Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “COGNITION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Informant-rated cognitive symptoms in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia. Initial development of an informant-rated screen (Brief Cognitive Scale) for mild cognitive impairment and dementia.

An informant-rated cognitive screen may have the potential to reliably help detect early dementia. A valuable scale should have good interitem associations and strong reliability when tested in groups with and without cognitive impairment. Our scale, the Brief Cognitive Scale (BCS), consists of 18 questions designed to assess cognitive function that affects everyday activities. Each question is coded with one of four levels, ranging from no impairment to severe impairment. We administered this screen to 120 subjects: 26 controls, 28 with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 66 with a diagnosis of dementia. In addition, we administered a Folstein Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) to each subject. Our results showed that the BCS scores were lowest in the control group and highest in the dementia group. In our sample, this scale was effective at discriminating between subjects with no cognitive impairment, MCI, and dementia. However, the scale needs further refinement before it can be employed in a clinical setting.

Aged↗

Post-intervention effectiveness of a computerized personalized cognitive stimulation program adapted according to cognitive reserve in older adults without cognitive impairment in Primary Care: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive reserve may influence responsiveness to cognitive interventions, yet it is rarely used to tailor computerized stimulation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a computerized cognitive stimulation program personalized according to cognitive reserve on cognition, reserve-related activities, and digital competence in community-dwelling older adults without cognitive impairment in Primary Care. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, 102 adults aged ≥65 years with normal cognitive performance were recruited from three primary care centers in Zaragoza, Spain, and stratified by cognitive reserve level before random allocation to intervention or control. The intervention comprised digital literacy sessions followed by 8 weeks of home-based computerized cognitive stimulation tailored to participants' cognitive reserve profiles and life history. Controls received a single group-based health education session focused on maintaining everyday cognitive activity. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and post-intervention using global cognition (MEC-35), the Cognitive Reserve Questionnaire, the Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire-16, and domain-specific neuropsychological tests. A total of 100 participants completed the final evaluation and were included in complete-case analyses. RESULTS: Compared with controls, the intervention group showed greater adjusted post-intervention improvements in global cognition (MEC-35 between-group difference: 1.8 points) and several cognitive measures, including temporal orientation, calculation, attention, praxis, verbal fluency, processing speed, executive functions, and verbal learning. CRQ scores and digital competence also improved, with small-to-large effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: A computerized cognitive stimulation program adapted according to cognitive reserve appears feasible in Primary Care and may improve cognition, engagement in reserve-related activities, and digital competence in older adults without cognitive impairment.

Humans↗

Do cognitive complaints either predict future cognitive decline or reflect past cognitive decline? A longitudinal study of an elderly community sample.

Data from a two-wave longitudinal study of an elderly community sample were used to assess whether cognitive complaints either predict subsequent cognitive decline or reflect past cognitive decline. Cognitive complaints and cognitive functioning were assessed on two occasions three and a half years apart. Cognitive complaints at Wave 1 were found not to predict future cognitive change on the Mini-Mental State Examination, an episodic memory test or a test of mental speed. Similarly, cognitive complaints at Wave 2 were unrelated to past cognitive changes on these tests after statistically controlling for the effects of anxiety and depression. Furthermore, cognitive complaints did not predict either mortality (after controlling for anxiety and depression) or future dementia. These results are evidence against the inclusion of cognitive complaints in diagnostic criteria for proposed disorders such as age-associated memory impairment, mild cognitive disorder and ageing-associated cognitive decline.

Aged↗

Lecithin for dementia and cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND: People with Alzheimer's disease have been found to have a relative lack of the enzyme responsible for converting choline into acetylcholine within the brain. Lecithin is a major dietary source of choline, so extra consumption may assist in the production of acetylcholine and reduce some of the symptoms of dementia. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of lecithin in the treatment of dementia or cognitive impairment. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Group Register of Clinical Trials has been searched, as have the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Psychlit, ISI and Current Contents. Reference lists and relevant books have been examined. SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded, randomised trials comparing lecithin with placebo in a treatment period longer than one day, in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type, vascular dementia, mixed vascular and Alzheimer's disease, unclassified or other dementia or unclassified cognitive impairment not fulfilling the criteria for dementia are eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data are extracted by two independent reviewers and cross checked. Meta-analyses are performed when more than one trial provide data on a comparable outcome on sufficiently similar patients. Random effects analyses are performed whenever heterogeneity between results appears to be present. Standardised mean difference are used due do the use of different scales and periods of treatment. Odds ratios for dichotomous data are pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel or DerSimonian and Laird methods. MAIN RESULTS: Eleven randomised trials have been identified involving patients with Alzheimer's disease (265 patients) and Parkinsonian dementia (21 patients). No trials reported any clear clinical benefit of lecithin. Few trials contributed data to meta-analyses. The only statistically significant result was in favour of placebo for adverse events, based on one trial, which appears likely to be a spurious result. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from randomised trials does not support the use of lecithin in the treatment of patients with dementia or cognitive impairment. A moderate effect cannot be ruled out, but results from the small trials to date do not indicate priority for a large randomised trial.

Alzheimer Disease↗

Effects of Exergame Balance Training with Variable Cognitive Motor Challenges on Serum BDNF, p-tau181, and Cognitive Functions in Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Cognitive-motor exergame balance training may increase attentional demands and neuronal processing, potentially affecting serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), A&#x3b2;1-42, and p-tau181, as well as train cognitive abilities in adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This study aimed to compare the effects of exergame balance training of mild, moderate, high-difficulty, and Wii Fit&#x2122; groups on blood serum levels of BDNF, A&#x3b2;1-42, p-tau181, and cognition function in adults with MCI. METHODS: In this four-arm, parallel group randomized clinical trial, 97 adults with MCI were randomly assigned to exergame balance training groups of mild, moderate, high-difficulty, and Wii Fit exergame as a control group. All participants received 40 min/session, 3 times/week for 8 weeks. Assessment of serum levels of p-tau181, A&#x3b2;1-42, BDNF, and cognitive functions was conducted at baseline, after weeks 4 and 8. A mixed-model analysis of covariance was used, with post-baseline measurements (weeks 4 and 8) specified as the within-subject factor and the corresponding baseline value entered as a covariate to adjust for initial between-group variability. RESULTS: A significant group &#xd7; time interaction was found for BDNF, F(3,92) = 6.413, P = 0.017, &#x3b7;p2 = 0.181; p-tau181, F(3,92) = 4.640, P = 0.040, &#x3b7;p2 = 0.138; attention, F(3,92) = 4.171, P = 0.045, &#x3b7;p2 = 0.057; abstraction, F(3,92) = 4.263, P = 0.043, &#x3b7;p2 = 0.058; and visuospatial skills, F(3,92) = 6.931, P < 0.001, &#x3b7;p2 = 0.234. CONCLUSION: Cognitive-motor challenge-based exergame balance training was associated with an increase in serum BDNF, a reduction in p-tau181. In contrast, the A&#x3b2;1-42 levels remained stable. These changes were accompanied by improvement in selective cognitive functions (attention, abstraction, and visuospatial skills) in individuals with MCI. Greater effects were observed in moderate and high-difficulty groups, suggesting the importance of intervention intensity in promoting cognitive and neurobiological outcomes in MCI.

Humans↗

Changes in hippocampal functional connectivity and volume associated with cognitive improvement and decline in amnestic mild cognitive impairment following computerized cognitive training.

BACKGROUND: The hippocampus influences the outcomes of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and undergoes different changes during the cognitive decline or recovery of aMCI compared to elderly individuals with normal cognition, which may reveal disease-dependent neurodegeneration or plasticity. We first aimed to investigate the hippocampal changes associated with cognitive changes in aMCI using a combined case-control study design. METHODS: In total, 50&#x202f;aMCI individuals and 50 healthy controls (HCs) were recruited in Shenyang, China, and separately randomized into training and control groups: aMCI training group, aMCI no training group, HC training group, and HC no training group. The aMCI and HC training groups received computerized cognitive training (CCT) thrice weekly for 12 weeks. Cognitive assessments and MRI data were collected at baseline and follow-up. RESULTS: The primary outcome was significant CCT&#xd7;diagnosis interaction effect on the change in cognitive performance as measured by clock drawing test (CDT) scores (F&#x202f;=&#x202f;4.322, P&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.041); this interaction was driven by CCT specifically in aMCI (F&#x202f;=&#x202f;4.465, P&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.038). Significant CCT&#xd7;diagnosis interaction effects of right-hippocampal FC changes were observed in the bilateral precuneus/cuneus (Pvoxel<0.05) driven by CCT in aMCI (F&#x202f;=&#x202f;5.429, P&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.023), and in the left superior temporal gyrus/middle temporal gyrus (STG/MTG, Pvoxel<0.05), driven by CCT of only in HCs (F&#x202f;=&#x202f;6.587, P&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.013). A significant interaction effect of left-hippocampal FC changes were observed in the right triangular part of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFGtriang, Pvoxel<0.05), driven by CCT in aMCI and HCs (F&#x202f;=&#x202f;6.550, P&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.013; F&#x202f;=&#x202f;7.097, P&#x202f;=&#x202f;0.010). No significant interaction effect on the change in hippocampal GMV was noted (P&#x202f;>&#x202f;0.05). CONCLUSION: CCT can improve the visuospatial ability of aMCI, which is reflected by the CDT scores. CCT can alter hippocampal FC in the bilateral precuneus/cuneus, the right IFGtriang, and the left STG/MTG. The hippocampal GMV is difficult to change in both HCs and aMCI during the cognitive decline. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR1900026849. DATE OF REGISTRATION: 24 October 2019 NAME OF TRIAL REGISTRY: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR).

Humans↗

How does cognitive therapy work? Cognitive change and symptom change in cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy for depression.

The effects of changes in depression-relevant cognition were examined in relation to subsequent change in depressive symptoms for outpatients with major depressive disorder randomly assigned to cognitive therapy (CT; n = 32) versus those assigned to pharmacotherapy only (NoCT; n = 32). Depression severity scores were obtained at the beginning, middle, and end of the 12-week treatment period, as were scores on 4 measures of cognition: Attributional Styles Questionnaire (ASQ), Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ), Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale (DAS), and the Hopelessness Scale (HS). Change from pretreatment to midtreatment on the ASQ, DAS, and HS predicted change in depression from midtreatment to posttreatment in the CT group, but not in the NoCT group. It is concluded that cognitive phenomena play mediational roles in cognitive therapy. However, data do not support their status as sufficient mediators.

Adolescent↗

Comparison of cognitive models of depression: relationships between cognitive constructs and cognitive diathesis-stress match.

The authors examined the relationship between the cognitive components of the Beckian and Hopelessness models of depression by administering measures of dysfunctional attitudes, attributional style, and life stress to a sample of 59 depressed adults. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that dysfunctional attitudes and attributional style load on separate factors as opposed to a single factor. Additional analyses revealed that depressed persons conforming to diathesis-stress criteria according to each model were largely independent of one another. Results supported the conclusion that the Beckian and Hopelessness models of depression describe distinct cognitive constructs and refer to distinct subsets of depressed persons.

Adult↗

Age at menopause and subjective cognitive symptoms predict digital cognitive outcomes at the gynecological Well-Woman visit.

INTRODUCTION: Women are at increased risk for Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Growing evidence suggests that the menopausal transition may represent a vulnerable window for development of AD-related pathology. Yet, women are diagnosed with AD later than men. Conducting routine cognitive screenings and integrating information about both cognitive symptoms and age at menopause may help address sex-based disparities in detection and prevention. This study investigated whether subjective cognitive symptoms, in combination with age at menopause, were associated with performance on a digital cognitive task in postmenopausal women. METHODS: 183 postmenopausal women (mean age&#x2009;=&#x2009;63.8, range&#x2009;=&#x2009;45-85) were recruited after their Well-Woman visit. Participants completed the Screener for Cognitive Problems in Everyday Life (SCoPE) to assess subjective cognitive symptoms, followed by a sensitive measure of objective cognition: the Linus Health Digital Clock and Recall (DCR&#x2122;). Information was also collected on age at menopause. We examined associations of subjective cognitive symptoms and age at menopause with digital cognitive performance, adjusting for age, education and depression. Model fit was evaluated using adjusted R2, AIC, and BIC. RESULTS: 48.1% of women reported one or more cognitive symptoms on the SCoPE. On objective testing, 73.2% scored in the normal range, 20.8% in the borderline range, and 6.0% in the impaired range. SCoPE total score was negatively associated with objective cognitive performance in adjusted models (B&#x2009;=&#x2009;-.12, p&#x2009;=&#x2009;.03). Age at menopause showed a significant quadratic association with cognitive performance (B&#x2009;=&#x2009;-0.006, p<.001). SCoPE total was not associated with DCR subtests, while age at menopause predicted both Delayed Recall and Clock Drawing. CONCLUSION: Subjective cognitive symptoms and age at menopause were associated with lower performance on a sensitive, objective cognitive test. Findings support routine cognitive screening and suggest that subjective cognitive symptoms as well as age at menopause are associated with cognitive function.

Humans↗

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation for cognition and well-being.

BACKGROUND: In view of the theoretical rationale for beneficial effects of DHEA and DHEAS in aging and dementia, we believe it is timely to undertake a thorough investigation of well-conducted studies in this area. This will provide a basis for confirmation of any effect of DHEA/S administration in humans, in large-scale and properly controlled trials, which would evaluate effective dosage, acceptable route and duration of administration and side effect profiles. This is especially pertinent at this time as DHEA is currently being sold in large quantities in health food stores, particularly in the USA. In some cases the recommended dose is different for men and women (50mg/day for men and 25mg/day for women) and the basis for this recommendation needs to be explored. OBJECTIVES: To establish whether administration of DHEA, or its sulphate, DHEAS, improves psychological well-being and/or improves cognitive function or reduces the rate of decline of cognitive function in older adults or in individuals with dementia. SEARCH STRATEGY: All available electronic databases, hand searched journals, personal communications and conference abstracts were searched for randomised controlled trials of DHEA in well-being and cognition. The total yield from searching was 415 and the detailed breakdown is given in the body of this review. SELECTION CRITERIA: All relevant randomised controlled trials of DHEA or DHEAS were considered for inclusion in the review. Studies where groups are matched, rather than randomised, were also considered. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data for the specified outcomes were independently extracted by two reviewers (FAH & JvN) and cross-checked. Any discrepancies were discussed and resolved. Where possible and appropriate, data were pooled and the mean differences estimated. MAIN RESULTS: The published DHEA trials fall into 2 categories: 1. four German studies in which DHEA was administered for a period of two weeks or less; 2. a USA study in which DHEA was administered for three months. Well-being was assessed in both sets of studies and a significant improvement was reported in the longer duration USA study, while no effect was reported in the shorter duration studies. The USA study used an open-ended questionnaire for self-assessment of well-being and stated that 67% of men and 82% of women reported enhanced well-being on DHEA compared with placebo. There was no significant change on an analogue measure of libido. The German studies assessed mood and well-being with a number of standardised scales and reported no significant effects of DHEA on any of them. Only the German studies examined performance on cognitive tests, i.e. memory, verbal fluency, speed of processing, etc. They reported no significant benefit of DHEA. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The data at present offer limited support for improvement in a sense of well-being following DHEA treatment. This effect was reported only in the longer-term study which used a crude measure of well-being. The data offer no support at present for an improvement in memory or other aspects of cognitive function following DHEA treatment, although cognitive function was only measured in the short-duration trials. In view of the growing public enthusiasm for DHEA supplementation, particularly in the USA, it is clear that high-quality trials need to be undertaken in older adults, in which (a) the duration of DHEA treatment is in excess of two weeks, (b) the number of participants is large enough to detect effects if they exist, and (c) the outcome measures include validated scales for assessment of mood and well-being, and objective tests of cognitive function. Recently, studies of DHEA supplementation in clinical depression and Alzheimer's Disease have been completed in the USA. As soon as the results are available these studies will be reviewed. Currently, two trials (in France and the USA) in normal elderly are in progress.

Adult↗

Alcohol use and cognition at mid-life: the importance of adjusting for baseline cognitive ability and educational attainment.

BACKGROUND: The nature of the relationship between cognition and alcohol consumption remains controversial. Studies have reported negative, positive, and nonsignificant effects of alcohol consumption on cognition. Problematic throughout the literature is that baseline cognitive ability has not been adequately controlled in previous studies, and even educational attainment is only sometimes controlled. Because such variables may be associated with both alcohol intake and later-life cognition, we hypothesize that the observed relationship between alcohol intake and cognition may change when these variables or other conditions in early life have been controlled. METHODS: We examined the relationship of alcohol intake and cognition at age 53 using the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, which has followed Wisconsin high school graduates from 1957 to 1992. Our measures include cognitive ability test scores from the freshman and junior years of high school, educational attainment, an abstract reasoning test score at age 53, alcohol intake at age 53, and other measures. RESULTS: When no controls were used, both men and women with low levels of alcohol consumption at 53 (i.e., 0-1 drink per day) had better scores on the abstract reasoning subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-R) at age 53 than subjects who never drank or currently did not drink. However, after adjusting for adolescent-measured cognitive ability and educational attainment, men with low levels of consumption no longer had higher abstract reasoning scores than nondrinking men, but they still did have higher abstract reasoning scores than men who drank more than one drink per day. For women, adjusting for cognitive ability and educational attainment eliminated all significant effects of alcohol on cognition, and reversed the nonsignificant result that women with higher consumption had the highest cognition scores. These results demonstrate the importance of adjusting for baseline cognitive ability when attempting to study the effect of long-term alcohol use patterns on cognition, and that educational attainment cannot be considered a valid substitute for baseline cognition scores. CONCLUSIONS: Much of the apparent benefit of moderate alcohol intake on cognition in our society may well be explained by differential rates of alcohol consumption among subjects with differing baseline cognitive ability scores. Neither is there evidence that moderate alcohol intake reduces cognitive functioning.

Alcohol Drinking↗

Effects of epileptiform EEG discharges on cognitive function: is the concept of "transient cognitive impairment" still valid?

In this article we review the existing evidence on the cognitive impact of interictal epileptiform EEG discharges. Such cognitive impairment occurs exclusively in direct relation to episodes of epileptiform EEG discharges and must be distinguished from (post) ictal seizure effects and from the nonperiodic long-term "stable" interictal effects caused by the clinical syndrome or the underlying etiology. Especially in patients with short nonconvulsive seizures, characterized often by difficult-to-detect symptoms, the ictal or postictal effects may be overlooked and the resulting cognitive effects may be erroneously related to the epileptiform EEG discharges. The existing epidemiological data show that the prevalence of cognitive impairment during epileptiform EEG discharges is low. In one study 2.2% of the patients referred to a specialized epilepsy center for EEG recording showed a definite relationship between epileptiform EEG discharges and cognitive impairments ("transient cognitive impairment"). Several studies have sought to analyze to what extent cognitive impairment can be attributed to epileptiform EEG discharges among the other epilepsy factors (such as the effect of the clinical syndrome). These studies show that epileptiform EEG discharges have an additional and independent effect, but this effect is mild and limited to transient mechanistic cognitive processes (alertness, mental speed). This finding concurs with clinical studies that also reported only mild effects. In only exceptional cases are epileptiform EEG discharges the dominant factor explaining cognitive impairment. In addition, some studies have indicated that such mild effects may accumulate over time (when frequent epileptiform EEG discharges persist over years) and consequently result in effects on stable aspects of cognitive function such as educational achievement and intelligence. Hence, the clinical relevance is that early detection of cognitive effects of epileptiform EEG discharges and subsequent treatment may prevent a definite impact on cognitive and educational development. The disruptive effects of epileptiform EEG discharges on long-term potentiation, as established in animal experiments, may be one of the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying this accumulation. In conclusion the concept of "transient cognitive impairment" is still valid, but refinement of methodology has shown that a large proportion of presumed transient cognitive impairment can be attributed to subtle seizures, while interictal epileptic activity accounts for a much smaller part of the cognitive effects than previously thought. In particular cryptogenic partial epilepsies are associated with the risk of cognitive impairment. We hope that increased clinical awareness of this need for early detection will stimulate longitudinal and prospective research that eventually also will provide an answer to the questions of when and how epileptiform discharges that are not part of a seizure need to be treated.

Adult↗

Prevalence and outcomes of vascular cognitive impairment. Vascular Cognitive Impairment Investigators of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the importance of vascular cognitive impairment and its three subgroups (cognitive impairment, no dementia; vascular dementia; and AD with a vascular component) to the prevalence and burden of cognitive impairment in elderly people. BACKGROUND: Vascular lesions may produce a spectrum of cognitive changes. Omitting elderly patients whose cognitive impairment falls short of dementia (vascular cognitive impairment, no dementia) may give a falsely low indication of the prevalence and burden of disease. To test this proposition, we compared the rates of adverse outcomes for patients with no cognitive impairment, vascular cognitive impairment (and its subgroups), and probable AD. METHODS: The Canadian Study of Health and Aging is a prospective cohort study of 10,253 randomly selected community-dwelling and institution-dwelling respondents aged 65 years or older. In the community, all participants (n = 9,008) were screened for cognitive impairment; those who screened positive and a sample of those who screened negative received a clinical assessment (n = 1,659). All patients living in institutions received a clinical assessment (n = 1,255). Participants were reassessed 5 years after the original survey. RESULTS: Vascular cognitive impairment without dementia was the most prevalent form of vascular cognitive impairment among those aged 65 to 84 years. Rates of institutionalization and mortality for those with vascular cognitive impairment were significantly higher than those of people who had no cognitive impairment, and the mortality rate for patients with vascular cognitive impairment was similar to that of patients with AD. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to consider vascular cognitive impairment without dementia underestimates the prevalence of impairment and the risk for adverse outcomes associated with vascular cognitive impairment.

Age Distribution↗

Subjective cognition trajectories, Alzheimer biomarkers, and incident mild cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND: Subjective cognitive decline is common in older adults and may represent an early clinical signal along the Alzheimer's disease continuum. The clinical relevance of longitudinal changes in subjective cognitive decline remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether trajectories of self- or study partner-reported cognitive decline predict progression to mild cognitive impairment and reflect Alzheimer's disease-specific biological patterns. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Data were pooled from two observational cohorts. Cognitively unimpaired participants with baseline amyloid status, repeated assessments of subjective cognitive decline, and clinical follow-up were included. The study included 770 participants with a median follow-up of 5.0 years (interquartile range 4.0-7.0). MEASUREMENTS: Subjective cognitive decline was assessed using the Everyday Cognition questionnaire completed by participants and study partners. Linear mixed-effects models examined associations with amyloid status and progression to mild cognitive impairment. Cox proportional hazards models tested whether one-year changes predicted progression. RESULTS: Amyloid-positive participants and those who progressed to mild cognitive impairment showed steeper increases in self- and study partner-reported cognitive difficulties over time. Among amyloid-positive participants, only increases in study partner-report differentiated progressors from non-progressors. One-year increases in study partner-report predicted a higher risk of mild cognitive impairment compared with unchanged scores (hazard ratio 3.24; 95% confidence interval 1.73-6.07]), with effects confined to amyloid-positive participants. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term increases in study partner-reported cognitive difficulties identify amyloid-positive cognitively unimpaired older adults at increased risk of near-term progression to mild cognitive impairment. Longitudinal monitoring using study partner reports may provide a low-burden and clinically relevant approach for early risk stratification and surveillance in aging populations.

Humans↗

Sustained cognitive and functional effects of pro-cognitive interventions for bipolar disorder: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

A substantial proportion of individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) experience considerable cognitive deficits. Existing systematic reviews have evaluated the efficacy of pro-cognitive interventions in BD, but have not established whether any cognitive benefits translate into functional improvements, with evidence for sustained functional effects remaining limited. A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library from inception until 21 May 2026. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in BD reporting cognitive or functional outcomes at three or more months following a pro-cognitive intervention, or examining the translation of cognitive benefits into improvements in functional outcomes at any timepoint. Seven unique RCTs plus three secondary analyses of these trials (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;615) met the inclusion criteria. Approximately 13% (7/55) of RCTs identified in the search of pro-cognitive interventions in adult BD assessed cognitive or functional outcomes at least 3&#xa0;months after treatment end. Of the seven unique RCTs, most evaluated cognitive remediation (CR; k&#xa0;=&#xa0;4). The average follow-up length was 4&#xa0;months (range: 3-6&#xa0;months). Three of the four RCTs examining CR reported cognitive benefits at 3 to 6&#xa0;months, whereas only one CR RCT found consistent functional effects at 3&#xa0;months. Evidence on the translation of cognitive benefits to functional improvements is scarce and inconsistent. Most trials examining pro-cognitive interventions do not examine whether potential benefits are sustained or whether they translate into improvements in real-world functioning. CR appears to be a promising intervention for achieving durable cognitive gains in BD, although evidence for sustained effects of other interventions is limited.

Humans↗

Multidisciplinary team interventions for delirium in patients with chronic cognitive impairment.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is common in hospitalized elderly people. In the frail elderly, delirium may occur in 60% of those hospitalized. In the cognitively impaired, 45% have been shown to develop delirium and these patients have longer lengths of stay and a higher rate of complications which, amongst other things, together contribute to an increase in cost of care. The combination of being elderly and chronically cognitively impaired leads to a high risk of delirium with the associated increased risk of prolonged hospital stay, complications, and poor outcomes. The management of delirium has commonly been multifaceted - the primary emphasis has always been on the diagnosis and therapy of the precipitating factors, but as this may not be immediately resolved, symptomatic and supportive care may become of major importance. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to assess the available evidence for the effectiveness, if any, of multidisciplinary team interventions in the coordinated care of patients with delirium superimposed on an underlying chronic cognitive impairment compared with the usual care of older cognitively impaired patients. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library, up to and including Issue 1, 1998) was searched using the terms 'delirium, controlled trial, cognitive'. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Psychlit (Ovid via Winspirs up to Feb 1998) were also searched with the same terms. Other sources including personal communications, ongoing trials, conference proceedings, handsearching and reference lists of published papers and books were all searched for relevant randomized controlled trials. The total yield from searching was 157 from which 8 (eight) were retained for consideration in the review. SELECTION CRITERIA: From the initial search yields, all randomised controlled trials involving the management of elderly patients with delirium were identified. A single reviewer (AMB) discarded irrelevant publications based on the title of the publication and its abstract. In the event that the article could possibly be relevant, it was retrieved for further assessment. All references were compiled in a list with a commentary on type of article, eg review, prospective study etc and this was independently considered by the second reviewer (RR) who agreed to review all randomised controlled studies reported on patients with delirium. Selection for possible inclusion in this review was then made on the basis of the participants reported as having chronic cognitive impairment, who then developed incident delirium and were randomly assigned to either coordinated multidisciplinary care or usual care. The outcomes of interest were length of stay in hospital, morbidity (including complications), patient distress & impact on care environment, mortality, discharge arrangements and follow-up including assessment of cognitive function at 6 months. Studies in which patients with chronic cognitive impairment or dementia, managed for incident delirium, according to ICD 9 criteria (see note) were considered eligible for inclusion in the review. Studies of risk factors and non-randomized studies were excluded. Note: this classification has been widely utilised throughout the English speaking medical literature over the past 20 years: ICD 10 is still being incorporated into clinical coding systems and has not been utilised in studies published in 1996. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Delirium↗

Cognitive behaviour therapy for schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Although medication is the mainstay of treatment for schizophrenia, always, some sort of informal or formal talking therapy is indicated. In cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) links are made between the person's feelings and patterns of thinking which underpin their distress. OBJECTIVES: To review the effects of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) for those with schizophrenia compared to standard care, specific medication and non-intervention; also to review the effects of CBT for those with schizophrenia who are concurrently receiving standard care compared to no additional intervention to standard care, specific medication, additional drug interventions to standard care and other additional psychosocial interventions to standard care. SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1980-1998), CINAHL (1982-1998), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1998), The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of Trials (August 1998), EMBASE (1980-1998), MEDLINE (1966-1998), PsycLIT (1887-1998), SIGLE (1990-1998), and Sociofile (1980-1998) were undertaken. All references of articles selected were searched for further relevant trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of cognitive behaviour therapy for people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, possible schizophrenia or mental illnesses where specific diagnoses have not been employed. Outcomes such as death, metal state, relapse, psychological well-being and acceptability of treatment were sought. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Studies were reliably selected and assessed for methodological quality. Data were extracted by two reviewers working independently. Dichotomous data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis and continuous data with 70% completion rate are presented. MAIN RESULTS: Four small trials were identified. All presented data suggested that there was a difference favouring CBT plus standard care over standard care alone in terms of reducing relapse rates (short term OR 0.31 CI 0.1-0.98; medium term OR 0.38 CI 0.17-0.83; long term OR 0.46 CI 0.26-0.83, NNT 6 CI 3-30). These findings were supported within the trials by scale-derived data. CBT, however, did not keep more people in care than a standard approach and there is no data relating to the effect of CBT on compliance with medication. One study also presented data on the effects of CBT when compared to supportive psychotherapy. No effect statistically significantly favoured either group but all were suggestive that the trial may have been underpowered to find an effect in favour of CBT. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The results of well conducted and reported ongoing trials are eagerly awaited. Currently, for those with schizophrenia willing to receive CBT, access to this treatment approach is associated with a substantially reduced risk of relapse. However, at present CBT is a fairly scarce commodity, often provided by highly skilled and experienced therapists. Therefore, its application in day to day practice may be restricted by the availability of suitable practitioners. Similarly, the present data provides little indication of how effective CBT procedures might be when they are applied by less experienced practitioners.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy↗

Piracetam for dementia or cognitive impairment.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical efficacy of piracetam for the features of dementia or cognitive impairment, classified according to the major subtypes of dementia: vascular, Alzheimer's disease or mixed vascular and Alzheimer's disease or unclassified dementia or cognitive impairment not fulfilling the criteria for dementia. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Group Register of Clinical Trials was searched using the terms "piracetam", "nootropic" and "2-oxo-l-pyrrolidine acetamide". Electronic bibliographic databases including Medline, Embase, PychLit, Current Contents, Sociofile were searched back to 1966 with the terms piracetam, nootropics, 2-oxo-1-pyrrolidine and trials. In addition the pharmaceutical company responsible for marketing most of the piracetam worldwide, UCB Pharma, provided a comprehensive list of abstracts, which included many unpublished studies. As many of these unpublished, placebo control studies will be reviewed as possible. SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded trials specified as randomised in which treatment with piracetam was administered for more than a day and compared with placebo in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type, vascular dementia or mixed vascular and Alzheimer's disease or uncalssified dementia or cognitive impairment not fulfilling the criteria for dementia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Each study was independently verified as fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Studies were rated for methodological quality by assessment of blinding and loss before analysis as described by Jadad et al. (1996). Studies were pooled if appropriate and possible, and the pooled odds ratios (95%CI) or the average differences (95%CI) were estimated. Where possible, intention-to-treat data were used. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine if successive elimination of those studies performing most poorly on these quality criteria changed the effect estimate. MAIN RESULTS: Unfortunately, many of these studies were crossover in design and data were unavailable from the first period. In many other studies data were not able to be extracted from the first period. From the data that were pooled there was only one outcome where significant amounts of evidence were available, Global Impression of Change. There was evidence of heterogeneity in the results from the individual studies, Chi squared test = 20.8 (df=5). Using a fixed effects model the odds ratio for improvement in the Piracetem group compared with the Placebo group was 3.55, [95% CI][2.45, 5.16]. If a random effects model was used the odds ratio was 3.47 [1.29, 9.30]. If one single-blind study was excluded, the fixed effects model yielded an odds ratio of 3.36 [2.29, 4.99] and if a random effects model was applied then the odds ratio was 2.89 [1.01, 8.24]. The evidence of effects on cognition and other measures, was inconclusive. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: At this stage the evidence available from the published literature does not support the use of Piracetem in the treatment of people with dementia or cognitive impairment because effects were found only on global impression of change but not on any of the more specific measures. There is a need for further evaluation of piracetam by : 1) Obtaining the data from these studies for an individual patient database review, 2) Performing a randomised trial of Piracetam in patients with diagnoses made by currently accepted diagnostic criteria. Piracetam should be trialled for a period of at least 6 months and preferably longer. Specific cognitive instruments which are sensitive to change, Clinician Global Impression of Change, levels of dependency and caregiver quality of life scales should also be incorporated in such a study.

Alzheimer Disease↗