Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Lymphoscintigraphy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Reliability of lymphoscintigraphy in indicating the number of sentinel nodes in melanoma patients.

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to establish the reliability of lymphoscintigraphy in indicating the number of sentinel nodes in patients with melanoma. METHODS: Lymphoscintigraphy was performed with dynamic imaging after injection of 60 MBq 99mTc-nanocolloid (1.6 mCi) and static imaging after 2 hours in 200 patients with clinically localized primary melanoma of the skin. The following day, sentinel nodes were retrieved with the blue dye technique and a gamma detection probe (Neoprobe 1000/1500). The discrepancies between the number of sentinel nodes indicated by lymphoscintigraphy and the actual number of sentinel nodes as established by the surgeon were evaluated. RESULTS: Lymphoscintigraphy showed drainage to 393 sentinel nodes in 255 lymphatic fields in 199 patients. In 48 lymphatic fields (19%) in 46 patients (23%), the number of sentinel nodes was different from the number that was visualized with scintigraphy. Additional sentinel nodes were found by the surgeon because a lymphatic vessel was not seen on the lymphoscintigraphy (43%), because a sentinel node was not visualized separately from other hot nodes or vessels or the injection site (36%), or because a sentinel node was blue and not hot (4%). Fewer sentinel nodes were found than suggested by scintigraphy because a lymphangioma was mistaken for a sentinel node (4%) or because a single elongated node was depicted as two hot spots (6%). CONCLUSIONS: Although lymphoscintigraphy is indispensable for lymphatic mapping, the predicted number of sentinel nodes is accurate in only 81% of lymph node fields. The limited discriminating power of the gamma camera is an important cause of discrepancies.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

The role of radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy in extremity lymphedema.

The characteristics of lymphedema on radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy were studied, and the diagnostic value of radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy in lymphedema was evaluated. In this report radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy was performed in 110 cases of clinically suspected lymphedema. A retrospective study method was used to analyze the imaging results. The typical pattern of lymphedema on radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy was summarized. It was found that the characteristics of lymphedema on radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy were diverse. The most common pattern was increased radiotracer accumulation in the soft tissue and lymphatic webs. Surgery and infection dominated as the causes of lymphedema in this study. It was concluded that radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy is a useful noninvasive method for diagnosing lymphedema. It is easy to operate and provides reliable results.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Clinical evaluation of lymphoscintigraphy with a new technetium compound for metastatic cervical lymphadenopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential usefulness of lymphoscintigraphy for the detection of metastatic cervical lymphadenopathy. METHODS: Dynamic and static lymphoscintigraphy with 99Tcm-HSA-D was performed in 23 patients with malignant oropharyngeal tumors. The internal jugular nodes were excised and examined pathologically. The results of the lymphoscintigraphy were compared with the pathological examination and clinical palpation for accuracy. RESULTS: All cases showed abnormal findings on lymphoscintigraphy. The accuracy on dynamic scintigraphy was 69% for asymmetric drainage, 69% for delayed drainage and 100% for inverse drainage. The overall accuracy for each side was 71%. With static scintigraphy, the accuracy was 69% for asymmetry, 86% for fitting defect, 67% for mottled-patchy appearance, 70% in swelling and 100% for collateral pathway. The overall accuracy for each side was 74%. The agreement between lymphoscintigraphy and palpation was 44%. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphoscintigraphy with 99Tcm-HSA-D was superior to palpation. The method is useful as a supplementary modality for the evaluation of metastatic cervical lymphadenopathy because of its relatively high accuracy and a low false-negative rate.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Lymphoscintigraphy with double tracer technique in carcinomas of the head-neck region].

BACKGROUND: Lymphoscintigraphy has been used since the early 1960s to demonstrate lymphatic drainage of head and neck tumors, but did not prove satisfactory. With the increasing importance of highly sophisticated neck dissection procedures, lymphoscintigraphy may have greater diagnostic impact. This assumes that lymphoscintigraphy will allow an accurate correlation of lymphatic drainage with anatomic structures. In this paper, we report on a method of lymphoscintigraphy with simultaneous body contouring. METHODS: Double-tracer lymphoscintigraphy was performed in 78 patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Patients received 100 MBq 99mTc-colloid in 0.1-0.2 ml in 3-4 peritumoral localizations. Ten patients were injected during surgery. Two milliliters of perchlorate solution were given orally in order to block the thyroid. Twenty minutes later patients received 50 MBq 99mTc-pertechnetate i.v. for body contouring. Planar images were obtained over 5 min each at 30 min and 4-6 h after injection from anterior, right lateral and left lateral using a LFOV-gamma camera. RESULTS: The thyroid was not visualized in any of the patients. In 28 of 78 patients (36%), the injection site was the only focal activity seen. In 50 of 78 patients (64%), lymph drainage was observed. Thirty-six of 78 patients (46%) showed unilateral lymphatic drainage, and 14 of 78 (18%) showed bilateral drainage. In all 50 patients showing lymphatic drainage, lymph nodes could be easily assigned to the six cervical lymph node compartments described. CONCLUSIONS: Double-tracer lymphoscintigraphy enables an accurate correlation of cervical lymph nodes and anatomic structures of the head and neck region. These findings suggest that the impact of these studies on the preoperative planning for neck dissection should be reevaluated.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Technical aspects of performing lymphoscintigraphy: optimization of methods used to obtain images.

Sentinel node detection is an important part of the clinical management of newly diagnosed melanoma. Now there is a similar or even greater enthusiasm for sentinel node evaluation in patients with breast carcinoma. However, controversies exist regarding the dose, volume, and route of administration. Even the role of lymphoscintigraphy itself, in contrast to using only a hand-held gamma probe during surgery for sentinel node detection, is being debated. Nevertheless, many centers and surgeons find that lymphoscintigraphy images are valuable in the treatment of patients and they use lymphoscintigraphy as a guide during surgery and to confirm the results obtained with the hand-held probe. Centers just beginning to use lymphoscintigraphy may find the images especially useful. Given this fact, the authors wanted to define the practical and technical aspects of performing lymphoscintigraphy in patients with breast cancer and examined various methods for the optimization of the technique of image acquisition. The suggested technique is generally free of the controversies noted above and applies to most patients. It includes various maneuvers that aim to improve the rate of sentinel node visualization using the gamma camera and the accuracy of node detection. The recommendations presented here should prove useful for both those experienced and for those centers just beginning to use the technique of lymphoscintigraphy.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2005

Breast lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel node identification in breast cancers with clinically-negative axillary nodes.

INTRODUCTION: To analyse and determine the clinical value of lymphoscintigraphy for sentinel lymph node (SLN) localisation in woman undergoing surgery for breast cancer, and evaluate the predictive value of SLN versus axillary lymph node (ALN) status in these patients. METHODS: Preoperative breast lymphoscintigraphy was performed in 35 female patients with breast cancer and clinically-negative ALNs. The mean age was 52.8 years (age range 38 to 73 years). The lymphoscintigraphy was performed using 74 MBq of Tc-99m nanocolloid subdermal injection over the tumour. The SLN location was marked on the skin. All patients underwent standard modified radical mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). A comparison of SLN and ALN histopathological results was completed in order to define the means by which the SLN biopsy was able to reflect the final status of ALNs. RESULTS: In 20/35 (57.1 percent) cases, SLNs were visualised in 20-minute dynamic imaging. In 12 patients, SLNs were seen after delayed imaging and/or by repositioning the patient. Overall, the estimated SLN identification rate was 91.4 percent. Of 32 patients in whom SLNs were localised by lymphoscintigraphy, nine were positive for metastatic tumours and the rest were negative for tumour involvement. In four of these nine patients, SLN was the only node that contained metastatic tumour cells while in five patients, an additional concomitant ALN metastasis was detected. In four patients, SLN was negative on frozen section, but skip ALN metastases were noted. Of three patients in which SLNs were not localised by lymphoscintigraphy, two had positive ALNs for tumour cells and the remaining one was negative for tumour involvement. CONCLUSION: We concluded that SLN localisation using lymphoscintigraphy is an accurate minimally-invasive procedure for staging breast cancer patients with clinically-negative ALNs, and can substantially reduce the morbidity and costs of surgical treatment by avoiding unnecessary ALND in the majority of patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Lymphoscintigraphy in oncology: a rediscovered challenge.

The validation of the sentinel node concept in oncology has led to the rediscovery of lymphoscintigraphy. By combining preoperative lymphatic mapping with intraoperative probe detection this nuclear medicine procedure is being increasingly used to identify and detect the sentinel node in melanoma, breast cancer, and in other malignancies such as penile cancer and vulvar cancer. In the past lymphoscintigraphy has been widely applied for various indications in oncology, and in the case of the internal mammary lymph-node chain its current use in breast cancer remains essential to adjust irradiation treatment to the individual findings of each patient. In another diagnostic area, lymphoscintigraphy is also useful to document altered drainage patterns after surgery and/or radiotherapy; its use in breast cancer patients with upper limb oedema after axillary lymph-node dissection or in melanoma patients with lower-extremity oedema after groin dissection can provide information for physiotherapy or reconstructive surgery. Finally, the renewed interest in lymphoscintigraphy in oncology has led not only to the rediscovery of findings from old literature reports, but also to a discussion about methodological aspects such as tracer characteristics, image acquisition or administration routes, as well as to discussion on the study of migration patterns of radiolabelled colloid particles in the context of cancer dissemination. All this makes the need for standardized guidelines for lymphoscintigraphy mandatory.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2002

[Localization diagnosis of chyluria by radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy].

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy, a new method of localization diagnosis of chyluria. METHODS: Radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy was used to examine 34 patients with chyluria and the results of radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy was compared with those of cystoscopy and lymphangiography. RESULTS: Among the 34 patients 85.3% of unilateral localization diagnosis by radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy was coincident with that by cystoscopy. The positive rate of bilateral localization diagnosis was higher than that by cystoscopy. CONCLUSION: A less invasive technique, radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy can be used as a new option for the localization diagnosis of chyluria.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Lymphoscintigraphy to confirm the clinical diagnosis of lymphedema.

Confirmation of the diagnosis of lymphedema often requires lymphangiography, a procedure that is painful for the patient and technically demanding. Radioisotope lymphoscintigraphy is a relatively new technique that uses technetium 99 m antimony trisulfide colloid to produce a diagnostic image similar to a lymphangiogram. The procedure requires a single subcutaneous injection in the involved extremity, and images are obtained 3 hours later. It is technically easy to perform, produces minimal discomfort for the patient, and has no adverse effects. We have recently used radioisotope lymphoscintigraphy to evaluate 17 patients with extremity edema. These patients initially had a presumed diagnosis of lymphedema involving the upper or lower extremity. Lymphoscintigraphy confirmed the diagnosis of lymphedema in 12 (70.6%) patients. In five of the 17 patients (29.4%) the clinical impression of lymphedema was not supported by lymphoscintigraphy, leading to alternative diagnoses such as lipomatosis, venous insufficiency (two patients), congestive heart failure, and disuse edema. In all patients with secondary lymphedema the lymphatic system in the involved extremity could be partially visualized. Conversely, three of four patients with primary lymphedema had no ascent of the tracer from the foot and no lymphatic channels could be visualized. Lymphoscintigraphy is relatively easy to perform, safe, minimally invasive, and not uncomfortable for the patient. It is useful in differentiating lymphedema from other causes of extremity edema, allowing institution of appropriate therapy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Detection of canine allograft lung rejection by pulmonary lymphoscintigraphy.

We previously demonstrated that lymphoscintigraphy could be used to study pulmonary lymphatic flow. Radiocolloids, high-molecular-weight proteins tagged with radioactive markers, are injected percutaneously in the periphery of the lung. These molecules enter the lymph, are transported via lymphatic channels, and concentrate in the tributary hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes, where they can be visualized by nuclear scan. The goal of this study was to determine whether pulmonary lymphoscintigraphy could be used to detect allograft rejection after lung transplantation. Thirteen mongrel dogs underwent left lung allotransplantation. Cyclosporine 15 mg/kg per day and azathioprine 1 mg/kg per day were given orally for postoperative immunosuppression. Lymphoscintigraphic studies were obtained 1 week after the operation and then at weekly intervals. In five dogs (group A), immunosuppression was continued until the animal died or was put to death 6 weeks later. Lymphoscintigraphy demonstrated reestablishment of lymphatic drainage between the lung graft and the mediastinum in all the animals 2 to 4 weeks after transplantation. In eight dogs (group B), immunosuppression was discontinued after reestablishment of graft lymphatic drainage was documented by two consecutive lymphoscintigraphic studies. The dogs continued to be studied with weekly scans. In group B, lymphatic drainage from the lung graft to the mediastinum disappeared 1 to 4 weeks after immunosuppression was stopped. Rejection was diagnosed clinically and confirmed histologically with open lung biopsies and/or autopsies in all animals. This study shows that canine allograft lung rejection is associated with disappearance of lymphatic drainage from lung graft to mediastinum, which can be documented by pulmonary lymphoscintigraphy, a minimally invasive technique that can be easily repeated. Pulmonary lymphoscintigraphy may be useful for early detection of lung allograft rejection.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Lower and central tumor location correlates with lymphoscintigraphy drainage to the internal mammary lymph nodes in breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Radiation to the internal mammary chain (IMC) may be indicated for breast carcinoma patients with positive axillary sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and lymphoscintigraphic evidence of drainage to the IMC. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of IMC drainage in patients with positive axillary SLNs. METHODS: The records of 297 breast carcinoma patients with positive axillary SLNs and preoperative lymphoscintigraphy were reviewed between 1995 and 2002. Radiolabeled colloid was injected peritumorally with lymphoscintigraphy performed 30-60 minutes later. Drainage to the regional nodes of 279 patients was seen on lymphoscintigraphy. Associations among patient and tumor-related factors and drainage to the IMC were examined. RESULTS: Drainage to the IMC on lymphoscintigraphy was seen in 63 patients (21%). IMC drainage only occurred in 4 patients, and 59 patients had both axillary and IMC drainage. The only variable that correlated with IMC drainage was tumor location (P = 0.017). Rates of drainage to the IMC were 14.1% for upper outer quadrant (n = 128), 16.7% for upper inner quadrant (n = 30), 31.6% for lower outer quadrant (n = 19), 42.9% for lower inner quadrant (n = 14), and 28.4% for central tumors (n = 88). IMC drainage rates differed significantly between upper and lower tumors (lower 36.4% vs. central 28.4% vs. upper 14.6%, P = 0.003) but not between medial and lateral tumors (medial 25.0% vs. central 28.4% vs. lateral 16.3%, P = 0.077). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with tumors in the lower or central breast and positive axillary SLNs have increased incidence of drainage to the IMC. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy can help to define the nodal basins at risk for harboring disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Lymphoscintigraphy of melanoma: lymphatic channel activity guides localization of sentinel lymph nodes, and gamma camera imaging/counting confirms presence of radiotracer in excised nodes.

UNLABELLED: Lymphoscintigraphy has become a standard preoperative procedure to map the cutaneous lymphatic channel for progression of nodal metastasis of melanoma of the skin. Lymphoscintigraphy was employed to visualize lymphatic channels as a guide to identify sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). Excised tissue was imaged with a gamma camera to verify the findings of presurgical lymphoscintigraphy. Percent counts of SLN(s) among the total counts of the excised melanoma tumor or scar tissue and SLN(s) were calculated. METHODS: Eleven patients with cutaneous melanoma received four to ten intradermal injections of Tc-99m sulfur colloid at elual distances around the melanoma site. Images were made immediately after injection: 1 minute per image for 15 min; and then 5 minutes or 1,000,000 counts per image for 30 min. After surgery, the excised melanoma tumor or scar and SLN(s) were imaged/counted with a gamma camera. Percent counts of SLNs among the total counts of the excised melanoma tumor or scar tissue and SLNs were calculated. To validate the specimen count accuracy, an experimental phantom study was done. RESULTS: Linear lymphatic channels were identified between the injected sites and the SLNs in each patient. Gamma camera images demonstrated radioactivity in the SLNs of all patients, verifying the lymphoscintigraphy findings. Uptake in the SLNs of ten of the eleven patients ranged from 0.4 to 7.2% (mean 2.2%) of the total counts in excised tissue. We noted that a node with lower uptake should not be ignored because a lower percent of SLN activity does not necessarily rule out existing metastasis. In two of eleven patients, histopathologic showed metastases. One patient's melanoma on the middle back had lymphatic channel activity directed to both axillae. The results of the phantom study validated accuracy of our specimen counts. CONCLUSIONS: Because linear lymphatic channels existed between lymph nodes and the injected sites in all eleven patients, these lymphatic channels could be used as a guide for localizing SLNs. The SLNs indicated by presurgical lymphoscintigraphy were verified by postoperative gamma camera imaging, and radiotracer localization in the SLNs averaged 2.2%.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The role of lymphoscintigraphy in rectal laparoscopic surgery: can the sentinel node concept be applied to rectal carcinoma?

BACKGROUND: Lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer, whether by open surgery or laparoscopy, is still a controversial subject. If we consider that approximately 20% of patients have nodal obturator metastases, then we must concede that extended lymphadenectomy is useless in the other 80% of patients. We set out to determine whether lymphoscintigraphy could show the lymphatic drainage from the cancer toward the obturator lymph nodes and thus help us to select the patients who would benefit by their removal. We also analyzed the possibility of applying the concept of the sentinel node to the treatment of rectal cancer. METHODS: Among 42 people who underwent laparoscopy for rectal cancer 11 patients with TNM stages T2-T3N0M0 were studied by CT & MRI, rectal ultrasonography, and lymphoscintigraphy with a colloidal injection of human albumin labeled with 99mTc at the base of the neoplasm. Afterward, the 11 patients underwent a lymphadenectomy that extended to the obturator nodes. RESULTS: In two patients, lymphoscintigraphy showed lymphatic drainage toward the obturator nodes. In one case, there were metastases. Lymphoscintigraphy did not show lymphatic drainage toward the obturator nodes in any of the other patients, and there were no metastases among them. It was not possible to identify a sentinel node. CONCLUSION: Lymphoscintigraphy can be used to select patients with rectal cancer who will be helped by a lymphadenectomy extended to the obturator nodes. However, the concept of the sentinel node cannot be applied to rectal cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

The role of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in surgery planning for sentinel lymph node biopsy in malignant melanoma.

AIM: To evaluate four years of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy experience and the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in our institution in melanoma patients with various tumor thicknesses. An additional aim was to evaluate the recurrence rate related to pathohistological findings. METHODS AND PATIENTS: During the period from February 2002 to November 2005, 201 patients underwent sentinel node biopsy. Lymphoscintigraphy for identification of sentinel nodes was performed four to six hours prior to operation of the patient. Sentinel lymph node biopsy using an intraoperative hand-held gamma probe was performed in all patients, together with wide local excision of biopsy wound or primary lesion (N=56). Immediate complete basin dissection was performed in patients with sentinel node metastases. In four patients delayed complete lymph node dissection was performed after definitive histopathologic examination of sentinel nodes. The accuracy of sentinel node biopsy was determined by comparing the intraoperative rates of sentinel node identification and the subsequent development of nodal metastases in regional nodal basins in patients with tumor-negative sentinel nodes and in those with tumorpositive sentinel nodes. RESULTS: Using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, we identified sentinel nodes in all but one of the 201 patients (99.0%), and in 248 nodal basins (1.2/patient) we observed 372 sentinel nodes (1.52 sentinels/basin; 1.8 sentinels/patient). The highest number of sentinel nodes was noticed in the groin of patients with melanoma on the lower extremities (1.5/patient), followed by the axilla (1.3/patient). Anomalous lymphatic drainage patterns were observed in 15.0% of all patients. The identification rate of sentinel nodes was 99.0% overall: 100% for the groin basins, and 98.0% for the axilla and head and neck basin. Forty-two patients (20.8%) had tumor-positive sentinel nodes. Ten patients (5.0%) had local or distant recurrences during a median follow-up of 23.1 months (range 2-46). The rate of false-negative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy as measured by nodal recurrence in patients with tumor-negative sentinel nodes was 1.3%. During the follow-up period, three of 201 patients died from other diseases and three patients died as the result of melanoma metastases, with a median follow-up of 13.5 months (range 12-22). CONCLUSION: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is a sensitive, inexpensive and essential method for the identification of drainage basins, determination of the number and position of sentinel nodes and their location outside the usual nodal basins. Scintigraphic findings may lead to changes in surgical management due to the unpredictability of lymphatic drainage. The low incidence of regional disease recurrence in patients with tumor-negative sentinel nodes supports the use of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node biopsy as a safe and accurate procedure for staging the regional nodal basin in patients with malignant melanoma.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Prediction of potential metastatic sites in cutaneous head and neck melanoma using lymphoscintigraphy.

BACKGROUND: The technique of lymphoscintigraphy may allow a more selective approach to the management of clinically negative neck nodes among patients with cutaneous head and neck melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A group of 97 patients with cutaneous head and neck melanoma had preoperative lymphoscintigraphy using intradermal injections of technetium 99m antimony trisulfide colloid to identify sentinel nodes. Fifty-one patients were eligible for clinical analysis after initial definitive treatment by wide excision only (n = 11), wide excision and elective dissection of the neck (n = 19) or axilla (n = 1), or wide excision and a sentinel node biopsy procedure (n = 20). RESULTS: Sentinel nodes were identified in 95 of 97 lymphoscintigrams, and 85% of patients had multiple sentinel nodes. In 21 patients (22%), sentinel nodes were identified outside the parotid region and the 5 main neck levels, mostly in postauricular nodes (n = 13). Lymphoscintigrams were discordant with clinical predictions in 33 patients (34%). Lymph nodes were positive in 4 elective dissections and 4 sentinel node biopsies. Among 16 patients evaluable after wide excision and a negative sentinel node biopsy, 4 patients subsequently developed metastatic nodes; however, confident identification of all nodes marked as sentinel nodes on lymphoscintigraphy was not achieved at the original biopsy procedure in 3 of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node biopsy are more difficult to perform in the head and neck than in other parts of the body. The reliability of sentinel node biopsy based on lymphoscintigraphy may be improved by identifying and marking all nodes that are considered to receive direct lymphatic drainage from the primary melanoma, and by use of a gamma probe intraoperatively.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

[Detection of the sentinal node by lymphoscintigraphy in squamous-cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a prospective study of 31 patients].

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed at evaluating the relevance of sentinel node detection by lymphoscintigraphy in patients diagnosed with squamous-cell carcinoma of the oral cavity in the absence of neck adenopathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was carried out in 31 patients diagnosed with T1 to T3 squamous-cell carcinoma of the oral cavity without any clinically detectable neck adenopathy. A lymphoscintigraphy was performed the day before surgery. All patients underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy guided by a gamma-ray detecting probe and modified neck dissection. Pathologic evaluation of the sentinel lymph node included, in addition to the standard protocol, immunohistochemical analysis and thin sections of E stained preparations. RESULTS: In 3 patients, the lymphoscintigraphy failed to detect any sentinel lymph node. In the remaining group of 28 patients, 20 patients showed a negative sentinel node concordant with a histologically negative neck dissection. In 5 patients, a positive lymph node was found although the rest of the neck dissection was negative. In 3 patients, sentinel lymph node was found to be negative but other neck nodes were positive. The overall sensitivity of lymphoscintigraphy in our study was 62%. DISCUSSION: Surprisingly, the results of our study do not support the clinical usefulness of sentinel lymph node detection as a reliable and accurate staging method in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. We observed that lymphoscintigraphy was not a reliable method for detecting micrometastases in patients diagnosed with a squamous-cell carcinoma of the oral cavity without clinical evidence of neck matastases.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel node (SN) biopsy appears to offer an alternative to routine axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for staging patients with breast cancer. Various techniques have been studied for identifying the SN, using vital blue dye or radioactive colloid, and initial reports are promising. The inherent limitations and pitfalls must be clearly understood before SN biopsy can be implemented in dinical practice. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective trial, the feasibility of using lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection for performing SN biopsy was studied. In 130 consecutive patients with T1-T2, N0 breast cancer, preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was performed with technetium 99m-colloidal albumin. During ALND, the radioactive axillary SNs were localized by the gamma probe. Histopathologic examination of the harvested SNs was compared with the status of the axillary lymph nodes. RESULTS: Axillary focal accumulations were clearly identified on lymphoscintigraphy in 116 patients (89%). The failure rate was significantly higher in patients who had a previous excision biopsy (36%) than in those with a palpable tumor in situ (4%). Using the gamma probe, radiolabeled axillary SNs were successfully biopsied in 122 patients (94%). Because 18 of these patients did not undergo formal lymphadenectomy, the predictive accuracy of SN biopsy was analyzed in 104 patients. Radioactive nodes revealed metastases in 44 of 104 patients (42%); in 26 of them (59%), these were the only involved axillary nodes. The SN was negative in 60 patients (58%); in one patient the ALND was found to contain metastatic disease (1.7% false negatives). Biopsy of the SN was 98% accurate in predicting the absence of nodal metastases. CONCLUSIONS: There are certain guidelines for performing SN biopsy by lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection. Success depends primarily on an adequate functional capacity of the SN, necessary for sufficient nodal uptake to ensure accurate identification. Lymphoscintigraphy defines the pattern of lymph flow and may prevent failure or false-negative biopsies. Biopsy of the SN is a highly accurate, minimally invasive method of staging patients with breast cancer and can substantially reduce the morbidity and costs of surgical treatment by avoiding unnecessary ALND in the majority of patients.

Axilla↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Failure to harvest sentinel lymph nodes identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer patients.

Selective sentinel lymphadenectomy dissection has been demonstrated to have high predictive value for axillary staging in breast cancer patients. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy can localize and facilitate the harvesting of sentinel lymph nodes (SNLs) with a high success rate. The failure rate of selective sentinel lymphadenectomy ranges between 2% and 8%. Details of the failures were seldom addressed. This study analyzes the causes of failure to harvest SLNs in spite of positive preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. From November 1997 through November 2000, 201 female patients with histologically confirmed and operable breast carcinoma underwent selective sentinel lymphadenectomy at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Carol Franc Buck Breast Care Center. Among these patients, 183 (91%) received preoperative lymphoscintigraphy to identify axillary lymph nodes. The causes of failure to harvest the SLNs in this group of patients despite successful preoperative lymphoscintigraphy were analyzed. In our series, the failure rate of SLN identification was 7.0% (14/201). The failure rate for our first year was 11.1% (6/54), second year 9.1% (7/77), and third year 1.4% (1/70). The incidence of failure in spite of positive preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was 3.5% (6/170). The shine-through effect of the primary injection site and failure to visualize a blue lymph node were the main reasons for technical failure. Most of these cases occurred during our learning curve of the procedure. The possibility of failure to get the SLN should be explained to patients before surgery. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) should be done if selective SLN dissection is not successful.

Adult↗