Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Multiple sequence alignment”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

The influence of gapped positions in multiple sequence alignments on secondary structure prediction methods.

All currently leading protein secondary structure prediction methods use a multiple protein sequence alignment to predict the secondary structure of the top sequence. In most of these methods, prior to prediction, alignment positions showing a gap in the top sequence are deleted, consequently leading to shrinking of the alignment and loss of position-specific information. In this paper we investigate the effect of this removal of information on secondary structure prediction accuracy. To this end, we have designed SymSSP, an algorithm that post-processes the predicted secondary structure of all sequences in a multiple sequence alignment by (i) making use of the alignment's evolutionary information and (ii) re-introducing most of the information that would otherwise be lost. The post-processed information is then given to a new dynamic programming routine that produces an optimally segmented consensus secondary structure for each of the multiple alignment sequences. We have tested our method on the state-of-the-art secondary structure prediction methods PHD, PROFsec, SSPro2 and JNET using the HOMSTRAD database of reference alignments. Our consensus-deriving dynamic programming strategy is consistently better at improving the segmentation quality of the predictions compared to the commonly used majority voting technique. In addition, we have applied several weighting schemes from the literature to our novel consensus-deriving dynamic programming routine. Finally, we have investigated the level of noise introduced by prediction errors into the consensus and show that predictions of edges of helices and strands are half the time wrong for all the four tested prediction methods.

Algorithms↗

Multiple sequence alignment using simulated annealing.

Multiple sequence alignment is a useful technique for studying molecular evolution and analyzing structure-sequence relationships. Dynamic programming of multiple sequence alignment has been widely used to find an optimal alignment. However, dynamic programming does not allow for certain types of gap costs, and it limits the number of sequences that can be aligned due to its high computational complexity. The focus of this paper is to use simulated annealing as the basis for developing an efficient multiple sequence alignment algorithm. An algorithm called Multiple Sequence Alignment using Simulated Annealing (MSASA) has been developed. The computational complexity of MSASA is significantly reduced by replacing the high-temperature phase of the annealing process by a fast heuristic algorithm. This heuristic algorithm facilitates in minimizing the solution set of the low-temperature phase of the annealing process. Compared to the dynamic programming approach, MSASA can (i) use natural gap costs which can generate better solution, (ii) align more sequences and (iii) take less computation time.

Algorithms↗

Detection of unrelated proteins in sequences multiple alignments by using predicted secondary structures.

MOTIVATION: Multiple sequence alignments are essential tools for establishing the homology relations between proteins. Essential amino acids for the function and/or the structure are generally conserved, thus providing key arguments to help in protein characterization. However for distant proteins, it is more difficult to establish, in a reliable way, the homology relations that may exist between them. In this article, we show that secondary structure prediction is a valuable way to validate protein families at low identity rate. RESULTS: We show that the analysis of the secondary structures compatibility is a reliable way to discard non-related proteins in low identity multiple alignment. AVAILABILITY: This validation is possible through our NPS@ server (http://npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr)

Algorithms↗

MALIGNED: a multiple sequence alignment editor.

A multiple sequence alignment editor is described which runs on a VAX/VMS system and can exchange data with a number of other programs, including those of the Genetics Computer Group (GCG). Up to 199 sequences can be aligned. The quality of the alignment can be easily judged during its development because the display attributes to each character are determined by the way it matches the other sequences. Four methods are available for calculating the highlighting to emphasize different aspects of the relationships of the sequences and up to four styles of highlighting can be used at the same time. Laser printer output is suitable for publication without modification.

Molecular Sequence Data↗

RASCAL: rapid scanning and correction of multiple sequence alignments.

MOTIVATION: Most multiple sequence alignment programs use heuristics that sometimes introduce errors into the alignment. The most commonly used methods to correct these errors use iterative techniques to maximize an objective function. We present here an alternative, knowledge-based approach that combines a number of recently developed methods into a two-step refinement process. The alignment is divided horizontally and vertically to form a 'lattice' in which well aligned regions can be differentiated. Alignment correction is then restricted to the less reliable regions, leading to a more reliable and efficient refinement strategy. RESULTS: The accuracy and reliability of RASCAL is demonstrated using: (i) alignments from the BAliBASE benchmark database, where significant improvements were often observed, with no deterioration of the existing high-quality regions, (ii) a large scale study involving 946 alignments from the ProDom protein domain database, where alignment quality was increased in 68% of the cases; and (iii) an automatic pipeline to obtain a high-quality alignment of 695 full-length nuclear receptor proteins, which took 11 min on a DEC Alpha 6100 computer AVAILABILITY: RASCAL is available at ftp://ftp-igbmc.u-strasbg.fr/pub/RASCAL. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: http://bioinfo-igbmc.u-strasbourg.fr/BioInfo/RASCAL/paper/rascal_supp.html

Algorithms↗

State of the art: refinement of multiple sequence alignments.

BACKGROUND: Accurate multiple sequence alignments of proteins are very important in computational biology today. Despite the numerous efforts made in this field, all alignment strategies have certain shortcomings resulting in alignments that are not always correct. Refinement of existing alignment can prove to be an intelligent choice considering the increasing importance of high quality alignments in large scale high-throughput analysis. RESULTS: We provide an extensive comparison of the performance of the alignment refinement algorithms. The accuracy and efficiency of the refinement programs are compared using the 3D structure-based alignments in the BAliBASE benchmark database as well as manually curated high quality alignments from Conserved Domain Database (CDD). CONCLUSION: Comparison of performance for refined alignments revealed that despite the absence of dramatic improvements, our refinement method, REFINER, which uses conserved regions as constraints performs better in improving the alignments generated by different alignment algorithms. In most cases REFINER produces a higher-scoring, modestly improved alignment that does not deteriorate the well-conserved regions of the original alignment.

Algorithms↗

Sequence alignment of citrate synthase proteins using a multiple sequence alignment algorithm and multiple scoring matrices.

The alignment of Escherichia coli citrate synthase to pig heart citrate synthase and the multiple alignment of the known sequences of the citrate synthase family of enzymes have been performed using six different amino acid similarity scoring matrices and a large range of gap penalty ratios for insertions and deletions of amino acids. The alignment studies have been performed as the first step in a project aimed at homology modelling E. coli citrate synthase (a hexamer) from pig heart citrate synthase (a dimer) in a molecular modelling approach to the study of multi-subunit enzymes. The effects of several important variables in producing realistic alignments have been investigated. The difference between multiple alignment of the family of enzymes versus simple pairwise alignment of the pig heart and E. coli proteins was explored. The effects of initial separate multiple alignments of the most highly related or most homologous species of the family of enzymes upon a subsequent pairwise alignment between species was evaluated. The value of 'fingerprinting' certain residues to bias the alignment in favour of matching those residues, as well as the worth of the computerized approach compared to an intuitive alignment technique, were assessed.

Algorithms↗

MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment.

The accuracy of multiple sequence alignment program MAFFT has been improved. The new version (5.3) of MAFFT offers new iterative refinement options, H-INS-i, F-INS-i and G-INS-i, in which pairwise alignment information are incorporated into objective function. These new options of MAFFT showed higher accuracy than currently available methods including TCoffee version 2 and CLUSTAL W in benchmark tests consisting of alignments of >50 sequences. Like the previously available options, the new options of MAFFT can handle hundreds of sequences on a standard desktop computer. We also examined the effect of the number of homologues included in an alignment. For a multiple alignment consisting of approximately 8 sequences with low similarity, the accuracy was improved (2-10 percentage points) when the sequences were aligned together with dozens of their close homologues (E-value < 10(-5)-10(-20)) collected from a database. Such improvement was generally observed for most methods, but remarkably large for the new options of MAFFT proposed here. Thus, we made a Ruby script, mafftE.rb, which aligns the input sequences together with their close homologues collected from SwissProt using NCBI-BLAST.

Reproducibility of Results↗

Combining partial order alignment and progressive multiple sequence alignment increases alignment speed and scalability to very large alignment problems.

MOTIVATION: Partial order alignment (POA) has been proposed as a new approach to multiple sequence alignment (MSA), which can be combined with existing methods such as progressive alignment. This is important for addressing problems both in the original version of POA (such as order sensitivity) and in standard progressive alignment programs (such as information loss in complex alignments, especially surrounding gap regions). RESULTS: We have developed a new Partial Order-Partial Order alignment algorithm that optimally aligns a pair of MSAs and which therefore can be applied directly to progressive alignment methods such as CLUSTAL. Using this algorithm, we show the combined Progressive POA alignment method yields results comparable with the best available MSA programs (CLUSTALW, DIALIGN2, T-COFFEE) but is far faster. For example, depending on the level of sequence similarity, aligning 1000 sequences, each 500 amino acids long, took 15 min (at 90% average identity) to 44 min (at 30% identity) on a standard PC. For large alignments, Progressive POA was 10-30 times faster than the fastest of the three previous methods (CLUSTALW). These data suggest that POA-based methods can scale to much larger alignment problems than possible for previous methods. AVAILABILITY: The POA source code is available at http://www.bioinformatics.ucla.edu/poa

Algorithms↗

Fuzzy Hidden Markov Models: a new approach in multiple sequence alignment.

This paper proposes a novel method for aligning multiple genomic or proteomic sequences using a fuzzyfied Hidden Markov Model (HMM). HMMs are known to provide compelling performance among multiple sequence alignment (MSA) algorithms, yet their stochastic nature does not help them cope with the existing dependence among the sequence elements. Fuzzy HMMs are a novel type of HMMs based on fuzzy sets and fuzzy integrals which generalizes the classical stochastic HMM, by relaxing its independence assumptions. In this paper, the fuzzy HMM model for MSA is mathematically defined. New fuzzy algorithms are described for building and training fuzzy HMMs, as well as for their use in aligning multiple sequences. Fuzzy HMMs can also increase the model capability of aligning multiple sequences mainly in terms of computation time. Modeling the multiple sequence alignment procedure with fuzzy HMMs can yield a robust and time-effective solution that can be widely used in bioinformatics in various applications, such as protein classification, phylogenetic analysis and gene prediction, among others.

Base Sequence↗

Multiple sequence alignment by a pairwise algorithm.

An algorithm is described that processes the results of a conventional pairwise sequence alignment program to automatically produce an unambiguous multiple alignment of many sequences. Unlike other, more complex, multiple alignment programs, the method described here is fast enough to be used on almost any multiple sequence alignment problem.

Algorithms↗

COFFEE: an objective function for multiple sequence alignments.

MOTIVATION: In order to increase the accuracy of multiple sequence alignments, we designed a new strategy for optimizing multiple sequence alignments by genetic algorithm. We named it COFFEE (Consistency based Objective Function For alignmEnt Evaluation). The COFFEE score reflects the level of consistency between a multiple sequence alignment and a library containing pairwise alignments of the same sequences. RESULTS: We show that multiple sequence alignments can be optimized for their COFFEE score with the genetic algorithm package SAGA. The COFFEE function is tested on 11 test cases made of structural alignments extracted from 3D_ali. These alignments are compared to those produced using five alternative methods. Results indicate that COFFEE outperforms the other methods when the level of identity between the sequences is low. Accuracy is evaluated by comparison with the structural alignments used as references. We also show that the COFFEE score can be used as a reliability index on multiple sequence alignments. Finally, we show that given a library of structure-based pairwise sequence alignments extracted from FSSP, SAGA can produce high-quality multiple sequence alignments. The main advantage of COFFEE is its flexibility. With COFFEE, any method suitable for making pairwise alignments can be extended to making multiple alignments. AVAILABILITY: The package is available along with the test cases through the WWW: http://www. ebi.ac.uk/cedric CONTACT: cedric.notredame@ebi.ac.uk

Algorithms↗

A method for multiple sequence alignment with gaps.

A method that performs multiple sequence alignment by cyclical use of the standard pairwise Needleman-Wunsch algorithm is presented. The required central processor unit time is of the same order of magnitude as the standard Needleman-Wunsch pairwise implementation. Comparison with the one known case where the optimal multiple sequence alignment has been rigorously determined shows that in practice the proposed method finds the mathematically optimal solution. The more interesting question of the biological usefulness of such multiple sequence alignment over pairwise approaches is assessed using protein families whose X-ray structures are known. The two such cases studied, the subdomains of the ricin B-chain and the S-domains of virus coat proteins, have low pairwise similarity and thus fail to align correctly under standard pairwise sequence comparison. In both cases the multiple sequence alignment produced by the proposed technique, apart from minor deviations at loop regions, correctly predicts the true structural alignment. Thus, given many sequences of low pairwise similarity, the proposed multiple sequence method, can extract any familial similarity and so produce a sequence alignment consistent with the underlying structural homology.

Algorithms↗

Analysis of human interferon-alpha gene promoters by multiple sequence alignment.

A map of conserved motifs within 11 human interferon-alpha gene promoters was developed using multiple sequence alignment. Multiple sequence alignment revealed the highly conserved structure of the virus-response element and a second region immediately upstream of the tata box. Homolog analysis indicated six families of potential promoter elements: (1) tata boxes, (2) GTATGT motifs, (3) virus-response elements, (4) distal putative interferon regulatory factor binding sites, (5) proximal putative interferon regulatory factor binding sites, and (6) TG sequences. On the basis of conserved promoter elements, a theoretical model of human interferon-alpha gene promoter organization was advanced. Transcriptional regulation of human interferon-alpha gene expression is controlled by a tata box and four regulatory domains. Experimental verification is necessary to confirm the predicted transcriptional control sequences. Proposed experimentation will generate insight into the differential transcriptional regulation of human interferon-alpha gene expression.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

EMBL-Align: a new public nucleotide and amino acid multiple sequence alignment database.

UNLABELLED: The submission of multiple sequence alignment data to EMBL has grown 30-fold in the past 10 years, creating a problem of archiving them. The EBI has developed a new public database of multiple sequence alignments called EMBL-Align. It has a dedicated web-based submission tool, Webin-Align. Together they represent a comprehensive data management solution for alignment data. Webin-Align accepts all the common alignment formats and can display data in CLUSTALW format as well as a new standard EMBL-Align flat file format. The alignments are stored in the EMBL-Align database and can be queried from the EBI SRS (Sequence Retrieval System) server. AVAILABILITY: Webin-Align: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/embl/Submission/align_top.html, EMBL-Align: ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/embl/align, http://srs.ebi.ac.uk/

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Kalign--an accurate and fast multiple sequence alignment algorithm.

BACKGROUND: The alignment of multiple protein sequences is a fundamental step in the analysis of biological data. It has traditionally been applied to analyzing protein families for conserved motifs, phylogeny, structural properties, and to improve sensitivity in homology searching. The availability of complete genome sequences has increased the demands on multiple sequence alignment (MSA) programs. Current MSA methods suffer from being either too inaccurate or too computationally expensive to be applied effectively in large-scale comparative genomics. RESULTS: We developed Kalign, a method employing the Wu-Manber string-matching algorithm, to improve both the accuracy and speed of multiple sequence alignment. We compared the speed and accuracy of Kalign to other popular methods using Balibase, Prefab, and a new large test set. Kalign was as accurate as the best other methods on small alignments, but significantly more accurate when aligning large and distantly related sets of sequences. In our comparisons, Kalign was about 10 times faster than ClustalW and, depending on the alignment size, up to 50 times faster than popular iterative methods. CONCLUSION: Kalign is a fast and robust alignment method. It is especially well suited for the increasingly important task of aligning large numbers of sequences.

Algorithms↗

Multiple sequence alignment in phylogenetic analysis.

Multiple sequence alignment is discussed in light of homology assessments in phylogenetic research. Pairwise and multiple alignment methods are reviewed as exact and heuristic procedures. Since the object of alignment is to create the most efficient statement of initial homology, methods that minimize nonhomology are to be favored. Therefore, among all possible alignments, the one that satisfies the phylogenetic optimality criterion the best should be considered the best alignment. Since all homology statements are subject to testing and explanation this way, consistency of optimality criteria is desirable. This consistency is based on the treatment of alignment gaps as character information and the consistent use of a cost function (e.g., insertion-deletion, transversion, and transition) through analysis from alignment to phylogeny reconstruction. Cost functions are not subject to testing via inspection; hence the assumptions they make should be examined by varying the assumed values in a sensitivity analysis context to test for the robustness of results. Agreement among data may be used to choose an optimal solution set from all of those examined through parameter variation. This idea of consistency between assumption and analysis through alignment and cladogram reconstruction is not limited to parsimony analysis and could and should be applied to other forms of analysis such as maximum likelihood.

Algorithms↗

A polynomial time solvable formulation of multiple sequence alignment.

Since traditional multiple alignment formulations are NP-hard, heuristics are commonly employed to find acceptable alignments with no guaranteed performance bound. This causes a substantial difficulty in understanding what the resulting alignment means and in assessing the quality of these alignments. We propose an alternative formulation of multiple alignment based on the idea of finding a multiple alignment of k sequences which preserves k - 1 pairwise alignments as specified by edges of a given tree. Although it is well known that such a preserving alignment always exists, it did not become a mainstream method for multiple alignment since it seems that a lot of information is lost from ignoring pairwise similarities outside the tree. In contrast, by using pairwise alignments that incorporate consistency information from other sequences, we show that it is possible to obtain very good accuracy with the preserving alignment formulation. We show that a reasonable objective function to use is to find the shortest preserving alignment, and, by a reduction to a graph-theoretic problem, that the problem of finding the shortest preserving multiple alignment can be solved in polynomial time. We demonstrate the success of this approach on three sets of benchmark multiple alignments by using consistency-based pairwise alignments from the first stage of two of the best performing progressive alignment algorithms TCoffee and ProbCons and replace the second heuristic progressive step of these algorithms by the exact preserving alignment step. We apply this strategy to TCoffee and show that our approach outperforms TCoffee on two of the three test sets. We apply the strategy to a variant of ProbCons with no iterative refinements and show that our approach achieves similar or better accuracy except on one test set. We also compare our performance to ProbCons with iterative refinements and show that our approach achieves similar or better accuracy on many subcategories even without further refinements. The most important advantage of the preserving alignment formulation is that we are certain that we can solve the problem in polynomial time without using a heuristic. A software program implementing this approach (PSAlign) is available at http://faculty.cs.tamu.edu/shsze/psalign.

Algorithms↗