PubMed · 9987403
This article discusses different types of pneumothorax and aspects of management, including physiotherapy and the insertion and removal of chest drains.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A Gallon. Pneumothorax.. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns1998.11.13.10.35.c2564
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: The insertion and subsequent removal of chest tubes are frequently performed procedures. We hypothesize that routine chest radiographs obtained after chest tube removal to confirm the absence of any post-procedure complications have little impact on clinical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 5-year retrospective study of 73 patients with tube thoracotomies was performed in a level II trauma center's intensive care unit. Patients were identified from billing records for chest tube placement. Medical records and official chest x-ray film reports, both before and after removal, were reviewed, and demographic data were collected. RESULTS: Of the 73 patients examined, only 8 had postprocedure reports that differed from the preprocedure reports. Two of these 8 patients required reinsertion of a chest tube to treat the recurrence of a significant pneumothorax. However, the decision to reinsert the chest tube was based on the patient's clinical appearance rather than on the x-ray findings. CONCLUSION: Chest radiography following the removal of chest tubes should not be a routinely performed procedure, but should preferably be based on the good clinical judgement and discrimination of the surgeon.
Although an uncommon complication, inadvertent suturing of the chest tube to the chest wall during closure of a thoracotomy, unfortunately can happen. This frustrating situation likely leads to a rethoracotomy and cutting of the suture in order to release the chest tube. In this report, we propose a fast and easy solution to this problem.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has a recognized role in treatment of empyema thoracis. The purpose of this report is to show the value of initial VATS as the primary treatment of parapneumonic collections. METHODS: A retrospective review was done of 139 children who required surgical consultation for parapneumonic collections between January 1992 and July 1998. Management options were (M1) thoracentesis, chest tube drainage, or fibrinolytic therapy and delayed thoracotomy for unresolved collections; (M2) thoracentesis, chest tube drainage, fibrinolytic therapy with delayed VATS if the child remained ill; or (M3) primary VATS. Comparative data included age, duration of prehospital illness, oxygen requirements, white blood cell count, bacterial culture results, number of procedures performed per patient, duration of chest tube drainage, complications, and length of stay. Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis was used, with significance at P less than .05. RESULTS: A total of 60 children were treated by M1, 38 by M2, and 41 by M3. Age, duration of prehospital illness, oxygen requirements, white blood cell count, bacterial culture results, and complication rates were comparable. The median length of stay was 12 days for M1, 11 days for M2, and 7 days for M3, with M3 significantly shorter at P<.001. The number of procedures was a median of 2 in M1, 2 in M2, and 1 in M3, with M3 significantly fewer at P<.001. Duration of chest tube drainage was a median 5 days for M1 and 3 days for M2 and M3, with M1 significantly longer at P<.001. There were 9 thoracotomies in the M1 group, 3 in the M2 group, and none in the M3 group. One child in M3 required a second VATS. CONCLUSIONS: Primary VATS has significantly decreased the number of procedures, duration of chest tube drainage and length of stay for children with parapneumonic effusions. Primary VATS appears to be of value in management of bacterial pneumonia with effusion.