Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Multiple sequence alignment”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Towards a reliable objective function for multiple sequence alignments.

Multiple sequence alignment is a fundamental tool in a number of different domains in modern molecular biology, including functional and evolutionary studies of a protein family. Multiple alignments also play an essential role in the new integrated systems for genome annotation and analysis. Thus, the development of new multiple alignment scores and statistics is essential, in the spirit of the work dedicated to the evaluation of pairwise sequence alignments for database searching techniques. We present here norMD, a new objective scoring function for multiple sequence alignments. NorMD combines the advantages of the column-scoring techniques with the sensitivity of methods incorporating residue similarity scores. In addition, norMD incorporates ab initio sequence information, such as the number, length and similarity of the sequences to be aligned. The sensitivity and reliability of the norMD objective function is demonstrated using structural alignments in the SCOP and BAliBASE databases. The norMD scores are then applied to the multiple alignments of the complete sequences (MACS) detected by BlastP with E-value<10, for a set of 734 hypothetical proteins encoded by the Vibrio cholerae genome. Unrelated or badly aligned sequences were automatically removed from the MACS, leaving a high-quality multiple alignment which could be reliably exploited in a subsequent functional and/or structural annotation process. After removal of unreliable sequences, 176 (24 %) of the alignments contained at least one sequence with a functional annotation. 103 of these new matches were supported by significant hits to the Interpro domain and motif database.

Amino Acid Motifs↗
PubMed2005

Randomized and parallel algorithms for distance matrix calculations in multiple sequence alignment.

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is a vital problem in biology. Optimal alignment of multiple sequences becomes impractical even for a modest number of sequences since the general version of the problem is NP-hard. Because of the high time complexity of traditional MSA algorithms, even today's fast computers are not able to solve the problem for large number of sequences. In this paper we present a randomized algorithm to calculate distance matrices, which is a major step in many multiple sequence alignment algorithms. The basic idea employed is sampling (along the lines of). We also illustrate how to parallelize this algorithm. In Section we introduce the problem of multiple sequence alignments. In Section we provide a discussion on various methods that have been employed in the literature for Multiple Sequence Alignment. In this section we also introduce our new sampling approach. We extend our randomized algorithm to the case of non-uniform length sequences as well. We show that our algorithms are amenable to parallelism in Section. In Section we back up our claim of speedup and accuracy with empirical data and examples. In Section we provide some concluding remarks.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1989

A tool for multiple sequence alignment.

Multiple sequence alignment can be a useful technique for studying molecular evolution and analyzing sequence-structure relationships. Until recently, it has been impractical to apply dynamic programming, the most widely accepted method for producing pairwise alignments, to comparisons of more than three sequences. We describe the design and application of a tool for multiple alignment of amino acid sequences that implements a new algorithm that greatly reduces the computational demands of dynamic programming. This tool is able to align in reasonable time as many as eight sequences the length of an average protein.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1994

An efficient method for multiple sequence alignment.

Multiple sequence alignment has been a useful method in the study of molecular evolution and sequence-structure relationships. This paper presents a new method for multiple sequence alignment based on simulated annealing technique. Dynamic programming has been widely used to find an optimal alignment. However, dynamic programming has several limitations to obtain optimal alignment. It requires long computation time and cannot apply certain types of cost functions. We describe detail mechanisms of simulated annealing for multiple sequence alignment problem. It is shown that simulated annealing can be an effective approach to overcome the limitations of dynamic programming in multiple sequence alignment problem.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2026

A reinforcement learning-enhanced fuzzy multi-objective equilibrium optimization framework for multiple sequence alignment.

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is a fundamental task in bioinformatics, underpinning comparative genomics, structural analysis, and evolutionary inference. However, MSA remains a challenging multi-objective optimization problem due to the need to simultaneously maximize alignment accuracy, preserve conserved regions, and control gap proliferation, particularly in large and heterogeneous sequence collections. In this work, we propose MOFSACEO-MSA, a novel hybrid optimization framework for multiple sequence alignment that integrates a fuzzy multi-objective evaluation scheme with the Equilibrium Optimizer (EO) and a Soft Actor-Critic (SAC)-based adaptive control mechanism. The proposed framework formulates MSA as a dynamic multi-objective optimization problem, in which alignment quality is assessed using complementary residue-level and column-level criteria, including Sum-of-Pairs score, column conservation, entropy, and gap statistics. Fuzzy membership functions are employed to harmonize competing objectives into a unified optimization landscape, while EO provides robust global exploration. To further enhance adaptability, SAC dynamically regulates key EO parameters during the search process, enabling an effective balance between exploration and exploitation across datasets of varying size and heterogeneity. Extensive experiments werew conducted on diverse biological sequence datasets, with a primary focus on RNA benchmarks, including structured families from Rfam, large-scale repositories from RNAcentral and GenBank, and organism-specific tRNA datasets from GtRNAdb. Comparative evaluations against classical alignment tools (ClustalW, MAFFT, MUSCLE, PRANK, KAlign, and T-Coffee), metaheuristic methods (SAGA, Sequoya and EAFSA), and a reinforcement learning-based approach (RLALIGN) demonstrate that MOFSACEO-MSA consistently achieves competitive or superior Sum-of-Pairs scores while significantly reducing gap proportions and maintaining compact alignment lengths. Notably, the proposed framework exhibits improved robustness on large and highly heterogeneous datasets, where existing methods often suffer from excessive gap insertion or unstable convergence. Overall, MOFSACEO-MSA provides a flexible and extensible optimization paradigm that effectively bridges evolutionary search and reinforcement learning for high-quality multiple sequence alignment, with demonstrated effectiveness on challenging RNA alignment tasks.

Sequence Alignment↗
PubMed2004

An adaptive and iterative algorithm for refining multiple sequence alignment.

Multiple sequence alignment is a basic tool in computational genomics. The art of multiple sequence alignment is about placing gaps. This paper presents a heuristic algorithm that improves multiple protein sequences alignment iteratively. A consistency-based objective function is used to evaluate the candidate moves. During the iterative optimization, well-aligned regions can be detected and kept intact. Columns of gaps will be inserted to assist the algorithm to escape from local optimal alignments. The algorithm has been evaluated using the BAliBASE benchmark alignment database. Results show that the performance of the algorithm does not depend on initial or seed alignments much. Given a perfect consistency library, the algorithm is able to produce alignments that are close to the global optimum. We demonstrate that the algorithm is able to refine alignments produced by other software, including ClustalW, SAGA and T-COFFEE. The program is available upon request.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2006

Multiple sequence alignment.

Multiple sequence alignments are an essential tool for protein structure and function prediction, phylogeny inference and other common tasks in sequence analysis. Recently developed systems have advanced the state of the art with respect to accuracy, ability to scale to thousands of proteins and flexibility in comparing proteins that do not share the same domain architecture. New multiple alignment benchmark databases include PREFAB, SABMARK, OXBENCH and IRMBASE. Although CLUSTALW is still the most popular alignment tool to date, recent methods offer significantly better alignment quality and, in some cases, reduced computational cost.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1995

Comprehensive study on iterative algorithms of multiple sequence alignment.

Multiple sequence alignment is an important problem in the biosciences. To date, most multiple alignment systems have employed a tree-based algorithm, which combines the results of two-way dynamic programming in a tree-like order of sequence similarity. The alignment quality is not, however, high enough when the sequence similarity is low. Once an error occurs in the alignment process, that error can never be corrected. Recently, an effective new class of algorithms has been developed. These algorithms iteratively apply dynamic programming to partially aligned sequences to improve their alignment quality. The iteration corrects any errors that may have occurred in the alignment process. Such an iterative strategy requires heuristic search methods to solve practical alignment problems. Incorporating such methods yields various iterative algorithms. This paper reports our comprehensive comparison of iterative algorithms. We proved that performance improves remarkably when using a tree-based iterative method, which iteratively refines an alignment whenever two subalignments are merged in a tree-based way. We propose a tree-dependent, restricted partitioning technique to efficiently reduce the execution time of iterative algorithms.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2005

Multiple sequence alignments.

Multiple sequence alignments are very widely used in all areas of DNA and protein sequence analysis. The main methods that are still in use are based on 'progressive alignment' and date from the mid to late 1980s. Recently, some dramatic improvements have been made to the methodology with respect either to speed and capacity to deal with large numbers of sequences or to accuracy. There have also been some practical advances concerning how to combine three-dimensional structural information with primary sequences to give more accurate alignments, when structures are available.

Algorithms↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Evaluation measures of multiple sequence alignments.

Multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) are frequently used in the study of families of protein sequences or DNA/RNA sequences. They are a fundamental tool for the understanding of the structure, functionality and, ultimately, the evolution of proteins. A new algorithm, the Circular Sum (CS) method, is presented for formally evaluating the quality of an MSA. It is based on the use of a solution to the Traveling Salesman Problem, which identifies a circular tour through an evolutionary tree connecting the sequences in a protein family. With this approach, the calculation of an evolutionary tree and the errors that it would introduce can be avoided altogether. The algorithm gives an upper bound, the best score that can possibly be achieved by any MSA for a given set of protein sequences. Alternatively, if presented with a specific MSA, the algorithm provides a formal score for the MSA, which serves as an absolute measure of the quality of the MSA. The CS measure yields a direct connection between an MSA and the associated evolutionary tree. The measure can be used as a tool for evaluating different methods for producing MSAs. A brief example of the last application is provided. Because it weights all evolutionary events on a tree identically, but does not require the reconstruction of a tree, the CS algorithm has advantages over the frequently used sum-of-pairs measures for scoring MSAs, which weight some evolutionary events more strongly than others. Compared to other weighted sum-of-pairs measures, it has the advantage that no evolutionary tree must be constructed, because we can find a circular tour without knowing the tree.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2006

A statistical score for assessing the quality of multiple sequence alignments.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sequence alignment is the foundation of many important applications in bioinformatics that aim at detecting functionally important regions, predicting protein structures, building phylogenetic trees etc. Although the automatic construction of a multiple sequence alignment for a set of remotely related sequences cause a very challenging and error-prone task, many downstream analyses still rely heavily on the accuracy of the alignments. RESULTS: To address the need for an objective evaluation framework, we introduce a statistical score that assesses the quality of a given multiple sequence alignment. The quality assessment is based on counting the number of significantly conserved positions in the alignment using importance sampling method in conjunction with statistical profile analysis framework. We first evaluate a novel objective function used in the alignment quality score for measuring the positional conservation. The results for the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain, Ras-like proteins, peptidase M13, subtilase and beta-lactamase families demonstrate that the score can distinguish sequence patterns with different degrees of conservation. Secondly, we evaluate the quality of the alignments produced by several widely used multiple sequence alignment programs using a novel alignment quality score and a commonly used sum of pairs method. According to these results, the Mafft strategy L-INS-i outperforms the other methods, although the difference between the Probcons, TCoffee and Muscle is mostly insignificant. The novel alignment quality score provides similar results than the sum of pairs method. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the proposed statistical score is useful in assessing the quality of multiple sequence alignments.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1997

New flexible approaches for multiple sequence alignment.

The multiple sequence alignment problem is applicable and important in various fields in molecular biology such as the prediction of three-dimensional structures of proteins and the inference of phylogenetic trees. However, the optimal alignment based on the scoring criterion is not always biologically the most significant alignment. We here propose two flexible and efficient approaches to solve this problem. One approach is to provide many suboptimal alignments as alternatives for the optimal one. It has been considered almost impossible to investigate such suboptimal alignments of more than two sequences because of the enormous size of the problem. We propose techniques for enumeration of suboptimal alignments using the Eppstein algorithm. We also discuss what kind of suboptimal alignment is unnecessary to enumerate and propose an efficient enumeration algorithm to enumerate only necessary alignments. The other approach is parametric analysis. The obtained optimal solution with fixed parameters such as gap penalties is not always the biologically best alignment. Thus, it is required to vary parameters and check how the optimal alignments change. The way to vary parameters has been studied well on the problem of two sequences, but not on the multiple alignment problem because of the difficulty of computing the optimal solution. We propose techniques for this parametric multiple alignment problem and examine the features of alignments obtained by various parametric analyses. For both approaches, this paper performs experiments on various groups of actual protein sequences and examines the efficiency of these algorithms and properties of sequence groups.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2005

Pattern-constrained multiple polypeptide sequence alignment.

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is one of the fundamental research topics in computational biology. The alignments help us to find functional assignment, evolutionary history and conserved region. Previous methods use a substitution matrix and do not incorporate knowledge of the sequences being aligned. Therefore, they do not assure the alignment of similar structures and common patterns in the sequences. We have been investigating into the solution to the problem in multiple and making use of knowledge of the sequences being aligned, including patterns in the Prosite databank, Blocks+, eBlocks databases, as well as motif and structural information. A pattern-constrained algorithm has been developed. Experiments with protein sequences have shown more accurate alignments with incorporation of the domain knowledge available in the sequences.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2005

BAliBASE 3.0: latest developments of the multiple sequence alignment benchmark.

Multiple sequence alignment is one of the cornerstones of modern molecular biology. It is used to identify conserved motifs, to determine protein domains, in 2D/3D structure prediction by homology and in evolutionary studies. Recently, high-throughput technologies such as genome sequencing and structural proteomics have lead to an explosion in the amount of sequence and structure information available. In response, several new multiple alignment methods have been developed that improve both the efficiency and the quality of protein alignments. Consequently, the benchmarks used to evaluate and compare these methods must also evolve. We present here the latest release of the most widely used multiple alignment benchmark, BAliBASE, which provides high quality, manually refined, reference alignments based on 3D structural superpositions. Version 3.0 of BAliBASE includes new, more challenging test cases, representing the real problems encountered when aligning large sets of complex sequences. Using a novel, semiautomatic update protocol, the number of protein families in the benchmark has been increased and representative test cases are now available that cover most of the protein fold space. The total number of proteins in BAliBASE has also been significantly increased from 1444 to 6255 sequences. In addition, full-length sequences are now provided for all test cases, which represent difficult cases for both global and local alignment programs. Finally, the BAliBASE Web site (http://www-bio3d-igbmc.u-strasbg.fr/balibase) has been completely redesigned to provide a more user-friendly, interactive interface for the visualization of the BAliBASE reference alignments and the associated annotations.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2000

An iterative method for faster sum-of-pairs multiple sequence alignment.

MOTIVATION: Multiple sequence alignment is an important tool in computational biology. In order to solve the task of computing multiple alignments in affordable time, the most commonly used multiple alignment methods have to use heuristics. Nevertheless, the computation of optimal multiple alignments is important in its own right, and it provides a means of evaluating heuristic approaches or serves as a subprocedure of heuristic alignment methods. RESULTS: We present an algorithm that uses the divide-and-conquer alignment approach together with recent results on search space reduction to speed up the computation of multiple sequence alignments. The method is adaptive in that depending on the time one wants to spend on the alignment, a better, up to optimal alignment can be obtained. To speed up the computation in the optimal alignment step, we apply the alpha(*) algorithm which leads to a procedure provably more efficient than previous exact algorithms. We also describe our implementation of the algorithm and present results showing the effectiveness and limitations of the procedure.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2000

The practical use of the A* algorithm for exact multiple sequence alignment.

Multiple alignment is an important problem in computational biology. It is well known that it can be solved exactly by a dynamic programming algorithm which in turn can be interpreted as a shortest path computation in a directed acyclic graph. The A* algorithm (or goal-directed unidirectional search) is a technique that speeds up the computation of a shortest path by transforming the edge lengths without losing the optimality of the shortest path. We implemented the A* algorithm in a computer program similar to MSA (Gupta et al., 1995) and FMA (Shibuya and Imai, 1997). We incorporated in this program new bounding strategies for both lower and upper bounds and show that the A* algorithm, together with our improvements, can speed up computations considerably. Additionally, we show that the A* algorithm together with a standard bounding technique is superior to the well-known Carrillo-Lipman bounding since it excludes more nodes from consideration.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2005

SPEM: improving multiple sequence alignment with sequence profiles and predicted secondary structures.

MOTIVATION: Multiple sequence alignment is an essential part of bioinformatics tools for a genome-scale study of genes and their evolution relations. However, making an accurate alignment between remote homologs is challenging. Here, we develop a method, called SPEM, that aligns multiple sequences using pre-processed sequence profiles and predicted secondary structures for pairwise alignment, consistency-based scoring for refinement of the pairwise alignment and a progressive algorithm for final multiple alignment. RESULTS: The alignment accuracy of SPEM is compared with those of established methods such as ClustalW, T-Coffee, MUSCLE, ProbCons and PRALINE(PSI) in easy (homologs) and hard (remote homologs) benchmarks. Results indicate that the average sum of pairwise alignment scores given by SPEM are 7-15% higher than those of the methods compared in aligning remote homologs (sequence identity <30%). Its accuracy for aligning homologs (sequence identity >30%) is statistically indistinguishable from those of the state-of-the-art techniques such as ProbCons or MUSCLE 6.0. AVAILABILITY: The SPEM server and its executables are available on http://theory.med.buffalo.edu.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2006

Optimization of multiple-sequence alignment based on multiple-structure alignment.

Routinely used multiple-sequence alignment methods use only sequence information. Consequently, they may produce inaccurate alignments. Multiple-structure alignment methods, on the other hand, optimize structural alignment by ignoring sequence information. Here, we present an optimization method that unifies sequence and structure information. The alignment score is based on standard amino acid substitution probabilities combined with newly computed three-dimensional structure alignment probabilities. The advantage of our alignment scheme is in its ability to produce more accurate multiple alignments. We demonstrate the usefulness of the method in three applications: 1) computing more accurate multiple-sequence alignments, 2) analyzing protein conformational changes, and 3) computation of amino acid structure-sequence conservation with application to protein-protein docking prediction. The method is available at http://bioinfo3d.cs.tau.ac.il/staccato/.

Amino Acid Sequence↗