Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Liquid Phase Microextraction”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Recovery, enrichment and selectivity in liquid-phase microextraction comparison with conventional liquid-liquid extraction.

Mathematical descriptions for extraction recovery and enrichment were applied for liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) and comparison with conventional two- and three-phase liquid-liquid extraction techniques (LLE) was made. The LPME theoretical calculations were verified by experimental determination of actual partition coefficients and by data obtained with LPME in a robust hollow fibre formate. With hollow fibre LPME operated in the two-phase mode, analytes were extracted from 1 to 4 ml aqueous samples into 25-50 microl of an organic solvent present in the pores and in the lumen of the porous hollow fibres. Compared with conventional two-phase LLE, two-phase LPME provided substantially higher enrichments for compounds with relatively large partition coefficients (K(org)/d>500). In contrast, because of the large volume of organic solvent relative to the sample volume, LLE provided high recovery and moderate enrichment even for compounds with relatively low partition coefficients (K(org)/d>5). Thus, two-phase LPME may be used for substantially enhanced extraction selectivity and enrichment of relatively hydrophobic analytes as compared with LLE whereas conventional two-phase LLE is superior for more hydrophilic analytes. Similar results were found for three-phase LPME where analytes where extracted from 1 to 4 ml aqueous samples through approximately 20 microl organic solvent immobilized within the pores of the hollow fibre and into 25 microl of an aqueous acceptor solution inside the lumen of the hollow fibre. The fundamental differences of LPME and LLE were further demonstrated with practical experiments on extraction of the basic drugs promethazine, methadone, and haloperidol from human plasma and urine.

Chromatography, Gas↗
PubMed2006

Determination of pesticides in water by cone-shaped membrane protected liquid phase microextraction prior to micro-liquid chromatography.

A new sample pre-treatment technique termed cone-shaped membrane liquid phase microextraction (CSM-LPME) was developed and combined with micro-liquid chromatography (micro-LC) for the determination of selected pesticides in water samples. Four pesticides (hexaconazole, procymidone, quinalphos and vinclozolin) were considered as target analytes. Several important extraction parameters such as types of extraction solvent, agitation rate, pH value, total exposure time and effect of salt and humic acids were optimized. Enrichment factors of > 50 folds were easily achieved within 20 min of extraction. The analytical data demonstrated relative standard deviations for the reproducibility of the optimized CSM-LPME method ranging from 6.3 to 7.5%. The correlation coefficients of the calibration curves were at least 0.9995 across a concentration range of 2-100 microg/L. The detection limits for all the analytes were found to be in the range of 1.1-1.9 microg/L.

Analytic Sample Preparation Methods↗
PubMed2004

Determination of ochratoxin A in wine using liquid-phase microextraction combined with liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection.

A liquid-liquid microextraction technique (LPME) has been applied to the extraction of ochratoxin A (OTA) from wine prior to its quantification by HPLC-fluorescence detection. OTA was extracted from wine, through 1-octanol immobilized in the pores of a porous hollow fiber, and introduced into 1-octanol inside the fiber. Recovery was 77%. The method was adequate for quantification of OTA in wine at levels within the range 0.25-10 ng/ml with a LOD of 0.2 ng/ml, and can be a simple and inexpensive alternative to the use of inmunoaffinity columns in order to quantify OTA levels in wine.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2005

Ultrasound-assisted liquid-phase microextraction and high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of nitric oxide produced in PC12 cells using 1,3,5,7-tetramethyl-2,6-dicarbethoxy-8-(3',4'-diaminophenyl)-difluoroboradiaza-s-indacene.

To reveal the function of nitric oxide (NO) that has been reported as an intracellular second messenger and a diffusible intercellular messenger, a novel ultrasound-assisted liquid-phase microextraction (ULPME) and high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of NO produced in PC12 cells has been developed. 1,3,5,7-Tetramethyl-2,6-dicarbethoxy-8-(3',4'-diaminophenyl)-difluoroboradiaza-s-indacene (DAMBO-CO(2)Et) has been used for NO trapping to form corresponding triazole (DAMBO-CO(2)Et-T). The enrichment factor of DAMBO-CO(2)Et-T reached 150 in 2.5 min with the proposed ULPME method. NO produced in (200+/-5) PC12 cells has been determined directly with the detection limit (S/N=3) of 2.5 x 10(-13)mol/L (5a mol), which was the lowest in HPLC determination of NO reported yet. The proposed method was sensitive, selective, convenient and rapid, which has great prospect in the qualitative and quantitative determination of NO in minimal biological samples.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Liquid-phase microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography for the determination of local anaesthetics in human urine.

A simple liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) device combined with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is presented for the simultaneous analysis of local anaesthetics, lidocaine, bupivacaine, and tetracaine, from human urine sample. An organic solvent showed good compatibility with the mobile phase of the HPLC, o-dibutyl phthalate, was selected. Local anaesthetics are extracted from 6 ml of the feed aqueous solution and human urine sample into a water-immiscible organic solvent suspended at the needle tip of the microsyringe, then the organic solvent was directly introduced to a reversed-phase HPLC system. The kind of the organic extraction solvent, the stirring rate, the pH value of the aqueous feed solution, and the extraction time have been discussed. Under the optimized extraction conditions, high enrichment factors (more than 86.0-fold) and significant sample clean-up for all of studied local anaesthetics were achieved within 30 min. The detection limits (lower than 0.05 microg/ml) were comparable with previously reported gas chromatography methods. This method was applied to specimen of patient who was treated with extradural anaesthesia of lidocaine, bupivacaine, and tetracaine, and revealed that simultaneous determination of above three local anaesthetics in human urine was possible.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed2006

[Developments of liquid-phase microextraction based on hollow fiber].

The liquid-phase microextraction (LPME), based on disposable hollow fiber, has been developed to be a new environmentally benign sample preparation technique which incorporate sampling, extraction and concentration into a single step. The novel technique can be easily manipulated in combination with high performance liquid chromatography, gas chromatography and capillary electrophoresis, and can provide excellent sample clean-up effect and high degree of extraction recovery and enrichment. It is proved to be simple, low-cost and virtually solvent-free. The extraction set-up, extraction mode, basic principles and recent applications of the hollow fiber-based liquid-phase microextraction are reviewed.

Analytic Sample Preparation Methods↗
PubMed2005

Two-step hollow fiber-based, liquid-phase microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography: a new approach to determination of aromatic amines in water.

A novel method for the extraction of aromatic amines present in water samples is produced here coupling two-step liquid-phase microextraction with high performance liquid chromatography by using a monolithic column. The hydrophobic porous polypropylene membranes were used as the interface between the donor water sample and the acceptor aqueous solution. In the first step, the analytes were extracted from a sample solution (pH 13) as donor phase into the organic phase, benzyl alcohol-ethyl acetate (80-20%, v/v) immobilized in the pores of a polypropylene dish and further into an acidified acceptor phase (pH 2) inside the polypropylene membrane. This step had about 100% relative recovery with an enrichment factors of over 59.9. For the second step, using a single piece of polypropylene hollow fiber, was shaped with a star liked profile as the acceptor phase. The acceptor solution in the first step was the donor phase for the second step. This solution was adjusted again to pH 13 with NaOH solution. Five microlitres of HCl solution (pH 2) as the acceptor phase was added to the hollow fiber, star liked profile, as the acceptor phase. This acceptor solution, after the second extraction step, was subsequently withdrawn into a micro syringe and directly injected into an HPLC system for analysis. With this two-step microextraction, total enrichment factors of >6000 could be obtained and detection limits of < or = 250.0 ng/l (S/N = 3)could be achieved. The calibration curves for analytes were linear within the range of 20.0 ng/l to 300 microg/l. All expreriments were carried out at room temperature, 22 +/- 0.5 degrees C.

Amines↗
PubMed2006

Determination of triphenylphosphine oxide in active pharmaceutical ingredients by hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction followed by reversed-phase liquid chromatography.

A versatile procedure has been developed and validated for the determination of triphenylphosphine oxide (TPPO) at low levels in various active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). This procedure incorporates the use of the novel hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) for the measurement of this potential process-related impurity in aqueous solutions of APIs. A small volume (40 microL) of 1-octanol contained within a hollow polypropylene fiber is used for the extraction of TPPO from low pH aqueous API solutions. More than a 100-fold increase in the TPPO concentration is obtained without additional evaporation of the extract. Experimental parameters of the extraction procedure were investigated to optimize extraction efficiency and minimize sample matrix interference. Using HPLC/UV as the end analysis technique, the procedure was validated for TPPO in the concentration range of 3-16 microg/L with an API present at 1500 mg/L. The versatility of the method was demonstrated by applying the procedure to the analysis of APIs with different molecular structures. This simple LPME procedure is inexpensive and offers appropriate sensitivity for the intended use while providing several advantages over other analysis methods for pharmaceutical samples.

Chemical Fractionation↗
PubMed2004

Ionic liquid-based liquid-phase microextraction, a new sample enrichment procedure for liquid chromatography.

Room temperature ionic liquids (RTILs) were used as extraction solvent in liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) coupled with liquid chromatography. Using 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([C6MIM][PF6]) as extraction solvent, some parameters related to LPME of 4-nonylphenol (4-NP) and 4-tert-octylphenol (4-t-OP) were optimized. Although [C6MIM][PF6] can suspend a much larger volume of drop on the needle of the microsyringe than the conventional solvents such as 1-octanol and carbon tetrachloride, the method sensitivity was analyte dependent because of the different partition coefficients and the relatively large viscosity of [C6MIM][PF6]. The proposed procedure has a detection limit and enrichment factor of 0.3 microg l(-1) and 163 for 4-NP, and 0.7 microg l(-1) and 130 for 4-t-OP, respectively. Aqueous samples including tap water, river water, and effluent from sewage treatment plant were analyzed by the proposed method and the recoveries at 10 microg l(-1) spiked level were in the range of 90-113%.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2003

Feasibility of a liquid-phase microextraction sample clean-up and liquid chromatographic/mass spectrometric screening method for selected anabolic steroid glucuronides in biological samples.

Anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) are metabolized extensively in the human body, resulting mainly in the formation of glucuronide conjugates. Current detection methods for AAS are based on gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric (GC/MS) analysis of the hydrolyzed steroid aglycones. These analyses require laborious sample preparation steps and are therefore time consuming. Our interest was to develop a rapid and straightforward method for intact steroid glucuronides in biological samples, using liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) sample clean-up and concentration method combined with liquid chromatographic/tandem mass spectrometric (LC/MS/MS) analysis. The applicability of LPME was optimized for 13 steroid glucuronides, and compared with conventional liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and solid-phase extraction (SPE) procedures. An LC/MS/MS method was developed for the quantitative detection of AAS glucuronides, using a deuterium-labeled steroid glucuronide as the internal standard. LPME, owing to its high specificity, was shown to be better suited than conventional LLE and SPE for the clean-up of urinary AAS glucuronides. The LPME/LC/MS/MS method was fast and reliable, offering acceptable reproducibility and linearity with detection limits in the range 2-20 ng ml(-1) for most of the selected AAS glucuronides. The method was successfully applied to in vitro metabolic studies, and also tested with an authentic forensic urine sample. For a urine matrix the method still has some unsolved problems with specificity, which should be overcome before the method can be reliably used for doping analysis, but still offering additional and complementary data for current GC/MS analyses.

Anabolic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Headspace water-based liquid-phase microextraction.

A new organic-free mode of headspace liquid-phase microextraction termed headspace water-based liquid-phase microextraction has been developed. Five phenols were used as model compounds in the development and evaluation of the procedure. Parameters affecting the extraction efficiency were investigated. Under optimal extraction conditions, very high enrichment factors were achieved. Since only water (with sodium hydroxide to adjust the pH) and a conventional microsyringe were used, this new technique is affordable, efficient, and convenient for extraction of volatile and semivolatile ionizable compounds. In addition, in combination with capillary electrophoresis, the entire analytical process is totally organic solvent-free and is thus environmentally friendly.

Chemistry Techniques, Analytical↗
PubMed2001

Determination of phenols in water using liquid phase microextraction with back extraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography.

Liquid phase microextraction with back extraction (LPME/BE) combined with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was studied for the determination of a variety of phenols in water samples. The target compounds were extracted from 2-ml aqueous sample adjusted to pH 1 (donor solution) through a microliter-size organic solvent phase (400-microl n-hexane), confined inside a small PTFE ring, and finally into a 1-microl basic aqueous acceptor microdrop suspended inthe aforementioned solvent phase from the tip of a microsyringe needle. After extracting for a prescribed time, the microdrop was taken back into the syringe and directly injected into an HPLC for detection. Factors relevant to the extraction procedure were studied. At the optimized extraction conditions, a large enrichment factor (more than 100-fold) can be achieved for most of the phenols within 35 min. The detection limit range was 0.5-2.5 microg/l for different analytes in aqueous samples. The results demonstrate the suitability of the LPME/BE approach to the analysis of polar compounds in aqueous samples.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2003

Three-phase liquid-phase microextraction of weakly basic drugs from whole blood.

The behaviour of weak basic analytes in liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) and the optimisation of parameters in whole blood are described. Benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepine drugs were chosen as model substances. Liquid-phase microextraction based on disposable polypropylene hollow fibres was used in the three-phase extraction of five weak bases from whole blood. The sample work up with the liquid-phase microextraction technique can be impeded by low recovery due to incomplete trapping in the acceptor phase of weakly basic drugs and the complexity of the whole blood matrix. Different parameters related to this problem were experimentally studied. Additionally the stability of the analytes was examined because of low pH in the acceptor phase. The investigation resulted in optimised LPME conditions for the extraction of weak bases from whole blood. The parameters limiting the recovery were evaluated.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2005

Surfactant enhanced liquid-phase microextraction of basic drugs of abuse in hair combined with high performance liquid chromatography.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a technique for simultaneous testing of hydrophilic abuse drugs in hair. The analysis of, codeine and methadone in morphine hair included incubation in methanol (5h, 50 degrees C), Surfactant enhanced liquid-phase microextraction (SE-LPME) and HPLC analysis. This study has demonstrated that SE-LPME constitute a real alternative to the other liquid-phase microextraction methods, for pre-concentration and extraction of hydrophilic drugs in biological samples and has shown the advantages of these optimized methodologies over the traditional microextraction techniques. For these drugs recoveries in the range of 57.5-93.7 were obtained from hair. The drugs were enriched by a factor of 61-128 during SE-LPME. Linearity (r2, 0.9982-0.9997) was obtained in the range of 50-500 microg/l for morphine and 10-500 microg/l for codeine and methadone.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2006

Determination of volatile residual solvents in pharmaceutical products by headspace liquid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-flame ionization detector.

This paper demonstrates headspace liquid-phase microextraction (HS-LPME) as used for the determination of volatile residual solvents in pharmaceutical products. This method is based on headspace liquid-phase microextraction capillary column gas chromatography. Under optimum conditions, the linerary of the method ranged from 1 to 1,000 mg l(-1). The limits of detection are 0.2-6.0 [corrected] mg l(-1) and relative standard deviations (RSD) for most of the volatile solvents were below 10%. This novel method is applied to the analysis of volatile residual solvents in pharmaceutical products with satisfactory results.

Chromatography, Gas↗
PubMed2006

Automation and optimization of liquid-phase microextraction by gas chromatography.

Several fully automated liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) techniques, including static headspace LPME (HS-LPME) (a drop of solvent is suspended at the tip of a microsyringe needle and exposed to the headspace of the sample solution), exposed dynamic HS-LPME (the solvent is exposed in the headspace of sample vial for different time, and then withdrawn into the barrel of the syringe. This procedure is repeated a number of times), unexposed dynamic HS-LPME (the solvent is moved inside the needle and the barrel of a syringe, and the gaseous sample is withdrawn into the barrel and then ejected), static direct-immersed LPME (DI-LPME) (a drop of solvent is suspended at the tip of a microsyringe needle and directly immersed into the sample solution), dynamic DI-LPME (the solvent is moved inside the needle and the barrel of a syringe, and the sample solution is withdrawn and ejected), and two phase hollow fiber-protected LPME (HF-LPME) (a hollow fiber is used to stabilize and protect the solvent), auto-performed with a commercial CTC CombiPal autosampler, are described in this paper. Critical experimental factors, including temperature, choice of extraction solvent, solvent volume, plunger movement rate, and extraction time were investigated. Among the three HS-LPME techniques that were evaluated, the exposed dynamic HS-LPME technique provided the best performance, compared to the unexposed dynamic HS-LPME and static HS-LPME approaches. For DI-LPME, the dynamic process can enhance the extraction efficiency and the achieved method precision is comparable with the static DI-LPME technique. The precision of the fully automated HF-LPME is quite acceptable (RSD values below 6.8%), and the concentration enrichment factors are better than the DI-LPME approaches. The fully automated LPME techniques are more accurate and more convenient, and the reproducibility achieved eliminates the need for an internal standard to improve the method precision.

Chemistry Techniques, Analytical↗
PubMed2005

Liquid-phase microextraction based on carrier mediated transport combined with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. New concept for the determination of polar drugs in a single drop of human plasma.

Recently, we demonstrated for the first time liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) of polar drugs based on carrier mediated transport. In this new extraction technique, selected analytes were extracted as ion-pairs from small volumes of biological samples, through a thin layer of a water immiscible organic solvent immobilised in the pores of a porous hollow fibre (liquid membrane), and into a microl volume of an acidic aqueous acceptor solution placed inside the lumen of the hollow fibre. In the current paper, this new extraction technique was combined with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) for the first time. Carrier mediated LPME was evaluated for several new model drugs (0.01 <log P< 1.76), the sample clean-up aspects were investigated in detail, and this new extraction technique was fully validated for the first time. Extractions were performed from 50 microl of human plasma samples, which provided sufficient material in combination with LC-MS. Sodium octanoate (50 mM) was added to the sample as carrier, 1-octanol (approximately 15 microl) was used as the liquid membrane in the wall of the hollow fibre, and 50 mM HCl was utilized as acceptor solution in the lumen of the hollow fibre. The addition of carrier to the samples was found to significantly improve extraction recoveries for the polar drugs tested, providing recoveries in the range 16-78%. Validation was accomplished for atenolol and cimetidine. Limits of quantification (S/N = 5) from 50 microl of plasma were 25 and 50 ng/ml for atenolol and cimetidine, respectively. The intra-day precision (R.S.D.) ranged from 7.8 to 17.2% and from 9.5 to 14.1% for atenolol and cimetidine, respectively, and corresponding inter-day precisions (R.S.D.) were within 6.7-1.4% and 7.7-20.3%. The method was linear in the range 25-1500 ng/ml for atenolol (r = 0.992), and 50-3500 ng/ml for cimetidine (r = 0.976). The accuracy of the method was found to be in range 89.1-99.6% and 83.4-86% for atenolol and cimetidine, respectively. The sample clean-up obtained by carrier mediated LPME was excellent, providing a significantly lower back-ground level in total ion current chromatograms by LC-MS as compared to protein precipitation.

Amphetamine↗
PubMed2000

Liquid-phase microextraction and capillary electrophoresis of acidic drugs.

Vial liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) combined with capillary electrophoresis (CE) was evaluated for the determination of the acidic drugs ibuprofen, naproxen, and ketoprofen present in water samples and in human urine. The 2.5 mL samples containing the drugs were filled into conventional vials and subsequently acidified by 250 microL of 1-10 M HCl. Porous hollow fibers of polypropylene containing 25 microL of an aqueous solution of 0.01-0.1 M NaOH (acceptor solution) and with dihexyl ether immobilized in the pores of the wall were placed into each of the samples. The acidic drugs were extracted from the acidified sample solutions into the dihexyl ether phase, in the pores of the hollow fiber, and further into the alkaline acceptor solution forced by high partition coefficients. The drugs were extracted almost quantitatively (75-100% extraction efficiency) from the 2.5 mL samples and into the 25 microL acceptor solutions, providing 75-100 times preconcentration. The acceptor solutions were collected for automated CE analysis, which enabled the drugs to be detected down to the 1 ng/mL level.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗