Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Flushing”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

The measurement of 2,3-butanediol and 1,2-propanediol in "flushing" and "non-flushing" Japanese.

Seven Japanese medical students, three "flushers" and four "non-flushers," were given 0.5 g ethanol/kg body weight PO in an attempt to assess whether elevated body acetaldehyde can account for 2,3-butanediol production in humans. Blood was taken from the anticubital vein immediately prior to, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after ingestion of ethanol. No difference in the two groups was observed in 2,3-butanediol or in 1,2-propanediol. Measured 1,2-propanediol was in the normal range in both groups. No 2,3-butanediol was detected in any of the subjects.

Adult↗

Improvement in embryo recovery using double uterine flushing.

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of double uterine flushing on the recovery of embryos/ova in cattle. Two hundred and ten embryo recovery procedures were conducted using a double uterine flushing method, and the results were compared with 432 conventional single-flushing procedures. Cyclic Limousin (n = 403) and Guzera (n = 239) donor cows received an intravaginal progesterone releasing device and 2 mg of estradiol benzoate on Day 0. Between Days 5 and 9, donors received decreasing doses of FSH, which ranged from 200 to 300 IU (Bos indicus) and 300 to 500 IU (Bos taurus). On the afternoon of Day 7, donors received an injection of 500 microg cloprostenol and progesterone implants were removed 12 h later (morning of Day 8). Artificial insemination was performed between 14 and 26 h after first detection of behavioral estrus. Cows were randomly assigned to have embryos recovered by a double-flushing method (n = 210) or the conventional single-flushing procedure (n = 432). For the double-flushing procedure, after first flushing the whole uterus with 1L of Dubelco's Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS), a Foley catheter was positioned in the uterine body to permit refilling of the uterus with fresh DPBS (80-150 mL). The catheter was closed with the plunger of a disposable 5 mL syringe, and the donors were allowed to rest in a holding area for 30 min. Thereafter, a second flush was performed to recover the solution remaining in the uterus. Animals from the control group were subjected to a single uterine flush. From 210 double-flushing procedures, 1409 viable embryos were recovered. In comparison, from 432 cows receiving the single-flushing procedure, 1993 embryos were recovered. Double flushing increased (P < 0.05) the number of embryos recovered per procedure compared to single flushing (6.7 +/- 0.4 versus 4.6 +/- 0.2, respectively; mean +/- S.E.M.). When double flushing was performed, average recovered embryos/ova increased (P < 0.05) from 8.3 +/- 0.4 to 12.7 +/- 0.7 in Limousin and from 7.9 to 11.5 in Guzera. Also, utilization of double flushing increased (P < 0.05) the number of viable embryos from 4.7 +/- 0.3 to 6.9 +/- 0.5 in Limousin and from 4.5 +/- 0.4 to 6.4 +/- 0.7 in Guzera. Mean total embryos/ova was similar (P > 0.05) between the control group and after the first uterine flushing in the double-flushing group; therefore, both flushings were conducted efficiently. In conclusion, double uterine flushing increased embryo recovery in cattle.

Animals↗

Improved control of niacin-induced flushing using an optimized once-daily, extended-release niacin formulation.

INTRODUCTION: Niacin is a recognized treatment for dyslipidemia due to its favorable effects on all lipid parameters. However, the clinical use of niacin has been limited by its adverse effects, particularly cutaneous flushing. A newly reformulated 1,000 mg niacin ER tablet has been designed to reduce flushing relative to the original commercial niacin ER formulation. The aim of this study is to compare the incidence, intensity and duration of flushing between the 1,000 mg reformulated niacin ER and the 1,000 mg commercially available formulation, when administered as a single 2,000 mg dose to healthy male volunteers. METHODS: This was a double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, 3-way crossover, flush provocation study conducted at a single center. To increase the probability of flushing, subjects were administered niacin ER at the upper limit of the approved dosage range (2,000 mg), and were precluded from using aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) during the study. Subjects received reformulated niacin ER, commercial niacin ER or placebo in a 3-way crossover fashion. The primary flushing variable was the occurrence of a flushing event. Secondary flushing variables included the number of flushing episodes, intensity and duration of flushing for both overall flushing events and for individual symptoms of flushing (redness, warmth, tingling and itching). RESULTS: A total of 156 subjects were enrolled in the study. Of 133 subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in at least 2 study periods, 89% of subjects experienced flushing during treatment with reformulated niacin ER, and 98% of subjects experienced flushing during treatment with commercial niacin ER. This difference was statistically significant (p - 0.0027). Reformulated niacin ER resulted in a 42% reduction in median flush intensity (p < 0.0001) and a 43% reduction in median flush duration (p < 0.0001) relative to commercial niacin ER. The duration of first flushing event was more than 1 hour shorter with reformulated niacin ER. During the study, 29% of subjects (45/156) experienced treatment-emergent adverse events, which were mostly mild in intensity and considered to be remotely related or unrelated to the study drug. CONCLUSION: The 1,000 mg reformulated niacin ER tablet substantially decreases the incidence, intensity and duration of flushing relative to the commercially available 1,000 mg niacin ER tablet, and represents an improved niacin therapy option.

Administration, Oral↗

Predictors of hot flushes in postmenopausal women who receive raloxifene therapy.

OBJECTIVE: In a previous report, we described the results of a randomized, controlled trial that evaluated the potential of raloxifene to induce or exacerbate hot flushes. Here, we provide additional analyses that were undertaken to identify potential predictors of hot flushes and to assess the clinical usefulness of various therapeutic strategies for the reduction of hot flushes in postmenopausal women who receive raloxifene therapy. STUDY DESIGN: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 487 unselected postmenopausal women were assigned randomly to receive treatment for 8 months with raloxifene, which was administered either at a dose of 60 mg/d every other day for 2 months followed by 60 mg/d (slow-dose escalation) or 60 mg/d throughout (raloxifene), or placebo. Data on the number, duration, intensity, and severity of hot flushes and awakenings because of night sweats were collected. Logistic regression models were used to examine the predictive value of various demographic and menopausal factors on the development or worsening of hot flushes. RESULTS: At baseline, 40.4% of all randomly assigned patients had hot flushes. The mean number of hot flushes (3-5 per week) was low. Fewer years postmenopause, surgical menopause, and previous estrogen or estrogen/progestin therapy were significant predictors of hot flushes at baseline but were not predictive of incident hot flushes during treatment with raloxifene. Of the women who received raloxifene therapy who had pre-existing hot flushes at baseline, 36% women had none at the end point. Early postmenopause and surgical menopause were significant predictors of a biologically relevant increase in hot flushes (>/=14 flushes/week). Early postmenopause, previous estrogen/progestin therapy, high body mass index, and greater duration of hot flushes at baseline were significant predictors of the need for symptomatic treatment. After 2 months of treatment, women in early postmenopause had significantly more hot flushes with raloxifene therapy than with slow-dose escalation ( P = .042), whereas there was no significant difference between raloxifene therapy and slow-dose escalation among women in later postmenopause. In the 50 patients who requested symptomatic treatment during the study, phytohormones or veralipride did not reduce the number of hot flushes markedly. CONCLUSION: A shorter time since menopause and surgical menopause are important predictors of hot flushes both before and during treatment with raloxifene. Previous estrogen/progestin therapy also increases the risk of hot flushes at baseline. For women in early postmenopause, slow-dose escalation of raloxifene therapy may be a suitable therapeutic strategy for the reduction of the risk of hot flushes.

Administration, Oral↗