Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Liquid Phase Microextraction”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Suitability of hollow fibre liquid-phase microextraction for the determination of acidic pharmaceuticals in wastewater by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry without matrix effects.

The applicability of hollow fibre liquid-phase microextraction (LPME), as an alternative to solid-phase extraction (SPE), for the extraction/enrichment of acidic drugs (e.g. ibuprofen, clofibric acid, bezafibrate, etc.) from water samples prior to the determination by LC-ESI-MS-MS has been evaluated. After LPME method optimisation, it was found that this technique can provide very clean extracts, which do not lead to signal suppression during LC-ESI-MS-MS analysis of the analytes. The limits of quantification (0.5-42 ng/L) are suitable for the analysis of these drugs in wastewater. However repeatability needs to been improved (intra-day R.S.D. = 3.4-32%), which may be expected by automation and the development of commercially available devices and fibres specially prepared for analytical purposes. The method was finally applied to wastewater samples (treated and untreated) and results comparable to SPE were obtained.

Chromatography, Liquid↗
PubMed2001

Application of static liquid-phase microextraction to the analysis of organochlorine pesticides in water.

Static liquid-phase microextraction, with subsequent analysis by gas chromatography-electron-capture detection, has been applied to extract eight organochlorine pesticides from water. A conventional microsyringe was used to extract analytes from water samples over a concentration range of 0.05-100 microg/l. Factors relevant to the extraction process were investigated. The sensitivity of the method was enhanced with agitation, and increasing the extraction temperature, of the sample solution. Concentration factors of >50-fold were easily achieved within 25 min of extraction. The analytical data exhibited a relative standard deviation (RSD) range of 3.2% (lindane) to 10.7% (methoxychlor) for the eight pesticides; most RSD values were under 7%. Water samples collected from a reservoir, and from tap water in a chemical laboratory were analyzed using the procedure.

Chromatography, Liquid↗
PubMed2004

Analysis of endocrine disrupting alkylphenols, chlorophenols and bisphenol-A using hollow fiber-protected liquid-phase microextraction coupled with injection port-derivatization gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

Liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry were used to determine alkylphenols (APs), chlorophenols (CPs) and bisphenol-A (BPA) in aqueous samples. APs, CPs and BPA are highly polar compounds and need to be derivatized before analysis by GC-MS. In this work, they were derivatized in the GC injection port with bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA). The analytes were extracted directly from 5 ml of sample solution using 5 microl of organic solvent though a porous polypropylene hollow fiber. The hollow fiber, filled with an immiscible organic solvent (ca. 5 microl), was immersed in the sample solution which was stirred during the 30-min extraction. An aliquot (2 microl) of the extract and 2 microl of BSTFA were then consecutively injected into the GC injection port. Extraction parameters such as extraction time, pH of sample, concentration of salt added, and stirring rate were optimised. The proposed LPME provided a good average enrichment factor of up to 162-fold, reproducibility ranging from 5.9 to 13.9% (n = 4), and good linearity (r2 = 0.995) for spiked water samples. The limits of detection (LODs) ranged between 0.005 and 0.015 microgl(-1) (S/N = 3) using GC-MS with selective ion monitoring and limits of quantification were in the range of 0.012-0.026 microg l(-1). A comparative study was performed between LPME, headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and liquid-liquid extraction (LLE). The results obtained suggested that hollow fiber LPME was a rapid, simple and efficient technique for APs, CPs and BPA, and provided a good alternative to SPME and LLE. Finally, the proposed method was applied to monitor Singapore coastal water samples.

Endocrine Glands↗
PubMed2005

Dynamic headspace liquid-phase microextraction of alcohols.

A method was developed using dynamic headspace liquid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for extraction and determination of 9 alcohols from water samples. Four different solvents, hexyl acetate, n-octanol, o-xylene and n-decane were studied as extractants. The analytes were extracted using 0.8 microl of n-octanol from the headspace of a 2 ml sample solution. The effect of sampling volume, solvent volume, sample temperature, syringe plunger withdrawal rate and ionic strength of the solution on the extraction performance were studied. A semiautomated system including a variable speed stirring motor was used to ensure a uniform movement of syringe plunger through the barrel. The method provided a fairly good precision for all compounds (5.5-9.3%), except methanol (16.4%). Detection limits were found to be between 1 and 97 microg/l within an extraction time of approximately 9.5 min under GC-MS in full scan mode.

Alcohols↗
PubMed2003

Hollow-fibre liquid-phase microextraction of phthalate esters from water.

A simple and efficient liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) technique using a hollow-fibre membrane, in conjunction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry has been developed for the extraction and analysis of six phthalate esters in water samples. Parameters such as extraction solvent, agitation of the sample, salt addition and extraction time were controlled and optimised. The developed protocol was found to yield a linear calibration curve in the concentration range from 0.02 to 10 microg l(-1) for most target analytes and the limits of detection were in the low microg l(-1) level, ranging between 0.005 and 0.1 microg l(-1). The repeatability of the method varied between 4% and 11%. Under the present experimental conditions, the performance of the method was found comparable to that of solid-phase microextraction (SPME). The advantage of the proposed method over SPME was that it eliminated carry-over of analytes between runs. The applicability of the developed hollow-fibre LPME method and SPME was demonstrated for real water samples. The ability of both microextraction methods to concentrate many organic analytes was demonstrated as both methods allowed the confirmation of the presence of an extra contaminant (ethyl p-ethoxybenzoate) in bottled mineral water samples.

Esters↗
PubMed2001

Reduction of extraction times in liquid-phase microextraction.

Recently, we introduced a simple and inexpensive disposable device for liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) based on porous polypropylene hollow fibres. In the present paper, extraction times were significantly reduced by an increase in the surface of the hollow fibres. The model compounds methamphetamine and citalopram, were extracted from 2.5 ml of urine, plasma, and whole blood after dilution with water and alkalisation with 125 microl of 2 M NaOH though a porous polypropylene hollow fibre impregnated with hexyl ether and into an aqueous acceptor phase consisting of 0.1 M HCl. Two commercially available hollow fibres, which differed in surface area, wall thickness and internal diameter, were compared. An increase in the contact area of the hollow fibre with the sample solution by a factor of approximately two resulted in reduction in equilibrium times by approximately the same factor. Thus, the model compounds were extracted to equilibrium within 15 min from both urine and plasma, and within 30 min from whole blood. For the first time LPME was utilised to extract drugs from whole blood, and the extracts were comparable with plasma both with regard to sample clean-up and extraction recoveries. Extraction recoveries for methamphetamine and citalopram varied from 60 to 100% using the two fibres and the different matrices.

Chromatography, Liquid↗
PubMed2004

Application of liquid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the determination of polychlorinated biphenyls in blood plasma.

This study investigated the feasibility of applying liquid-phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to determine polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in blood plasma. An efficient and simple extraction technique has been developed for the enrichment of PCBs from human blood plasma samples using single-step liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) in conjunction with a hollow fibre membrane (HFM). An eight PCB congener mixture was spiked into 2.5 ml of blood plasma, and the solution was then adjusted to pH 10.5 with a salinity of 20% (w/v) prior to making the total volume to 5 ml with ultrapure water. The porous HFM, filled with 3 microl of organic solvent, was then immersed into the solution, which was continuously agitated at 700 rpm for 30 min. Extract (1 microl) containing the pre-concentrated analytes was then injected into a GC-MS without further pre-treatment. Using an optimised extraction procedure, a large enrichment factor of the analytes, i.e. up to 241-fold was achieved in 30 min. The procedure resulted in a relative standard deviation of < 11% (n = 6), and a linear calibration range from 2.5 to 150 microg/l (r > 0.999), and detection limits between 0.07 and 0.94 microg/l, respectively. To demonstrate the feasibility of the procedure, PCB concentrations were determined in actual blood samples collected from the local population in Singapore using the optimised LPME technique.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry↗
PubMed2002

Application of static and dynamic liquid-phase microextraction in the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Two modes of liquid-phase microextraction (LPME), static and semi-automated dynamic, have been developed for the HPLC analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. In static LPME, a small drop (3 microl) of organic solvent was held at the tip of a microsyringe needle and exposed to the sample containing the analytes, permitting extraction to occur. In semi-automated dynamic LPME, a syringe pump was used to automate the repetitive procedure of filling a microsyringe barrel that functioned as a microseparatory funnel, with fresh aliquots of sample, and expelling them after extraction. The factors influential to both techniques such as the type of organic solvent, extraction time, sampling volume, number of samplings, salt concentration and temperature were investigated. Static LPME provided high enrichment (60- to 180-fold) and simplicity. The analytical data exhibited a relative standard deviation range of 4.7-9.0%. Dynamic LPME provided higher (>280-fold) enrichment within nearly the same extraction time (approximately 20 min) and better precision (< or = 6.0%). Both methods allow the detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at microg/l levels in water by HPLC. Water samples collected from two rivers were analyzed using the methods, respectively. The results demonstrated that both modes of LPME were fast, simple and accurate.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2006

Determination of chlorobenzenes in water by drop-based liquid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-electron capture detection.

A drop-based liquid phase microextraction and gas chromatographic-electron capture detection (GC-ECD) method was described for the determination of chlorobenzenes including chlorobenzene, 1,2-dichlorobenzene, 1,3-dichlorobenzene, 1,4-dichlorobenzene and 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene in 5 ml of water. The method used 2 microl of n-hexane as extraction solvent, 5 min extraction time, a stirring rate of 600 rpm and sample ionic strength of 3 M maintained with sodium chloride at 25 degrees C (ambient temperature). The limits of detection (LODs) ranged from 0.004 microg l(-1) (for 1,3-dichlorobenzene) to 0.008 microg l(-1) (for monochlorobenzene). The dynamic linear range for all investigated chlorobenzenes was 1-50 microg l(-1). Recoveries of chlorobenzenes from fortified distilled water are over 90% for three different fortification levels (5, 15 and 45 microg l(-1)) and relative standard deviations of the recoveries are below 6%. Analysis of fortified (5 microg l(-1)) real water samples revealed that matrices had no adverse effect on extraction efficiency of proposed method. The recovery of fortified real water samples was from 90 to 94% with relative standard deviations below 6%.

Chlorobenzenes↗
PubMed2003

Automated hollow fiber-protected dynamic liquid-phase microextraction of pesticides for gas chromatography-mass spectrometric analysis.

Dynamic liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) controlled by a programmable syringe pump was evaluated for extracting pesticides in water prior to GC-MS analysis. A conventional microsyringe with a 1.3-cm length of hollow fiber attached to its needle was connected to a syringe pump to perform the extraction. The microsyringe was used as both the microextraction device as well as the sample introduction device for GC-MS analysis. The attached hollow fiber served as the "holder" and protector" of 3 microl of organic solvent. The solvent was repeatedly withdrawn into and discharged from the hollow fiber by the syringe pump. Pesticides were extracted from 4-ml water samples into the organic solvent impregnated in the hollow fiber. The effects of organic solvents, plunger movement pattern, agitation and extraction time were investigated. Good repeatabilities of extraction performance were obtained, with the RSD values ranging from 3.0% (alachlor) to 9.8% (4-chlorophenol) for the 14 pesticides; most RSD values were under 5.0%. The method provided a 490-fold preconcentration of the target pesticides. The limits of detection were in the range of 0.01-5.1 microg/l (S/N = 3) in the GC-MS selected ion monitoring mode. In addition, sample clean-up was achieved during LPME because of the selectivity of the hollow fiber, which prevented undesirable large molecules from being extracted. A slurry sample (mixture of 40 mg soil/ml of water) containing seven pesticides was extracted using this method which also gave good linearity and precision (most RSDs <7.0%, n = 3).

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry↗
PubMed2002

Hollow fiber-protected liquid-phase microextraction of triazine herbicides.

A new microextraction technique termed hollow fiber-protected liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) was developed. Triazines were employed as model compounds to assess the extraction procedure and were determined by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Toluene functioned as both the extraction solvent and the impregnation solvent. Some important extraction parameters, such as effect of salt, agitation, pH, and exposure time were optimized. The new method provided good average enrichment factors of > 150 for eight analytes, good repeatability (RSDs <3.50%, n = 7), and good linearity (r2 > or = 0.9995) for spiked deionized water samples. The limits of detection (LODs) were in the range of 0.007-0.063 microg/L (S/N = 3) under selected ion monitoring mode. In addition to enrichment, hollow fiber-protected LPME also served as a technique for sample cleanup because of the selectivity of the membrane, which prevented large molecules and extraneous materials, such as humic acids in solution, from being extracted. The utilization of this procedure in the extraction of a slurry sample (mixture of soil and water) also gave good precision (RSDs <5.00%, n = 3) and LODs (0.04-0.18 microg/L, S/N = 3). Finally, the comparison of the new method with the static solvent drop LPME and solid-phase microextraction was performed. The results demonstrated that hollow fiber-protected LPME was a fast, accurate, and stable sample pretreatment method that gave very good enrichment factors for the extraction of triazine herbicides from aqueous or slurry samples.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry↗
PubMed2005

Screening the extractability of some typical environmental pollutants by ionic liquids in liquid-phase microextraction.

The extractability of some typical environmental pollutants in ionic liquids (ILs) was screened by using a simple one-step liquid phase microextraction procedure. It was demonstrated that 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([CnMIM][PF6], n = 4, 8), two typical ILs, could effectively extract a set of 45 typical environmental pollutants including BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, phthalates, phenols, aromatic amines, herbicides, organotin, and organomecury. Analytes in 10 mL sample solution held in a 15 mL vial were extracted by a 5 microL drop of ILs suspended on the needle of a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) microsyringe; this was followed by HPLC, atomic absorption spectrometry, or cold-vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry determination. The enrichment factors determined were in the range of 5-168 for 15 min extraction by [C4MIM][PF6] and 4-178 for 30 min extraction by [C8MIM][PF6], respectively, which indicates that ILs might be considered as potential environmentally benign alternative recyclable solvents for the enrichment of environmental pollutants.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2000

Development of a simple in-vial liquid-phase microextraction device for drug analysis compatible with capillary gas chromatography, capillary electrophoresis and high-performance liquid chromatography.

A simple, inexpensive and disposable device for liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) is presented for use in combination with capillary gas chromatography (GC), capillary electrophoresis (CE) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). 1-4 ml samples of human urine or plasma were filled into conventional 4-ml vials, whereafter 15-25 microl of the extraction medium (acceptor solution) was filled into a short piece of a porous hollow fiber and placed into the sample vial. The drugs of interest were extracted from the sample solutions and into the small volumes of acceptor solution based on high partition coefficients and were preconcentrated by a factor of 30-125. For LPME in combination with GC, the porous hollow fiber was filled with 15 microl n-octanol as the acceptor solution. Following 30 min of extraction, the organic acceptor solution was injected directly into the GC system. For LPME in combination with CE and HPLC, n-octanol was immobilized within the pores of the hollow fiber, while the internal volume of the fiber was filled with either 25 microl of 0.1 M HCl (for extraction of basic compounds) or 25 microl 0.02 M NaOH (for acidic compounds). Following 45 min extraction, the aqueous acceptor solution was injected directly into the CE or HPLC system. Owing to the low cost, the extraction devices were disposed after a single extraction which eliminated the possibility of carry over effects. In addition, because no expensive instrumentation was required for LPME, 10-30 samples were extracted in parallel to provide a high number of samples per unit time capacity.

Blood Chemical Analysis↗
PubMed2005

Kinetic calibration for automated headspace liquid-phase microextraction.

The kinetics of the absorption and desorption of analytes for headspace liquid-phase microextraction (HS-LPME) were studied. It was found that the desorption of analytes from the extraction phase into the sample matrix is isotropic to the absorption of the analytes from the sample matrix into the extraction phase under the same conditions. This therefore allows for the calibration of absorption using desorption. Calibration was accomplished by exposing the extraction phase, which contained a standard, to the sample matrix. The information from the desorption of the standard, such as time constant a, could be directly used to estimate the concentration of the target analyte in the sample matrix. This new kinetic calibration method for headspace LPME was successfully used to correct the matrix effects in the BTEX analysis of an orange juice sample. In this study, the headspace LPME techniques were successfully fully automated, for both static and dynamic methods, with the CTC CombiPal autosampler. All operations of headspace LPME, including sample transfer and agitation, filling of extraction solvent, exposing the solvent in the headspace, withdrawing the solvent to syringe and introducing the extraction phase into injector, were autoperformed by the CTC autosampler. The fully automated headspace LPME technique is more convenient and improved the precision and sensitivity of the method. This automated dynamic headspace LPME technique can be also used to obtain the distribution coefficient between the sample matrix (aqueous or another solution) and the extraction phase (1-octanol or another solvent). The distribution coefficient between 1-octanol and orange juice, at 25 degrees C, was obtained with this technique.

Adsorption↗
PubMed2005

Simultaneous derivatization and extraction of primary amines in river water with dynamic hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometric detection.

A one-step derivatization and extraction technique for the determination of primary amines in river water by liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) is presented. In this method the primary amines are derivatized with pentafluorobenzaldehyde (PFBAY) in aqueous solution and extracted by dynamic hollow fiber-protected-LPME (HF-LPME) simultaneously. The effects of solvent selection, sample agitation, extraction time, extraction temperature and salt concentration on the extraction performance are investigated. High enrichments (172-244-fold) and good repeatabilities (RSD less than 7.2%) were obtained. Linearity in this developed method was ranging from 1 to 500 ng/ml, and the correlation coefficients (R2) were between 0.992 and 0.998. Comparisons of sensitivity and precision between dynamic HF-LPME and single-drop liquid-phase microextraction (SDME) were also made.

Amines↗
PubMed2005

Single-drop liquid-phase microextraction for the determination of hypericin, pseudohypericin and hyperforin in biological fluids by high performance liquid chromatography.

The analysis of hypericin, pseudohypericin (collectively called in this study hypericins) and hyperforin in biological fluids is reported using single-drop liquid-phase microextraction in conjunction with HPLC-UV-fluorescence detection. A new option for analysis of the active principle constituents in biological samples is proposed, reducing the steps required prior to analysis. There are several parameters which determine the mass transfer such as the extraction solvent, drop and sample volumes, extraction time and temperature, pH and ionic strength, stirring rate and depth of needle tip in the bulk solution. These parameters were chosen to optimize the performance in the current study. The method was validated with respect to precision, accuracy and specificity. The intra-day precision values were below 2.3% for the high concentration level of control samples and 6.2% for the low level. The respective inter-day precision values were calculated to be below 4.4 and 7.1%, respectively, for the two concentration levels. Accuracy of the method, calculated as relative error, ranged from -2.6 to 7.0%. It was demonstrated that as long as the extraction procedure is consistently applied, quantitative analysis is performed accurately and reproducibly in human urine and plasma samples. Limits of quantitation (LOQs) in urine were calculated to be 3, 6 and 12 ng/ml for pseudohypericin, hypericin and hyperforin, respectively. Slightly higher limits were measured in plasma, i.e. 5, 12 and 20 ng/ml, for the respective analytes.

Anthracenes↗
PubMed2005

Bioanalysis of drugs by liquid-phase microextraction coupled to separation techniques.

The demand for automation of liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) in drug analysis combined with the demand for reduced sample preparation time has led to the recent development of liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) based on disposable hollow fibres. In LPME, target drugs are extracted from aqueous biological samples, through a thin layer of organic solvent immobilised within the pores of the wall of a porous hollow fibre, and into an microl volume of acceptor solution inside the lumen of the hollow fibre. After extraction, the acceptor solution is subjected directly to a final analysis either by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), capillary electrophoresis (CE), mass spectrometry (MS), or capillary gas chromatography (GC) without any further treatments. Hollow fibre-based LPME may provide high enrichment of drugs and excellent sample clean-up, and probably has a broad application potential within the area of drug analysis. This review focuses on the principle of LPME, and recent applications of three-phase, two-phase, and carrier mediated LPME of drugs from plasma, whole blood, urine, and breast milk.

Body Fluids↗
PubMed2006

Determination of nicotine in mainstream smoke on the single puff level by liquid-phase microextraction coupled to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization Fourier transform mass spectrometry.

A method coupling liquid-phase microextraction with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization Fourier transform mass spectrometry (LPME/MALDI-FTMS) was developed to measure the content of nicotine in mainstream smoke at the single puff level. Glycerol was utilized as a matrix additive in the sample preparation to improve the homogeneity of analyte distribution in a sample spot. Good repeatability of the MALDI-MS signal (RSD <9%) was achieved by the method. Selective LPME facilitated the separation and purification of basic components from cigarette smoke. The LPME device was coupled to a smoking machine, and each puff of one cigarette could be gathered by this modified machine. The amount of nicotine in the mainstream smoke was measured at the single puff level by LPME/MALDI-FTMS. The method was simple and selective and was sufficiently sensitive to detect nicotine in each puff of one cigarette. The method thus offered an alternative approach to the study of the formation mechanism of cigarette smoke constituents.

Journal Article↗