Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 42717267

Near and distance vergence facility provides complementary clinical information in concussion-related convergence insufficiency.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare near and distance vergence facility testing in adolescents and young adults with concussion-related convergence insufficiency and evaluate changes following office-based vergence/accommodative therapy (OBVAM). METHODS: This secondary analysis of the CONCUSS randomized clinical trial evaluated vergence facility at near (40&#xa0;cm) and distance (4&#xa0;m) using a 12&#x394; base out/3&#x394; base in prism flipper. Participants aged 11-25&#xa0;years with concussion-related convergence insufficiency were randomized to immediate or 6&#xa0;weeks delayed OBVAM. Vergence facility was assessed at baseline, outcome time 1 assessment (after 12 therapy sessions for the immediate group and 6&#xa0;weeks of watchful waiting for the delayed group), and outcome time 2 assessment (after both groups completed 16 therapy sessions). Agreement between near and distance vergence facility classifications was evaluated, and treatment-related changes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of the 106 enrolled participants, 102 completed all study visits. At baseline, the near and distance vergence facility classifications demonstrated substantial discordance. Among 101 participants with both measures available, 49 demonstrated reduced distance vergence facility despite normal near vergence facility, whereas only two showed the opposite pattern (Cohen's &#x3ba;&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.12; p&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.0001). Vergence facility improved following therapy in both treatment groups, with larger early improvements in the immediate-treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Near and distance vergence facility testing provided complementary rather than interchangeable clinical information in adolescents and young adults with concussion-related convergence insufficiency. Both measures improved following vergence/accommodative therapy, supporting consideration of both testing distances in clinical assessment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mitchell Scheiman, Tara L Alvarez, Farzin Hajebrahimi, Melissa Noble, Matthew L Robich, Rebecca Baro, Josie A Bachman, Christina L Master, Arlene Goodman, CONCUSS Investigator Group. 2026. Near and distance vergence facility provides complementary clinical information in concussion-related convergence insufficiency.. https://doi.org/10.1002/ovs2.70097

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

Discover connections

Connections use source metadata and explicit phrase matches, not verified experimental comparisons.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Socket motility assessment of anophthalmic sockets: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Systematically review and categorize the methods used to assess socket and prosthetic motility in anophthalmic patients following enucleation or evisceration. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from inception through September 2024. Studies reporting qualitative or quantitative assessments of motility in anophthalmic sockets or ocular prostheses were included. Motility assessment methods were categorized as qualitative (descriptive or graded clinical evaluation) or quantitative (numerical measurements in millimeters, degrees, or objective tracking systems). RESULTS: Thirty-five studies encompassing 1,819 patients met inclusion criteria. Nineteen studies used qualitative assessment methods, including subjective observation, graded scales based on cardinal gaze positions, or comparison with the contralateral eye. Sixteen studies employed quantitative techniques, such as the Kestenbaum limbus test, Lister perimeter measurements, conjunctival or limbal markings, photographic image analysis, infrared eye-tracking systems, and magnetic search-coil technology. Considerable heterogeneity was observed in measurement techniques, reporting standards, timing of assessment, and distinction between socket and prosthetic motility. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial variability exists in the methods used to assess motility in anophthalmic sockets, limiting comparability across studies. Establishing standardized, feasible, and reproducible assessment approaches may improve outcome reporting and facilitate meaningful comparisons in future oculoplastic research.

Humans

Putting Globus Into Context: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Overlap With Other Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction.

OBJECTIVE: Globus is characterized by the sensation of a lump in the throat without dysphagia or underlying structural abnormality or major motility disorder. Reported prevalences vary considerably across studies. Globus has been linked to both heartburn and affective disorders. This study aims to determine the global prevalence of globus, its association with heartburn, overlap with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) and psychosocial disorders, and its impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS: Internet surveys from the Rome Foundation Global Epidemiology study were used (N&#xa0;=&#xa0;54,127). Rome IV criteria were used to identify globus and concurrent DGBI. Heartburn was defined as symptoms &#x2265; 2-3&#xa0;days/week. Psychosocial co-morbidity and somatic symptom severity were assessed with PHQ-4 and PHQ-15, and HRQOL by PROMIS-10. RESULTS: The global prevalence of globus according to Rome IV criteria was 0.75%, representing 12.8% of esophageal DGBI and 1.86% of all DGBI. Prevalence was highest in Western Europe (0.94%) and Asia (0.90%), and lowest in the Middle East (0.31%). Globus was slightly more common in females (55.4%), and most affected individuals were aged between 40 and 64&#xa0;years (46.6%). Coexisting heartburn was reported in 17.4% of cases, esophageal DGBI in 9.1%, and non-esophageal DGBI in 49.0%. Anxiety and/or depression was present in 60.5%. CONCLUSION: Global prevalence of globus is 0.75%, with a slight female predominance, and is most prevalent below 65&#xa0;years. Overlap with non-esophageal DGBI was greater than with heartburn symptoms or esophageal DGBI, and most patients had anxiety and/or depressive symptoms.

Humans

Xerophthalmia and ocular manifestations of vitamin A deficiency in children in high-income countries: A systematic review.

Xerophthalmia is a vision-threatening eye condition caused by vitamin A deficiency (VAD). Cases of xerophthalmia in high-income countries (HICs) are vulnerable to misdiagnosis, causing delays in treatment and adverse visual outcomes. We define the features, causes and complications of VAD and xerophthalmia in children of HICs. Our study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines (CRD42024492023). We performed a search for eligible articles on Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, PubMed and Medline. Cases reporting on children under 18 years of age residing in HICs with ocular features of VAD were eligible for inclusion. The search yielded 2474 results; 43 case reports and case series met the inclusion criteria consisting of a total of 61 cases (mean age 9.9&#x202f;&#xb1;&#x202f;4.2 years, range 3-17 years). Xerophthalmia was graded according to the most advanced finding for each case: 21.3% had night blindness only; 29.5% had conjunctival xerosis or Bitot spots; 29.5% had corneal xerosis, ulceration or scarring; 1.6% had xerophthalmia fundus only; and 18.0% had ocular manifestations associated with VAD that are not encompassed under the WHO classification. These features included swollen optic discs, optic neuropathy, or ocular dryness. Restrictive dietary practises were the most common mechanism of deficiency (75%), and autism was the most common underlying condition (49%). This shows that VAD remains a cause of severe visual impairment in HICs, especially when associated with delays in diagnosis and treatment. Further research is required to establish the prevalence of xerophthalmia in HICs.

Humans