SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Comparative Study”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2,598 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Foot exercise plus education versus brief advice for the treatment of plantar heel pain (FEET Trial): a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite foot muscle strengthening being a target of exercise interventions for plantar heel pain (PHP) no study has measured foot muscle outcomes, and existing research is limited by a lack of control (no treatment) comparisons. OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial and investigate the acceptability and credibility of comprehensive progressive foot exercise and education compared to brief advice for PHP. DESIGN: Randomised parallel group feasibility trial. METHOD: People with PHP were randomised (1:1 concealed allocation) to receive either foot exercise plus education or brief advice for twelve weeks. Primary outcomes included willingness to enrol, recruitment rate, adherence, logbook completion, dropout rate, early withdrawal reasons, adverse events, additional treatments sought, and credibility/expectancy. RESULTS: Twenty people with PHP (16 women; age 50 ± 9 years; body mass index = 30.7 ± 4.6 kg/m2) were recruited over 15 weeks (1.3 participants per week). Primary outcomes were willingness to enrol (80%), adherence (physiotherapy sessions attended: foot exercise plus education 85%, brief advice 100%; home exercise program: 62% daily sessions completed, 72% thrice weekly sessions completed), logbook completion (foot exercise plus education 75%, brief advice 90%), dropout rate (15%), and additional treatments sought (69%). There were no intervention-related adverse events, and credibility scores were higher for foot exercise plus education. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms feasibility and acceptability of a protocol comparing foot exercise plus education with brief advice in individuals with PHP, generating key insights to inform future trial design.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Comparison of immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of EVA71 vaccine in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Enterovirus 71 (EV-A71) is a principal cause of hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD), potentially leading to severe neurological complications in children. Inactivated EV-A71 vaccines have been introduced. This study compares the immunogenicity, safety, and efficacy of EV-A71 vaccines versus placebo in pediatric populations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Following a PROSPERO-registered protocol, RCTs involving EV-A71 in children were identified via PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Two independent reviewers performed screening, extraction, and RoB assessments (RoB 2.0). RESULTS: Five phase III RCTs involving 36,659 children were included. EV-A71 vaccination significantly increased seropositivity across follow-up periods, including early (RR 5.8), medium-term (RR 3.09), and long-term (RR 2.95) response. Seroconversion was significantly higher in the vaccinated group (pooled RR 13.04, 95% CI 2.80-60.61; p < 0.001). Geometric mean titers, analyzed using the ratio of means approach, were significantly higher in the vaccinated group during early and medium-term follow-up. Vaccine efficacy against EV-A71-associated HFMD exceeded 98% (pooled RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01-0.09; p = 0.0028; I2 = 50%). Solicited local and systemic adverse events were mild and comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: Inactivated EV-A71 vaccines robust immunogenicity, high clinical efficacy, and an acceptable safety profile in children. Future studies should explore long-term protection, booster schedules, and multivalent formulations against non-EV-A71 serotypes.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Stapled versus hand-sewn intestinal anastomosis in pediatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal anastomosis is a core procedure in pediatric gastrointestinal surgery, performed for conditions such as necrotizing enterocolitis, intestinal atresia, Hirschsprung's disease, and inflammatory bowel disease. Although stapled anastomosis (SA) may improve operative efficiency, its safety and effectiveness compared with hand-sewn anastomosis (HA) in children remain uncertain. This meta-analysis compared clinical outcomes of SA and HA in pediatric patients. METHODS: The study followed PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251177257). A systematic search of PubMed, Dimensions, and the Cochrane Library was conducted through June 2025. Studies including children under 7 years undergoing intestinal SA or HA were eligible. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment using ROB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Statistical analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (v3) with a random-effects model. RESULTS: Eleven studies involving 903 patients met inclusion criteria, including two randomized controlled trials. Of these, 333 patients underwent SA and 570 underwent HA. SA was associated with significantly shorter operative time (mean difference [MD] = -19.26 min; 95% CI: -24.24 to -14.28; p < 0.001) and earlier initiation of oral feeding (MD = -2.32 days; 95% CI: -3.78 to -0.86; p = 0.002). No significant differences were found in anastomotic leakage, stricture formation, reoperation rate, or length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Stapled anastomosis appears as safe as hand-sewn techniques in pediatric intestinal surgery while offering shorter operative duration and faster postoperative feeding recovery. Selective use of stapled techniques is supported when anatomically feasible, though further multicenter randomized trials are needed.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Robot-assisted versus manual percutaneous vascular interventions across vascular territories: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Robot-assisted percutaneous vascular intervention (R-PVI) has expanded beyond coronary procedures, but previous reviews were largely coronary-focused and observational. Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) warrant broader reassessment of R-PVI versus manual percutaneous vascular intervention (M-PVI) across vascular territories. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database inception to January 31, 2026, following PRISMA guidelines. RCTs and observational studies including ≥10 adult patients in total were eligible. Comparative studies informed primary analyses, while single-arm studies provided supportive evidence. Primary outcomes were clinical success rate and major adverse cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events (MACE) rate. Secondary outcomes included mortality rate, technical success rate, procedural time metrics, contrast volume, and radiation exposure. Random-effects models were used. Forty studies were included: 3 RCTs, 10 comparative observational studies, and 27 single-arm observational studies, comprising 3,870 patients undergoing R-PVI and 1,142 undergoing M-PVI. Comparative analyses showed similar clinical success rates (RR 1.00, P = 0.46), MACE rates (RR 0.72, P = 0.43), and mortality. Single-arm pooled estimates for clinical and technical success were 98.76% and 96.09%, respectively. R-PVI prolonged total procedure time overall (MD 15.92 min, P = 0.01), with consistent increases in the neurovascular, RCT, and non-RCT subgroups. Fluoroscopy time was also longer (MD 1.91 min, P = 0.04), mainly in the RCT subgroup (MD 2.83 min, P = 0.001). In contrast, intravascular intervention time was unchanged overall and in RCTs, but was prolonged in non-RCTs (MD 8.72 min, P = 0.006). Operator radiation exposure was markedly reduced (MD -33.97 μSv, P < 0.001), whereas patient radiation exposure and contrast volume were similar. R-PVI appears feasible and safe across selected vascular procedures. Its clearest benefit is reduced operator radiation exposure, whereas lower whole-procedure efficiency remains its main limitation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Versus Transjugular Portal Pressure Measurements: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Published reviews of endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) have emphasized feasibility and safety. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis specifically to evaluate how closely EUS-based portal pressure measurements track invasive comparator measurements in prospective paired studies and to summarize agreement, technical success, and adverse events. METHODS: We searched major databases through January 2026 for prospective cohorts reporting same-patient EUS-based portal pressure measurement and invasive hemodynamic measurements. Correlations were pooled with random-effects models and analyzed separately for studies comparing EUS-PPG with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and studies comparing EUS-based portal measurements with direct portal venous pressure. Agreement and threshold discordance were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: Six prospective cohorts (127 attempted procedures) were included. In studies using HVPG as the comparator, the pooled correlation was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.89; I2 = 0%). In studies comparing EUS-based portal measurements with direct portal venous pressure, the pooled correlation was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.72-0.93; I2 = 16.9%). Technical success was 95.3%. EUS-PPG-attributed adverse events occurred in 2.4% of procedures, with no procedure-related deaths. Agreement data were limited. Reported limits of agreement were wide (approximately - 6 to + 7 mmHg), and discrepancies of 5 mmHg or greater occurred in 4 of 30 paired measurements. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-based portal pressure measurement is feasible and shows a strong association with invasive hemodynamic comparators, but the evidence base remains small (six cohorts, 127 attempted procedures). Further study will be necessary to establish patient-level agreement, procedural reproducibility, EUS-specific clinically significant portal hypertension thresholds, and whether HVPG-based decision thresholds can be transferred to EUS-derived measurements.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Performance comparison of rapid and native barcoding methods for Oxford Nanopore sequencing of Poliovirus Viral Protein 1 (VP1) amplicons.

Accurate and timely sequencing of poliovirus is critical for global eradication efforts, particularly for molecular epidemiology based on the typing region of the genome, viral protein 1 (VP1). While Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) sequencing has expanded capabilities for poliovirus surveillance, the relative performance of different ONT library preparation methods, including ligation-based (Native Barcoding) and transposase-based (Rapid Barcoding) approaches, has not been systematically evaluated. In this study, we compared rapid barcoding and native barcoding workflows for sequencing VP1 amplicons from 17 type 2 poliovirus-positive samples, each processed in triplicate. Native barcoding generated significantly more sequencing output, producing approximately 2.3-fold greater total read yield than rapid barcoding, and demonstrated higher run-to-run reproducibility (R2 = 0.979-0.998 vs. 0.847-0.929, respectively; p < 0.001). In addition, native barcoding generated 80% of the total yield achieved by rapid barcoding within approximately 7 h, whereas rapid barcoding required approximately 40 h to reach the same output. Despite these differences, both methods produced identical VP1 consensus sequences across all samples, with comparable read quality (median per-base Q-scores of approximately Q17-Q18). Rapid barcoding provided substantial practical advantages, reducing hands-on library preparation time (55 vs. 200 min) and per-sample cost ($12.82 vs. $16.54), while simplifying workflow and reducing technical complexity. These findings indicate that sequencing yield may not be a determinant of downstream analytical outcomes for poliovirus VP1 ONT sequencing. Rapid barcoding therefore represents a cost-effective and efficient approach for routine poliovirus surveillance, whereas native barcoding remains advantageous in applications requiring rapid data generation or maximal sequencing depth.

Poliovirus↗

PubMed2026

Cefoxitin versus cefotaxime as empirical treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in liver cirrhotic patients: randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a severe complication of cirrhosis requiring immediate empirical antibiotic therapy. Third-generation cephalosporins are the traditional agents of choice; however, increasing clinical failure rates necessitate the evaluation of alternative antibiotics to ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes. The aim was to investigate the efficacy of cefoxitin versus cefotaxime for SBP treatment. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted on 140 cirrhotic patients with community-acquired SBP at Al-Rajhy Liver University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt. Patients were randomized to receive either cefotaxime (n = 70) or cefoxitin (n = 70), 2 g every 8 h for 5 days. Polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) counts were measured upon admission, on Day 2 and on Day 5. Clinical response rates at Days 2 and 5, development of hepatorenal syndrome, length of stay and mortality were assessed. RESULTS: According to intention-to-treat analysis, clinical response rates at Day 2 were 74.2% in the cefotaxime group and 80% in the cefoxitin group, while at Day 5, they were 71.4% and 74.3%, respectively (P = 0.704). The PMN counts at Days 0, 2 and 5 showed no significant differences between the cefotaxime and cefoxitin groups (P = 0.889, 0.909 and 0.360, respectively). The incidence of hepatorenal syndrome was 7.1% in the cefotaxime group compared with 8.6% in the cefoxitin group (P = 0.753), and mortality was 15.7% and 12.9%, respectively (P = 0.629). CONCLUSIONS: Cefoxitin showed comparable effectiveness to cefotaxime but may be utilized in selected clinically stable SBP patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Triggering modalities to synchronise non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that synchronised nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (sNIPPV) may be the optimal mode of non-invasive respiratory support. However, no comprehensive review of sNIPPV modes is available. This review aims to describe different synchronisation methods for sNIPPV and compare their effectiveness in clinical, physiological and technical outcomes with other modes of non-invasive respiratory support. METHODS: This review identified all clinical studies in preterm infants that compared sNIPPV to other non-invasive respiratory support modes or compared different trigger modalities between 1990 and 2026. A search was carried out in MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Main outcomes were categorised as clinical (eg, extubation failure (EF)), physiological (eg, breathing effort) and technical (eg, synchronisation rate). RESULTS: 49 studies (2864 infants) were included, with a low to moderate risk of bias. Meta-analysis showed a reduction in EF (risk ratio=0.38; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.85; p=0.03) in favour of sNIPPV compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP). Physiological outcomes were significantly improved during sNIPPV compared with nCPAP and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), especially breathing effort. When reviewing technical outcomes, non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist showed lower patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) (index ranging from 7% to 50%), a higher synchronisation rate (80%-99%) and a shorter trigger delay (35 ms) compared with other sNIPPV modes. CONCLUSIONS: This review shows that synchronising NIPPV results in consistent physiological (reduced patient effort) and technical benefits (reduced PVA). However, evidence on positive effects on (long-term) major clinical outcomes remains limited and requires further studies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251022479.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Near and distance vergence facility provides complementary clinical information in concussion-related convergence insufficiency.

PURPOSE: To compare near and distance vergence facility testing in adolescents and young adults with concussion-related convergence insufficiency and evaluate changes following office-based vergence/accommodative therapy (OBVAM). METHODS: This secondary analysis of the CONCUSS randomized clinical trial evaluated vergence facility at near (40 cm) and distance (4 m) using a 12Δ base out/3Δ base in prism flipper. Participants aged 11-25 years with concussion-related convergence insufficiency were randomized to immediate or 6 weeks delayed OBVAM. Vergence facility was assessed at baseline, outcome time 1 assessment (after 12 therapy sessions for the immediate group and 6 weeks of watchful waiting for the delayed group), and outcome time 2 assessment (after both groups completed 16 therapy sessions). Agreement between near and distance vergence facility classifications was evaluated, and treatment-related changes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of the 106 enrolled participants, 102 completed all study visits. At baseline, the near and distance vergence facility classifications demonstrated substantial discordance. Among 101 participants with both measures available, 49 demonstrated reduced distance vergence facility despite normal near vergence facility, whereas only two showed the opposite pattern (Cohen's κ = 0.12; p < 0.0001). Vergence facility improved following therapy in both treatment groups, with larger early improvements in the immediate-treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Near and distance vergence facility testing provided complementary rather than interchangeable clinical information in adolescents and young adults with concussion-related convergence insufficiency. Both measures improved following vergence/accommodative therapy, supporting consideration of both testing distances in clinical assessment.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Virtual surgical planning-assisted versus free-hand head and neck reconstruction: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and a novel classification.

Virtual surgical planning (VSP)-assisted reconstruction is increasingly used as an alternative to conventional free-hand (FH) techniques in mandibular and maxillary free-flap reconstruction. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared clinical outcomes and proposed a Reconstruction Complexity-Completeness classification. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and reference lists were searched from inception to 20 June 2026. Comparative studies were eligible. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analyses used restricted maximum likelihood estimation and Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Forty-two studies included 2763 patients (1204 VSP; 1559 FH). VSP significantly reduced operative time (33 studies; MD -64.75 min, 95% CI -83.51 to -46.00), ischemia time (15 studies; MD -37.40 min, 95% CI -48.97 to -25.82), and hospital stay (16 studies; MD -1.75 days, 95% CI -3.43 to -0.08). VSP was associated with significantly lower odds of bony non-union (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.16-0.59) and malocclusion (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.64), whereas flap loss, surgical site infection, and plate exposure did not differ significantly. VSP-assisted reconstruction was associated with improved operative efficiency, shorter hospitalization, and lower odds of bony non-union and malocclusion, while no statistically significant differences were detected in flap loss, surgical site infection, or plate exposure. The proposed classification may support complexity-adjusted reporting and comparison.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A Sentiment-Based Comparison of AI- and Physician-Generated Empathic Statements in Palliative Care.

CONTEXT: Empathic communication promotes trust in patient-provider relationships. As healthcare integrates artificial intelligence (AI) into patient communication, we have yet to understand how these models' communication compares to that of physicians. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objectives were to examine patient preferences for AI-generated vs. palliative care physician-generated empathic statements addressing fear and anxiety around cancer treatment, and to analyze associations between linguistic features and patient preferences. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the PALL-AI trial, a randomized controlled survey comparing cancer patients' preferences of AI- to physician-generated empathic statements. Physicians and AI were provided the same prompt with a maximum sentence length. Patient preferences for each statement were measured in blinded surveys. We analyzed sentiment of the statements using the Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner (VADER) and the National Research Council Canada (NRC) Emotion Lexicon. We evaluated associations between sentiment scores and patient preferences using Spearman's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients completed blinded surveys, preferring the AI-generated statement 72.4% of the time. VADER sentiment analysis showed all three AI statements displayed positive sentiment, while all three physician statements displayed negative sentiment. Controlling for statement length, AI statements used twice as many positive words as human statements. However, they contained a similar number of negative words. Of the eight NRC emotions, "trust" and "joy" demonstrated the strongest correlations with patient preference. CONCLUSION: Patients preferred AI-generated statements around cancer care over those from palliative care physicians when standardized for prompt and statement length. Analysis shows AI-generated statements contain more positive language which may be the factor driving patient preference toward AI.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Early radiographic loss of intermetatarsal angle correction after single first TMT arthrodesis (Modified Lapidus) versus three-corner TMT arthrodesis.

INTRODUCTION: The Lapidus procedure treats hallux valgus with first-ray hypermobility. It can be performed as a single first tarsometatarsal (TMT) arthrodesis or a three-corner TMT construct with additional intermetatarsal fusion. Early loss of correction remains a concern. This study compared early radiographic stability between techniques. METHODS: Fifty patients (15 three-corner TMT arthrodesis, 35 single first TMT arthrodesis) treated between 2014 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), Méary's angle, and tibial sesamoid position were measured on weight-bearing radiographs at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Both techniques achieved significant correction. The three-corner TMT arthrodesis group showed greater initial IMA correction at 6 weeks (p = 0.020) and maintained a lower IMA at 6 months (p = 0.001). Early IMA loss was greater after single first TMT arthrodesis (1.5°±1.7° vs 0.6°±0.8°, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Three-corner TMT arthrodesis was associated with greater early intermetatarsal stability than single first TMT arthrodesis.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Clinical Utility of Ultra-Widefield Swept-Source OCT for Intraocular Tumors: Comparison With Ultrasonography, SD-OCT, and MRI.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical performance of ultra-widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography (UWF-OCT) in the assessment of choroidal tumors and to compare it with ultrasonography (US), spectral-domain (SD)-OCT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). DESIGN: Retrospective diagnostic comparison. SUBJECTS: Thirty-nine eyes from 39 patients diagnosed with choroidal tumors at a single tertiary referral center. METHODS: This retrospective diagnostic comparison evaluated patients diagnosed with choroidal tumors at a single tertiary referral center between January 2023 and August 2025. All patients underwent UWF-OCT imaging at diagnosis. Tumor measurements obtained with UWF-OCT were compared with US, SD-OCT, and MRI. Comparative analysis among imaging modalities and predictors affecting UWF-OCT applicability was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tumor thickness (mm) and largest basal diameter (LBD, mm) measurements, and complete measurability rate across different tumor size categories. RESULTS: Thirty-nine eyes from 39 patients (mean age 59.2 ± 16.9 years) were analyzed, including 27 choroidal melanomas (69.2%), 5 metastatic tumors (12.8%), 4 hemangiomas (10.3%), 2 osteomas (5.1%), and 1 (2.6%) indeterminate choroidal melanocytic lesion. UWF-OCT successfully measured both tumor thickness and largest basal diameter (LBD) in 100% (31/31) of small and medium choroidal tumors, substantially outperforming SD-OCT (complete measurement achieved in 63.6% of small tumors, and 0% of medium or large tumors). UWF-OCT measurements were systematically smaller than ultrasonography (thickness: -32.3%, P < .01; LBD: -11.1%, P < .01) and MRI (thickness: -29.2%, P < .01). Mushroom-shaped tumor morphology was the strongest negative predictor of UWF-OCT quality (OR = 0.015, 95% CI 0.001-0.196, P < .01). UWF-OCT's complete measurability was limited in large tumors (12.5%, 1/8). CONCLUSIONS: UWF-OCT provides precise, noninvasive, single-scan assessment of small-to-medium choroidal tumors with detailed structural visualization. It may be particularly useful for dome-shaped tumors, while multimodal imaging with US and MRI remains optimal for complex morphologies. Overall, UWF-OCT represents a valuable tool for diagnosis and treatment planning, with potential utility for longitudinal follow-up in choroidal tumor management.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of Elagolix Versus Dienogest for Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Endometriosis Pain: A Phase III, Multicentric, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Non-Inferiority Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of elagolix with dienogest in women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. DESIGN: A multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, parallel-group, active-controlled, non-inferiority phase III study. SETTING: Nineteen clinical centres across India. STUDY POPULATION: Women (18-49 years) diagnosed with endometriosis and experiencing moderate-to-severe pain. METHODS: Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive oral elagolix (150 mg once daily) or dienogest (2 mg once daily) for 24 weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in endometriosis-related pain (Numeric Rating Scale [NRS]) from baseline to Day 85. Secondary outcomes included changes in NRS (Day 169), dysmenorrhoea, non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) scores (Days 85 and 169), rescue medication use, patient global impression of change (PGIC), adverse events and bone mineral density. RESULTS: Of 340 patients screened, 230 were randomised (115 per group). At Day 85, both arms showed similar reductions in NRS pain scores with a treatment difference of 0.04 (95% CI: -0.3, 0.37) [p = 0.9747] demonstrating non-inferiority as upper 95% CI was below pre-specified margin of 1.5. At Day 169, both arms showed comparable improvements in overall pain, dysmenorrhoea and NMPP from baseline (p = 0.9372, p = 0.8884, and p = 0.9616, respectively). Rescue medication use and PGIC were comparable between treatment arms. Adverse event incidence was similar (elagolix: 14.8%; dienogest: 19.1%), with no serious TEAEs or discontinuations. No significant bone mineral density changes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Elagolix demonstrated non-inferiority to dienogest with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, supporting its use in managing endometriosis-associated pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: CTRI/2023/01/049292.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Short-term safety of dual versus single antiplatelet therapy in flow diversion for distal intracranial aneurysms: results from the DART trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Flow diverters (FDs) have become one of the primary treatments for intracranial aneurysms (IAs). However, their use in distal IA has been associated with higher complication rates compared with other techniques. The development of coated FDs, in combination with novel antiplatelet regimens, offers promising strategies to improve the safety profile of FDs in this context. This trial aimed to compare mono antiplatelet therapy (MAPT) using prasugrel versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and prasugrel for the treatment of distal IA using the p48 MW HPC FD (WallabyPhenox). METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, parallel-group, single-blind, non-inferiority randomized trial. Between February 2021 and February 2025, 140 patients were enrolled. After excluding 11 patients, 129 were included in the final analysis. The primary endpoint was the absence of new neurological deficits, defined as no shift in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of any stroke. RESULTS: At the 30-day follow-up, 66 patients (98.5%) in the MAPT group and 59 patients (95.2%) in the DAPT group showed no new neurological deficits. With a predefined non-inferiority margin of 5%, the difference of 3.35% confirmed the non-inferiority of MAPT compared with DAPT (p=0.002). The incidence of any stroke was 4/67 (5.9%) in the MAPT group and 6/62 (9.6%) in the DAPT group (p=0.431). CONCLUSION: Prasugrel monotherapy for the treatment of distal IAs using the p48 MW HPC was non-inferior to DAPT within the first 30 days following treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-3q9zb73. UTN code: U1111-1290-2489. Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital das Clínicas de Ribeirão Preto - Universidade de São Paulo. CAAE number: 29848720.0.1001.5440.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion With Lateral Vertebral Screw Fixation Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Severe Lumbar Stenosis: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The benefits of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) vs transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in severe lumbar stenosis (Schizas C/D) remain uncertain. This randomized trial compared clinical, radiographic, and safety outcomes of OLIF and TLIF. METHODS: From November 2018 to December 2021, a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial enrolled 260 adults with single-level severe stenosis and instability. In total, 224 patients were randomized to OLIF or TLIF. Prespecified outcomes followed consolidated standards of reporting trials. Primary outcomes were visual analog scale back/leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), with minimal clinically important difference thresholds of ODI ≥12-13 points or ≥30% improvement, and visual analog scale ≥1.5-2.0 points. Radiographic measures included disc height, lumbar and segmental lordosis, and canal cross-sectional area (CSA). Complications were recorded. Ethics approval was obtained from the institutional review board, the trial was registered with ISRCTN.com , and all patients provided written informed consent. RESULTS: In total, 224 patients were randomized, 5 were lost to follow-up (TLIF n = 2, OLIF n = 3). Baseline features were comparable. OLIF was associated with shorter operative time, less blood loss, earlier ambulation, and shorter hospital stay (all P < .05). Both groups achieved significant, clinically meaningful improvements. OLIF showed greater back pain reduction at 3-6 months and 2 years ( P < .05) and superior ODI improvement at 3 and 6 months ( P < .001), although long-term ODI scores were similar. Radiographically, OLIF provided greater restoration of disc height and segmental lordosis (all P < .001) and demonstrated progressive CSA increase (dynamic decompression), whereas TLIF achieved immediate, sustained CSA enlargement. Fusion rates were comparable at 1-2 years. Complication rates were low and similar (7.3% TLIF vs 5.5% OLIF), with most OLIF-specific events transient. CONCLUSION: Both OLIF and TLIF yield improvements in severe lumbar stenosis. OLIF offers perioperative advantages, earlier functional recovery, radiographic restoration, and dynamic canal remodeling, supporting its role as an equivalent alternative for lumbar spinal stenosis with some secondary advantages.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-associated thrombosis is a condition associated with high mortality rates, yet limited evidence exists regarding the safety and effectiveness of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), focusing on a fixed follow-up period based on clinical practice guideline recommendations. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of DOACs versus LMWH in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis over a 6-month follow-up period. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched up to 30 June, 2025. Recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials and 28 cohort studies were included in our systematic review. After applying the criteria for a 6-month follow-up period, five randomized controlled trials and 16 cohort studies with 49,824 patients were analyzed in the meta-analysis. In randomized controlled trials, DOACs showed a lower incidence of venous thromboembolism recurrence (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.87) compared with LMWH, with a non-significant increase in major bleeding (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.87-1.88) and no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86-1.18). Cohort studies demonstrated a lower incidence of venous thromboembolism recurrence (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.62-0.76) with DOACs, a non-significant reduction in major bleeding (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68-1.07), and a lower risk of all-cause mortality (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.72). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cancer-associated thrombosis, DOACs demonstrated a decrease in recurrent venous thromboembolism without increasing the risk of all-cause mortality. A non-significant increase in the risk of major bleeding was recorded in randomized controlled trials, but not in cohort studies. DOACs may provide greater effectiveness for cancer-associated thrombosis compared with LMWH.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Photothermal-Activated Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Conventional Platelet-Rich Plasma for Melasma: A Split-Face, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Melasma is a common acquired pigmentary disorder that predominantly affects women with darker skin types and substantially impairs quality of life. Current treatments are limited by variable efficacy, adverse effects, and frequent recurrence. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has emerged as a potential regenerative treatment through growth-factor-mediated modulation of melanogenesis. Photothermal activation, which combines photobiomodulation with controlled hypothermic conditioning, has been hypothesized to promote a more sustained growth-factor release than conventional PRP. This study compared the efficacy and safety of photothermal-activated PRP (PT-PRP) and conventional PRP (C-PRP) for melasma treatment. METHODS: This split-face, double-blind, randomized controlled trial included 26 women with epidermal or mixed-type melasma. Each participant received three monthly sessions of intradermal PRP, with PT-PRP and C-PRP injected into opposite facial sides. Outcomes were assessed at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12 using the modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI), Mexameter melanin and erythema indices, patient satisfaction, overall improvement, and adverse events. RESULTS: Both treatments significantly reduced mMASI by week 12, with no significant between-group differences at any time point. C-PRP showed significant mMASI improvement from week 4, whereas PT-PRP reached significance from week 8. For the melanin index, PT-PRP produced a significant within-group reduction at week 12, while C-PRP did not. At week 12, PT-PRP showed a significantly lower melanin index than C-PRP. Mild injection-site bruising was the only adverse event. CONCLUSION: PT-PRP and C-PRP produced comparable clinical improvement, but PT-PRP achieved greater objective melanin reduction at week 12. PT-PRP may represent a safe alternative treatment for melasma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai Clinical Trials Registry: TCTR20260318004.

Humans↗