SEARCH · Search PubMed

Search Search PubMed

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Comparing the Efficacy of Mechanochemical Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Treating Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence. METHODS: Online databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing MOCA and RFA in the treatment of varicose veins in lower extremities from database inception to October 2025. Primary outcome was anatomic success. Secondary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS), Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire score (AVVQ), and complications. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. Subsequent analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. RESULTS: A total of four RCTs, one cohort study and retrospective cross-sectional study involving 737 patients (380 MOCA patients and 357 RFA patients) were included. The meta-analysis results showed that the RFA group was significantly better than the MOCA group in short term and long term of anatomical success rate [(odds ratio [OR] = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] (0.20, 0.71), P = 0.003), (OR = 0.17, 95% CI (0.06, 0.45), P = 0.0003)], but patients in the MOCA group had significantly lower perioperative period pain (mean difference [MD] = -4.48, 95% CI (-7.58, -1.37), P = 0.005] and required fewer days to return to normal activities (MD = -0.76, 95% CI, (-0.95, -0.57), P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in minor and major complications [(OR = 0.93, 95% CI (0.66, 1.33), P = 0.70), (OR = 1.30, 95% CI (0.32, 5.28), P = 0.72)] or quality of life scores (MD = -0.45, 95% CI (-2.53 to 1.63), P = 0.67). CONCLUSION: MOCA of GSV incompetence is an effective and safe method. Compared with RFA, it has lower postoperative pain score and faster recovery time. However, the anatomical success rates were significantly lower with MOCA than with RFA. Therefore, long-term follow-up to evaluate the impact on clinical results is required.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

ALID score for treatment-effect heterogeneity of adjunctive low-voltage area ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation: A post hoc analysis of SUPPRESS-AF.

BACKGROUND: In persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), the incremental benefit of adjunctive low-voltage area (LVA) ablation beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a simple clinical score characterizes treatment-effect heterogeneity of adjunctive LVA ablation among patients with mapped LVA > 5 cm2 and to perform an exploratory supportive analysis in an independent randomized cohort. METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis of SUPPRESS-AF, which included patients with persistent AF and mapped LVA > 5 cm2 after PVI, four variables-age ≥ 75 years, left atrial diameter > 44 mm, estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and absence of diabetes-were combined into the ALID score (0-4). Patients were stratified into low (0-1), intermediate (2), and high (3-4) score groups. Because EARNEST-PVI did not use LVA-guided ablation or select patients based on mapped LVA, it was analyzed as an exploratory supportive cohort rather than as an external validation cohort. RESULTS: In SUPPRESS-AF (n = 336), a significant treatment-by-score interaction was observed (P < 0.001). Adjunctive LVA ablation was associated with increased recurrence in the low-score stratum (HR 3.92; 95% CI 1.50-10.20) and reduced recurrence in the high-score stratum (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.26-0.86). In EARNEST-PVI (n = 494), a qualitatively similar interaction pattern was observed for additional ablation beyond PVI (interaction P = 0.029), although the ablation strategy differed from LVA-guided ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with persistent AF and mapped LVA >5 cm2, the ALID score identified heterogeneity in response to adjunctive LVA ablation. These hypothesis-generating findings require prospective validation before clinical implementation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Incidence of silent cerebral lesions during pulsed field ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is a first-line treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Complications such as silent cerebral lesion (SCL) may occur during ablation. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal method thatablates cardiac tissue via irreversible electroporation. Limited studies have reported the incidence of SCL during PFA, with highly variable results. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain scarce. The objective of this study was to compare perioperative SCL incidence between PFA and RFCA, and to identify risk factors for SCL during PFA. METHODS: In this prospective pilot RCT (ChiCTR2400088774), 62 patients with PAF were randomized 1:1 to undergo PFA or RFCA. Cerebral MRI (3.0 T) was performed preoperatively and 24-48h postoperatively. SCL was defined as a new acute brain lesion on MRI without neurological deficits. Baseline and surgical data of the patients were collected. RESULTS: SCL was detected post-procedure in 6.45% (2/31) in the RFCA group, 12.90% (4/31) in the PFA group. No statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative SCL was detected between the two groups (p = 0.67). Left atrium dimension (LAD), left atrial operation time (LAOT), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), and total operation time (TOT) were significantly higher in SCL group than those in no-SCL group (p < 0.05) through univariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: SCL incidence was 12.90% in the PFA group versus 6.45% in the RFCA group. While no statistically significant difference was detected between two groups, the numerically higher rate in the PFA group warrants larger studies to evaluate cerebral safety associated with PFA.

Humans↗