Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Lymphoscintigraphy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer: the value of breast lymphoscintigraphy in breast sentinel node staging.

A 28-year-old woman with an infiltrating ductal carcinoma in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast diagnosed by excisional biopsy underwent lumpectomy, intraoperative lymphatic mapping, and sentinel node dissection. This was followed by an immediate completion axillary node dissection using a hand-held gamma probe and isosulfan blue to map the lymphatics. Preoperative breast lymphoscintigraphy showed drainage into the axilla and an apparent area of radiocolloid accumulation in the inferior hemisphere of the left breast. Because our protocol called only for removal of axillary sentinel nodes, the inferior hemisphere radiocolloid accumulation was not removed. The patient did not complete local regional therapy with breast irradiation and developed a mass in the inferior hemisphere of the left breast, which on biopsy was shown to be metastatic breast cancer in an intramammary lymph node. This case illustrates the potential value of breast lymphoscintograms to identify unusual sites of lymphatic drainage that may prove to be clinically relevant.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy during lymphatic mapping for breast cancer: improved sentinel node imaging using subareolar injection of technetium 99m sulfur colloid.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy has been recommended to confirm the successful uptake and direction of migration of radiotracer into sentinel nodes during lymphatic mapping for breast cancer. In addition, preoperative lymphatic mapping may provide a visually useful aid to the relative location of sentinel nodes within a nodal basin. One common method of breast lymphoscintigraphy involves injections of unfiltered technetium 99m sulfur colloid (Tc-99m-SC) directly into parenchymal tissues surrounding a tumor or biopsy cavity (IP injection). Because of the many imaging failures and prolonged imaging times of IP lymphoscintigraphy, the procedure has fallen into disfavor by oncologic surgeons. The purpose of this study is to document the increased success rate of preoperative breast lymphoscintigraphy using a new anatomic site of injection, the subareolar lymphatic plexus (SA injection). STUDY DESIGN: In the 12 months between December 1, 1998, and December 29, 1999, 42 women with stage I and II breast cancer underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy by either the IP (n = 12, December 1998 to May 1999) or SA (n = 30, May 1999 to December 1999) route of injection. Both groups were injected with 1 mCi (37 MBq) of unfiltered Tc-99m-SC followed immediately by external gamma-camera imaging. The success rate for preoperative sentinel node imaging and the total imaging time were recorded in both groups. RESULTS: The success rate of identifying a sentinel node by SA lymphoscintigraphy was 90% (n = 27 of 30 patients), compared with 50% (n = 6 of 12 patients) for IP lymphoscintigraphy (p = 0.009). The imaging time in the SA injection group was 34 +/- 16 minutes, which was 59% shorter than the imaging time in the IP injection group of 82 +/- 48 minutes (p < 0.001). No uptake into internal mammary nodes was seen in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Moving the site of injection ofunfiltered Tc-99m-SC to the subareolar lymphatic plexus (SA injection) increased the success rate of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy to 90%, compared with 50% using IP injections. Preoperative SA lymphoscintigraphy resulted in the rapid visualization of axillary sentinel nodes within 30 minutes of SA injection, enabling a visual determination of the approximate number of sentinel nodes and their relative locations within the axilla. We conclude SA injection of unfiltered Tc-99m-SC is superior to IP injections when performing preoperative breast lymphoscintigraphy and is a visually useful aid to lymphatic mapping for breast cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Same-day lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node biopsy for early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node biopsy are currently being assessed as an alternative to axillary dissection for staging in early breast cancer. However, little is known about the optimum timing of surgery following injection of the radio-isotope into the breast. The aim of the present study was to establish whether lymphoscintigraphy on the morning of surgery allowed efficacious and accurate sentinel node identification and biopsy. METHODS: We reviewed our experience of 216 consecutive cases of lymphoscintigraphy in early breast cancer using peritumoural injections of technetium99m antimony sulphide colloid and subsequent sentinel node biopsy using a hand-held gamma probe and blue dye. The time interval between radioisotope injection and successful intraoperative identification of the sentinel node was assessed and whether this was associated with certain clinical and histological variables. RESULTS: The sentinel node was identified by lymphoscintigraphy in 160 cases (74%) at a median time duration of 40 min post injection. The median time duration between isotope injection and surgery was 5 h. Of the 160 cases where the sentinel node was visualized at lymphoscintigraphy, sentinel node biopsy was successfully performed in 155 cases (97%). This compares with 25/56 (45%) cases where lymphoscintigraphy failed to localize the sentinel node (P < 0.0001). There was no association found between the injection of the radioisotope greater or less than 5 h before surgery and the successful intraoperative identification of the sentinel node. Failure to identify the sentinel node at lymphoscintigraphy beyond 3 h was associated with a low intraoperative identification rate. There was no correlation found between intraoperative identification of the sentinel node according to the duration of isotope injection in relation to surgery and the various clinical and histological factors assessed. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the chance of identifying the sentinel node at the time of surgery does not increase with longer isotope injection duration using technetium99m antimony sulphide colloid. As soon as a sentinel node is identified at lymphoscintigraphy, one can proceed to surgery. Scanning beyond 3 h does not appear to be effective in sentinel node localization. Given that the median time for successful lymphoscintigraphic mapping was only 40 min, lymphoscintigraphy can easily be completed during the morning to allow surgery to take place the same day.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Lymphoscintigraphy for interpretation of changes of cervical lymph node function in patients with oral malignant tumors: comparison of Tc-99m-Re and Tc-99m-HSA-D.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the usefulness of technetium-99m-rhenium colloid (Tc-99m-Re) and technetium-99m-human serum albumin diethylene-triamine-pentaacetic acid (Tc-99m-HSA-D) as lymphoscintigraphic agents and to discuss the significance of lymphoscintigraphy in comparison with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasonography (US). STUDY DESIGN: Dynamic and static lymphoscintigraphies were performed with Tc-99m-Re and Tc-99m-HSA-D. The usefulness of the 2 agents was evaluated statistically in comparison with pathologic findings and palpation. The significance of lymphoscintigraphy is discussed in comparison with CT, MRI, and US (by the literature of CT, MRI, and US). RESULTS: Lymphoscintigraphy was superior to palpation, and Tc-99m-Re was superior to Tc-99m-HSA-D in accuracy, specificity, and the incidence of true-positive and false-positive. Statistical significance was shown between the static lymphoscintigraphy with Tc-99m-Re and palpation. The reliability of lymphoscintigraphy seemed to be slightly inferior to CT and MRI in specificity and accuracy. However, lymphoscintigraphy had some advantages that CT and MRI lacked; for example, it showed very high sensitivity (100%) and no false-negative (0%). It also showed changes of lymph node function, showed all levels of neck nodes at one time, and showed a possibility of detecting small lymph node metastases. CONCLUSION: Lymphoscintigraphy was more useful than palpation in detecting lymph node metastases, and Tc-99m-Re was superior to Tc-99m-HSA-D as an agent. Lymphoscintigraphy is significant when it is performed as a preliminary examination before CT or MRI.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Lymphoscintigraphy and radioguided biopsy of the sentinel axillary node in breast cancer.

UNLABELLED: Lymphoscintigraphy associated with radioguided biopsy of the sentinel node (SN) is well established in clinical practice for melanoma. In breast cancer, the SN concept is similarly valid, and lymphoscintigraphy is a useful method for localizing the axillary SN. The aim of this study was to optimize the lymphoscintigraphy technique in association with a gamma ray detecting probe (GDP) for identifying and removing the SN in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Two-hundred fifty patients with operable breast tumor underwent lymphoscintigraphy before surgery. Three different size ranges of 99mTc-labeled colloid particles (<50, <80 and 200-1000 nm) were used, with either subdermal (above tumor) or peritumoral injection. Early and late scintigraphic images were obtained in anterior and oblique projections, and the skin projection of the detected SN was marked. Sentinel nodes were identified and removed with the aid of the GDP during breast surgery; they were tagged separately. Complete axillary dissection followed. In 40 patients, a blue dye was also administered in addition to subdermal radiolabeled colloid to compare blue dye mapping with lymphoscintigraphy localization. RESULTS: Lymphoscintigraphy successfully revealed lymphatic drainage in 245 of 250 patients (98%). The axillary SN was identified in 240 patients (96%). SN biopsy correctly predicted axillary node status in 234 of 240 patients (97.5%). Lymphoscintigraphy and GDP detected the SN most easily and consistently when 200-1000 nm colloid was administered subdermally in an injection volume of 0.4 ml. Blue dye mapping was successful in 30 of 40 patients (75%). In 26 of these patients, the dye and lymphoscintigraphy identified the same node; in 4 cases different nodes were identified. None of these four patients had axillary disease. CONCLUSION: Lymphoscintigraphy is a simple procedure that is well tolerated by patients. Sentinel node identification is more reliable when large-size radiolabeled colloids are injected in a relatively small injection volume (0.4 ml). Use of a GDP greatly facilitates precise pinpointing and rapid removal of the SN.

Antimony↗
PubMed2001

The role of lymphoscintigraphy in the management of the patient with breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Regional nodal status is the most powerful predictor of recurrence and survival in women with breast cancer. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy have been found to accurately predict the regional nodal status. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy has been used in melanoma patients to identify the basins at risk for metastases when primary sites are located in watershed areas of the body. This study was performed to define the role of lymphoscintigraphy for axillary nodal staging in women with breast cancer. Specifically, can preoperative lymphoscintigraphy define a population of women with breast cancer who have multidirectional drainage or who do not drain to the axilla and need no axillary dissection? METHODS: 516 patients with invasive breast cancer were accrued in a national breast lymphatic mapping trial sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy images were produced using filtered technetium-99 sulfur colloid. Lymphatic drainage to axillary and internal mammary sites was noted. RESULTS: Drainage to an axillary SLN was found in 335 (65%) patients, and internal mammary or extra-axillary drainage was noted in 52 (10%) patients. By using sensitive hand-held probes and vital blue dye intraoperatively, the overall success rate of finding an axillary SLN was 85%. Of the 335 patients who had an axillary SLN identified with imaging, all had successful SLN biopsy procedures. Although no SLNs could be imaged in 181 patients, 153 (85%) of these patients had an axillary SLN identified with intraoperative mapping. For 28 patients in which lymphoscintigraphy was negative and intraoperative mapping was unsuccessful, complete axillary node dissection was performed, and 13 (46%) of these patients were found to have metastatic disease in the basin. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy can identify those women with primary breast cancers who have extra-axillary regional basin drainage such as internal mammary. The ability to image an axillary SLN was associated with a high success rate of being able to find the node intraoperatively with a combination mapping technique. In a high percentage of patients with negative lymphoscintigraphy, the SLN was identified with more sensitive hand-held probes. Therefore, patients who have a negative preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperatively are found to have no "hot" spot in the axilla with the hand-held probe still need an axillary node dissection, because 46% of these patients contain metastatic disease in the axilla.

Axilla↗
PubMed1993

Noninvasive evaluation of the lymphatic system with lymphoscintigraphy: a prospective, semiquantitative analysis in 386 extremities.

PURPOSE: Lymphoscintigraphy has emerged as the diagnostic test of choice in patients with suspected lymphedema. To assess the lymphatic circulation of 386 extremities in 188 patients, we prospectively recorded a semiquantitative index of lymphatic transport in addition to visual evaluation of lymphoscintigraphy image patterns. METHODS: Sixty-one male and 127 female patients were studied (mean age 48 years, range 13 to 87 years). Twenty had upper extremity swelling, and 168 had lower extremity swelling. The disease was bilateral in 60 patients. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed by injecting a mean of 503 microCi of technetium 99m-antimony trisulfide colloid subcutaneously into the second interdigital space of the extremity. Time for transport to regional lymph nodes, appearance of lymph vessels and nodes and distribution pattern were scored. These scores were compiled into a modified Kleinhans transport index (TI). To assess the venous circulation, 155 patients underwent evaluation of the venous system by impedance plethysmography, ultrasonography, or contrast venography. RESULTS: The mean TI (+/- SEM) in 79 asymptomatic extremities was 2.6 +/- 0.5, with 66 (83.5%) demonstrating normal lymphoscintigraphy pattern (TI < 5). Patients with clinical diagnosis of lymphedema (n = 124) had a mean TI of 23.8 +/- 1.5; 81.5% of these were greater than 5. Fifty-six patients (30%) had primary and 68 (36%) had secondary lymphedema. (TI of 26 +/- 3.5 and 22.1 +/- 1.9, respectively, p = NS). Patients without any lymphatic transport (TI of 45) were more likely to have cellulitis in their history (p < 0.05). Contrast lymphangiography in six patients correlated with lymphoscintigraphy. Sixty-four patients (34%) had swelling without lymphedema (venous edema, cardiac edema, lipedema, etc.; TI of 1.9 +/- 0.4, p < 0.001). Of the 41 patients with abnormal venous studies, 18 (44%) had an elevated TI. CONCLUSIONS: Semiquantitative evaluation of the lymphatic transport with lymphoscintigraphy reliably depicts abnormalities in the lymphatic circulation. Lymphoscintigraphy excluded lymphedema as a cause of leg swelling in one third of our patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is not necessary prior to sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study was performed to ascertain the added benefit of lymphoscintigraphy to a standard method of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer. METHODS: Patients with invasive breast cancer were injected with 99mTc sulfur colloid prior to sentinel node biopsy; preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was then performed in half of the patient population. RESULTS: Sentinel node identification was possible in 45 of 50 patients (90%). All 14 patients (31%) with axillary nodal metastases had at least one histologically positive sentinel node (0% false negative rate). Lymphoscintigraphy revealed sentinel nodes in 17 of the 24 patients (70.8%) imaged. All 17 of these patients had one or more axillary sentinel nodes identified using intraoperative lymphatic mapping. In addition, 5 of 7 patients with a negative preoperative lymphoscintogram had an axillary sentinel lymph node(s) identified intraoperatively. None of the tumors showed drainage to the internal mammary lymph node chain by lymphoscintigraphy despite the fact that there were 5 patients with inner quadrant tumors. There was no significant advantage with respect to sentinel lymph node localization (91.7% versus 88.5%, P = not significant) or false negative rate (0%, both groups, P = not significant) in the group undergoing preoperative lymphoscintigraphy when compared with the patients in whom lymphoscintigraphy was not performed. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy adds little additional information to intraoperative lymphatic mapping, and its routine use is not justified.

Axilla↗
PubMed2003

Feasibility of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for identification of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with conjunctival and periocular skin malignancies.

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy for identification of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with conjunctival and periocular skin tumors and to determine the patterns of lymphatic drainage from such tumors. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients with biopsy-confirmed conjunctival and periocular skin malignancies who underwent lymphoscintigraphy with or without SLN biopsy between January 1999 and June 2000. Patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy with 0.3 to 1 mCi of technetium Tc-99m sulfur colloid in a volume of either 0.2 mL or 1 mL. Images were taken as soon as the first SLNs were detected through the camera and every 15 minutes thereafter. Intraoperative mapping and SLN biopsy was performed 1 to 2 days after lymphoscintigraphy unless the patient refused or there were medical contraindications to the procedure. RESULTS: The study included 7 patients with malignant melanoma of the conjunctiva or periocular skin and 1 patient with Merkel cell carcinoma of the eyelid. On lymphoscintigraphy, at least 1 SLN was identified in 7 of the 8 patients. Although all lesions located in the lateral half of the ocular adnexa drained to at least one SLN in the parotid (preauricular) area, there was some variability in the drainage patterns of lesions located in the medial half of the ocular adnexa. A smaller injection volume (0.2 mL) was adequate for detecting the nodes draining the area of injection and led to less spread of technetium to the surrounding areas. Six patients underwent SLN biopsy. In all but one, the nodes identified during surgery corresponded with those visualized on lymphoscintigraphy. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy successfully identifies SLNs in most patients with conjunctival and periocular skin malignancies. Smaller injection volumes (0.2 mL) appear to be adequate for identification of the sentinel nodes and lead to less spread to surrounding tissues.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer--is lymphoscintigraphy really necessary?

The role of lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer remains debatable. This study assesses the value of lymphoscintigraphy in axillary sentinel node biopsy in women undergoing surgery for breast cancer. Sixty-two patients underwent sentinel node biopsy using a combination of technetium-labelled nanocolloid, lympho-scintigraphy and patent blue dye. Lymphoscintigraphy was successful in 84% of patients. Axillary sentinel nodes were identified intraoperatively in all these patients. Internal mammary nodes were identified on lymphoscintigraphy in 19%. Despite lymphoscintigraphy being unsuccessful in 10 patients, axillary sentinel nodes were found intraoperatively in eight of these patients. Lymphoscintigraphy did not increase the detection rate of axillary sentinel nodes and a negative scan did not preclude identification of an axillary sentinel node intraoperatively. This study questions the contribution of lymphoscintigraphy in axillary sentinel node biopsy, however its value may lie in the detection of extra-axillary nodes.

Axilla↗
PubMed1997

Redefining cutaneous lymphatic flow: the necessity of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in the management of malignant melanoma.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to emphasize the instrumental role of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in the surgical treatment of patients with malignant melanoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The efficacy of lymphoscintigraphy is reflected in its ability to reveal cutaneous lymphatic drainage to regional nodal basins that are at risk for melanoma metastases but not necessarily discernable to be at risk through standard historical anatomical guidelines or clinical experience. This preoperative lymphatic mapping technique has contributed greatly to the accuracy and efficiency of staging procedures including sentinel node biopsy and elective lymph node dissection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After informed consent, a selected series of four patients with primary melanomas located in watershed areas of the body (left neck, right mid-abdomen, right scapula, left back) and two patients with extremity melanomas (right distal forearm and left ankle) underwent pre-operative lymphoscintigraphy to identify all basins for metastases. RESULTS: In all of the cases, lymphatic drainage occurred in an unusual and unexpected basin that could not have been predicted clinically and in three of the cases the resected basins contained positive sentinel nodes. If not for the preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, these nodal basins would not have been resected and metastatic disease would have been left behind. In addition, the staging of the melanoma patient would have been inaccurate. CONCLUSION: If the sentinel node biopsy of elective lymph node dissection (ELND) were based on clinical predictions only, nodes equally at risk for metastatic disease would not have been resected and in some cases, nodal basins not at risk for metastases would have been resected unnecessarily. Without lymphoscintigraphy, the validity and efficacy of the ELND or the sentinel node biopsy for nodal staging is greatly compromised. These six case studies illustrate the difficulty of predicating lymphatic drainage from primary sites located on the head and neck, truck and even the extremities and demonstrate the indispensability of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in the management of malignant melanoma.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2000

Reliability of lymphoscintigraphy in indicating the number of sentinel nodes in melanoma patients.

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to establish the reliability of lymphoscintigraphy in indicating the number of sentinel nodes in patients with melanoma. METHODS: Lymphoscintigraphy was performed with dynamic imaging after injection of 60 MBq 99mTc-nanocolloid (1.6 mCi) and static imaging after 2 hours in 200 patients with clinically localized primary melanoma of the skin. The following day, sentinel nodes were retrieved with the blue dye technique and a gamma detection probe (Neoprobe 1000/1500). The discrepancies between the number of sentinel nodes indicated by lymphoscintigraphy and the actual number of sentinel nodes as established by the surgeon were evaluated. RESULTS: Lymphoscintigraphy showed drainage to 393 sentinel nodes in 255 lymphatic fields in 199 patients. In 48 lymphatic fields (19%) in 46 patients (23%), the number of sentinel nodes was different from the number that was visualized with scintigraphy. Additional sentinel nodes were found by the surgeon because a lymphatic vessel was not seen on the lymphoscintigraphy (43%), because a sentinel node was not visualized separately from other hot nodes or vessels or the injection site (36%), or because a sentinel node was blue and not hot (4%). Fewer sentinel nodes were found than suggested by scintigraphy because a lymphangioma was mistaken for a sentinel node (4%) or because a single elongated node was depicted as two hot spots (6%). CONCLUSIONS: Although lymphoscintigraphy is indispensable for lymphatic mapping, the predicted number of sentinel nodes is accurate in only 81% of lymph node fields. The limited discriminating power of the gamma camera is an important cause of discrepancies.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Clinical evaluation of lymphoscintigraphy with a new technetium compound for metastatic cervical lymphadenopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential usefulness of lymphoscintigraphy for the detection of metastatic cervical lymphadenopathy. METHODS: Dynamic and static lymphoscintigraphy with 99Tcm-HSA-D was performed in 23 patients with malignant oropharyngeal tumors. The internal jugular nodes were excised and examined pathologically. The results of the lymphoscintigraphy were compared with the pathological examination and clinical palpation for accuracy. RESULTS: All cases showed abnormal findings on lymphoscintigraphy. The accuracy on dynamic scintigraphy was 69% for asymmetric drainage, 69% for delayed drainage and 100% for inverse drainage. The overall accuracy for each side was 71%. With static scintigraphy, the accuracy was 69% for asymmetry, 86% for fitting defect, 67% for mottled-patchy appearance, 70% in swelling and 100% for collateral pathway. The overall accuracy for each side was 74%. The agreement between lymphoscintigraphy and palpation was 44%. CONCLUSIONS: Lymphoscintigraphy with 99Tcm-HSA-D was superior to palpation. The method is useful as a supplementary modality for the evaluation of metastatic cervical lymphadenopathy because of its relatively high accuracy and a low false-negative rate.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Lymphoscintigraphy with double tracer technique in carcinomas of the head-neck region].

BACKGROUND: Lymphoscintigraphy has been used since the early 1960s to demonstrate lymphatic drainage of head and neck tumors, but did not prove satisfactory. With the increasing importance of highly sophisticated neck dissection procedures, lymphoscintigraphy may have greater diagnostic impact. This assumes that lymphoscintigraphy will allow an accurate correlation of lymphatic drainage with anatomic structures. In this paper, we report on a method of lymphoscintigraphy with simultaneous body contouring. METHODS: Double-tracer lymphoscintigraphy was performed in 78 patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Patients received 100 MBq 99mTc-colloid in 0.1-0.2 ml in 3-4 peritumoral localizations. Ten patients were injected during surgery. Two milliliters of perchlorate solution were given orally in order to block the thyroid. Twenty minutes later patients received 50 MBq 99mTc-pertechnetate i.v. for body contouring. Planar images were obtained over 5 min each at 30 min and 4-6 h after injection from anterior, right lateral and left lateral using a LFOV-gamma camera. RESULTS: The thyroid was not visualized in any of the patients. In 28 of 78 patients (36%), the injection site was the only focal activity seen. In 50 of 78 patients (64%), lymph drainage was observed. Thirty-six of 78 patients (46%) showed unilateral lymphatic drainage, and 14 of 78 (18%) showed bilateral drainage. In all 50 patients showing lymphatic drainage, lymph nodes could be easily assigned to the six cervical lymph node compartments described. CONCLUSIONS: Double-tracer lymphoscintigraphy enables an accurate correlation of cervical lymph nodes and anatomic structures of the head and neck region. These findings suggest that the impact of these studies on the preoperative planning for neck dissection should be reevaluated.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Technical aspects of performing lymphoscintigraphy: optimization of methods used to obtain images.

Sentinel node detection is an important part of the clinical management of newly diagnosed melanoma. Now there is a similar or even greater enthusiasm for sentinel node evaluation in patients with breast carcinoma. However, controversies exist regarding the dose, volume, and route of administration. Even the role of lymphoscintigraphy itself, in contrast to using only a hand-held gamma probe during surgery for sentinel node detection, is being debated. Nevertheless, many centers and surgeons find that lymphoscintigraphy images are valuable in the treatment of patients and they use lymphoscintigraphy as a guide during surgery and to confirm the results obtained with the hand-held probe. Centers just beginning to use lymphoscintigraphy may find the images especially useful. Given this fact, the authors wanted to define the practical and technical aspects of performing lymphoscintigraphy in patients with breast cancer and examined various methods for the optimization of the technique of image acquisition. The suggested technique is generally free of the controversies noted above and applies to most patients. It includes various maneuvers that aim to improve the rate of sentinel node visualization using the gamma camera and the accuracy of node detection. The recommendations presented here should prove useful for both those experienced and for those centers just beginning to use the technique of lymphoscintigraphy.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1999

Lymphoscintigraphy in oncology: a rediscovered challenge.

The validation of the sentinel node concept in oncology has led to the rediscovery of lymphoscintigraphy. By combining preoperative lymphatic mapping with intraoperative probe detection this nuclear medicine procedure is being increasingly used to identify and detect the sentinel node in melanoma, breast cancer, and in other malignancies such as penile cancer and vulvar cancer. In the past lymphoscintigraphy has been widely applied for various indications in oncology, and in the case of the internal mammary lymph-node chain its current use in breast cancer remains essential to adjust irradiation treatment to the individual findings of each patient. In another diagnostic area, lymphoscintigraphy is also useful to document altered drainage patterns after surgery and/or radiotherapy; its use in breast cancer patients with upper limb oedema after axillary lymph-node dissection or in melanoma patients with lower-extremity oedema after groin dissection can provide information for physiotherapy or reconstructive surgery. Finally, the renewed interest in lymphoscintigraphy in oncology has led not only to the rediscovery of findings from old literature reports, but also to a discussion about methodological aspects such as tracer characteristics, image acquisition or administration routes, as well as to discussion on the study of migration patterns of radiolabelled colloid particles in the context of cancer dissemination. All this makes the need for standardized guidelines for lymphoscintigraphy mandatory.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2002

[Localization diagnosis of chyluria by radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy].

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy, a new method of localization diagnosis of chyluria. METHODS: Radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy was used to examine 34 patients with chyluria and the results of radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy was compared with those of cystoscopy and lymphangiography. RESULTS: Among the 34 patients 85.3% of unilateral localization diagnosis by radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy was coincident with that by cystoscopy. The positive rate of bilateral localization diagnosis was higher than that by cystoscopy. CONCLUSION: A less invasive technique, radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy can be used as a new option for the localization diagnosis of chyluria.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Lymphoscintigraphy to confirm the clinical diagnosis of lymphedema.

Confirmation of the diagnosis of lymphedema often requires lymphangiography, a procedure that is painful for the patient and technically demanding. Radioisotope lymphoscintigraphy is a relatively new technique that uses technetium 99 m antimony trisulfide colloid to produce a diagnostic image similar to a lymphangiogram. The procedure requires a single subcutaneous injection in the involved extremity, and images are obtained 3 hours later. It is technically easy to perform, produces minimal discomfort for the patient, and has no adverse effects. We have recently used radioisotope lymphoscintigraphy to evaluate 17 patients with extremity edema. These patients initially had a presumed diagnosis of lymphedema involving the upper or lower extremity. Lymphoscintigraphy confirmed the diagnosis of lymphedema in 12 (70.6%) patients. In five of the 17 patients (29.4%) the clinical impression of lymphedema was not supported by lymphoscintigraphy, leading to alternative diagnoses such as lipomatosis, venous insufficiency (two patients), congestive heart failure, and disuse edema. In all patients with secondary lymphedema the lymphatic system in the involved extremity could be partially visualized. Conversely, three of four patients with primary lymphedema had no ascent of the tracer from the foot and no lymphatic channels could be visualized. Lymphoscintigraphy is relatively easy to perform, safe, minimally invasive, and not uncomfortable for the patient. It is useful in differentiating lymphedema from other causes of extremity edema, allowing institution of appropriate therapy.

Adolescent↗