Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Filgrastim”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Filgrastim for cladribine-induced neutropenic fever in patients with hairy cell leukemia.

Cladribine treatment of hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is complicated by neutropenic fever in 42% of patients despite documented infections being relatively uncommon. We performed a study of priming filgrastim followed by cladribine and then filgrastim again to determine if filgrastim would lead to a reduction of neutropenia and febrile episodes. Thirty-five patients received filgrastim and cladribine and were compared with 105 historic controls treated with cladribine alone. Cladribine was administered at 0.1 mg/kg/d by continuous infusion for 7 days. Filgrastim was administered at 5 micrograms/kg/d subcutaneously on days -3, -2, and -1 and then again after the completion of cladribine until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was >/=2 x 10(9)/L on 2 consecutive days (days +8, +9, etc). After filgrastim priming, the median ANC increased from 0.9 x 10(9)/L to 2.26 x 10(9)/L (2.5-fold increase), and after cladribine, the median nadir ANC in the filgrastim-treated group was 0.53 x 10(9)/L compared with 0.29 x 10(9)/L among historic controls (P =. 04). The median number of days to an ANC greater than 1.0 x 10(9)/L was 9 days in the filgrastim-treated group versus 22 days among historic controls (P < 10(-5)). The percentage of febrile patients, number of febrile days, and frequency of admissions for antibiotics were not statistically different in the two groups. Filgrastim regularly increases the ANC in patients with HCL and shortens the duration of severe neutropenia after cladribine. This phase II study, with comparison to historical controls, failed to detect any clinical advantage from the use of filgrastim and cladribine in the treatment of HCL. Accordingly, the routine adjunctive use of filgrastim with cladribine in the treatment of HCL cannot be recommended.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization using stem cell factor in combination with filgrastim in breast cancer patients.

The safety and optimal dose and schedule of stem cell factor (SCF) administered in combination with filgrastim for the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) was determined in 215 patients with high-risk breast cancer. Patients received either filgrastim alone (10 microg/kg/d for 7 days) or the combination of 10 microg/kg/d filgrastim and 5 to 30 microg/kg/d SCF for either 7, 10, or 13 days. SCF patients were premedicated with antiallergy prophylaxis. Leukapheresis was performed on the final 3 days of cytokine therapy and, after high-dose chemotherapy and infusion of PBPCs, patients received 10 microg/kg/d filgrastim until absolute neutrophil count recovery. The median number of CD34+ cells collected was greater for patients receiving the combination of filgrastim and SCF, at doses greater than 10 microg/kg/d, than for those receiving filgrastim alone (7.7 v 3.2 x 10(6)/kg, P < .05). There were significantly (P < .05) more CD34+ cells harvested for the 20 microg/kg/d SCF (median, 7.9 x 10(6)/kg) and 25 microg/kg/d SCF (median, 13.6 x 10(6)/kg) 7-day combination groups than for the filgrastim alone patients (median, 3.2 x 10(6)/kg). The duration of administration of SCF and filgrastim (7, 10, or 13 days) did not significantly affect CD34+ cell yield. Treatment groups mobilized with filgrastim alone or with the cytokine combination had similar hematopoietic engraftment and overall survival after PBPC infusion. In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that SCF therapy enhances CD34+ cell yield and is associated with manageable levels of toxicity when combined with filgrastim for PBPC mobilization. The combination of 20 microg/kg/d SCF and 10 microg/kg/d filgrastim with daily apheresis beginning on day 5 was selected as the optimal dose and schedule for the mobilization of PBPCs.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) may overcome imatinib-induced neutropenia in patients with chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Imatinib mesylate administration has become standard treatment for patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Although the safety profile of imatinib is favorable, Grade > or = 3 neutropenia (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) occurs in 35-45% of patients with CML in chronic phase who receive standard-dose imatinib. Myelosuppression results in treatment interruptions, which may compromise responses to imatinib. The authors investigated the ability of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) to reverse imatinib-associated neutropenia, thereby allowing for more continuous imatinib administration. METHODS: Thirteen patients with chronic-phase CML and Grade > or = 3, imatinib-induced neutropenia were treated with filgrastim. Treatment with filgrastim was initiated after a median of 22 months from the start of imatinib. Eleven patients received filgrastim 5 microg/kg 1-3 times weekly, and 2 patients received filgrastim 5 microg/kg daily; doses were titrated to maintain an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > or = 10(9)/L. RESULTS: Seven of 11 patients (64%) who began treatment with an ANC < 1.5 x 10(9)/L had responses (i.e., their ANC improved to > or = 2 x 10(9)/L within 21 days); the other 4 patients experienced slower recovery but were able to continue receiving imatinib uninterrupted. Before filgrastim administration was initiated, patients did not receive imatinib (due to neutropenia-related treatment interruptions) for an average of 21% of the total time since the start of imatinib. This figure decreased to 6% after the start of filgrastim treatment (P = 0.0008). Before filgrastim treatment was initiated, only one patient had achieved a major (partial) cytogenetic response. After the start of filgrastim treatment, five patients had major cytogenetic responses (including two complete responses). CONCLUSIONS: The authors concluded that filgrastim may overcome imatinib-associated neutropenia and allow improved delivery of imatinib. Some patients may experience improvements in their responses to therapy as a result.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Phase I/II trial of human recombinant granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) and escalating doses of cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and 5-FU in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We performed a phase I/II dose-escalation trial of cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and 5-fluorouracil (CNF) in combination with human recombinant granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, filgrastim) in patients with advanced breast cancer. The objectives of this trial were (1) to gain experience with filgrastim given to patients with advanced breast cancer and receiving standard-dose CNF, and (2) to determine the maximum tolerated dose of CNF that could be given with filgrastim support by incremental dose escalation of two components of the CNF regimen, cyclophosphamide and mitoxantrone. METHODS: Four patients who had received prior therapy for advanced disease received standard-dose CNF with filgrastim support. Sequentially enrolled patients who had received no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease were treated with standard-dose CNF without filgrastim (5 patients), standard-dose CNF with filgrastim (15 patients), or were entered into sequential cohorts of 3-6 patients to be treated with increasing doses of CNF with filgrastim support (29 patients). RESULTS: The maximum tolerated doses that could be given with filgrastim support were 1500 mg/ml cyclophosphamide, 20 mg/m2 mitoxantrone, and 500 mg/m2 5-FU. Overall, 7 complete (14%) and 13 partial responses (26%) were observed. Despite the use of filgrastim, repeated cycles of CNF at doses of 2000 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 25 mg/m2 mitoxantrone, and 500 mg/m2 5-FU could not be given because of neutropenia and thrombopenia. Among 18 patients with bidimensionally measurable disease there were 3 complete (17%) and 5 partial (28%) responses. The median progression-free survival of all patients was 236 days (34 weeks). CONCLUSION: The use of filgrastim allows CNF to be given at approximately twice the dose intensity of "standard"-dose CNF. Because nonhematopoietic toxicity was not dose-limiting, further dose escalation of this regimen might be possible with more effective hematopoietic support. The response rate and survival of patients treated in this study were within the range expected with standard-dose chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Recovery and biological activity of filgrastim after injection through silicone rubber catheters.

The recovery and biological activity of filgrastim after injection through a silicone rubber catheter were studied. Various volumes of filgrastim injection 300 micrograms/mL (0.17, 0.34, 0.51, 0.68, 0.85, and 1.0 mL) were injected through silicone rubber catheters and collected in glass vials to simulate intravenous bolus injections. The catheters were flushed with 3 mL of 5% dextrose injection before and after the injections. For some catheters, the procedure was repeated to simulate the administration of a second filgrastim dose through the same catheter. The theoretical filgrastim concentration in the expelled fluid was 16.1, 30.5, 43.6, 55.4, 66.2, or 75.0 micrograms/mL (corresponding to the filgrastim injection volumes). Filgrastim concentrations in expelled fluid were measured with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and biological activity was measured with a mitogenic cell-culture assay. There was > or = 10% loss of filgrastim after the first injection when the injection volume was 0.17, 0.34, or 0.68 mL. Mean drug recovery after the second filgrastim injection exceeded that after the first for all six volumes and was > or = 90% for five volumes. The recovered filgrastim retained all of its activity. A > or = 10% loss of filgrastim occurred for three of six volumes after one injection through a silicon rubber catheter. Recovery was higher after a second injection through the same catheter. Biological activity was not affected.

Catheterization↗
PubMed1998

Rapid hematopoietic recovery after multicycle high-dose chemotherapy: enhancement of filgrastim-induced progenitor-cell mobilization by recombinant human stem-cell factor.

PURPOSE: To assess the mobilization potential and safety of recombinant human stem-cell factor (SCF) when coadministered with filgrastim to untreated women with poor-prognosis breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible women had breast cancer with 10 or more positive axillary nodes, or estrogen receptor-negative tumor with 4 positive nodes, or stage III disease. Patients were randomized to receive SCF plus filgrastim or filgrastim alone. Filgrastim 12 microg/kg daily was administered for 6 days by continuous subcutaneous infusion. SCF was administered by daily subcutaneous injection at 5, 10, or 15 microg/kg concurrent with filgrastim for 7 days, or 10 microg/kg daily starting 3 days before filgrastim for a total of 10 days (SCF pretreatment). Apheresis was performed on days 5, 6, and 7 of filgrastim administration. Patients then had three cycles of epirubicin 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 every 28 days, each supported by one third of the apheresis product. RESULTS: Sixty-two women were treated. Greater yields occurred in patients who received SCF 10 microg/kg daily plus filgastim than those who received filgrastim alone (P=.013 for CD34+ cells; P=.07 for granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cells [GM-CFCs]). The difference was more marked with SCF-pretreatment than concurrent SCF. Fewer aphereses were required to reach the predetermined target of peripheral-blood progenitor/stem cells (PBPCs) in women who received SCF. SCF was generally well tolerated. Hematologic recovery was rapid after each of the three cycles of chemotherapy. There was no difference in recovery between the different treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Mobilization of PBPCs by filgrastim is significantly enhanced by coadministration of SCF, and commencing SCF before filgrastim can optimize this effect. SCF has the potential to reduce the number of aphereses required to collect a target number of PBPCs.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Filgrastim. A reappraisal of pharmacoeconomic considerations in the prophylaxis and treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Neutropenia is a frequent and often dose-limiting complication of chemotherapy and is associated with considerable patient morbidity and mortality. Standard treatment in patients who become febrile includes hospitalisation and empirical antibiotic therapy. Filgrastim is a recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF). It significantly decreases the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving standard-dose chemotherapy, and shortens the duration of febrile neutropenia in patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) or peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) infusion after myeloablative chemotherapy regimens. These effects are usually associated with a decrease in hospitalisation and antibiotic requirements. The contribution of filgrastim therapy to beneficial effects on other clinically important end-points (e.g. quality of life, tumour relapse rate, and short and long term survival) remains to be accurately determined. Pharmacoeconomic data concerning the use of filgrastim as an adjunct to standard-dose chemotherapy are derived largely from the results of phase III trials. Cost analyses based on hospital charges suggest that the cost of providing filgrastim therapy can be fully recouped if the drug is used as primary prophylaxis in previously untreated patients, for whom the risk of developing febrile neutropenia is at least 40%. Reserving filgrastim for use in patients who have developed febrile neutropenia in a previous chemotherapy cycle may result in further cost savings. However, careful patient selection is required, since potential cost savings will vary depending upon the risk of hospitalisation in the absence of filgrastim treatment. Infusion of filgrastim-mobilised PBPCs is emerging as a preferred strategy in patients receiving myeloablative chemotherapy, and promising results have been obtained from cost analyses. From a pharmacoeconomic viewpoint, future research should be directed towards defining optimum dosage regimens and hence improving the cost-effective use of filgrastim. Data evaluating patient quality of life and treatment preferences would help define the cost utility of filgrastim therapy. In the meantime, available pharmacoeconomic data support the use of filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in selected clinical situations.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1993

The impact of therapy with filgrastim (recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) on the health care costs associated with cancer chemotherapy.

The objective of the study was to estimate the net impact on health resource utilisation of using recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) following myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Cost minimisation of the study medication in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in teaching institutions and affiliated community hospitals participating in a clinical trial. 68 patients with small cell lung cancer undergoing cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and etoposide chemotherapy were randomised to blinded placebo or filgrastim study medication at three or 14 clinical trials sites. The patients received daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim or placebo, initiated 24 h after chemotherapy and continued until the neutrophil count exceeded 10,000 x 10(6)/l after the time of the expected nadir. Differences in total charges, costs and Medicare payments between treatment groups were the main outcomes measured. Compared to placebo patients, filgrastim-treated patients had significantly fewer and less resource-intensive hospitalisations. After accounting for filgrastim purchase and administration, the charge model predicts overall savings from filgrastim use in a clinical setting in which the risk of febrile neutropenia is high for patients not receiving filgrastim. The Medicare and cost models predict only a partial recapture of the cost of filgrastim therapy. The health care resources impact of filgrastim was sensitive to the risk of hospitalisation with febrile neutropenia, and to the perspective chosen for measuring resource utilisation (charges, costs or Medicare payments). The adjunctive use of filgrastim following myelosuppressive chemotherapy leads to partial or complete recapture of the cost of purchasing and administering the product.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1997

Phase 1 safety trial of Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) in non-neutropenic patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia.

The objectives of the present study were to: (1) evaluate the safety of Filgrastim therapy in non-neutropenic patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia; (2) determine the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) response to various dosages of Filgrastim in non-neutropenic patients with active infection; and (3) describe the impact of therapy with Filgrastim in combination with antibiotics on selected pneumonia-related clinical parameters. The study design was an open-label, dose-ranging, clinical trial, set in the General Clinical Research Unit of a large, public community hospital. The study population consisted of 30 patients who had presented to the Emergency Department with severe, community-acquired pneumonia. One of five dosages (75, 150, 300, 450 or 600 micrograms day-1) of Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) was given subcutaneously daily for 10 days, until discharge or until the absolute neutrophil count > 75 x 10(9) l(-1), whichever was earlier. Vital signs, pulse oximetry, arterial blood gases, daily complete blood counts with differential, serum chemistries, coagulation profiles, electrocardiograms, chest radiographs, plasma G-CSF concentrations and duration of hospitalization were measured. There was no evidence of Filgrastim-related lung injury or evidence of extra-pulmonary toxicity. There was no apparent dose-response effect of Filgrastim on pneumonia-related clinical variables. Dosages of Filgrastim between 150 and 600 micrograms day-1 had similar effects on increasing the ANC. Filgrastim appeared to be safe in non-neutropenic patients with severe, community-acquired pneumonia when given in dosages of 75-600 micrograms day-1 in combination with appropriate antibiotic therapy. Further study is needed to determine the effect of Filgrastim on morbidity, mortality and duration of symptoms in this patient population.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

An open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 2 study of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) as an adjunct to combination chemotherapy in paediatric patients with metastatic neuroblastoma.

Administration of combination chemotherapy to children with metastatic neuroblastoma induces profound myelosuppression resulting in chemotherapy treatment delays and febrile neutropenic episodes. The objective of this randomised multicentre study was to assess the incidence, duration and severity of neutropenia when filgrastim is added to induction chemotherapy administered to patients with metastatic neuroblastoma. In this study, 59 patients with metastatic neuroblastoma were randomised to receive chemotherapy (control group, n = 28) or chemotherapy plus filgrastim (filgrastim group, n = 31). Chemotherapy consisted of four cycles of cyclophosphamide, vincristine and doxorubicin (CADO) alternating at 21-day intervals with cisplatin and etoposide (CDDP-VP16). Filgrastim was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 5 micrograms/kg/day from day 7 for up to 14 days. The incidence of neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] < 0.5 x 10(9)/l) in the filgrastim group was not reduced after the first CADO course. However, significant reductions were observed after courses 2, 3 and 4. The duration of neutropenia and of intravenous antibiotic use were significantly reduced in the filgrastim group over the whole study period (9 days versus 26 days, P < 0.001; 12 days versus 20 days, P = 0.04, respectively). However, the duration of hospitalisation and the incidence of febrile neutropenia were not significantly reduced. Compliance to treatment was good and the ability to administer chemotherapy without treatment delays was significantly better in the filgrastim group (P < 0.05). Event-free survival was greater in the filgrastim than in the control group (2.4 years versus 1.3 years; P = 0.072). Filgrastim is a beneficial adjunct to combination induction chemotherapy used in the treatment of metastatic neuroblastoma.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1997

The impact of Filgrastim schedule variation on hematopoietic recovery post-chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: A phase 2 trial was done to study effects of varying treatment schedule of Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) on hematologic recovery following chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients with extensive small-cell carcinoma of the lung were randomized to receive one of three Filgrastim schedules following cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CAE) chemotherapy for up to six cycles of treatment. Chemotherapy was delivered on days 1-3 of each 21-day cycle with Filgrastim initiated at 5 micrograms/kg/day subcutaneously (SC) beginning on day 4, day 6, or day 8 and continuing until post-nadir neutrophil recovery. RESULTS: During the first cycle of chemotherapy, the duration of neutropenia was similar for all three schedules; however, the pattern of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery differed. In subsequent cycles of treatment, an improvement in the severity of neutropenia occurred in patients on the day-4 and day-6 schedules compared with the first cycle of chemotherapy. By contrast, patients on the day-8 schedule continued to experience neutropenia similar to that seen in cycle one. Patients on the day-8 schedule also experienced a greater magnitude of grade IV thrombocytopenia in later cycles of treatment. CONCLUSION: Timing of Filgrastim administration post-chemotherapy has profound effects on hematologic recovery. Delay of Filgrastim until day 8 was associated with suboptimal hematologic recovery compared with administration of Filgrastim on day 4 or day 6. Initiation of Filgrastim on day 4 or day 6 showed a similar pattern of hematologic recovery. Beginning Filgrastim on day 6 is associated with a decrease in the total dose of Filgrastim administered.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Compatibility of filgrastim with selected antimicrobial drugs during simulated Y-site administration.

The compatibility of filgrastim with imipenem-cilastatin, ceftazidime, fluconazole, gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin was studied. Filgrastim 40 micrograms/mL or filgrastim 10 micrograms/mL (with human albumin) was combined with (1) imipenem-cilastatin 5 mg/mL (in terms of imipenem content), (2) ceftazidime 10 mg/mL (as the sodium salt), (3) fluconazole 2 mg/ mL, (4) gentamicin 1.6 mg/ mL (as the sulfate), (5) tobramycin 1.6 mg/mL (as the sulfate), or (6) amikacin 5 mg/ mL (as the sulfate). Equal volumes (5 mL) of the test-agent solutions were added in pairs to glass containers (simulating Y-site administration) in triplicate. Samples were analyzed for filgrastim activity, drug concentration, pH, and visible physical changes during storage at approximately 25 degrees C for up to four hours. Filgrastim activity was measured by the in vitro bioassay, and antimicrobial drug concentrations were measured by stability-indicating high-performance liquid chromatography or fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Filgrastim retained its activity, except for the combination of filgrastim at the lower concentration with gentamicin or at the higher concentration with imipenem-cilastatin. Antimicrobial drug concentrations did not change significantly during the study. No precipitation, color change, or haze was noted in any mixture. Changes in pH were negligible except for an increase in the mixture of filgrastim at either concentration with ceftazidime. In most cases, filgrastim retained its activity in the presence of a variety of antimicrobial drugs for up to four hours; in all cases, the antimicrobial drugs remained stable.

Anti-Infective Agents↗
PubMed1999

Economic and clinical impact of a pharmacy-based filgrastim protocol in oncology patients.

The effects of a clinical protocol for filgrastim use in oncology patients were studied. A chart review was conducted for every fourth oncology inpatient who received filgrastim at a community hospital between January and June 1996 to determine how filgrastim was being used in the hospital's oncology patients. The results were presented to the oncology committee, and a filgrastim protocol was implemented. The protocol stated that filgrastim would be discontinued when the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was > or =1500 cells/mm3 for two days after the neutrophil nadir. Six months after the protocol was implemented, a follow-up evaluation was conducted by reviewing the chart for every fourth oncology patient who received filgrastim between November 1996 and April 1997. Twenty-one patient charts were reviewed before the protocol was implemented, and 34 charts were reviewed after implementation. The results showed there was compliance with the protocol for 19 (76%) of the 25 patients evaluable for compliance. Sixty-seven percent of patients were febrile before the protocol was implemented, and 56% were febrile afterward. Ten percent of patients had documented infections before implementation, compared with 12% afterward. The average ANC at which filgrastim was discontinued before and after the protocol was implemented was 6839 and 5538 cells/mm3, respectively. Filgrastim was discontinued by a pharmacist in 32% of cases. A $22,416 cost saving was achieved in the first six months after protocol implementation, with no compromise in clinical efficacy. A pharmacy-based protocol for discontinuing filgrastim therapy in oncology patients saved a community hospital more than $22,000 in the first six months withno adverse impact on the drug's effectiveness.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Filgrastim to treat neutropenia and support myelosuppressive medication dosing in HIV infection. G-CSF 92105 Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Patients with HIV infection frequently experience disease or treatment-related myelosuppression leading to neutropenia. Neutropenia often leads to dose-reduction or discontinuation of important myelosuppressive therapy. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of filgrastim for reversing neutropenia and determine the effect of this on use of myelosuppressive medications. DESIGN: Open-label, non-comparative, multicentre study in 200 HIV-positive patients with neutropenia [absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1.0 x 10(9)/l]. Filgrastim was started at 1 microgram/kg/day subcutaneously for 28 days. This initial treatment phase was followed by a maintenance phase, using 300 micrograms on 1-7 days/week. In both phases the dose of filgrastim was adjusted to achieve an ANC of 2-5 x 10(9)/l. RESULTS: Filgrastim reversed neutropenia in 98% of patients (ANC > or = 2 x 10(9)/l), with a median time to reversal of 2 days (range 1-16) and a median dose of 1 microgram/kg/day (range 0.5-10). Most patients (96%) achieved reversal of neutropenia with a filgrastim dose of < or = 300 micrograms/day (< or = 1 vial/day). Normal ANCs were then maintained with a median of 1 microgram/kg/day (range 0.22-10.6) during the treatment phase and 3 x 300 micrograms vials/week (range 1-7) during the maintenance phase. Ganciclovir, zidovudine, co-trimoxazole and pyrimethamine were the drugs most frequently considered to be causing neutropenia, and 83% of patients received one or more of these in the study. Filgrastim allowed > 80% of patients to increase or maintain dose-levels of these four medications or add them to their therapy. The number of these four medications received per patient increased by > 20% during filgrastim therapy. Filgrastim was well tolerated. CD4, CD8 and total lymphocyte counts all increased slightly, and there was no difference in HIV-1 p24 antigen levels. CONCLUSION: Filgrastim rapidly reverses neutropenia and maintains normal ANC in patients with HIV infection. This allows greater use of myelosuppressive medications without the potentially life-threatening complications of neutropenia.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Filgrastim prevents severe neutropenia and reduces infective morbidity in patients with advanced HIV infection: results of a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial. G-CSF 930101 Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of filgrastim treatment on the incidence of severe neutropenia in patients with advanced HIV infection, and the effect of initial filgrastim treatment on prevention of infectious morbidity. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter study. SETTING: Outpatient centers and physician offices. PATIENTS: Men and women aged > 13 years, who were HIV antibody-positive, and had a CD4 cell count < 200 x 10(6)/l, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) 0.75-1.0 x 10(9)/l, and platelet count > or = 50 x 10(9)/l within 7 days of randomization were eligible. Two hundred and fifty-eight patients entered and 201 completed the study. INTERVENTION: Daily filgrastim (starting at 1 microg/kg daily, adjusted up to 10 microg/kg daily) or intermittent filgrastim (starting at 300 microg daily one to three times per week to a maximum of 600 microg daily 7 days weekly) was administered to maintain an ANC between 2 and 10 x 10(9)/l. Patients in the control group received filgrastim if severe neutropenia developed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of severe neutropenia (ANC < 0.5 x 10(9)/l) or death, incidence of bacterial and fungal infections, duration of hospitalization and intravenous antibacterial use, and safety. RESULTS: The primary endpoint of severe neutropenia or death was less frequent in patients who received daily (12.8%) or intermittent (8.2%) filgrastim compared with control patients (34.1%; P<0.002 and P<0.0001 for comparison with daily and intermittent groups, respectively). Filgrastim-treated patients developed 31% fewer bacterial infections and 54% fewer severe bacterial infections than control patients, required 26% less hospital days including 45% fewer hospital days for bacterial infections, and needed 28% fewer days of intravenous antibacterials. Filgrastim was not associated with an increase in HIV-1 plasma RNA level in a subset of patients in whom this was measured or any new or unexpected adverse events. CONCLUSION: Filgrastim was safe and effective in preventing severe neutropenia in patients with advanced HIV infection, and may reduce the incidence and duration of bacterial infections, incidence of severe bacterial infections, duration of hospital days for infections, and days of intravenous antibacterial agents.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1997

Low-dose filgrastim significantly enhances neutrophil recovery following autologous peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders: evidence for clinical and economic benefit.

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical and economic benefit of low-dose (50 microg/m2) filgrastim after peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation (PBSCT) in a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blinded study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with lymphoproliferative disorders were randomized to receive low-dose filgrastim (19 patients) or placebo (19 patients) beginning on the first day after stem-cell reinfusion and continuing until absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was greater than 0.5 x 10(9)/L. All patients received greater than 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, which was mobilized with chemotherapy and filgrastim 300 microg from the fifth day. An economic analysis was performed based on the outcome in the two groups. RESULTS: Neutrophil engraftment was significantly more rapid in patients who received filgrastim with a median number of days until ANC was greater that 0.5 x 10(9)/L of 10 (9 to 13) versus 14 (9 to 19; P < .0001). The time to reach an ANC greater than 1 x 109/L was 12 (9 to 14) versus 16 days (10 to 25; P < .0001). The total number of patients who required intravenous antibiotic therapy was lower in the filgrastim-treated group (68%) compared with the placebo group (89%); also, the median number of days with fever and the duration of antibiotic therapy were shorter, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. However, although only three of 19 (16%) patients who received filgrastim required amphotericin, 11 of 19 (58%) who received placebo did require it, and amphotericin usage was significantly less in the filgrastim group (P = .029). Finally, in-patient stay was significantly shortened in those who received filgrastim from 16 (13 to 23) to 13 days (11 to 18; P = .0003). CONCLUSION: Low-dose filgrastim significantly reduces neutrophil engraftment time post-PBSCT and also reduces in-patient stay and costs, which makes it economically viable for patients who are undergoing high-dose chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Integration of filgrastim into chemoradiation for limited small cell lung cancer: a Phase I study.

PURPOSE: Recent studies document the value of early combined modality therapy of small cell lung cancer, but also indicate that early thoracic radiation adds to myelosuppression and can complicate further chemotherapy. Other studies indicate that simultaneous use of growth factors with thoracic radiation may be deleterious. However, temporal separation of growth factor use from cytotoxic therapy may allow dose intensity to be maintained/enhanced during combined modality treatment. We sought to integrate filgrastim into a novel chemoradiation regimen for patients with limited small cell lung cancer using an approach that separated growth factor administration from both chemotherapy and thoracic radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-seven patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer were enrolled in a Phase I trial of cisplatin, ifosfamide/mesna, oral etoposide, and thoracic radiation (1.5 Gy b.i.d. x 30 fractions days 1-19 cycle 1) +/- filgrastim (5 microg/kg/day). Filgrastim was given on days 20-25 of cycle 1 after completion of radiation and following completion of oral etoposide in subsequent cycles. The primary end point was determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of chemotherapy. Serial cohorts were treated with and without filgrastim. RESULTS: Because of dose-limiting thrombocytopenia, primarily, and nonhematologic toxicity, the MTDs with and without filgrastim were identical (cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. and ifosfamide 1200 mg/m2 i.v., both given days 1-3, and etoposide 40 mg/m2 p.o. days 1-14). Filgrastim use shortened the duration of neutropenia at the MTD (median 4 vs. 7 days), but was not associated with a reduction in febrile neutropenia. Although growth factor administration did not allow dose escalation of this regimen, it did allow chemotherapy doses to be maintained at the MTD more frequently through four cycles of therapy. In the 24 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 100% (71% partial and 29% complete). CONCLUSIONS: Despite careful attention to the timing of growth factor with chemoradiation, the administration of filgrastim with this regimen did not allow dose escalation. As in many other recent studies of hematopoietic growth factors given prophylactically with chemotherapy, the duration of neutropenia at the MTD was shortened and the need for dose reduction throughout treatment was reduced in patients receiving filgrastim at the MTD.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Effect of filgrastim (G-CSF) during chemotherapy and abdomino-pelvic radiation therapy in patients with ovarian carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, G-CSF) in reducing neutropenia and treatment interruptions during whole abdominal radiotherapy for ovarian cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixteen patients with ovarian cancer treated with 2 to 6 courses of cisplatin-containing chemotherapy and abdomino-pelvic radiation therapy received filgrastim for neutrophil counts <2 x 10(9)/L. Endpoints for analysis included the ability to maintain the neutrophil count in the target range, number of treatment interruptions due to neutropenia, and toxicity attributed to filgrastim. RESULTS: Fourteen patients received a mean of 2.9 courses of filgrastim (each with a mean duration of 4.1 days), with no treatment interruptions due to neutropenia. The majority of neutrophil counts were maintained above the target range of 2 x 10(9)/L during treatment. Thrombocytopenia requiring treatment interruption was seen in six patients and necessitated platelet transfusions in one. Thrombocytopenia occurred at a mean abdominal radiation dose of 2207 cGy and in all but one patient was preceded by one or more episodes of neutropenia. In comparison with a control group of 31 patients treated without filgrastim there was no reduction in treatment interruptions. Four patients did not complete treatment because of persistent thrombocytopenia yet received a mean of 94% of the planned abdominal radiation dose and 69% of the planned pelvic dose. Filgrastim toxicity was limited to mild skeletal pains in six patients and a Grade 1 skin rash in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: Filgrastim is safe and effective in preventing neutropenia and reducing neutropenic treatment interruptions during abdominal radiotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer. However, there was no clear benefit to the use of filgrastim as thrombocytopenia became the dose-limiting toxicity resulting in a risk of treatment interruptions and early termination of radiotherapy.

Abdomen↗