk FactorsCase-Control StudiesChildMaleMultifactorial InheritanceRisk AssessmentAgedAdolescentRetrospective StudiesChild, PreschoolOdds Ratiogenetic variantspolygenic risk scorevenous thromboembolismJournal Article

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Katlyn G McKay, Oliver S Zhao, Samaya S Badrieh, Lisa Bastarache, Xinnan Niu, Jing He, Prince J Kannankeril, Jamie R Robinson. 2026-05-07. Harnessing Polygenic Risk Scores to Refine Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification.. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.70212

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Journal Article resourceAdolescent subjectAdult subjectAged subjectCase-Control Studies subjectChild subjectChild, Preschool subjectFemale subjectGenetic Predisposition to Disease subjectGenetic Risk Score subjectGenetic variants subjectHumans subjectJournal Article subjectMale subjectMiddle Aged subjectMultifactorial Inheritance subject

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Risk factors of venous thromboembolism in ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with the development of VTE in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to 25 April 2025, to identify studies examining the association between risk factors and the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ICU patients. Data were pooled using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 2465 relevant studies were identified through the systematic search, of which 30 were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled data showed that the following were significant risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ICU patients: central venous catheterization (OR = 2.67, 95% CI: 1.67-4.28; I2 = 28%), invasive mechanical ventilation (OR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.46-2.96; I2 = 0%), advanced age (OR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.28-3.31; I2 = 86%), length of ICU stay (OR = 4.24, 95% CI: 1.43-12.57; I2 = 98%), malignancy (OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.03-5.12; I2 = 67%), elevated D-dimer levels (OR = 2.46, 95% CI: 1.37-4.40; I2 = 34%), and a history of VTE (OR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.45-5.55; I2 = 51%). According to the GRADE assessment, the quality of evidence was rated as moderate for invasive mechanical ventilation, low for central venous catheterization and D-dimer levels, and very low for the remaining factors. CONCLUSION: Invasive mechanical ventilation, central venous catheterization, and elevated D-dimer levels are associated with VTE risk, supported by relatively high-quality evidence. These findings may help identify ICU patients at higher risk of VTE, inform the development of risk assessment models for patient stratification, and ultimately contribute to improved prognosis through optimal screening and management strategies.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-associated thrombosis is a condition associated with high mortality rates, yet limited evidence exists regarding the safety and effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), focusing on a fixed follow-up period based on clinical practice guideline recommendations. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of DOACs versus LMWH in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis over a 6-month follow-up period. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched up to 30 June, 2025. Recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials and 28 cohort studies were included in our systematic review. After applying the criteria for a 6-month follow-up period, five randomized controlled trials and 16 cohort studies with 49,824 patients were analyzed in the meta-analysis. In randomized controlled trials, DOACs showed a lower incidence of venous thromboembolism recurrence (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.87) compared with LMWH, with a non-significant increase in major bleeding (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.87-1.88) and no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86-1.18). Cohort studies demonstrated a lower incidence of venous thromboembolism recurrence (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.62-0.76) with DOACs, a non-significant reduction in major bleeding (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68-1.07), and a lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.72). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cancer-associated thrombosis, DOACs demonstrated a decrease in recurrent venous thromboembolism without increasing the risk of all-cause mortality. A non-significant increase in the risk of major bleeding was recorded in randomized controlled trials, but not in cohort studies. DOACs may provide greater effectiveness for cancer-associated thrombosis compared with LMWH.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Plasma proteomics reveal SERPINA1 and CD59 as candidate biomarkers for COVID-19 severity stratification and prognosis prediction.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has been closely associated with coagulation abnormalities. However, existing biomarkers, including D-dimer and fibrin degradation products (FDP), exhibit limited accuracy in stratifying disease severity and predicting long-term clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to use proteomic analysis to identify plasma biomarkers associated with COVID-19 severity and prognosis, and validate their predictive utility for mortality and thromboembolic complications. METHODS: Plasma proteomic profiles were analyzed across three COVID-19 severity classes. Differential expression analysis and functional analysis were performed. Clustering analysis was used to identify proteins correlated with disease severity. Candidate biomarkers were validated in an independent cohort. Predictive performance of the biomarkers for mortality, sepsis and venous thromboembolism was evaluated using bootstrap-corrected ROC analyses and multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS: Proteomic analysis revealed progressive involvement of the coagulation and complement pathway with increasing disease severity. SERPINA1 and CD59 were identified as candidate biomarkers and exhibited significantly higher plasma levels in severe cases. Bootstrap-corrected ROC analyses demonstrated strong predictive performance: SERPINA1 achieved AUCs of 0.775 and 0.924 for 30-day and 12-month mortality, and CD59 achieved AUCs of 0.720 for sepsis; the combined model further improved prediction of 12-month mortality (AUC 0.946) and sepsis (AUC 0.904), outperforming D-dimer and FDP. Multivariable regression confirmed their independent prognostic value. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study identifies SERPINA1 and CD59 as candidate prognostic biomarkers in COVID-19, highlighting the role of coagulation and complement-related pathways in disease severity and warranting further prospective validation.

Humans↗