Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Filgrastim”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Randomized comparison of progenitor-cell mobilization using chemotherapy, stem-cell factor, and filgrastim or chemotherapy plus filgrastim alone in patients with ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: This was the first randomized study to investigate the efficacy of peripheral-blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization using stem-cell factor (SCF) in combination with filgrastim (G-CSF) following chemotherapy compared with filgrastim alone following chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with ovarian cancer were treated with cyclophosphamide and randomized to receive filgrastim 5 microg/kg alone or filgrastim 5 microg/kg plus SCF. The dose of SCF was cohort-dependent (5, 10, 15, and 20 microg/kg), with 12 patients in each cohort, nine of whom received SCF plus filgrastim and the remaining three patients who received filgrastim alone. On recovery from the WBC nadir, patients underwent a single apheresis. RESULTS: SCF in combination with filgrastim following chemotherapy enhanced the mobilization of progenitor cells compared with that produced by filgrastim alone following chemotherapy. This enhancement was dose-dependent for colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM), burst-forming unit-erythrocyte (BFU-E), and CD34+ cells in both the peripheral blood and apheresis product. In the apheresis product, threefold to fivefold increases in median CD34+ and progenitor cell yields were obtained in patients treated with SCF 20 microg/kg plus filgrastim compared with yields obtained in patients treated with filgrastim alone. Peripheral blood values of CFU-GM, BFU-E, and CD34+ cells per milliliter remained above defined threshold levels longer with higher doses of SCF. The higher doses of SCF offer a greater window of opportunity in which to perform the apheresis to achieve high yields. CONCLUSION: SCF (15 or 20 microg/kg) in combination with filgrastim following chemotherapy is an effective way of increasing progenitor cell yields compared with filgrastim alone following chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Randomized trial of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim after myelosuppressive chemotherapy for the harvesting of peripheral-blood stem cells.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim on CD34(+) cell yields and morbidity after myelosuppressive mobilization chemotherapy (MC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-six patients were randomized to receive filgrastim (n = 51), sargramostim (n = 52), or sargramostim for 5 days followed by filgrastim (n = 53) after MC with either cyclophosphamide and etoposide (n = 75) or paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (n = 81). RESULTS: Compared with those who received sargramostim, patients who received filgrastim had faster recovery of an absolute neutrophil count of 0.5 x 10(9)/L or greater (a median of 11 v 14 days; P =. 0001), with fewer patients requiring RBC transfusions (P =.008), fewer patients with fever (18% v 52%; P = 0.001), fewer hospital admissions (20% v 42%; P =.013), and less intravenous antibiotic therapy (24% v 69%; P =.001). Patients who received filgrastim yielded more CD34(+) cells (median, 7.1 v 2.0 x 10(6)/kg/apheresis; P =.0001), and a higher fraction achieved 2.5 x 10(6) (94% v 78%; P =.021) and 5 x 10(6) (88% v 53%; P =.001) or more CD34(+) cells/kg with fewer aphereses (median, 2 v 3; P =.002) and fewer days of growth-factor treatment (median, 12 v 14; P =.0001). There were no major differences in outcomes between the filgrastim alone and the sequential regimens. After high-dose chemotherapy, patients who had peripheral-blood stem cells (PBSCs) mobilized with filgrastim or the sequential regimen received higher numbers of CD34(+) cells and had faster platelet recovery (P =.015), with fewer patients (P =.014) receiving fewer platelet transfusions (P =.001) than patients receiving sargramostim-mobilized PBSCs. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that filgrastim alone or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim were superior to sargramostim alone for the mobilization of CD34(+) cells and reduction of toxicities after MC.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Characterization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) mobilized by filgrastim (rHuG-CSF) in normal volunteers: dose-effect relationship for filgrastim with the character of mobilized PBPC.

Filgrastim (rHuG-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in healthy Japanese volunteers were characterized in detail using two clonal cell culture systems and double-colour flow cytometry to detect multilineage colony-forming cells and subsets of CD34+ cells. The kinetics of PBPC during the administration of filgrastim was studied, and possible differences in the character of progenitor cells relative to given doses of filgrastim were investigated. Filgrastim was administered subcutaneously to normal volunteers for 7 d at doses of 100, 200 or 400 microgram/m2 (10 per cohort). Treatment with 100 or 200 microgram/m2 filgrastim was well tolerated; however, the 400 microgram/m2 dose level was not completed because of bone pain and myalgia. The treatment strikingly mobilized various types of progenitor cells, including highly proliferative megakaryocytic colony-forming cells. The number of progenitor cells peaked on days 5 and 6. The fold increase of circulating progenitor cells from the baseline value in the volunteers treated with 200 microgram/m2 filgrastim was more pronounced than in those treated with 100 microgram/m2. Treatment with 200 microgram/m2 also released the less mature progenitor cells (i.e. mixed colony-forming cells CD34+/33- cells, and CD34+/HLA-DR-cells) into circulation better than the 100 microgram/m2 dose. These results suggest that daily subcutaneous injection with 200 microgram/m/2 filgrastim for 5 d will effectively mobilize, both qualitatively and quantitatively, PBPC in healthy donors.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Randomized trial of autologous filgrastim-primed bone marrow transplantation versus filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in lymphoma patients.

Although a large amount of data is available on the effects of filgrastim (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF]) on the mobilization of stem cells in the circulation, data concerning its effects on bone marrow (BM) harvesting is scarce and controversial. We have designed a randomized trial comparing filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation with filgrastim-primed autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). Fifty-five patients affected by non-Hodgkin's (n = 38) or Hodgkin's (n = 17) lymphoma, selected for autologous transplantation over a 12-month period in a single institution, were randomized 2:1 to undergo BM or PB harvest/collection after priming for 3 days with filgrastim, 16 microg/kg body weight daily subcutaneously. BM priming with G-CSF allowed the harvest of a significantly higher number of mononuclear cells (MNC) (0.53 x 10(8)/kg, range, 0.32 to 1.40), as compared with a historical control of unprimed BM harvests (0.43 x 10(8) MNC/kg, range, 0.15 to 0.72, P = .001). After high-dose ablative therapy, median time to neutrophil recovery above 0.5 x 10(9)/L was 12 days for BM and 11 days for PB (P = .219); median time to platelet recovery above 20 x 10(9)/L was 13 days for BM and 11 days for PB (P = .242). The same number of red blood cells, platelet transfusions, and posttransplant G-CSF doses were required in the two groups of patients. Less patients (50% v 70%) became febrile in the group transplanted with mobilized PB, but days of fever/patient and days on antibiotics were overlapping. The median time spent in the hospital after reinfusion was 16.5 and 15.5 days after primed BM and primed PB, respectively (P = .134). These data suggest that in patients with lymphoma submitted to autologous transplantation, the reinfusion of filgrastim-primed BM or filgrastim-mobilized PB leads to similar results, with an advantage of only 1 day in the neutrophil recovery and 1 day on the time spent in the hospital in favor of primed PB. Either option can be chosen on the basis of the availability of a surgery room or cell separator facilities and considering the patients' characteristics and wishes.

Bone Marrow Transplantation↗
PubMed1998

Effect of prophylactic administration of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) on the frequency of nosocomial infections in patients with acute traumatic brain injury or cerebral hemorrhage. The Filgrastim Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of prophylactic recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) reduces the frequency of nosocomial infections in patients with either acute traumatic brain injury or cerebral hemorrhage. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter phase II study. SETTING: Intensive care units of seven medical centers. PATIENTS: Patients with either acute traumatic brain injury or cerebral hemorrhage who were intubated within 6 hrs of admission and who were expected to be ventilated for >72 hrs. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive daily subcutaneous injections of placebo (n = 21) or one of two doses of filgrastim (75 microg [n = 20] or 300 microg [n = 20]) for 10 days or until the absolute neutrophil count was >75,000 cells/mm3 or until extubation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: End points included increase in absolute neutrophil count, safety of filgrastim, and frequency of nosocomial infections (pneumonia, bacteremia, and urinary tract infection). Filgrastim caused a dose-dependent increase in absolute neutrophil count. There were no differences in the frequency of pneumonia or urinary tract infection; however, there was a dose-dependent decrease in the frequency of bacteremias (p < .05). Adverse events were similar among the three groups. There was one case of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: In this patient population, use of filgrastim was safe and the agent appeared to reduce the risk of primary bacteremias but had no beneficial effects on mortality, length of stay, or other nosocomial infections.

APACHE↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Autologous transplantation of peripheral blood progenitor cells mobilized by chemotherapy with or without G-CSF (filgrastim) in resistant lymphoproliferative diseases: enhanced hemopoietic recovery with filgrastim primed progenitors.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Bone marrow transplantation is increasingly used to overcome the bone marrow toxicity from myeloblative therapy. Peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) has been recognized as an alternative source of bone marrow for hemopoietic recovery after myeloblative therapy. In the steady state condition hemopoietic progenitors are scarce in peripheral blood; chemotherapy and growth factors are both able to increase PBPCs. Twenty-five patients affected by resistant lymphoproliferative diseases [4 multiple myeloma (MM), 19 non Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and 2 Hodgkin's disease (HD)] were submitted to autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT). PBPCs were collected after chemotherapy (CT) alone (8 patients) or plus filgrastim (17 patients). Filgrastim was not administered after PBPCT in any case. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: A statistically significant difference between the two groups was found for the following parameters: number of leukaphereses administered, amount of CFU-GM infused, time to hemopoietic recovery, amount of supportive care, number of days of antibiotic therapy, length of hospitalization. PBPCs primed with filgrastim CT appeared to be markedly superior to CT-recruited PBPCs in reducing the period of neutropenia and, surprisingly, of thrombocytopenia. Reduction in hematologic toxicity resulted in a decrease of transplantation-related toxicity and mortality, even in elderly and/or heavily pretreated patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Randomized trial of filgrastim vs. sequential filgrastim and molgramostim after dose-intensified carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide: a phase I pilot study.

This phase I randomized study was designed in order to verify if the sequential administration of filgrastim, a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and molgramostim, a granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), was superior to filgrastim alone in improving tolerance of dose-intensified carboplatin (CBDCA), cyclophosphamide (CTX), and etoposide (VP-16). A group of 10 heavily pretreated patients with stage IV disease and no therapeutic option were enrolled into the study. They received two courses of the same chemotherapy with CTX and VP-16 at doses of 1,500 mg/m2 and 400 mg/m2, respectively. CBDCA doses were escalated from 450 to 600 mg/m2. After chemotherapy each patient was allocated randomly to receive either 14 days of G-CSF (arm A) or 7 days of G-CSF followed by 7 days of GM-CSF (arm B). Crossover in the second chemotherapy course was accomplished. Both G-CSF and GM-CSF were given 5 microg/kg/day, subcutaneously. Twenty chemotherapy courses are evaluable, 10 in each arm. Absolute neutrophil count < 1 x 10(3)/microl was observed for 54 days in arm A vs. 68 days in arm B (P < 0.02); platelet (PLT) count < 20 x 10(3)/microl, 57 days vs. 30 days (P < 0.01); days of hospitalization 35 vs. 16 (P < 0.38); PLT transfusion, 107 vs. 58 (P < 0.01); packed red blood cell unit transfusions, 15 vs. 5 (P < 0.13). Seven patients had responses. These data indicate that dose-intensified chemotherapy may be delivered without bone marrow or peripheral stem cell support, with acceptable toxicity, and that, while G-CSF alone shortens days of neutropenia, the combination of the two cytokines shortens the time of thrombocytopenia and decreases the number of PLT transfusions.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Filgrastim during combination chemotherapy of patients with poor-prognosis metastatic germ cell malignancy. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Genito-Urinary Group, and the Medical Research Council Testicular Cancer Working Party, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of r-metHu granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on the proportion of patients with metastatic poor-prognosis malignant germ cell tumors who receive full dose-intensity combination chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a phase III study patients received six cycles of BEP/EP (etoposide, and cisplatin, plus or minus bleomycin) or six cycles of BOP/VIP-B (bleomycin, vincristine, cisplatin/etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, bleomycin). A subset were secondarily randomized to receive or not receive filgrastim. Filgrastim 5 microg/kg/day was administered subcutaneously on days 3 through 9 after each BOP and on days 6 through 19 after each VIP, BEP, or EP cycle. RESULTS: Eighty-five percent of 120 eligible patients randomized to filgrastim received at least six chemotherapy cycles compared with 70% of 130 patients randomized to not receive filgrastim (VCP = .003). Patients in the filgrastim-arm achieved significantly higher dose-intensities. Neutropenic fever occurred in 25 of 128 filgrastim-patients and in 38 of 129 non-filgrastim-patients (P = .052). Twelve and three toxic deaths occurred in the non-filgrastim- and filgrastim-arms, respectively. Nine of the 12 toxic deaths and all of the three toxic deaths were associated with febrile grade 4 neutropenia. Failure-free and overall survival were similar in both arms. CONCLUSION: During combination chemotherapy in patients with malignant germ cell tumors, the routine use of filgrastim significantly improved the delivery of the planned treatment schedule without effect on failure-free or overall survival. The use of filgrastim was associated with a clinically important reduction in the number of toxic deaths, confined to the experimental intensified-chemotherapy schedule. This study does not support the routine use of filgrastim during standard chemotherapy with BEP.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Stem cell factor in combination with filgrastim after chemotherapy improves peripheral blood progenitor cell yield and reduces apheresis requirements in multiple myeloma patients: a randomized, controlled trial.

Stem cell factor (SCF) has been shown to synergize with filgrastim to mobilize CD34(+) cells into the peripheral blood. To determine if addition of SCF to chemotherapy and filgrastim reduces the number of leukaphereses required to achieve a target yield of 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, 102 patients with multiple myeloma were randomized to receive mobilization chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m(2)) and either SCF (20 micrograms/kg/d) combined with filgrastim (5 micrograms/kg/d) or filgrastim alone (5 micrograms/kg/d), administered daily until leukaphereses were completed. After collection, patients were treated with myeloablative therapy supported by autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) infusion and filgrastim (5 micrograms/kg/d). There was a significant difference between the treatment groups in the number of leukaphereses required to collect 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg (median of 1 v 2 for SCF + filgrastim and filgrastim alone, respectively, P =.008). Patients receiving the combination of SCF plus filgrastim had a 3-fold greater chance of reaching 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in a single leukapheresis compared with patients mobilized with filgrastim alone. The median CD34(+) cell yield was significantly increased for the SCF group in the first leukapheresis (11.3 v 4.0 x 10(6)/kg, P =.003) and all leukaphereses (12.4 v 8.2 x 10(6)/kg, P =.007). Total colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) and mononuclear cell counts were also significantly higher in the SCF group in the first leukapheresis and in all leukaphereses. As expected for patients mobilized to an optimal CD34(+) cell yield, the time to engraftment was similar between the 2 treatment groups. Cells mobilized with the combination of SCF plus filgrastim were thus considered effective and safe for achieving rapid engraftment. Treatment with SCF plus filgrastim was well tolerated, with mild to moderate injection site reactions being the most frequently reported adverse events. There were no serious allergic-like reactions to SCF. The addition of SCF to filgrastim after cyclophosphamide for PBPC mobilization resulted in a significant increase in CD34(+) cell yield and a concomitant reduction in the number of leukaphereses required to collect an optimal harvest of 5 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Filgrastim for cladribine-induced neutropenic fever in patients with hairy cell leukemia.

Cladribine treatment of hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is complicated by neutropenic fever in 42% of patients despite documented infections being relatively uncommon. We performed a study of priming filgrastim followed by cladribine and then filgrastim again to determine if filgrastim would lead to a reduction of neutropenia and febrile episodes. Thirty-five patients received filgrastim and cladribine and were compared with 105 historic controls treated with cladribine alone. Cladribine was administered at 0.1 mg/kg/d by continuous infusion for 7 days. Filgrastim was administered at 5 micrograms/kg/d subcutaneously on days -3, -2, and -1 and then again after the completion of cladribine until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was >/=2 x 10(9)/L on 2 consecutive days (days +8, +9, etc). After filgrastim priming, the median ANC increased from 0.9 x 10(9)/L to 2.26 x 10(9)/L (2.5-fold increase), and after cladribine, the median nadir ANC in the filgrastim-treated group was 0.53 x 10(9)/L compared with 0.29 x 10(9)/L among historic controls (P =. 04). The median number of days to an ANC greater than 1.0 x 10(9)/L was 9 days in the filgrastim-treated group versus 22 days among historic controls (P < 10(-5)). The percentage of febrile patients, number of febrile days, and frequency of admissions for antibiotics were not statistically different in the two groups. Filgrastim regularly increases the ANC in patients with HCL and shortens the duration of severe neutropenia after cladribine. This phase II study, with comparison to historical controls, failed to detect any clinical advantage from the use of filgrastim and cladribine in the treatment of HCL. Accordingly, the routine adjunctive use of filgrastim with cladribine in the treatment of HCL cannot be recommended.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization using stem cell factor in combination with filgrastim in breast cancer patients.

The safety and optimal dose and schedule of stem cell factor (SCF) administered in combination with filgrastim for the mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) was determined in 215 patients with high-risk breast cancer. Patients received either filgrastim alone (10 microg/kg/d for 7 days) or the combination of 10 microg/kg/d filgrastim and 5 to 30 microg/kg/d SCF for either 7, 10, or 13 days. SCF patients were premedicated with antiallergy prophylaxis. Leukapheresis was performed on the final 3 days of cytokine therapy and, after high-dose chemotherapy and infusion of PBPCs, patients received 10 microg/kg/d filgrastim until absolute neutrophil count recovery. The median number of CD34+ cells collected was greater for patients receiving the combination of filgrastim and SCF, at doses greater than 10 microg/kg/d, than for those receiving filgrastim alone (7.7 v 3.2 x 10(6)/kg, P < .05). There were significantly (P < .05) more CD34+ cells harvested for the 20 microg/kg/d SCF (median, 7.9 x 10(6)/kg) and 25 microg/kg/d SCF (median, 13.6 x 10(6)/kg) 7-day combination groups than for the filgrastim alone patients (median, 3.2 x 10(6)/kg). The duration of administration of SCF and filgrastim (7, 10, or 13 days) did not significantly affect CD34+ cell yield. Treatment groups mobilized with filgrastim alone or with the cytokine combination had similar hematopoietic engraftment and overall survival after PBPC infusion. In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that SCF therapy enhances CD34+ cell yield and is associated with manageable levels of toxicity when combined with filgrastim for PBPC mobilization. The combination of 20 microg/kg/d SCF and 10 microg/kg/d filgrastim with daily apheresis beginning on day 5 was selected as the optimal dose and schedule for the mobilization of PBPCs.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Phase I/II trial of human recombinant granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) and escalating doses of cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and 5-FU in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We performed a phase I/II dose-escalation trial of cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and 5-fluorouracil (CNF) in combination with human recombinant granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, filgrastim) in patients with advanced breast cancer. The objectives of this trial were (1) to gain experience with filgrastim given to patients with advanced breast cancer and receiving standard-dose CNF, and (2) to determine the maximum tolerated dose of CNF that could be given with filgrastim support by incremental dose escalation of two components of the CNF regimen, cyclophosphamide and mitoxantrone. METHODS: Four patients who had received prior therapy for advanced disease received standard-dose CNF with filgrastim support. Sequentially enrolled patients who had received no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease were treated with standard-dose CNF without filgrastim (5 patients), standard-dose CNF with filgrastim (15 patients), or were entered into sequential cohorts of 3-6 patients to be treated with increasing doses of CNF with filgrastim support (29 patients). RESULTS: The maximum tolerated doses that could be given with filgrastim support were 1500 mg/ml cyclophosphamide, 20 mg/m2 mitoxantrone, and 500 mg/m2 5-FU. Overall, 7 complete (14%) and 13 partial responses (26%) were observed. Despite the use of filgrastim, repeated cycles of CNF at doses of 2000 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 25 mg/m2 mitoxantrone, and 500 mg/m2 5-FU could not be given because of neutropenia and thrombopenia. Among 18 patients with bidimensionally measurable disease there were 3 complete (17%) and 5 partial (28%) responses. The median progression-free survival of all patients was 236 days (34 weeks). CONCLUSION: The use of filgrastim allows CNF to be given at approximately twice the dose intensity of "standard"-dose CNF. Because nonhematopoietic toxicity was not dose-limiting, further dose escalation of this regimen might be possible with more effective hematopoietic support. The response rate and survival of patients treated in this study were within the range expected with standard-dose chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Rapid hematopoietic recovery after multicycle high-dose chemotherapy: enhancement of filgrastim-induced progenitor-cell mobilization by recombinant human stem-cell factor.

PURPOSE: To assess the mobilization potential and safety of recombinant human stem-cell factor (SCF) when coadministered with filgrastim to untreated women with poor-prognosis breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible women had breast cancer with 10 or more positive axillary nodes, or estrogen receptor-negative tumor with 4 positive nodes, or stage III disease. Patients were randomized to receive SCF plus filgrastim or filgrastim alone. Filgrastim 12 microg/kg daily was administered for 6 days by continuous subcutaneous infusion. SCF was administered by daily subcutaneous injection at 5, 10, or 15 microg/kg concurrent with filgrastim for 7 days, or 10 microg/kg daily starting 3 days before filgrastim for a total of 10 days (SCF pretreatment). Apheresis was performed on days 5, 6, and 7 of filgrastim administration. Patients then had three cycles of epirubicin 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 every 28 days, each supported by one third of the apheresis product. RESULTS: Sixty-two women were treated. Greater yields occurred in patients who received SCF 10 microg/kg daily plus filgastim than those who received filgrastim alone (P=.013 for CD34+ cells; P=.07 for granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming cells [GM-CFCs]). The difference was more marked with SCF-pretreatment than concurrent SCF. Fewer aphereses were required to reach the predetermined target of peripheral-blood progenitor/stem cells (PBPCs) in women who received SCF. SCF was generally well tolerated. Hematologic recovery was rapid after each of the three cycles of chemotherapy. There was no difference in recovery between the different treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Mobilization of PBPCs by filgrastim is significantly enhanced by coadministration of SCF, and commencing SCF before filgrastim can optimize this effect. SCF has the potential to reduce the number of aphereses required to collect a target number of PBPCs.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Filgrastim. A reappraisal of pharmacoeconomic considerations in the prophylaxis and treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Neutropenia is a frequent and often dose-limiting complication of chemotherapy and is associated with considerable patient morbidity and mortality. Standard treatment in patients who become febrile includes hospitalisation and empirical antibiotic therapy. Filgrastim is a recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF). It significantly decreases the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving standard-dose chemotherapy, and shortens the duration of febrile neutropenia in patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) or peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) infusion after myeloablative chemotherapy regimens. These effects are usually associated with a decrease in hospitalisation and antibiotic requirements. The contribution of filgrastim therapy to beneficial effects on other clinically important end-points (e.g. quality of life, tumour relapse rate, and short and long term survival) remains to be accurately determined. Pharmacoeconomic data concerning the use of filgrastim as an adjunct to standard-dose chemotherapy are derived largely from the results of phase III trials. Cost analyses based on hospital charges suggest that the cost of providing filgrastim therapy can be fully recouped if the drug is used as primary prophylaxis in previously untreated patients, for whom the risk of developing febrile neutropenia is at least 40%. Reserving filgrastim for use in patients who have developed febrile neutropenia in a previous chemotherapy cycle may result in further cost savings. However, careful patient selection is required, since potential cost savings will vary depending upon the risk of hospitalisation in the absence of filgrastim treatment. Infusion of filgrastim-mobilised PBPCs is emerging as a preferred strategy in patients receiving myeloablative chemotherapy, and promising results have been obtained from cost analyses. From a pharmacoeconomic viewpoint, future research should be directed towards defining optimum dosage regimens and hence improving the cost-effective use of filgrastim. Data evaluating patient quality of life and treatment preferences would help define the cost utility of filgrastim therapy. In the meantime, available pharmacoeconomic data support the use of filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in selected clinical situations.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1993

The impact of therapy with filgrastim (recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) on the health care costs associated with cancer chemotherapy.

The objective of the study was to estimate the net impact on health resource utilisation of using recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) following myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Cost minimisation of the study medication in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in teaching institutions and affiliated community hospitals participating in a clinical trial. 68 patients with small cell lung cancer undergoing cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and etoposide chemotherapy were randomised to blinded placebo or filgrastim study medication at three or 14 clinical trials sites. The patients received daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim or placebo, initiated 24 h after chemotherapy and continued until the neutrophil count exceeded 10,000 x 10(6)/l after the time of the expected nadir. Differences in total charges, costs and Medicare payments between treatment groups were the main outcomes measured. Compared to placebo patients, filgrastim-treated patients had significantly fewer and less resource-intensive hospitalisations. After accounting for filgrastim purchase and administration, the charge model predicts overall savings from filgrastim use in a clinical setting in which the risk of febrile neutropenia is high for patients not receiving filgrastim. The Medicare and cost models predict only a partial recapture of the cost of filgrastim therapy. The health care resources impact of filgrastim was sensitive to the risk of hospitalisation with febrile neutropenia, and to the perspective chosen for measuring resource utilisation (charges, costs or Medicare payments). The adjunctive use of filgrastim following myelosuppressive chemotherapy leads to partial or complete recapture of the cost of purchasing and administering the product.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1997

Phase 1 safety trial of Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) in non-neutropenic patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia.

The objectives of the present study were to: (1) evaluate the safety of Filgrastim therapy in non-neutropenic patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia; (2) determine the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) response to various dosages of Filgrastim in non-neutropenic patients with active infection; and (3) describe the impact of therapy with Filgrastim in combination with antibiotics on selected pneumonia-related clinical parameters. The study design was an open-label, dose-ranging, clinical trial, set in the General Clinical Research Unit of a large, public community hospital. The study population consisted of 30 patients who had presented to the Emergency Department with severe, community-acquired pneumonia. One of five dosages (75, 150, 300, 450 or 600 micrograms day-1) of Filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) was given subcutaneously daily for 10 days, until discharge or until the absolute neutrophil count > 75 x 10(9) l(-1), whichever was earlier. Vital signs, pulse oximetry, arterial blood gases, daily complete blood counts with differential, serum chemistries, coagulation profiles, electrocardiograms, chest radiographs, plasma G-CSF concentrations and duration of hospitalization were measured. There was no evidence of Filgrastim-related lung injury or evidence of extra-pulmonary toxicity. There was no apparent dose-response effect of Filgrastim on pneumonia-related clinical variables. Dosages of Filgrastim between 150 and 600 micrograms day-1 had similar effects on increasing the ANC. Filgrastim appeared to be safe in non-neutropenic patients with severe, community-acquired pneumonia when given in dosages of 75-600 micrograms day-1 in combination with appropriate antibiotic therapy. Further study is needed to determine the effect of Filgrastim on morbidity, mortality and duration of symptoms in this patient population.

Adult↗