Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “COGNITION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Effects of epileptiform EEG discharges on cognitive function: is the concept of "transient cognitive impairment" still valid?

In this article we review the existing evidence on the cognitive impact of interictal epileptiform EEG discharges. Such cognitive impairment occurs exclusively in direct relation to episodes of epileptiform EEG discharges and must be distinguished from (post) ictal seizure effects and from the nonperiodic long-term "stable" interictal effects caused by the clinical syndrome or the underlying etiology. Especially in patients with short nonconvulsive seizures, characterized often by difficult-to-detect symptoms, the ictal or postictal effects may be overlooked and the resulting cognitive effects may be erroneously related to the epileptiform EEG discharges. The existing epidemiological data show that the prevalence of cognitive impairment during epileptiform EEG discharges is low. In one study 2.2% of the patients referred to a specialized epilepsy center for EEG recording showed a definite relationship between epileptiform EEG discharges and cognitive impairments ("transient cognitive impairment"). Several studies have sought to analyze to what extent cognitive impairment can be attributed to epileptiform EEG discharges among the other epilepsy factors (such as the effect of the clinical syndrome). These studies show that epileptiform EEG discharges have an additional and independent effect, but this effect is mild and limited to transient mechanistic cognitive processes (alertness, mental speed). This finding concurs with clinical studies that also reported only mild effects. In only exceptional cases are epileptiform EEG discharges the dominant factor explaining cognitive impairment. In addition, some studies have indicated that such mild effects may accumulate over time (when frequent epileptiform EEG discharges persist over years) and consequently result in effects on stable aspects of cognitive function such as educational achievement and intelligence. Hence, the clinical relevance is that early detection of cognitive effects of epileptiform EEG discharges and subsequent treatment may prevent a definite impact on cognitive and educational development. The disruptive effects of epileptiform EEG discharges on long-term potentiation, as established in animal experiments, may be one of the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying this accumulation. In conclusion the concept of "transient cognitive impairment" is still valid, but refinement of methodology has shown that a large proportion of presumed transient cognitive impairment can be attributed to subtle seizures, while interictal epileptic activity accounts for a much smaller part of the cognitive effects than previously thought. In particular cryptogenic partial epilepsies are associated with the risk of cognitive impairment. We hope that increased clinical awareness of this need for early detection will stimulate longitudinal and prospective research that eventually also will provide an answer to the questions of when and how epileptiform discharges that are not part of a seizure need to be treated.

Adult↗

Prevalence and outcomes of vascular cognitive impairment. Vascular Cognitive Impairment Investigators of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the importance of vascular cognitive impairment and its three subgroups (cognitive impairment, no dementia; vascular dementia; and AD with a vascular component) to the prevalence and burden of cognitive impairment in elderly people. BACKGROUND: Vascular lesions may produce a spectrum of cognitive changes. Omitting elderly patients whose cognitive impairment falls short of dementia (vascular cognitive impairment, no dementia) may give a falsely low indication of the prevalence and burden of disease. To test this proposition, we compared the rates of adverse outcomes for patients with no cognitive impairment, vascular cognitive impairment (and its subgroups), and probable AD. METHODS: The Canadian Study of Health and Aging is a prospective cohort study of 10,253 randomly selected community-dwelling and institution-dwelling respondents aged 65 years or older. In the community, all participants (n = 9,008) were screened for cognitive impairment; those who screened positive and a sample of those who screened negative received a clinical assessment (n = 1,659). All patients living in institutions received a clinical assessment (n = 1,255). Participants were reassessed 5 years after the original survey. RESULTS: Vascular cognitive impairment without dementia was the most prevalent form of vascular cognitive impairment among those aged 65 to 84 years. Rates of institutionalization and mortality for those with vascular cognitive impairment were significantly higher than those of people who had no cognitive impairment, and the mortality rate for patients with vascular cognitive impairment was similar to that of patients with AD. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to consider vascular cognitive impairment without dementia underestimates the prevalence of impairment and the risk for adverse outcomes associated with vascular cognitive impairment.

Age Distribution↗

Subjective cognition trajectories, Alzheimer biomarkers, and incident mild cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND: Subjective cognitive decline is common in older adults and may represent an early clinical signal along the Alzheimer's disease continuum. The clinical relevance of longitudinal changes in subjective cognitive decline remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether trajectories of self- or study partner-reported cognitive decline predict progression to mild cognitive impairment and reflect Alzheimer's disease-specific biological patterns. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Data were pooled from two observational cohorts. Cognitively unimpaired participants with baseline amyloid status, repeated assessments of subjective cognitive decline, and clinical follow-up were included. The study included 770 participants with a median follow-up of 5.0 years (interquartile range 4.0-7.0). MEASUREMENTS: Subjective cognitive decline was assessed using the Everyday Cognition questionnaire completed by participants and study partners. Linear mixed-effects models examined associations with amyloid status and progression to mild cognitive impairment. Cox proportional hazards models tested whether one-year changes predicted progression. RESULTS: Amyloid-positive participants and those who progressed to mild cognitive impairment showed steeper increases in self- and study partner-reported cognitive difficulties over time. Among amyloid-positive participants, only increases in study partner-report differentiated progressors from non-progressors. One-year increases in study partner-report predicted a higher risk of mild cognitive impairment compared with unchanged scores (hazard ratio 3.24; 95% confidence interval 1.73-6.07]), with effects confined to amyloid-positive participants. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term increases in study partner-reported cognitive difficulties identify amyloid-positive cognitively unimpaired older adults at increased risk of near-term progression to mild cognitive impairment. Longitudinal monitoring using study partner reports may provide a low-burden and clinically relevant approach for early risk stratification and surveillance in aging populations.

Humans↗

Cognitive enhancement therapy for schizophrenia: effects of a 2-year randomized trial on cognition and behavior.

BACKGROUND: Deficits in social cognition and neurocognition are believed to underlie schizophrenia disability. Attempts at rehabilitation have had circumscribed effects on cognition, without concurrent improvement in broad aspects of behavior and adjustment. OBJECTIVE: To determine the differential effects of cognitive enhancement therapy (a recovery-phase intervention) on cognition and behavior compared with state-of-the-art enriched supportive therapy. DESIGN: A 2-year, randomized controlled trial with neuropsychological and behavioral assessments completed at baseline and at 12 and 24 months. SETTING: An outpatient research clinic housed in a medical center's comprehensive care service for patients with severe mental illness. PATIENTS: A total of 121 symptomatically stable, non-substance-abusing but cognitively disabled and chronically ill patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. INTERVENTIONS: Cognitive enhancement therapy is a multidimensional, developmental approach that integrates computer-assisted training in neurocognition with social cognitive group exercises. Enriched supportive therapy fosters illness management through applied coping strategies and education. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Six highly reliable summary measures--Processing Speed, Neurocognition, Cognitive Style, Social Cognition, Social Adjustment and Symptoms--were tested using analysis of covariance and linear trend analysis. RESULTS: At 12 months, robust cognitive enhancement therapy effects were observed on the Neurocognition and Processing Speed composites (P<.003), with marginal effects observed on the behavioral composites. By 24 months, differential cognitive enhancement therapy effects were again observed for the 2 neuropsychological composites and for Cognitive Style (P=.001), Social Cognition (P=.001), and Social Adjustment (P=.01). As expected, no differences were observed on the residual Symptoms composite. Effects were unrelated to the type of antipsychotic medication received. Enriched supportive therapy also demonstrated statistically significant within-group effect sizes, suggesting that supportive psychotherapy can also have positive, although more modest, effects on cognitive deficits. CONCLUSION: Many cognitive deficits and related behaviors of patients with stable schizophrenia are improved when sufficient exposure to relevant rehabilitation is provided.

Adult↗

Sustained cognitive and functional effects of pro-cognitive interventions for bipolar disorder: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

A substantial proportion of individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) experience considerable cognitive deficits. Existing systematic reviews have evaluated the efficacy of pro-cognitive interventions in BD, but have not established whether any cognitive benefits translate into functional improvements, with evidence for sustained functional effects remaining limited. A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library from inception until 21 May 2026. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in BD reporting cognitive or functional outcomes at three or more months following a pro-cognitive intervention, or examining the translation of cognitive benefits into improvements in functional outcomes at any timepoint. Seven unique RCTs plus three secondary analyses of these trials (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;615) met the inclusion criteria. Approximately 13% (7/55) of RCTs identified in the search of pro-cognitive interventions in adult BD assessed cognitive or functional outcomes at least 3&#xa0;months after treatment end. Of the seven unique RCTs, most evaluated cognitive remediation (CR; k&#xa0;=&#xa0;4). The average follow-up length was 4&#xa0;months (range: 3-6&#xa0;months). Three of the four RCTs examining CR reported cognitive benefits at 3 to 6&#xa0;months, whereas only one CR RCT found consistent functional effects at 3&#xa0;months. Evidence on the translation of cognitive benefits to functional improvements is scarce and inconsistent. Most trials examining pro-cognitive interventions do not examine whether potential benefits are sustained or whether they translate into improvements in real-world functioning. CR appears to be a promising intervention for achieving durable cognitive gains in BD, although evidence for sustained effects of other interventions is limited.

Humans↗

Multidisciplinary team interventions for delirium in patients with chronic cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is common in hospitalized elderly people. In the frail elderly, delirium may occur in 60% of those hospitalized. In the cognitively impaired, 45% have been shown to develop delirium and these patients have longer lengths of stay and a higher rate of complications which, amongst other things, together contribute to an increase in cost of care. The combination of being elderly and chronically cognitively impaired leads to a high risk of delirium with the associated increased risk of prolonged hospital stay, complications, and poor outcomes. The management of delirium has commonly been multifaceted - the primary emphasis has always been on the diagnosis and therapy of the precipitating factors, but as this may not be immediately resolved, symptomatic and supportive care may become of major importance. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to assess the available evidence for the effectiveness, if any, of multidisciplinary team interventions in the coordinated care of patients with delirium superimposed on an underlying chronic cognitive impairment compared with the usual care of older cognitively impaired patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library, up to and including Issue 1, 1998) was searched using the terms 'delirium, controlled trial, cognitive'. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Psychlit (Ovid via Winspirs up to Feb 1998) were also searched with the same terms. Other sources including personal communications, ongoing trials, conference proceedings, handsearching and reference lists of published papers and books were all searched for relevant randomized controlled trials. The total yield from searching was 157 from which 8 (eight) were retained for consideration in the review. SELECTION CRITERIA: From the initial search yields, all randomised controlled trials involving the management of elderly patients with delirium were identified. A single reviewer (AMB) discarded irrelevant publications based on the title of the publication and its abstract. In the event that the article could possibly be relevant, it was retrieved for further assessment. All references were compiled in a list with a commentary on type of article, eg review, prospective study etc and this was independently considered by the second reviewer (RR) who agreed to review all randomised controlled studies reported on patients with delirium. Selection for possible inclusion in this review was then made on the basis of the participants reported as having chronic cognitive impairment, who then developed incident delirium and were randomly assigned to either coordinated multidisciplinary care or usual care. The outcomes of interest were length of stay in hospital, morbidity (including complications), patient distress & impact on care environment, mortality, discharge arrangements and follow-up including assessment of cognitive function at 6 months. Studies in which patients with chronic cognitive impairment or dementia, managed for incident delirium, according to ICD 9 criteria (see note) were considered eligible for inclusion in the review. Studies of risk factors and non-randomized studies were excluded. Note: this classification has been widely utilised throughout the English speaking medical literature over the past 20 years: ICD 10 is still being incorporated into clinical coding systems and has not been utilised in studies published in 1996. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Delirium↗

Subjective cognitive complaints and cognitive decline: consequence or predictor? The epidemiology of vascular aging study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore whether more cognitive complaints are associated with previous or future cognitive decline. DESIGN: Longitudinal; epidemiology vascular aging study. SETTING: Community in Nantes, France. PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred thirty-three subjects, aged 59 to 71. MEASUREMENTS: Subjective cognitive complaints were recorded at 4-year follow-up examination in a prospective study of people aged 59 to 71 at study entry. Participants' cognitive performances were assessed repeatedly at each wave (baseline, 4 years, and 6 years) of the study using a series of neuropsychological tests including the Mini-Mental State Examination. Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. Subjects also had a cerebral magnetic resonance imaging scan at 4-year follow-up to evaluate presence and severity of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs). RESULTS: Subjects with more cognitive complaints had greater cognitive decline. This significant relationship persisted after adjusting for potential confounders, including depressive symptoms. Multivariate analysis also showed that, in subjects without measured cognitive decline between study entry and 4-year follow-up, those with more cognitive complaints at 4-year follow-up had significantly greater measured cognitive decline during the subsequent 2 years. In the presence of severe WMH, more cognitive complaints were an even stronger predictor of future cognitive decline. CONCLUSION: Cognitive complaints reflect measured cognitive decline, but they also predict cognitive decline at an earlier stage than objective tests that are not able to detect cognitive deficits. They need to be taken into account in clinical practice.

Aged↗

The Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale: an interview-based assessment and its relationship to cognition, real-world functioning, and functional capacity.

OBJECTIVE: Interview-based measures of cognition may serve as potential coprimary measures in clinical trials of cognitive-enhancing drugs for schizophrenia. However, there is no such valid scale available. Interviews of patients and their clinicians are not valid in that they are unrelated to patients' levels of cognitive impairment as assessed by cognitive performance tests. This study describes the reliability and validity of a new interview-based assessment of cognition, the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS), that involves interviews with patients and informants. METHOD: Sixty patients with schizophrenia were assessed with the SCoRS and three potential validators of an interview-based measure of cognition: cognitive performance, as measured by the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS); real-world functioning, as measured by the Independent Living Skills Inventory; and functional capacity, as measured by the University of California, San Diego, Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA). RESULTS: The SCoRS global ratings were significantly correlated with composite scores of cognitive performance and functional capacity and with ratings of real-world functioning. Multiple regression analyses suggested that SCoRS global ratings predicted unique variance in real-world functioning beyond that predicted by the performance measures. CONCLUSIONS: An interview-based measure of cognition that included informant reports was related to cognitive performance as well as real-world functioning. Interview-based measures of cognition, such as the SCoRS, may be valid coprimary measures for clinical trials assessing cognitive change and may also aid clinicians desiring to assess patients' level of cognitive impairment.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Early and late life cognitive activity and cognitive systems in old age.

Little is known about the relative benefits of cognitively stimulating activities at different points in the lifespan. In a cohort of 576 older persons without dementia, we assessed current and past (childhood, young adulthood, middle age) frequency of cognitive activity; availability of cognitively stimulating resources in the home in childhood and middle age; and 5 domains of cognitive function. Past cognitive activity and cognitive resources were positively correlated with both current cognitive activity and current cognitive function. The association with cognitive function was reduced after controlling for current cognitive activity, however. Current cognitive activity was associated with better cognitive function, especially semantic memory and perceptual speed, even after controlling for past activity. The results suggest that past cognitive activity contributes to current cognition principally through its association with cognitive activity in old age.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Cognitive behaviour therapy for schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Although medication is the mainstay of treatment for schizophrenia, always, some sort of informal or formal talking therapy is indicated. In cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) links are made between the person's feelings and patterns of thinking which underpin their distress. OBJECTIVES: To review the effects of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for those with schizophrenia compared to standard care, specific medication and non-intervention; also to review the effects of CBT for those with schizophrenia who are concurrently receiving standard care compared to no additional intervention to standard care, specific medication, additional drug interventions to standard care and other additional psychosocial interventions to standard care. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1980-1998), CINAHL (1982-1998), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1998), The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of Trials (August 1998), EMBASE (1980-1998), MEDLINE (1966-1998), PsycLIT (1887-1998), SIGLE (1990-1998), and Sociofile (1980-1998) were undertaken. All references of articles selected were searched for further relevant trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of cognitive behaviour therapy for people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, possible schizophrenia or mental illnesses where specific diagnoses have not been employed. Outcomes such as death, metal state, relapse, psychological well-being and acceptability of treatment were sought. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were reliably selected and assessed for methodological quality. Data were extracted by two reviewers working independently. Dichotomous data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis and continuous data with 70% completion rate are presented. MAIN RESULTS: Four small trials were identified. All presented data suggested that there was a difference favouring CBT plus standard care over standard care alone in terms of reducing relapse rates (short term OR 0.31 CI 0.1-0.98; medium term OR 0.38 CI 0.17-0.83; long term OR 0.46 CI 0.26-0.83, NNT 6 CI 3-30). These findings were supported within the trials by scale-derived data. CBT, however, did not keep more people in care than a standard approach and there is no data relating to the effect of CBT on compliance with medication. One study also presented data on the effects of CBT when compared to supportive psychotherapy. No effect statistically significantly favoured either group but all were suggestive that the trial may have been underpowered to find an effect in favour of CBT. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The results of well conducted and reported ongoing trials are eagerly awaited. Currently, for those with schizophrenia willing to receive CBT, access to this treatment approach is associated with a substantially reduced risk of relapse. However, at present CBT is a fairly scarce commodity, often provided by highly skilled and experienced therapists. Therefore, its application in day to day practice may be restricted by the availability of suitable practitioners. Similarly, the present data provides little indication of how effective CBT procedures might be when they are applied by less experienced practitioners.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy↗

Piracetam for dementia or cognitive impairment.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical efficacy of piracetam for the features of dementia or cognitive impairment, classified according to the major subtypes of dementia: vascular, Alzheimer's disease or mixed vascular and Alzheimer's disease or unclassified dementia or cognitive impairment not fulfilling the criteria for dementia. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Group Register of Clinical Trials was searched using the terms "piracetam", "nootropic" and "2-oxo-l-pyrrolidine acetamide". Electronic bibliographic databases including Medline, Embase, PychLit, Current Contents, Sociofile were searched back to 1966 with the terms piracetam, nootropics, 2-oxo-1-pyrrolidine and trials. In addition the pharmaceutical company responsible for marketing most of the piracetam worldwide, UCB Pharma, provided a comprehensive list of abstracts, which included many unpublished studies. As many of these unpublished, placebo control studies will be reviewed as possible. SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded trials specified as randomised in which treatment with piracetam was administered for more than a day and compared with placebo in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type, vascular dementia or mixed vascular and Alzheimer's disease or uncalssified dementia or cognitive impairment not fulfilling the criteria for dementia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Each study was independently verified as fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Studies were rated for methodological quality by assessment of blinding and loss before analysis as described by Jadad et al. (1996). Studies were pooled if appropriate and possible, and the pooled odds ratios (95%CI) or the average differences (95%CI) were estimated. Where possible, intention-to-treat data were used. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine if successive elimination of those studies performing most poorly on these quality criteria changed the effect estimate. MAIN RESULTS: Unfortunately, many of these studies were crossover in design and data were unavailable from the first period. In many other studies data were not able to be extracted from the first period. From the data that were pooled there was only one outcome where significant amounts of evidence were available, Global Impression of Change. There was evidence of heterogeneity in the results from the individual studies, Chi squared test = 20.8 (df=5). Using a fixed effects model the odds ratio for improvement in the Piracetem group compared with the Placebo group was 3.55, [95% CI][2.45, 5.16]. If a random effects model was used the odds ratio was 3.47 [1.29, 9.30]. If one single-blind study was excluded, the fixed effects model yielded an odds ratio of 3.36 [2.29, 4.99] and if a random effects model was applied then the odds ratio was 2.89 [1.01, 8.24]. The evidence of effects on cognition and other measures, was inconclusive. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: At this stage the evidence available from the published literature does not support the use of Piracetem in the treatment of people with dementia or cognitive impairment because effects were found only on global impression of change but not on any of the more specific measures. There is a need for further evaluation of piracetam by : 1) Obtaining the data from these studies for an individual patient database review, 2) Performing a randomised trial of Piracetam in patients with diagnoses made by currently accepted diagnostic criteria. Piracetam should be trialled for a period of at least 6 months and preferably longer. Specific cognitive instruments which are sensitive to change, Clinician Global Impression of Change, levels of dependency and caregiver quality of life scales should also be incorporated in such a study.

Alzheimer Disease↗

Cognitive behavioural interventions for sleep problems in adults aged 60+.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of sleep problems in adulthood increases with age. While not all sleep changes are pathological in later life, severe disturbances may lead to depression, cognitive impairments, deterioration of quality of life, significant stresses for carers and increased healthcare costs. The most common treatment for sleep disorders (particularly insomnia) is pharmacological. The efficacy of non-drug interventions has been suggested to be slower than pharmacological methods, but with no risk of drug-related tolerance or dependency. Cognitive and behavioural treatments for sleep problems aim to improve sleep by changing poor sleep habits, promoting better sleep hygiene practices and by challenging negative thoughts, attitudes and beliefs about sleep. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of cognitive-behavioural interventions in improving sleep quality, duration and efficiency amongst older adults (aged 60 and above). SEARCH STRATEGY: The following databases were searched: MEDLINE (1966 - October 2001); EMBASE (1980 - January 2002), CINAHL ( 1982 - January 2002; PsychINFO 1887 to 2002; The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2002); National Research Register (NRR [2002]). Bibliographies of existing reviews in the area, as well as of all trial reports obtained, were searched. Experts in the field were consulted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of cognitive behavioural treatments for primary insomnia where 80% or more of participants were over 60. Participants must have been screened to exclude those with dementia and/or depression. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Abstracts of studies identified in searches of electronic databases were read and assessed to determine whether they might meet the inclusion criteria. Data were analysed separately depending on whether results had been obtained subjectively or objectively. MAIN RESULTS: Six trials, including 282 participants with insomnia, examined the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural treatments (CBT) for sleep problems in this population. The final total of participants included in the meta-analysis was 224. The data suggest a mild effect of CBT for sleep problems in older adults, best demonstrated for sleep maintenance insomnia. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: When the possible side-effects of standard treatment (hypnotics) are considered, there is an argument to be made for clinical use of cognitive-behavioural treatments. Research is needed to establish the likely predictors of success with such treatments. As it may well be the case that the treatment efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy itself is not durable, the provision of "top-up" sessions of CBT training to improve durability of effect are worthy of investigation.

Age Factors↗

Cognitive activity and cognitive decline in a biracial community population.

BACKGROUND: Frequent participation in cognitively stimulating activities has been associated with reduced risk of AD in several prospective studies. However, the association of cognitive activity with cognitive decline, the principal manifestation of AD, is not well understood. METHODS: More than 4,000 older residents of a geographically defined biracial community of Chicago were interviewed at approximately 3-year intervals for an average of 5.3 years. Each interview included administration of four cognitive function tests from which a previously established global measure was derived. At baseline, each person rated frequency of participation in cognitively stimulating activities (e.g., reading a magazine) from which a previously established composite measure of cognitive activity was derived. RESULTS: Cognitive activity scores ranged from 1 to 5 (mean = 3.14, SD = 0.66), with higher scores indicating more frequent participation. More frequent cognitive activity was associated with reduced cognitive decline during follow-up. In a model that controlled for baseline level of cognition, age, sex, race, and education, a 1-point increase in cognitive activity score was associated with an approximately 19% decrease in annual rate of cognitive decline (p < 0.001). This effect remained when we controlled for depressive symptoms and chronic medical conditions (p < 0.001), and when we excluded persons with evidence of memory impairment at baseline (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Frequent participation in cognitively stimulating activities is associated with reduced cognitive decline in older persons.

Aged↗

Medication use patterns among demented, cognitively impaired and cognitively intact community-dwelling elderly people.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether medication use patterns in community-dwelling elderly people vary with level of cognitive function-dementia, cognitive impairment (but not dementia) and intact cognition. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: A five-county area of central North Carolina, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 520 members of the Duke Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly. MEASUREMENTS: Medication use in the previous 2 weeks was ascertained during a interview in the patient's home and was coded as to prescription and therapeutic class status. Cognitive status, the primary independent variable, was divided into: (i) dementia (n=100); (ii) cognitive impairment but not dementia (n=117); and (iii) cognitively intact (n=303). The dependent variables were any prescription or over-the-counter (OTC) medication use (vs non-use); number of prescription or OTC medications used; and prescription and OTC use combined within major therapeutic classes. Multivariate analyses controlled for socio-demographic characteristics, health status, functional status and access to health care. RESULTS: The use of any prescription medication was similar in the three groups. The demented were significantly less likely than cognitively impaired people to use any OTC medications (OR=0.65, 95% CI=0.45, 0.93), cardiovascular medications (OR=0.70, 95% CI=0.49, 0.99) and analgesics (OR=0.54, 95% CI=0.39, 0.75). As a combined group, those who were demented and cognitively impaired were less likely than the cognitively intact group to use any OTC medications (OR=0.78, 95% CI 0.65, 0.92). Compared with the cognitively impaired subjects, the demented group took fewer prescription medications (beta coefficient=-0.31, 95% CI=-0.59, -0.03) and similar numbers of OTC medications. Compared with those who were cognitively intact, the combined group of demented and cognitively impaired subjects took fewer OTC medications (beta coefficient=-0.14, 95% CI=-0.23, -0.05) and similar numbers of prescription medications. CONCLUSION: Increasing level of cognitive dysfunction is associated with decreased use of OTC, cardiovascular and analgesic medications and the use of fewer prescription medications. These results suggest important differences in medication use patterns among community-dwelling elderly people who vary in cognitive status.

Aged↗

Cognitive assessment of a representative community population with Parkinson's disease (PD) using the Cambridge Cognitive Assessment-Revised (CAMCOG-R).

BACKGROUND: cognitive decline is well recognised in Parkinson's disease (PD) but the best cognitive assessment tool for use in such patients remains unclear. The 30-point Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), while quick and straightforward to use, fails to cover a full range of cognitive domains and is recognised to have a ceiling effect. The Cambridge Cognitive Assessment-Revised (CAMCOG-R) is a cognitive screening tool allowing the assessment of a number of different domains of cognition. It has not previously been used specifically on PD subjects. METHODS: a prevalent community population of 135 PD patients were assessed cognitively using the MMSE. Those scoring 25 or above on the MMSE were subsequently further assessed using CAMCOG-R. Demographic and disease factors including disease duration, symptom severity, anxiety, depression and the presence of hallucinations were recorded for each participant. RESULTS: 31/135 (23%) demonstrated cognitive impairment on the MMSE (score < 25). Ninety-four of the remaining group (10 were excluded) achieved a median total CAMCOG-R score of 89/104. The results were widely distributed. The subjects scored particularly highly in the cognitive domains of orientation, comprehension and perception but relatively poorly at memory and abstract thinking. Significantly poorer scores (P < 0.05) were seen throughout the cognitive domains with increasing age, increasing PD symptom severity and increasing disease duration, but not with the presence of anxiety, depression or hallucinations in the subjects. DISCUSSION: CAMCOG-R was found to be a viable and useful cognitive screening tool for use in PD. A wide range of cognitive ability was demonstrated in subjects who had been assessed previously by the MMSE as not having significant cognitive impairment. The group performed worse in certain cognitive domains than others and those who were older, with more severe PD symptoms and with symptoms for longer, scored less well.

Aged↗

Cognitive neuroimaging: cognitive science out of the armchair.

Cognitive scientists were not quick to embrace the functional neuroimaging technologies that emerged during the late 20th century. In this new century, cognitive scientists continue to question, not unreasonably, the relevance of functional neuroimaging investigations that fail to address questions of interest to cognitive science. However, some ultra-cognitive scientists assert that these experiments can never be of relevance to the study of cognition. Their reasoning reflects an adherence to a functionalist philosophy that arbitrarily and purposefully distinguishes mental information-processing systems from brain or brain-like operations. This article addresses whether data from properly conducted functional neuroimaging studies can inform and subsequently constrain the assumptions of theoretical cognitive models. The article commences with a focus upon the functionalist philosophy espoused by the ultra-cognitive scientists, contrasting it with the materialist philosophy that motivates both cognitive neuroimaging investigations and connectionist modelling of cognitive systems. Connectionism and cognitive neuroimaging share many features, including an emphasis on unified cognitive and neural models of systems that combine localist and distributed representations. The utility of designing cognitive neuroimaging studies to test (primarily) connectionist models of cognitive phenomena is illustrated using data from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) investigations of language production and episodic memory.

Brain Mapping↗

Cognition enhancers in age-related cognitive decline.

A review of recently published studies on the effect of cognition enhancers in non-demented human study participants is presented. The heterogeneity of the therapeutic target, age-associated cognitive decline, can be improved by separately treating groups in whom age-extrinsic factors may underlie cognitive pathology. Standardisation of cognitive assessments is necessary, since many different tests are applied to answer the same question. Modelling cognitive dysfunction, either by pharmacological or nonpharmacological means, in humans is highly recommended since it allows hypotheses to be tested in a clearly operationalised way. Predictive validity of the currently applied models for the clinical situation remains a problem, however. The scopolamine (hyoscine) model has, to a reasonable extent, predictive validity for the cholinergic agents. The results of 67 single-dose studies and 30 multiple-dose studies are summarised. All single-dose studies and 14 multiple-dose studies were carried out in young or elderly human volunteers. In 45 of 81 volunteer studies, models of cognitive dysfunction were employed. The scopolamine model was the most used (n = 21); the other studies induced cognitive dysfunction by means of benzodiazepines (8), hypoxia (7), alcohol (5) and sleep-deprivation (4). The remaining 16 multiple-dose studies were clinical trials of a duration varying between 2 weeks and 1 year (average duration was 14 weeks). In these trials, the effects of cognition enhancers were assessed in elderly people in whom impairment of memory, psychomotor performance or cognitive function was determined. These included age-associated memory impairment (AAMI) and age-associated cognitive decline (AACD). There were many studies in which the cognition enhancing properties of substances in humans were reliably demonstrated. The cognition enhancing properties of substances that are widely used, such as caffeine, nicotine and vitamins, may already be active against AACD. New developments such as serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine3; 5-HT3) antagonists and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists have provided marginal and disappointing results in AAMI. There is no cognition enhancer that has reliably and repeatedly been demonstrated to be efficacious for the treatment of AACD. However, this situation may change as the selectivity, specificity and adverse effect profiles of substances that are being developed for the treatment of AD may be expected to be improved in the future.

Aged↗

Cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive training for early-stage Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia.

BACKGROUND: Memory problems are a defining feature of the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia. Cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation are specific approaches designed to address everyday memory difficulties. OBJECTIVES: The main aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of cognitive training and cognitive rehabilitation interventions aimed at improving memory functioning for people in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease or vascular dementia. The two types of intervention were considered separately. SEARCH STRATEGY: The CDCIG Specialized Register, which contains records from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and many other databases, was searched on 9 April 2003. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs comparing cognitive rehabilitation or cognitive training interventions with comparison conditions, and reporting outcomes for the person with dementia and/or the family caregiver, were considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Six studies reporting cognitive training interventions were included. Statistical analyses were conducted to provide an indication of intervention effect sizes. Data from ordinal scales was treated as continuous, and a fixed effects model was applied in calculating weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. No studies were found that reported a fully individualised cognitive rehabilitation approach. MAIN RESULTS: None of the six studies reporting cognitive training interventions demonstrated any statistically significant effects in any domain, although there were indications of some modest, non-significant effects in various domains of cognitive functioning. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The present findings do not provide strong support for the use of cognitive training interventions for people with early-stage AD or vascular dementia, although these findings must be viewed with caution due to the limited number of RCTs available and to the methodological limitations identified, and further well-designed trials would help to provide more definitive evidence. Due to a complete absence of RCTs evaluating an individualised cognitive rehabilitation approach, It is not possible at present to draw conclusions about the efficacy of individualised cognitive rehabilitation interventions for people with early-stage dementia, and further research is required in this area.

Alzheimer Disease↗